Term structures and scenario-based social discount rates under smooth ambiguity

References

• Armitage, S. (2017). Discount rates for long-term projects: The cost of capital and social discount rate compared. The European Journal of Finance, 23(1), 60–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847X.2015.1029591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrow, K. J., Cropper, M. L., Gollier, C., Groom, B., Heal, G. M., Newell, R. G., Nordhaus, W. D., Pindyck, R. S., Pizer, W. A., Portney, P. R., Sterner, T., Tol, R. S. J., & Weitzman, M. L. (2014). Should governments use a declining discount rate in project analysis? Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 8(2), 145–163. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/reu008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barsky, R. B., Juster, F. T., Kimball, M. S., & Shapiro, M. D. (1997). Preference parameters and behavioral heterogeneity: An experimental approach in the health and retirement study. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(2), 537–579. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355397555280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billingsley, P. (1995). Probability and measure (3rd ed.). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Bruce, J. P., Lee, H., & Haites, E. F. (1996). Climate change 1995: Economic and social dimensions of climate change: Contribution of Working Group III to the second assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chernoff, H. (1954). Rational selection of decision functions. Econometrica, 22(4), 422–443. https://doi.org/10.2307/1907435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cropper, M. L., Freeman, M. C., Groom, B., & Pizer, W. A. (2014). Declining discount rates. American Economic Review, 104(5), 538–543. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.5.538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffie, D., & Skiadas, C. (1994). Continuous-time security pricing: A utility gradient approach. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 23(2), 107–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4068(94)90001-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, L. G., & Zin, S. E. (1989). Substitution, risk aversion, and the temporal behavior of consumption and asset returns: A theoretical framework. Econometrica, 57(4), 937–969. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913778
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gierlinger, J., & Gollier, C. (2017). Do interest rates decline when there is ambiguity about growth? Working paper.
   Google Scholar
• Gollier, C. (2004). The economics of risk and time. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gollier, C. (2013). Pricing the planet’s future: The economics of discounting in an uncertain world. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gollier, C. (2016). Evaluation of long-dated assets: The role of parameter uncertainty. Journal of Monetary Economics, 84, 66–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2016.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gollier, C., & Mahul, O. (2017). Term structures of discount rates: An international perspective. Toulouse School of Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Hector, S. (2015). Extending the Ramsey equation further: Discounting under mutually utility independent and recursive preferences. Working paper.
   Google Scholar
• Interagency Working Group. (2016). Technical update of the social cost of carbon for regulatory impact analysis. Technical report, Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Greenhouse Gases, United States Government.
   Google Scholar
• Ju, N., & Miao, J. (2012). Ambiguity, learning, and asset returns. Econometrica, 80, 559–591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreps, D. M., & Porteus, E. L. (1978). Temporal resolution of uncertainty and dynamic choice theory. Econometrica, 46(1), 185–200. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laplace, P. S. (1814). Essai Philosophique sur les Probabilités. Mme. Ve. Courcier.
   Google Scholar
• Machina, M., & Siniscalchi, M. (2014). Ambiguity and ambiguity aversion. In M. Machina, & K. Viscusi (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of risk and uncertainty (pp. 729–807). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Miao, J. (2014). Economic dynamics in discrete time. The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nakićenović, N., Alcamo, J., Davis, G., de Vries, B., Fenhann, J., Gaffin, S., Gregory, K., Grübler, A., Jung, T. Y., Kram, T., Lebre La Rovere, E., Michaelis, L., Mori, S., Morita, T., Pepper, W., Pitcher, H., Price, L., Riahi, K., Roehrl, A. … Dadi, Z. (2000). IPCC special report on emissions scenarios. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nordhaus, W. D. (2017). Revisiting the social cost of carbon. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(7), 1518–1523. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1609244114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsey, F. P. (1928). A mathematical theory of saving. The Economic Journal, 38(152), 543–559. https://doi.org/10.2307/2224098
   Google Scholar
• Riahi, K., van Vuuren, D. P., Kriegler, E., Edmonds, J., O’Neill, B. C., Fujimori, S., Bauer, N., Calvin, K., Dellink, R., Fricko, O., Lutz, W., Popp, A., Cuaresma, J. C., Samir, K. C., Leimbach, M., Jiang, L., Kram, T., Rao, S., Emmerling, J., Ebi, K. … Tavoni, M. (2017). The shared socioeconomic pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview. Global Environmental Change, 42, 153–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinn, H.-W. (1980). A rehabilitation of the principle of insufficient reason. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 94(3), 493–506. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skiadas, C. (2013). Smooth ambiguity aversion toward small risks and continuous-time recursive utility. Journal of Political Economy, 121(4), 775–792. https://doi.org/10.1086/671179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traeger, C. P. (2014). Why uncertainty matters: Discounting under intertemporal risk aversion and ambiguity. Economic Theory, 56(3), 627–664. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-014-0800-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treasury, H. M. (2003). The green book: Appraisal and evaluation in central government. Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Wakker, P. P. (2010). Prospect theory: For risk and ambiguity. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weitzman, M. (1998). Why the far-distant future should be discounted at its lowest possible rate. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 36(3), 201–208. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1998.1052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhuang, J. (2007). Theory and practice in the choice of social discount rate for cost-benefit analysis: A survey. Technical report, Asian Development Bank.
   Google Scholar