0
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Is being clever enough? Young people’s construction of the ideal student in computer science education

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Received 11 Dec 2023, Accepted 05 Jul 2024, Published online: 11 Aug 2024

References

  • AND Digital. (2022). The nature of the UK’s digital skills gap AND what this means for people and our economy. Retrieved July 31, 2023, from https://www.and.digital/spotlight/nature-of-the-uks-digital-skills-gap
  • Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Godec, S., Henderson, M., Holmegaard, H., Liu, Q., Macleod, E., Mendick, H., Moote, J., & Watson, E. (2023). ASPIRES3 main report: Young people’s STEM trajectories, Age 10-22. UCL Institute of Education.
  • Ardito, G., Czerkawski, B., & Scollins, L. (2020). Learning computational thinking together: Effects of gender differences in collaborative middle school robotics program. TechTrends, 64(3), 373–387. doi: 10.1007/s11528-019-00461-8
  • BCS. (2020). Annex: Grading standards in GCSE Computer Science Evidence of misalignment. Retrieved December 11, 2023, from https://www.bcs.org/media/8418/scac-letter-ofqual-chief-regulator-plus-annex.pdf
  • Bian, L., Leslie, S. J., & Cimpian, A. (2017). Gender stereotypes about intellectual ability emerge early and influence children’s interests. Science, 355(6323), 389–391. doi: 10.1126/science.aah6524
  • Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction. Routledge.
  • Buck, G. A., Leslie-Pelecky, D., & Kirby, S. K. (2002). Bringing female scientists into the elementary classroom: Confronting the strength of elementary students’ stereotypical images of scientists. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 14(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03173844
  • Cambridge Dictionary. (2023). Smart. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/smart and https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/independent
  • Cheryan, S., Master, A., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2015). Cultural stereotypes as gatekeepers: Increasing girls' interest in computer science and engineering by diversifying stereotypes. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 49. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00049
  • Cheryan, S., Plaut, V. C., Handron, C., & Hudson, L. (2013). The stereotypical computer scientist: Gendered media representations as a barrier to inclusion for women. Sex Roles, 69(1), 58–71. doi: 10.1007/s11199-013-0296-x
  • Cheryan, S., Ziegler, S. A., Montoya, A. K., & Jiang, L. (2017). Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others? Psychological Bulletin, 143(1), 1–35. doi: 10.1037/bul0000052
  • Childs, K. (2022). A pair programming approach for engaging girls in the Computing classroom: Study results. Retrieved July 7, 2022, from https://www.raspberrypi.org/blog/gender-balance-in-computing-pair-programming-approach-engaging-girls/
  • Chiu, Y. L. T., Wong, B., & Charalambous, M. (2021). ‘It’s for others to judge’: What influences students’ construction of the ideal student? Journal of Further and Higher Education, 45(10), 1424–1437. doi: 10.1080/0309877X.2021.1945553
  • Connell, R. (1987). Gender and power: Society, the person and sexual politics. Polity Press.
  • Dou, R., Bhutta, K., Ross, M., Kramer, L., & Thamotharan, V. (2020). The effects of computer science stereotypes and interest on middle school boys’ career intentions. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 20(3), 18:1–18:15. doi: 10.1145/3394964
  • Eagly A. H. (2018). The shaping of science by ideology: How feminism inspired, led, and constrained scientific understanding of sex and gender. Journal of Social Issues, 74(4), 871–888. doi: 10.1111/josi.12291
  • Fox, M. F. (1999). Gender, hierarchy, and science. In J. S. Chafetz (Ed.), Handbook of the sociology of gender (pp. 441–457). Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
  • Gaucher, D., Friesen, J., & Kay, A. C. (2011). Evidence that gendered wording in job advertisements exists and sustains gender inequality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(1), 109–128. doi: 10.1037/a0022530
  • Google. (2015). Images of Computer Science: Perceptions among students, parents and educators in the US. https://services.google.com/fh/files/misc/images-of-computer-science-report.pdf
  • Guardian. (2021). Why aren’t more girls in the UK choosing to study computing and technology? Retrieved July 31, 2023, from https://www.theguardian.com/careers/2021/jun/28/why-arent-more-girls-in-the-uk-choosing-to-study-computing-and-technology
  • Hamer, J. M. M., Kemp, P., Wong, B., Copsey-Blake, M. (under review). Cracking the code: Exploring student attitudes towards coding in secondary education.
  • Hamer, J. M. M., Kemp, P. E. J., Wong, B., & Copsey-Blake, M. (2023). Who wants to be a computer scientist? The computing aspirations of students in English secondary schools. International Journal of Science Education, 45(12), 990–1007. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2023.2179379
  • Hannover, B., & Kessels, U. (2004). Self-to-prototype matching as a strategy for making academic choices. Why high school students do not like math and science. Learning and Instruction, 14(1), 51–67. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2003.10.002
  • JCQ. (2023). GCSE (full course) results – Summer 2023. Joint Councils for Qualifications.
  • Jerkins, J. A., Stenger, C. L., Stovall, J., & Jenkins, J. T. (2013). Establishing the impact of a computer science/mathematics anti-symbiotic stereotype in CS students. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 28(5), 47–53. https://doi.org/10.5555/2458569.2458578
  • Jones, K. L., & Hamer, J. M. M. (2022). Examining the relationship between parent/carer’s attitudes, beliefs and their child’s future participation in physics. International Journal of Science Education, 44(2), 201–222. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2021.2021457
  • Kemp, P. E. J., Wong, B., & Berry, M. G. (2019). Female performance and participation in computer science: A national picture. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 20(1), 4:1–4:28.
  • Kirby, P. (2016). Shadow schooling: Private tuition and social mobility in the UK. Sutton Trust.
  • Maass, A., Karasawa, M., Politi, F., & Suga, S. (2006). Do verbs and adjectives play different roles in different cultures? A cross-linguistic analysis of person representation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 734–750. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.734
  • Main, J. B., & Schimpf, C. (2017). The underrepresentation of women in computing fields: A synthesis of literature using a life course perspective. IEEE Transactions on Education, 60(4), 296–304. doi: 10.1109/TE.2017.2704060
  • Margolis, J., Estrella, R., Goode, J., Holme, J. J., & Nao, K. (2008). Stuck in the shallow end: Education, race, and computing. The MIT Press.
  • McGuire, L., Mulvey, K. L., Goff, E., Irvin, M. J., Winterbottom, M., Fields, G. E., Hartstone-Rose, A., & Rutland, A. (2020). STEM gender stereotypes from early childhood through adolescence at informal science centers. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2020.101109
  • Mendick, H. (2006). Masculinities in mathematics. Open University Press.
  • Merriam-Webster. (2023). Smart. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/smartandhttps://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/independent
  • Miller, D. I., Nolla, K. M., Eagly, A. H., & Uttal, D. H. (2018). The development of children’s gender-science stereotypes: A meta-analysis of 5 decades of US draw-a-scientist studies. Child Development, 89(6), 1943–1955. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13039
  • Morales-Chicas, J., Castillo, M., Bernal, I., Ramos, P., & Guzman, B. L. (2019). Computing with relevance and purpose: A review of culturally relevant education in computing. International Journal of Multicultural Education, 21(1), 125–155. doi: 10.18251/ijme.v21i1.1745
  • Morin-Messabel, C., Ferrière, S., Martinez, F., Devif, J., & Reeb, L. (2017). Counter-stereotypes and images: An exploratory research and some questions. Social Psychology of Education: An International Journal, 20(1), 1–13. doi: 10.1007/s11218-017-9370-5
  • ONS (2023). Ethnic group variable: Census 2021. Last updated: 28 November 2023. https://www.ons.gov.uk/census/census2021dictionary/variablesbytopic/ethnicgroupnationalidentitylanguageandreligionvariablescensus2021/ethnicgroup
  • Pantic, K., Clarke-Midura, J., Poole, F., Roller, J., & Allan, V. (2018). Drawing a computer scientist: Stereotypical representations or lack of awareness? Computer Science Education, 28(3), 232–254. doi: 10.1080/08993408.2018.1533780
  • Parker, M. C., & Guzdial, M. (2015). A critical research synthesis of privilege in computing education. In 2015 research in equity and sustained participation in engineering, computing, and technology (RESPECT) (pp. 1–5). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE).
  • Proudfoot, D., Kay, A. C., & Koval, C. Z. (2015). A gender bias in the attribution of creativity: Archival and experimental evidence for the perceived association between masculinity and creative thinking. Psychological Science, 26(11), 1751–1761. doi: 10.1177/0956797615598739
  • Raspberry Pi. (2021). Culturally relevant and responsive computing in the classroom: A guide for curriculum design and teaching. Raspberry Pi Foundation.
  • Royal Society. (2017). After the reboot: Computing education in UK schools.
  • Sentence, S. (2023). Gender Balance in Computing—the big picture. Retrieved January 5, 2023, from. https://www.raspberrypi.org/blog/gender-balance-in-computing-big-picture/
  • Shimwell, J., DeWitt, J., Davenport, C., Padwick, A., Sanderson, J., & Strachan, R. (2023). Scientist of the week: Evaluating effects of a teacher-led STEM intervention to reduce stereotypical views of scientists in young children. Research in Science & Technological Education, 41(2), 423–443. doi: 10.1080/02635143.2021.1941840
  • Sieben, S., & Lechner, C. M. (2019). Measuring cultural capital through the number of books in the household. Measurement Instruments for the Social Sciences, 1(1), 1–6. doi: 10.1186/s42409-018-0006-0
  • Starr, C. R. (2018). “I’m Not a science nerd!”: STEM stereotypes, identity, and motivation Among undergraduate women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 42(4), 489–503. doi: 10.1177/0361684318793848
  • Steinke, J., Lapinski, M., Long, M., Van Der Maas, C., Ryan, L., & Applegate, B. (2009). Seeing oneself as a scientist: Media influences and adolescent girls’ science career-possible selves. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 15(4), 279–301. doi: 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v15.i4.10
  • Thinyane, H. (2013). Academic perceptions of the ideal computer science student. South African Computer Journal, 50(1), 28–40.
  • Varma, R. (2010). Why so few women enrol in computing? Gender and ethnic differences in students’ perception. Computer Science Education, 20(4), 301–316. doi: 10.1080/08993408.2010.527697
  • Wei, X., Lin, L., Meng, N., Tan, W., Kong, S.-C., & Kinshuk. (2021). The effectiveness of partial pair programming on elementary school students’ computational thinking skills and self-efficacy. Computers & Education, 160, 104023. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104023
  • Womenintech. (2023). Women in tech survey. Retrieved January 5, 2023, from https://www.womenintech.co.uk/women-in-tech-survey-2023
  • Wong, B. (2016). ‘I’m good, but not that good’: Digitally-skilled young people’s identity in computing. Computer Science Education, 26(4), 299–317. doi: 10.1080/08993408.2017.1292604
  • Wong, B., & Chiu, Y.-L. T. (2021a). Exploring the concept of ‘ideal’ university student. Studies in Higher Education, 46(3), 497–508. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2019.1643302
  • Wong, B., & Chiu, Y. L. T. (2021b). The ideal student: Deconstructing expectations in higher education. Open University Press.
  • Wong, B., Chiu, Y.-L. T., Murray, ÓM, Horsburgh, J., & Copsey-Blake, M. (2023). ‘Biology is easy, physics is hard’: Student perceptions of the ideal and the typical student across STEM higher education. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 32(1), 118–139. doi: 10.1080/09620214.2022.2122532
  • Wong, B., & Copsey-Blake, M. (2023). Pragmatic, persistent and precarious: The pathways of three minority ethnic women in STEM higher education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 21(7), 2123–2142. doi: 10.1007/s10763-022-10337-8
  • Wong, B., & Kemp, P. E. J. (2018). Technical boys and creative girls: The career aspirations of digitally-competent youths. Cambridge Journal of Education, 48(3), 301–316. doi: 10.1080/0305764X.2017.1325443