816
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Learning, unlearning and redefining teachers’ agency in international private education: a Swedish education company operating in India

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Received 31 Oct 2022, Accepted 19 Jun 2023, Published online: 06 Jul 2023

References

  • Aspbury-Miyanishi, E. (2022). The affordances beyond what one does: Reconceptualizing teacher agency with Heidegger and Ecological Psychology. Teaching and Teacher Education, 113, 103662.
  • Babu, S. S., & Mahajan, A. (2021). Branding an ‘inter’national school: Fusing ‘Indian values’ with a global diploma. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 30(3), 287–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/09620214.2020.1853589
  • Bailey, L. (2015). Reskilled and ‘running ahead’: Teachers in an international school talk about their work. Journal of Research in International Education, 14(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475240915572949
  • Bailey, L., & Cooker, L. (2019). Exploring teacher identity in international schools: Key concepts for research. Journal of Research in International Education, 18(20), 125–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475240919865035
  • Bhatty, K., Bordoloi, M., Kapur, A., Hamza, M., & Singh, A. (2022). Regulation on non-state actors in school education in India. Paper commissioned for the 2022 Global Education Monitoring Report, South Asia – Non-state actors in education. UNESCO.
  • Biesta, G., Priestley, M., & Robinson, S. (2015). The role of beliefs in teacher agency. Teachers and Teaching, 21(6), 624–664. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2015.1044325
  • Biesta, G., & Tedder, M. (2007). Agency and learning in the lifecourse: Towards an ecological perspective. Studies in the Education of Adults, 39(2), 132–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/02660830.2007.11661545
  • Brandin, M. (2021). A qualitative study of host country national teachers’ perspectives on belonging at an international school in Peru [Unpublished EdD dissertation]. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, US. http://hdl.handle.net/2142/114055.
  • Bunnell, T. (2017). Teachers in international schools: A neglected ‘middling actor’ in expatriation. Journal of Global Mobility: The Home of Expatriate Management Research, 5(2), 194–202. https://doi.org/10.1108/JGM-07-2016-0033
  • Bunnell, T. (2022). The crypto-growth of “international schooling”: Emergent issues and implications. Educational Review, 74(1), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2021.1907316
  • Bunnell, T., & Poole, A. (2022). (Re)Considering “precarious privilege” within international schooling: expatriate teachers’ perceptions in China of being marginalised and undervalued. Educational Studies, 1–15. doi:10.1080/03055698.2022.2054270
  • Bunnell, T., & Poole, A. (2023). International schools in China and teacher turnover: The need for a more nuanced approach towards precarity reflecting agency. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 43(2), 463–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2021.1940840
  • Cormier, G. (2018). The language variable in educational research: An exploration of researcher positionality, translation, and interpretation. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 41(3), 328–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2017.1307335
  • Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962–1023. https://doi.org/10.1086/231294
  • Friend, L., Mills, K. A., & Lingard, B. (2022). Globalisation, cultural knowledges and sociomateriality in middle eastern education: How the global and local influence classroom practices? Globalisation, Societies and Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2021.2016376
  • Gardner-McTaggart, A. (2016). International elite, or global citizens? Equity, distinction and power: The international baccalaureate and the rise of the south. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 14(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2014.959475
  • Gardner-McTaggart, A. (2018). The promise of advantage: Englishness in IB international schools. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 22(4), 109–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603108.2018.1456491
  • Garton, B. (2000). Recruitment of teachers for international education. In M. Hayden, & J. J. Thompson (Eds.), International schools and international education: Improving teaching, management and quality (pp. 145–157). Routledge.
  • Gibson, M. T., & Bailey, L. (2022). Constructing international schools as postcolonial sites. Globalisation, Societies and Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2022.2045909
  • Golding, D., & Kopsick, K. (2022). The colonial governmentality of Cambridge assessment international education. European Educational Research Journal. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/14749041221125027
  • Gorur, R., & Arnold, B. (2022). Regulating private sector schooling in the global south: The case of India. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 52(3), 345–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2020.1766947
  • Government of India. (2020). National Education Policy 2020. Ministry of Human Resource Development. Government of India. https://www.education.gov.in/sites/upload_files/mhrd/files/NEP_Final_English_0.pdf
  • Gupta, A. (2023). Exposing the “shadow”: An empirical scrutiny of the “shadowing process” of private tutoring in India. Educational Review, 75(3), 394–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2021.1931038
  • Hartmann, E. (2021). The shadow sovereigns of global education policy: A critique of the world society approach. Journal of Education Policy, 36(3), 367–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2019.1671989
  • Härmä, J. (2009). Can choice promote education for all? Evidence from growth in private primary schooling in India. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 39(2), 151–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057920902750400
  • Holm, A.-S., Carlbaum, S., & Rönnberg, L. (2022). ‘How do we marry the two things together?’ A Swedish education company expanding its business to India. Globalisation, Societies and Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2022.2100982
  • Howard, A. (2020). Globally elite: Four domains of becoming globally-oriented within elite schools. Educational Review, 74(1), 6–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2020.1805412
  • Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
  • Kamenarac, O. (2022). Reconfiguring teacher agency within market-driven early childhood spaces. Policy Futures in Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/14782103221110976
  • Kim, H. (2019). The origins of international school groups. In H. Kim (Ed.), How global capital is remaking international education. The emergence of transnational education corporations (pp. 29–42). Springer Nature.
  • Kingdon, G. G. (2020). The private schooling phenomenon in India: A review. The Journal of Development Studies, 56(10), 1795–1817. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2020.1715943
  • Kumar, D., & Choudhury, P. K. (2021). Determinants of private school choice in India: All about the family backgrounds? Journal of School Choice, 15(4), 576–602. https://doi.org/10.1080/15582159.2020.1852517
  • Lai, C., Li, Z., & Gong, Y. (2016). Teacher agency and professional learning in cross-cultural teaching contexts: Accounts of Chinese teachers from international schools in Hong Kong. Teaching and Teacher Education, 54, 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.11.007
  • Ledger, S. (2016). Breaking through the cultural bubble: International schools engaging at the local level. International Schools Journal, 36(1), 27–39. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Susan-Ledger-2/publication/312579232_Breaking_through_the_cultural_bubble_engaging_at_the_local_level/links/5fb3d12a45851518fdad06ba/Breaking-through-the-cultural-bubble-engaging-at-the-local-level.pdf
  • Merriam, S. B., Johnson-Bailey, J., Lee, M.-Y., Kee, Y., Ntseane, G., & Muhamad, M. (2001). Power and positionality: Negotiating insider/outsider status within and across cultures. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 20(5), 405–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370120490
  • Mooney Simmie, G. (2021). Teacher professional learning: A holistic and cultural endeavour imbued with transformative possibility. Educational Review, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2021.1978398
  • Nambissan, G. B. (2021). The changing urban and education in Delhi: Privilege and exclusion in a megacity. Working Paper Series 2021/9. MaxWeber Stiftung.
  • Oolbekkink-Marchand, H., Hadar, L., Smith, K., Helleve, I., & Ulvik, M. (2017). Teachers’ perceived professional space and their agency. Teaching and Teacher Education, 62, 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.11.005
  • Pantić, N. (2017). An exploratory study of teacher agency for social justice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 66, 219–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.04.008
  • Parreira Do Amaral, M., Steiner-Khamsi, G., & Thompson, C. (Eds.). (2019). Researching the global education industry. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Poole, A. (2022a). Beyond the tyranny of the typology: Moving from labelling to negotiating international school teachers’ identities. Educational Review, 74(6), 1157–1171. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2021.1875992
  • Poole, A. (2022b). More than interchangeable ‘local’ teachers: Host country teachers’ journeys into internationalised school teaching in China. Research in Comparative and International Education, 17(3), 424–440. https://doi.org/10.1177/17454999221078390
  • Priestley, M., Biesta, G., Philippou, S., & Robinson, S. (2016). The teacher and the curriculum: Exploring teacher agency. In D. Wyse, L. Hayward, & J. Pandya (Eds.), The Sage handbook of curriculum, pedagogy and assessment (pp. 187–201). Sage.
  • Rey, J., Bolay, M., & Gez, Y. N. (2020). Precarious privilege: Personal debt, lifestyle aspirations and mobility among international school teachers. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 18(4), 361–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2020.1732193
  • Rizvi, F. (2014). Old elite schools, history and the construction of a new imaginary. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 12(2), 290–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2014.890886
  • Rönnberg, L. (2017). From national policy-making to global edu-business: Swedish edu-preneurs on the move. Journal of Education Policy, 32(2), 234–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2016.1268725
  • Rönnberg, L., Alexiadou, N., Benerdal, M., Carlbaum, S., Holm, A.-S., & Lundahl, L. (2022). Swedish free-school companies going global: Spatial imaginaries and movable pedagogical ideas. Nordic Journal of Studies in Education Policy, 8(1), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2021.2008115
  • Sancho, D. (2016). ‘Keeping up with the time’: Rebranding education and class formation in globalising India. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 14(4), 477–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2015.1077101
  • Savvides, N., Al-Youssef, J., Colin, M., & Garrido, C. (2014). Journeys into inner/outer space: Reflections on the methodological challenges of negotiating insider/outsider status in international educational research. Research in Comparative and International Education, 9(4), 412–442. https://doi.org/10.2304/rcie.2014.9.4.412
  • Schweisfurth, M. (2015). Learner-centred pedagogy: Towards a post-2015 agenda for teaching and learning. International Journal of Educational Development, 40, 259–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2014.10.011
  • Srivastava, P., & Walford, G. (2016). Non-state actors in education in the global south. Oxford Review of Education, 42(5), 491–494. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2016.1217695
  • Stoll, L., Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Wallace, M., & Thomas, S. (2006). Professional learning communities: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Change, 7(4), 221–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-006-0001-8
  • Tooley, J., & Dixon, P. (2006). ‘De facto’ privatisation of education and the poor: Implications of a study from sub-Saharan Africa and India. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 36(4), 443–462. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057920601024891
  • UNESCO. (2022). Global education monitoring report 2022 – south Asia – Non-state actors in education: Who chooses? Who loses?.
  • Vetenskapsrådet. (2017). Good research practice.
  • Watson, C. (2014). Effective professional learning communities? The possibilities for teachers as agents of change in schools. British Educational Research Journal, 40(1), 18–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3025
  • Winchip, E. (2022). Open for business: A quantitative analysis of teachers’ experiences of marketisation in international schools. Educational Review. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2022.2094343
  • Woods, O., & Kong, L. (2020). The spatial subversions of global citizenship education: Negotiating imagined inclusions and everyday exclusions in international schools in China. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 112(x), 139–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.04.005
  • Wright, E., & Lee, M. (2019). Re/producing the global middle class: International baccalaureate alumni at “world-class” universities in Hong Kong. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 40(5), 682–696. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2019.1573880
  • Wu, W., & Koh, A. (2022). Being “international” differently: A comparative study of transnational approaches to international schooling in China. Educational Review, 74(1), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2021.1887819
  • Yemini, M., Lee, M., & Wright, E. (2022). Straddling the global and national: The emerging roles of international schooling. Educational Review, 74(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2022.2030959
  • Yin, K. R. (2018). Case study research and applications design and methods (6th ed.). Sage.

Documents from LearnyComp: