School equity, marketisation and access to the Australian senior secondary curriculum

References

• Ainley, J., Jones, W., & Navaratnam, K. K. (1990). Subject choice in senior secondary school. Australian Government Publishing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Ainley, J., Robinson, L., Harvey-Beavis, A., Elsworth, G., & Fleming, M. (1994). Subject choice in Years 11 and 12. Australian Government Publishing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Alegre, M. À., & Ferrer, G. (2010). School regimes and education equity: Some insights based on PISA 2006. British Educational Research Journal, 36(3), 433–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920902989193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apple, M. (2004). Ideology and curriculum (3rd ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2020). Schools, Australia, 2019 (Cat. No. 4221.0).
   Google Scholar
• Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2016). Australian curriculum. https://www.acara.edu.au/about-us
   Google Scholar
• Bleazby, J. (2015). Why some school subjects have a higher status than others: The epistemology of the traditional curriculum hierarchy. Oxford Review of Education, 41(5), 671–689. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2015.1090966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böhlmark, A., Holmlund, H., & Lindahl, M. (2016). Parental choice, neighbourhood segregation or cream skimming? An analysis of school segregation after a generalized choice reform. Journal of Population Economics, 29(4), 1155–1190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-016-0595-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonnor, C., & Caro, J. (2007). The stupid country: How Australia is dismantling public education. University of NSW Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cai, J., Morris, A., Hohensee, C., Hwang, S., Robison, V., & Hiebert, J. (2018). The role of replication studies in educational research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 49(1), 2–8. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.49.1.0002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, C. (2005). Changing school loyalties and the middle class: A reflection on the developing fate of state comprehensive high schooling. The Australian Educational Researcher, 32(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03216810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, C., Proctor, H., & Sherington, G. (2009). School choice: How parents negotiate the new school market in Australia. Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, D., Lavery, L., & Witte, J. F. (2011). The determinants of interdistrict open enrollment flows: Evidence from two states. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33(1), 76–94. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373710388643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesters, J. (2019). Alleviating or exacerbating disadvantage: Does school attended mediate the association between family background and educational attainment? Journal of Education Policy, 34(3), 332–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2018.1488001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobbold, T. (2017). Resource gaps between advantaged & disadvantaged schools among the largest in the world (Education Research Brief). Save Our Schools. http://saveourschools.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Resource-Gaps-Between-Advantaged-Disadvantaged-Schools-Among-the-Largest-in-the-World.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dills, A. K. (2005). Does cream-skimming curdle the milk? A study of peer effects. Economics of Education Review, 24(1), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2004.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dilnot, C. (2016). How does the choice of A‐level subjects vary with students’ socio‐economic status in English state schools? British Educational Research Journal, 42(6), 1081–1106. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, B. (2000). The gendered subject: Students’ subject preferences and discussions of gender and subject ability. Oxford Review of Education, 26(1), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/030549800103845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, B., & Mills, M. (2012). Schools as damaging organisations: Instigating a dialogue concerning alternative models of schooling. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 20(2), 251–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2012.688765
   Google Scholar
• Fullarton, S., Walker, M., Ainley, J., & Hillman, K. (2003). Patterns of participation in Year 12 (LSAY Research Report No.33). Australian Council of Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• Heckman, J. J., & Kautz, T. (2013). Fostering and measuring skills: Interventions that improve character and cognition (NBER Working Paper No. 19656). https://www.nber.org/papers/w19656.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hoffer, T. B. (1997). Social background and achievement in public and Catholic high schools. Social Psychology of Education, 2(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009684000915
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, S. P., Micklewright, J., & Schnepf, S. V. (2008). Social segregation in secondary schools: How does England compare with other countries? Oxford Review of Education, 34(1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054980701542039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenway, J., Fahey, J., Epstein, D., Koh, A., McCarthy, C., & Rivzi, F. (2017). Class choreographies: Elite schools and globalization (1st ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lamb, S. (2007). School reform and inequality in urban Australia: A case of residualising the poor. In R. Teese, S. Lamb, & M. Duru-Belat (Eds.), Education and inequality (Vol. 3, pp. 1–38). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lamb, S., & Ball, K. (1999). Curriculum and careers: The education and labour market consequences of Year 12 subject choice (LSAY Report No. 12). Australian Council of Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• Lamb, S., Hogan, D., & Johnson, T. (2001). The stratification of learning opportunities and achievement in Tasmanian secondary schools. Australian Journal of Education, 45(2), 153–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/000494410104500205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauder, H., & Hughes, D. (1999). Trading in futures: Why markets in education don’t work. Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, V. E., Chow-Hoy, T. K., Burkam, D. T., Geverdt, D., & Smerdon, B. A. (1998). Sector differences in high school course taking: A private school or Catholic school effect? Sociology of Education, 71(4), 314–335. https://doi.org/10.2307/2673173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leigh, A. (2008). Returns to education in Australia. Economic Papers: A Journal of Applied Economics and Policy, 27(3), 233–249. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-3441.2008.tb01040.x
   Google Scholar
• Makel, M. C., & Plucker, J. A. (2014). Facts are more important than novelty: Replication in the education sciences. Educational Researcher, 43(6), 304–316. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X14545513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marginson, S. (1997). Educating Australia: Government, economy and citizen since 1960. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Musset, P. (2012). School choice and equity: Current policies in OECD countries and a literature review (OECD Education Working Paper No. 66). Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
   Google Scholar
• NSW Department of Education. (2019). Review of needs-based funding requirements 2019–public submission. NSW Department of Education. https://www.dese.gov.au/system/files/documents/document-file/2020-12/department_of_education_new_south_wales.pdf
   Google Scholar
• NSW Department of Education. (2020). Selective high schools and opportunity classes. NSW Department of Education. https://education.nsw.gov.au/public-schools/selective-high-schools-and-opportunity-classes/year-7/what-are-selective-high-schools
   Google Scholar
• NSW Education Standards Authority. (2019). The place of the English extension stage 6 syllabus in the K–12 curriculum. NSW Education Standards Authority. https://www.educationstandards.nsw.edu.au/wps/portal/nesa/11-12/stage-6-learning-areas/stage-6-english/english-extension-2017/place-of-the-syllabus
   Google Scholar
• NSW Education Standards Authority. (2020). Determining HSC results. NSW Education Standards Authority. https://www.educationstandards.nsw.edu.au/wps/portal/nesa/11-12/hsc/about-HSC/determining-HSC-results
   Google Scholar
• Perry, L. B., & Lamb, S. (2016). Curricular differentiation and stratification in Australia. Orbis Scholae, 10(3), 27–47. https://doi.org/10.14712/23363177.2017.9
   Google Scholar
• Perry, L. B., & Lubienski, C. (2020). Between-school stratification of academic curricular offerings in upper secondary education: School decision-making, curriculum policy context, and the educational marketplace. Oxford Review of Education, 46(5), 582–600. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2020.1739012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, L. B., & McConney, A. (2010). Does the SES of the school matter? An examination of socioeconomic status and student achievement using PISA 2003. Teachers College Record, 112(4), 1137–1162. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054980701542039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, L. B., & Southwell, L. (2014). Access to academic curriculum in Australian secondary schools: A case study of a highly marketised education system. Journal of Education Policy, 29(4), 467–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2013.846414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, P. (2016). Place, rural education and social justice: A study of rural teaching and curriculum politics [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Charles Sturt University.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, P., Dean, J., & Lommatsch, G. (2019). Still winning? Social inequity in the NSW senior secondary curriculum hierarchy. Rural Education and Communities Research Group.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, C., & Watson, L. (2004). The drift to private schools in Australia: Understanding its features (Discussion Paper No. 479). Centre for Economic Policy Research.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, C., & Watson, L. (2009, October 25–27). The impact of school choice on students’ university entrance rank scores in Australia [Paper presentation]. School choice and school improvement conference Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlberg, P. (2011). Finnish lessons: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland? Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sinning, M. (2014). How much is it worth? New estimates of private returns to university education in Australia (Final Report). University of Queensland.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, A. (2009). Academic self‐concept, gender and single‐sex schooling. British Educational Research Journal, 35(2), 259–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920802042960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, A., Joshi, H., & Leonard, D. (2010). Single-sex schooling and academic attainment at school and through the lifecourse. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 6–36. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209350106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teese, R. (1998). Curriculum hierarchy, private schooling, and the segmentation of Australian secondary education, 1947–1985. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 19(3), 401–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142569980190308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teese, R. (2000). Academic success and social power: Examinations and inequality. University of Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Teese, R. (2011). From opportunity to outcomes. The changing role of public schooling in Australia and national funding arrangements. Centre for Research on Education Systems, University of Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Teese, R., Davies, M., Charlton, M., & Polesel, J. (1995). Who wins at school? Boys and girls in Australian secondary education. Department of Education Policy and Management, University of Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Teese, R., & Polesel, J. (2003). Undemocratic schooling. Equity and quality in mass secondary education in Australia. Melbourne University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, S. (2005). Pathways from school to further education or work: Examining the consequences of Year 12 course choices (LSAY Research Report No. 46). Australian Council of Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• Uerz, D., Dekkers, H. P. J. M., & Béguin, A. A. (2004). Mathematics and language skills and the choice of science subjects in secondary education. Educational Research and Evaluation, 10(2), 163–182. https://doi.org/10.1076/edre.10.2.163.27908
   Google Scholar
• Universities Admissions Centre. (2018). Report on the scaling of the 2017 NSW higher school certificate. Universities Admissions Centre. https://www.uac.edu.au/assets/documents/scaling-reports/Scaling-Report-2017-NSW-HSC.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Watson, L., & Ryan, C. (2010). Choosers and losers: The impact of government subsidies on Australian secondary schools. Australian Journal of Education, 54(1), 86–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/000494411005400107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, A. (2006). School choice, equity and social justice: The case for more control. British Journal of Educational Studies, 54(1), 15–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8527.2006.00334.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitlam, E. G. (1972, November 13). Australia labor party policy speech. Museum of Australian Democracy at Old Parliament House. https://electionspeeches.moadoph.gov.au/speeches/1972-gough-whitlam
   Google Scholar
• Whitty, G., & Power, S. (2000). Marketization and privatization in mass education systems. International Journal of Educational Development, 20(2), 93–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0738-0593(99)00061-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, K. C., Lam, Y. R., & Ho, L. M. (2002). The effects of schooling on gender differences. British Educational Research Journal, 28(6), 827–843. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192022000019080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar