“As it is an Evil”: Defensive Equivocation in Measure for Measure

References

• Innocent XI: A Decree Made at Rome, the Second of March, 1679 condemning some opinions of the Jesuits and other Casuists. Accessed November 29, 2020 https://quod.lib.umich.edu/e/eebo2/A45897.0001.001?view=toc.
   Google Scholar
• Oxford English Dictionary. 2nd ed. 20 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989. http://www.oed.com/
   Google Scholar
• Abbot, George. Quæstiones Sex Totidem Prælectionibus, in Schola Theologica, Oxoniæ, Pro Forma, Habitis, Discussae, et Disceptatæ. Oxford, 1598.
   Google Scholar
• Aquinas, Thomas. Summa Theologica. Complete English Edition. 5 Vols. Translated by the Fathers of the English Dominican Province. New York: Benziger Bros., 1948.
   Google Scholar
• Barker, Robert. A True and perfect relation of the whole proceedings against the late most barbarous traitors, Garnet a Iesuite, and his confederats contayning sundry speeches deliuered by the Lords commissioners at their arraignments for the better satisfaction of those that were hearers, as occasion was offered: the Earle of Northamptons speech hauing bene enlarged vpon those grounds which are set downe: and lastly all that passed at Garnets execution. London, 1606. Accessed December 15, 2020. https:19-22)8/search.proquest.com/docview/2264215425?accountid=12528. EEBO.
   Google Scholar
• Battenhouse, Roy W. “Measure for Measure and the Doctrine of Christian Atonement.” PMLA 61, no. 4 (1946): 1029–1059.
   Google Scholar
• Beckwith, Sarah. Shakespeare and the Grammar of Forgiveness. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Booty, John E., ed. The Book of Common Prayer 1559: The Elizabethan Prayer Book. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 1976, reissued 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, Todd Wayne. “Equivocation, Cognition, and Political Authority in Early Modern England.” Texas Studies in Literature and Language 54, no. 1 (2012): 132–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, Eric Josef. Marriage and the English Reformation. Cambridge: Mass.: Blackwell, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Carrafiello, Michael L. “St. Paul and the Polemicists: the Robert Parsons-Thomas Morton Exchanges, 1606–10.” The Catholic Historical Review 95, no. 3 (2009): 474–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaucer, Geoffrey. The Canterbury Tales. Edited by F. N. Robinson. 2nd ed. London: Oxford UP, 1966.
   Google Scholar
• Christofides, R. M. “Iago and Equivocation: The Seduction and Damnation of Othello.” Early Modern Literary Studies 15, no. 1 (2010): 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Christofides, R. M. “Shakespeare and Equivocation: The Language of Doom in Hamlet, Othello, Macbeth and King Lear.” Phd diss., Cardiff University, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Coghill, Nevill. “Comic Form in Measure for Measure.” In Shakespeare Survey, edited by Allardyce Nicoll, Vol. 8, 14–27. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1955.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, John. “Shakespeare and Religion.” Religions 9, no. 11 (2018): 343–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cressy, David. Birth, Marriage, and Death: Ritual, Religion, and the Life-Cycle in Tudor and Stuart England. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Curran, John. “That Suggestion: Catholic Casuistry, Complexity, and Macbeth.” Religions 9, no. 10 (2018): 315–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, Wayne, “Implicature”. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta, 2019. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2019/entries/implicature/
   Google Scholar
• Desper, Richard. “We Must Speak by the Card or Equivocation Will Undo Us.” The Oxfordian 4 (2001): 121–141.
   Google Scholar
• Devlin, Christopher. The Life of Robert Southwell, Poet and Martyr. London: Longmans, Green, 1956.
   Google Scholar
• Doloff, Steven. “Speaking ‘by the Card’: Hamlet Remembers His Catechism.” Notes and Queries 64, no. 2 (2017): 270–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donatus, Aelius. Ars Grammatica, edited by Roberta Cervani. Bologna: Patron, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, John. The Fourth General Council of Lateran Recognized and Established by Subsequent Councils and Synods Down to the Council of Trent. London: L & G Seeley, 1843.
   Google Scholar
• Fahey, Maria Franziska. Metaphor and Shakespearean Drama: Unchaste Signification. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Flaherty, Jennifer. “Heaven and Earth: Confession as Performance in Hamlet and Measure for Measure.” Theatre Symposium 21, no. 1 (2013): 78–89.
   Google Scholar
• Garnet, Henry. A Treatise of Equivocation, edited by David Jardine. London: Longman, Brown, Green, and Longmans, 1851.
   Google Scholar
• Greenblatt, Stephen. Shakespearean Negotiations: The Circulation of Social Energy in Renaissance England. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths, John, ed. The Two Books of Homilies Appointed to be Read in Churches. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1859. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Halley, Janet E. “Equivocation and the Legal Conflict Over Religious Identity in Early Modern England.” Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities 3, no. 1 (1991): 33–52.
   Google Scholar
• Hamlin, Hannibal, ed. The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare and Religion. Cambridge Companions to Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Hanna, Edward. “Attrition.” In The Catholic Encyclopedia. Vol. 2. New York: Robert Appleton Company, 1907. http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/02065a.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, Elizabeth. Discovering the Subject in Renaissance England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Hayne, Victoria. “Performing Social Practice: The Example of Measure for Measure.” Shakespeare Quarterly 44, no. 1 (1993): 1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillman, Richard. William Shakespeare: The Problem Plays. New York: Twayne, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Huntley, Frank L. “Macbeth and the Background of Jesuitical Equivocation.” PMLA 79, no. 4 (1964): 390–400.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, Ken, and Arthur F. Marotti. “The Turn to Religion in Early Modern English Studies.” Criticism 46, no. 1 (2004): 167–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, G. Wilson. The Wheel of Fire. London: Oxford University Press, 1930.
   Google Scholar
• Knoppers, Laura Lunger. “(En) Gendering Shame: Measure for Measure and the Spectacles of Power.” English Literary Renaissance 23, no. 3 (1993): 450–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwan, Roberta. “‘Then Shalt Thou Se Clearly’: The Hypocrites, Law and Mercy in Measure for Measure.” English Studies 98, no. 3 (2017): 223–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwan, Roberta. “‘You Are in the State of Grace?’ The Absence of Grace and Semantic Embranglement in Shakespeare’s Troilus and Cressida.” English Studies 97, no. 4 (2016): 362–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lea, Henry C. Confession and Absolution. Vol. 1 of A History of Auricular Confession and Indulgences in the Latin Church. Philadelphia: Lea Brothers & Co., 1896.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, Henry. The New Art of Lying, Covered by IESVITES, Vnder the Vaile of Eqvivocation, Discovered and Disproved by Henry Mason. London: John Clarke, 1624. https://www.google.com.au/books/edition/The_New_Art_of_Lying_Covered_by_Jesuites/dLJoAAAAcAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=henry+mason+the+new+art+of+lying.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, Russ. Shakespeare and the Arts of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Morton, Thomas. A Full Satisfaction Concerning a Double Romish Iniquitie; Hainous Rebellion, and More Then Heathenish Æquivocation. London: R. Field for E. Weaver, 1606. https://books.google.com.au/books?redir_esc=y&id=N61kAAAAcAAJ&q=hydra#v=onepage&q=metropolis&f=false.
   Google Scholar
• Mullaney, Steven. “Lying Like Truth: Riddle, Representation and Treason in Renaissance England.” ELH 47, no. 1 (1980): 32–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagarajan, S. “‘Measure for Measure’ and Elizabethan Betrothals.” Shakespeare Quarterly 14, no. 2 (1963): 115–119.
   Google Scholar
• Navarrus [Martin de Azpilcueta]. Commentarius in Cap. Humanae Aures. In Commentaria, 1:218v –224r. Venice, 1588.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, Henry Neill. The Royal Play of Macbeth: When, Why, and How It Was Written by Shakespeare. New York: Macmillan, 1950.
   Google Scholar
• Pricket, Robert. The Iesuits Miracles, or new Popish Vvonders Containing the Straw, the Crowne, and the Vvondrous Child, with the Confutation of Them and Their Follies. London: Nicholas Okes, 1607. EEBO. Accessed November 15, 2020. https://search.proquest.com/docview/2240857154?accountid=12528.
   Google Scholar
• Puttenham, G[eorge]. The Arte of English Poesie, 1589. Archive.org. Accessed November 13, 2020. https://archive.org/details/georgeputtenham00puttgoog/page/n254/mode/2up/search/267.
   Google Scholar
• Schanzer, Ernest. “The Marriage-Contracts in Measure for Measure.” In Shakespeare Survey, edited by Allardyce Nicoll, Vol. 13, 81–89. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1960.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, William O. “Macbeth’s — And Our — Self-Equivocations.” Shakespeare Quarterly 37, no. 2 (1986): 160–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, William. Measure for Measure, edited by J. W. Lever. Arden Shakespeare, 2nd Series. London: Methuen, 1966.
   Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, William. Measure for Measure, edited by A. R. Braunmuller and Robert N. Watson. Arden Shakespeare, 3rd Series. London: Bloomsbury, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, William. The Riverside Shakespeare, edited by G. Blakemore Evans. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Slater, Thomas. “Mental Reservation.” in The Catholic Encyclopedia. Vol. 10. New York: Robert Appleton Company, 1911.
   Google Scholar
• Slights, Camille Wells. The Casuistical Tradition in Shakespeare, Donne, Herbert, and Milton. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Soto, Domingo de. De Ratione Tegendi et Detegendi Secretum. Salamanca, 1541.
   Google Scholar
• Stelling, Lieke. “Recent Studies in Religious Conversion.” English Literary Renaissance 47, no. 1 (2017): 164–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tutino, Stefania. “Nothing but the Truth? Hermeneutics and Morality in the Doctrines of Equivocation and Mental Reservation in EM Europe.” Renaissance Quarterly 64 (2011): 115–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tutino, Stefania. Shadows of Doubt: Language and Truth in Post-Reformation Catholic Culture. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Valbuena, Olga. Subjects to the King’s Divorce: Equivocation, Infidelity, and Resistance in Early Modern England. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Waterworth, J. Trans. The Canons and Decrees of the Sacred and Oecumenical Council of Trent. Chicago: Christian Symbolic Publication Society, 1917.
   Google Scholar
• White, R. S. Ambivalent Macbeth. Sydney: Sydney University Press, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Wills, Garry. Witches and Jesuits: Shakespeare’s Macbeth. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Zagorin, Perez. Ways of Lying: Dissimulation, Persecution, and Conformity in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990.
   Google Scholar