Exploring mechanisms of peer-effects in education: a frame-factor analysis of instruction

References

• Abedi, J. (2002). A latent-variable modeling approach to assessing reliability and validity of a creativity instrument. Creativity Research Journal, 14(2), 267–276. http://doi.org/10.1207/S15326934CRJ1402_12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abedi, J., & Baker, E. L. (1995). A latent-variable modeling approach to assessing interrater reliability, topic generalizability, and validity of a content assessment scoring rubric. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55(5), 701–715. http://doi.org/10.1177/0013164495055005001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad, S., Zulkurnain, N., & Khairushalimi, F. (2016). Assessing the validity and reliability of a measurement model in Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). British Journal of Mathematics & Computer Science, 15(3), 1–8. http://doi.org/10.9734/bjmcs/2016/25183
   Google Scholar
• Aizer, A. (2009). Peer effects and human capital accumulation: The externalities of ADD. Cambridge: NBER Working paper no. 14354.
   Google Scholar
• Ammermueller, A., & Pischke, J. S. (2009). Peer effects in European primary schools: Evidence from the progress in international reading literacy study. Journal of Labor Economics, 27(3), 315–348. http://doi.org/10.1086/603650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arlin, M. (1984). Time, equality, and mastery learning. Review of Educational Research, 54(1), 65–86. http://doi.org/10.3102/00346543054001065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnott, R., & Rowse, J. (1987). Peer group effects and educational attainment. Journal of Public Economics, 32(3), 287–305. http://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(87)90034-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, R., & Dreeben, R. (1977). Instruction in classrooms. Review of Research in Education, 5, 89–162. http://doi.org/10.2307/1167173
   Google Scholar
• Bäckström, P. (2020). School composition, disruptive classroom behaviour and student results: A study of mechanisms of peer effects. Nordic Studies in Education, 41(2), 167–184. http://doi.org/10.23865/nse.v41.2965
   Google Scholar
• Beckerman, T. M., & Good, T. L. (1981). The classroom ratio of high- and low-aptitude students and its effect on achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 18(3), 317–327. http://doi.org/10.3102/00028312018003317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blatchford, P., Edmonds, S., & Martin, C. (2003). Class size, pupil attentiveness and peer relations. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(1), 15–36. http://doi.org/10.1348/000709903762869897
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blatchford, P., Russell, A., Basset, P., Brown, P., & Martin, C. (2007). The effect of class size on the teaching of pupils aged 7-11 years. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 18(2), 147–172. http://doi.org/10.1080/09243450601058675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Block, J. H., & Burns, R. B. (1976). Mastery learning. Review of Research in Education, 4, 3–49. http://doi.org/10.2307/1167112
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. (1974). Time and learning. American Psychologist, 29(9), 682–688. http://doi.org/10.1037/h0037632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. (1984). The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Researcher, 13(6), 4–16. http://doi.org/10.3102/0013189 ( 013006004
   Google Scholar
• Bourke, S. (1986). How smaller is better: Some relationships between class size, teaching practicies, and student achievment. American Educational Research Journal, 23(4), 558–571. http://doi.org/10.3102/00028312023004558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. (2008). Social research methods. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. B. (1963). A model of school learning. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 64(8), 1–9. http://doi.org/10.1177/016146816306400801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheema, J., & Kitsantas, A. (2014). Influences of disciplinary classroom climate on high school student self-efficacy and mathematics achievment: A look at gender and racial differences. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(5), 1261–1279. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9454-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E. Q., Hobson, C. J., McPartland, J., Mood, A. M., Weinfeld, F. D., & York, R. L. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. US Department of Health, Education and Welfare.
   Google Scholar
• Dahllöf, U. (1967). Skoldifferentiering och undervisningsförlopp. Almqvist & Wiksell.
   Google Scholar
• Dahllöf, U. (1970). Curriculum process analysis and comparative evaluation of school systems. Paedagogica Europaea, 6, 21–36. http://doi.org/10.2307/1502497
   Google Scholar
• Dahllöf, U. (1999). Det tidiga ramfaktorteoretiska tänkandet. En tillbakablick. Pedagogisk forskning i Sverige, 4(1), 5–29.
   Google Scholar
• Decristana, J., Fauth, B., Kunter, M., Büttner, G., & Kliemec, E. (2017). The interplay between class heterogeneity and teaching quality in primary school. International Journal of Educational Research, 86, 109–121. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2017.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreeben, R., & Barr, R. (1988). Classroom composition and the design of instruction. Sociology of Education, 61(3), 129–142. http://doi.org/10.2307/2112622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumay, X., & Dupriez, V. (2007). Accounting for class effect using the TIMSS 2003 eighth-grade database: Net effect of group composition, net effect of class process, and joint effect. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 18(4), 383–408. http://doi.org/10.1080/09243450601146371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eklöf, H., & Knekta, E. (2017). Using large-scale educational data to test motivation theories: A synthesis of findings from Swedish studies on test-taking motivation. International Journal of Quantitative Research in Education, 4(1/2), 52–71. http://doi.org/10.1504/ijqre.2017.10007536
   Google Scholar
• Engzell, P. (2019). What do books in the home proxy for? A cautionary tale. Sociological Methods & Research, 50(4), 1487–1514. http://doi.org/10.1177/0049124119826143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engzell, P., & Jonsson, J. O. (2015). Estimating social and ethnic inequality in school surveys: Biases from child misreporting and parent nonresponse. European Sociological Review, 31(3), 312–325. http://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcv005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epple, D., & Romano, R. (2011). Peer effects in education: A survey of the theory and evidence. In J. Benhabib (Ed.), Handbook of social economics (pp. 1053–1163). Elsevier. http://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-444-53707-2.00003-7
   Google Scholar
• Evertson, C. M., Sanford, J. P., & Emmer, E. T. (1981). Effects of class heterogeneity in junior high school. American Educational Research Journal, 18(2), 219–232. http://doi.org/10.3102/00028312018002219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Foy, P. (2017). TIMSS 2015 user guide for International database. IEA.
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, W. (2004). Profiles of classroom practices in U.S. Public schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 15(3-4), 377–406. http://doi.org/10.1080/09243450512331383252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, J.-E. (2009). Strukturella ekvationsmodeller. In G. Djurfeldt & M. Barmark (Eds.), Statistisk verktygslåda 2 - multivariat analys (pp. 269–321). Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Hansson, Å. (2010). Instructional responsibility in Mathematics education: Modelling classroom teaching using Swedish data. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 75(2), 171–189. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-010-9249-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansson, Å. (2012). The meaning of mathematics instruction in multilingual classrooms: Analyzing the importance of responsibility for learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 81(1), 103–125. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9385-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A., & Matthes, J. (2009). Computational procedures for probing interactions in OLS and logistic regressions: SPSS and SAS implementations. Behavior Research Methods, 41(3), 924–936. http://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.3.924
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heck, R. H., Thomas, S. L., & Tabata, L. N. (2010). Multilevel and longitudinal modeling with IBM SPSS. Routledge Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Henrekson, M., & Jävervall, S. (2016). Svenska skolresultat rasar – vad vet vi? Kungliga Ingenjörsvetenskapsakademien (IVA).
   Google Scholar
• Hox, J. J. (2010). Multilevel analysis. Techniques and applications. Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L-T, & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. http://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, M. P. (2014). Secondary data analysis: A method of which the time has come. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries, 3(3), 619–626.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, C. (2007). Academic interactions among classroom peers: A cross-country comparison using TIMSS. Applied Economics, 39(12), 1531–1544. http://doi.org/10.1080/00036840600606328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klapp, A., & Jönsson, A. (2020). Scaffolding or simplifying: Students’ perception of support in Swedish compulsory school. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 36(4), 1055–1074. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-020-00513-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lavy, V. M., Paserman, D., & Schlosser, A. (2011). Inside the black box of ability peer effects: Evidence from variation in the proportion of low achievers in the classroom. The Economic Journal, 122(559), 208–237. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2011.02463.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazear, E. P. (2001). Educational production. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(3), 777–803. http://doi.org/10.1162/00335530152466232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundgren, U. P. (1972). Frame factors and the teaching process. A contribution to curriculum theory and theory on teaching. Göteborgs universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Manski, C. F. (1993). Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. The Review of Economic Studies, 60(3), 531–542. http://doi.org/10.2307/2298123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Abduljabbar, A. S., Abu-Hilal, M. M., Morin, A. J., Abdelfattah, F., Leung, K. C., Xu, M. K., Nagengast, B., & Parker, P. (2013). Factorial, convergent, and discriminant validity of TIMSS math and science motivation measures: A comparison of Arab and Anglo-Saxon countries. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(1), 108–128. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0029907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., & Hau, K.-T. (2007). Applications of latent-variable models in Educational Psychology: The need for methodological substantive synergies. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32(1), 151–170. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullis, M. M., & Hooper, I. V. (2016). Methods and procedures in TIMSS 2015. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College. http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/publications/timss/2015-methods.html.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, H., & Tindrebäck, S. (2013). Utvärdering av det diagnostiska provet i matematik för gymnasieskolan ht 2012. Sweco.
   Google Scholar
• Nuthall, G. (2005). The cultural myths and realities of classroom teaching and learning: A personal journey. Teachers College Record, 107(5), 895–934. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2005.00498.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opdenakker, M.-C., & Damme, J. V. (2006). Differences between secondary schools: A study about school context, group composition, school practice, and school effects with special attention to public and catholic schools and types of schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(1), 87–117. http://doi.org/10.1080/09243450500264457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubie-Davies, C. M. (2010). Teacher expectations and perceptions of student attributes: Is there a relationship? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(1), 121–135. http://doi.org/10.1348/000709909 ( 466334
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutkowski, L., Gonzalez, E., Joncas, M., & von Davier, M. (2010). International large-scale assessment data: Issues in secondary analysis and reporting. Educational Researcher, 39(2), 142–151. http://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X10363170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutter, M., & Maughan, B. (2002). School effectiveness findings 1979–2002. Journal of School Psychology, 40(6), 451–475. http://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-4405(02)00124-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schindler Rangvid, B. (2007). School composition effects in Denmark: Quantile regression evidence from PISA 2000. Empirical Economics, 33(2), 359–388. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-007-0133-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seery, M. K. (2009). The role of prior knowledge and student aptitude in undergraduate performance in chemistry: A correlation-prediction study. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 10(3), 227. http://doi.org/10.1039/b914502h
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skolverket. (2014). Grundskolan i internationella kunskapsmätningar – kunskap, skolmiljö och attityder till lärande. Rapport 407.
   Google Scholar
• Skolverket. (2015). Att svara eller inte svara. Svenska elevers motivation att genomföra PISA-provet.
   Google Scholar
• Skolverket. (2016). TIMSS 2015. Svenska grundskoleelevers kunskaper i matematik och naturvetenskap i ett internationellt perspektiv. Skolverket.
   Google Scholar
• Skolverket. (2019). Attityder till skolan. Rapport 479.
   Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. E. (1990). Achievement effects of ability grouping in secondary schools: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 60(3), 471–499. http://doi.org/10.3102/00346543060003471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, E. (2008). Pitfalls and promises: The use of secondary data analysis in educational research. British Journal of Educational Studies, 56(3), 323–339. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8527.2008.00405.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, P. K., & López-Castro, L. (2017). Cross-National data on victims of bullying: How does PISA measure up with other surveys? An update and extension of the study by Smith, Robinson, and Marchi (2016). International Journal of Developmental Science, 11(3-4), 87–92. http://doi.org/10.3233/dev-170227
   Google Scholar
• Sollerman, S. (2019). Kan man räkna med PISA och TIMSS? Relevansen hos internationella storskaliga mätningar i matematik i en nationell kontext. Stockholms universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Sund, K. (2009). Estimating peer effects in Swedish high school using school, teacher, and student fixed effects. Economics of Education Review, 28(3), 329–336. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2008.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thrupp, M. (1999). School making a difference: Let's be realistic! school-mix, school effectiveness and the social limits of reform. Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thrupp, M., Lauder, H., & Robinson, T. (2002). School composition and peer effects. International Journal of Educational Research, 37(5), 483–504. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00016-8
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J., Hefetz, A., & Liberman, G. (2017). Applying structural equation modelling in educational research. Cultura y Educación, 29(3), 563–618. http://doi.org/10.1080/11356405.2017.1367907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinert, F. E., Schrader, F. W., & Helmke, A. (1989). Quality of instruction and achievement outcomes. International Journal of Educational Research, 13(8), 895–914. http://doi.org/10.1016/0883-0355(89)90072-4
   Google Scholar
• Wiberg, M. (2019). The relationship between TIMSS mathematics achievements, grades, and national test scores. Education Inquiry, 10(4), 328–343. http://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2019.1579626
   Google Scholar
• Yeung, R., & Nguyen-Hoang, P. (2016). Endogenous peer effects: Fact or fiction? The Journal of Educational Research, 109(1), 37–49. http://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2014.918528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, J., & Gallant, D. J. (2012). Student evaluation of instruction in higher education: exploring issues of validity and reliability. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(2), 227–235. http://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2010.523819
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, D. J. (2003). Peer effects in academic outcomes: Evidence from a natural experiment. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(1), 9–23. http://doi.org/10.1162/003465303762687677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar