REFERENCES
- Krumboltz, Weisman, 1962. “The effect of covert and overt responding to programmed learning on immediate and delayed retention”, J. Educ. Psy. 53 (2) (1962), pp. 89–92.
- Skinner, B.F., Cumulative Record, Analysis of Behaviour 182 (15), , Introduction, viii.
- Stolurow, , and Walker, , 1962. “A comparison of overt and covert responding in programmed learning”, J. Educ. Res. 55 (9) (1962), pp. 421–9.
- Lambert, Miller and Wiley, 1962. “Experimental Folk Lore and experimentation: the study of programmed learning in the Wauwatosa Public Schools”, J. Educ. Res. 55 (1962), pp. 485–94.
- Feldhusen and Birt, 1962. “A study of nine methods of presentation of programmed learning material”, J. Educ. Res. 55 (9) (1962), pp. 461–6.
- Evans, Glaser and Homme, 1962. “An investigation of teaching machine variable using learning programs in symbolic logic”, J. Educ. Res. 55 (9) (1962), p. 433.
- Goldbeck and Campbell, 1962. “The effects of response mode and response difficulty on programed learning”, J. Educ. Psy. 53 (3) (1962), pp. 110–18.
- Keislar and McNeil, 1962. “A comparison of two response modes in an auto‐instructional program with children in the primary grades”, J. Educ. Psy. 53 (3) (1962), pp. 127–31.
- See Silberman, April 1962. “Self‐teaching devices and programmed learning”, Rev. Educ. Res. 22 (2) (April 1962), Also Kendler, in Galanter, Automatic Teaching.
- Cook and Spitzer, 1960. “Prompting and Confirmation in paired‐associate learning”, J. Exp. Psy. 59 (4) (1960), pp. 275–6.
- Angell and Lumsdaine, 1962. “Prompted plus unprompted trials vs. prompted trials alone in paired associate learning”, J. Prog. Instr. 1 (1) (1962), pp. 55–78, quoted in Silverman and Alter.
- Krumboltz and Bonawitz, 1962. “The effect of receiving the confirming response in context in programed material”, J. Educ. Res. 55 (9) (1962).
- Silverman and Alter, 1960. “Notes on the response in teaching machine programs”, Psychol. Rep. 7 (496) (1960).
- Smith, in Galanter, Automatic Teaching, The State of the Art. Some successful programs.
- Holland, J.G., “A teaching machine program in psychology,”, in Galanter, pp. 69–82.
- Evans, Glaser and Homme, 1962. “The ruleg system for the construction of programmed verbal learning sequences”, J. Educ. Res. 55 (9) (1962).
- Rothkopf, Ernst, “Programmed self‐instruction booklets. Mnemonic phrases and unguided study in the acquisition of equivalances”, >J. Prog. Instr. 1 (1), pp. 19–28, This research had to be completed by post!.
- Roe, , Case, , and Roe, , April 1962. “Scrambled vs. Ordered Sequence in autoinstructional programs”, J. Educ. Psy. 53 (2) (April 1962).
- Ferster, , and Sapon, , 1958. “Teaching of German”, Harvard Educ. Rev. 28 (1958), pp. 58–69.
- , Attacked, quite rightly, by Brown and Hodgkinson, “A note concerning ‘An application of recent developments in psychology to the teaching of German’ “, Harvard Educ. Review, and Lumsdaine and Glaser, Teaching Machines and Programmed Learning..