Project Ranking in Petroleum Exploration

References

• Anagnostopoulos, K.P. and Mamanis, G. (2010) A portfolio optimization model with three objectives and discrete variables. Computers and Operations Research, 37, 1285–1297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, N. and Ghasemzadeh, F. (2004) Project portfolio selection and management. In The Wiley Guide to Managing Projects, P.W.G. Morris, and J.K. Pinto, editors. John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, NJ, pp. 237–255.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, B.C. and Savage, S.L. (1999) Notes on exploration and production portfolio optimization: a new era in petroleum exploration and production management. Available at http://web.stanford.edu/∼savage/fordownload/Notes.pdf (accessed 13 September 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Ballestero, E. and Romero, C. (1996) Portfolio selection: a compromise programming solution. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 47, 1377–1386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beringer, C., Jonas, D. and Kock, A. (2013) Behavior of internal stakeholders in project portfolio management and its impact on success. International Journal of Project Management, 31, 830–846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brans, J.P., Vincke, P. and Mareschal, B. (1986) How to select and how to rank projects: the Promethee method. European Journal of Operational Research, 24, 228–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çelikyurt, U. and Özekici, S. (2007) Multiperiod portfolio optimization models in stochastic markets using the mean–variance approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 179, 186–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costantino, F., Di Gravio, G. and Nonino, F. (2015) Project selection in project portfolio management: an artificial neural network model based on critical success factors. International Journal of Project Management, 33, 1744–1754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyer, J.S. (1990) Remarks on the analytic hierarchy process. Management Science, 36, 249–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eilat, H., Golany, B. and Shtub, A. (2006) Constructing and evaluating balanced portfolios of R&D projects with interactions: a DEA based methodology. European Journal of Operational Research, 172, 1018–1039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elazouni, A. and Abido, M. (2011) Multiobjective evolutionary finance-based scheduling: individual projects within a portfolio. Automation in Construction. 20, 755–766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etherington, J.R. and Ritter, J.E. (2008) The 2007 SPE/WPC/AAPG/SPEE petroleum resources management system (PRMS). Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 47, 15–17.
   Google Scholar
• Forman, E. and Gass, S. (2001) The analytic hierarchy process—an exposition. Operations Research, 49, 469–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gass, S.I. (2005) Model world: the great debate—MAUT versus AHP. Interfaces, 35, 308–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutjahr, W.J., Katzensteiner, S., Reiter, P., Stummer, C. and Denk, M. (2010) Multi-objective decision analysis for competence-oriented project portfolio selection. European Journal of Operational Research, 205, 670–679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, R.A. (1966) Decision analysis: applied decision theory. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Operational Research, D. B. Hertz and J. Melese, (editors). Wiley Interscience, New York, pp. 55–77.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, C.-L. and Yoon, K. (1981) Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications a state-of-the-art survey. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 58–191.
   Google Scholar
• Jablonowski, C.J. and Kleit, A.N. (2011) Transaction costs and organizational choice: modeling governance in offshore drilling. The Engineering Economist, 56, 28–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jafarizadeh, B. and Bratvold, R.B. (2015) Oil and gas exploration valuation and the value of waiting. The Engineering Economist, 60, 245–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, J.J. and Klein, G. (1999) Project selection criteria by strategic orientation. Information & Management, 36, 63–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, M.G., El Arbi, F. and Ahlemann, F. (2015) Successful project portfolio management beyond project selection techniques: understanding the role of structural alignment. International Journal of Project Management, 33, 126–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, M.J. and Snyder, B. (2013) Capital investment and operational decision making in the offshore drilling industry. The Engineering Economist, 58, 35–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalili-Damghani, K., Sadi-Nezhad, S., Lotfi, F.H. and Tavana, M. (2013) A hybrid fuzzy rule–based multi-criteria framework for sustainable project portfolio selection. Information Sciences, 220, 442–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Killen, C.P., Jugdev, K., Drouin, N. and Petit, Y. (2012) Advancing project and portfolio management research: applying strategic management theories. International Journal of Project Management, 30, 525–538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopmann, J., Kock, A., Killen, C.P. and Gemünden, H.G. (2017) The role of project portfolio management in fostering both deliberate and emergent strategy. International Journal of Project Management, 35, 557–570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mai, L. and Li, H. (2016) Optimizing the capital rationing decision with uncertain returns. The Engineering Economist, 61, 128–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinsuo, M. and Lehtonen, P. (2007) Role of single-project management in achieving portfolio management efficiency. International Journal of Project Management, 25, 56–65.
   Google Scholar
• Meskendahl, S. (2010) The influence of business strategy on project portfolio management and its success—a conceptual framework. International Journal of Project Management, 28, 807–817.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, R., Martinsuo, M. and Blomquist, T. (2008) Project portfolio control and portfolio management performance in different contexts. Project Management Journal, 39, 28–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutavdzic, M. and Maybee, B. (2015) An extension of portfolio theory in selecting projects to construct a preferred portfolio of petroleum assets. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 133, 518–528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newendorp, P.D. (1975) Decision analysis for petroleum exploration. Petroleum Publishing Co., Tulsa, OK.
   Google Scholar
• Nowak, M. (2013) Project portfolio selection using interactive approach. Procedia Engineering, 57, 814–822.
   Google Scholar
• Olsson, R. (2008) Risk management in a multi-project environment: an approach to manage portfolio risks. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 25, 60–71.
   Google Scholar
• Otis, R.M. and Schneidermann, N. (1997) A process for evaluating exploration prospect. AAPG Bulletin, 81, 1087–1109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paquin, J.P., Gauthier, C. and Morin, P.P. (2016) The downside risk of project portfolios: the impact of capital investment projects and the value of project efficiency and project risk management programmes. International Journal of Project Management, 34, 1460–1470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patanakul, P. (2015) Key attributes of effectiveness in managing project portfolio. International Journal of Project Management, 33, 1084–1097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pöyhönen, M., Hämäläinen, R.P. and Salo, A.A. (1997) An experiment on the numerical modeling of verbal ratio statements. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 1997, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Project Management Institute. (2013) A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide). 5th ed. Project Management Institute. Newtown Square, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, P.R. (2001) Risk analysis and management of petroleum exploration ventures. Available at http://members.aapg.org/eseries/StaticContent/AAPG_files/html/m12toc.html. (accessed 13 September 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Roy, B. (1968) Classement et choix en présence de points de vue multiples (la méthode ELECTRE) [Ranking and choice in pace of multiple points of view (the ELECTRE method)]. La Revue d‘Informatique et de Recherche Opérationelle (RIRO), 8, 57–75.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, R.W. (1987) The analytic hierarchy process—what it is and how it is used. Mathematical Modelling, 9, 161–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schenkerman, S. (1997) Inducement of nonexistent order by the analytic hierarchy process. Decision Sciences, 28, 475–482.
   Google Scholar
• Sebestyen, Z. and Toth, T. (2015) Ranking projects in multi-criteria environment. Organization, Technology & Management in Construction, 7, 1295–1301.
   Google Scholar
• Teller, J. and Kock, A. (2013) An empirical investigation on how portfolio risk management influences project portfolio success. International Journal of Project Management, 31, 817–829.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unger, B.N., Gemünden, H.G. and Aubry, M. (2012) The three roles of a project portfolio management office: Their impact on portfolio management execution and success. International Journal of Project Management, 30, 608–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voss, M. and Kock, A. (2013) Impact of relationship value on project portfolio success—investigating the moderating effects of portfolio characteristics and external turbulence. International Journal of Project Management, 31, 847–861.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walls, M.R. (2004) Combining decision analysis and portfolio management to improve project selection in the exploration and production firm. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 44, 55–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue, Q., Wang, Z., Liu, S. and Zhao, D. (2014) An improved portfolio optimization model for oil and gas investment selection. Petroleum Science, 11, 181–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye, J. (2013) A linear programming method based on an improved score function for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy multicriteria decision making. The Engineering Economist, 58, 179–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar