Similarities and differences of emotions in human–machine and human–human interactions: what kind of emotions are relevant for future companion systems?

REFERENCES

• Abele-Brehm, A., and W.Brehm. 1986. “The Conceptualization and Measurement of Affective State Scale. The Development of the Affective State [Zur Konzeptionalisierung und Messung der Befindlichkeit. Die Entwicklung der Befindlichkeitsskalen (BFS)].” Diagnostica32 (3): 209–228.
   Google Scholar
• Ayzenberg, Y., J.Hernandez, and R. W.Picard. 2012. “FEEL: Frequent EDA and Event Logging, a Mobile Social Interaction Stress Monitoring System.” In CHI '12 Extended abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2357–2362. New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, P.1988. “A Structural Model of Affective State [Ein Strukturmodell der emotionalen Befindlichkeit].” Psychologische Beiträge30 (4): 514–536.
   Google Scholar
• Bedny, G. Z., and W.Karwowski. 2004. “Activity Theory as a Basis for the Study of Work.” Ergonomics47 (2): 134–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedny, G. Z., and W.Karwowski. 2011. Human–Computer Interaction and Operators Performance: Optimizing Work Design with Activity Theory. London: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biundo, S., and A.Wendemuth. 2010. “From Cognitive Technical Systems to Companion Systems [Von kognitiven technischen Systemen zu Companion-Systemen].” Künstliche Intelligenz24 (4): 335–339.
   Google Scholar
• Biundo, S., and A.Wendemuth. 2011. “A Companion Technology for Cognitive Systems.” In Cognitive Behavioral Systems. COST 2102 International Training School, Dresden, Germany, February 21–26, 2011, Revised Selected Papers, edited by A.Esposito, A. M.Esposito, A.Vinciarelli, R.Hoffmann, and V. C.Müller, 89–103. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, M. M., and P. J.Lang. 1994. “Measuring Emotion: The Self-Assessment Manikin and the Semantic Differential.” Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry25 (1): 49–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowie, R.2010. “Companionship is an Emotional Business.” In Close Engagements with Artificial Companions. Key Social, Psychological, Ethical and Design Issues, edited by Y.Wilks, 169–172. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Drasgow, F., and R. I.Lissak. 1983. “Modified Parallel Analysis: A Procedure for Examining the Latent Dimensionality of Dichotomously Scored Item Responses.” Journal of Applied Psychology68 (3): 363–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekman, P., and W.Friesen. 1978. Facial Action Coding System: A Technique for the Measurement of Facial Movement. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y.1987. Learning by Expanding: An Activity – Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research. Helsiniki: Orienta-konsultit.
   Google Scholar
• Hassenzahl, M., M.Burmester, and F.Koller. 2003. “AttrakDiff: Ein Fragebogen zur Messungen wahrgenommer hedonischer und pragmatischer Qualität [AttrakDiff: A Questionnaire for the Measurement Perceived Hedonic and Pragmatic Quality].” In Mensch & Computer, edited by J.Ziegler, and G.Szwillius, 187–196. Stuttgart: B.G. Teubner.
   Google Scholar
• Hayton, J. C., D. G.Allen, and V.Scarpello. 2004. “Factor Retention Decisions in Exploratory Factor Analysis: A Tutorial on Parallel Analysis.” Organizational Research Methods7 (2): 191–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hecheltjen, K. G., and F.Mertesdorf. 1973. “Development of a Multidimensional Mood Questionnaire [Entwicklung eines mehrdimensionalen Stimmungsfragebogens (MSF)].” Gruppendynamik40: 110–122.
   Google Scholar
• Hoc, J. M.2000. “From Human–Machine-Interaction to Human–Machine-Cooperation.” Ergonomics43 (7): 833–843.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inagaki, T.2008. “Smart Collaboration Between Humans and Machines Based on Mutual Understanding.” Annual Reviews in Control32 (2): 253–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Izard, C. E.1977. Human Emotions. New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Izard, C. E., F. E.Dougherty, B. M.Bloxom, and N. E.Kotsch. 1974. The Differential Emotions Scale: A Method of Measuring the Subjective Experience of Discrete Emotions. Nashville, TN: Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University.
   Google Scholar
• Janke, W., and G.Debus. 1978. Die Eigenschaftswörterliste (EWL) [The Feature List of Words]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
   Google Scholar
• Kuutti, K.1995. “Activity Theory as a Potential Framework for Human–Computer Interaction Research.” In Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human–Computer Interaction, edited by B. A.Nardi, 17–44. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, P. J.1995. “The Emotion Probe: Studies of Motivation and Attention.” American Psychologist50 (5): 372–385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leontyev, A. N.1978. Activity, Consciousness and Personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, D.2010. “Falling in Love with a Companion.” In Close Engagements with Artificial Companions. Key Social, Psychological, Ethical and Design Issue, edited by Y.Wilks, 147–153. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Lorr, M.1989. “Models and Methods for Measurement of Mood.” In Emotion. Theory, Research, and Experience: The Measurement of Emotions, edited by R.Plutchik, and H.Kellerman, 37–53. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mackay, C. J.1980. “The Measurement of Mood and Psychophysiological Activity Using Self Report Techniques.” In Techniques in Psychophysiology, edited by I.Martin, and P.Venables, 501–562. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Nitsch, J. R.1976. “Die Eigenzustandsskala (EZ-Skala) – Ein Verfahren zur hierarchisch-mehrdimensionalen Befindlichkeitsskalierung [Condition Measurement and Latent-State-Trate Models].” In Beanspruchung im Sport. Beiträge zur psychologischen Analyse sportlicher Leistungssituationen, edited by J. R.Nitsch, and I.Udris, 81–102. Bad Homburg: Limpert.
   Google Scholar
• Peter, C., and R.Beale. 2008. Affect and Emotion in Human–Computer Interaction. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Picard, R. W.1997. Affective Computing. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, C., P.Rani, N.Sarkar, and E.Vanman. 2006. “An Empirical Study of Machine Learning Techniques for Affect Recognition in Human–Robot Interaction.” Pattern Analysis and Applications9 (1): 58–69. 10.1007/s10044-006-0025-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. 2010. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org.
   Google Scholar
• Reise, S. P., T. M.Moore, and M. G.Haviland. 2010. “Bifactor Models and Rotations: Exploring the Extent to Which Multidimensional Data Yield Univocal Scale Scores.” Journal of Personality Assessment92 (6): 544–559. 10.1080/00223891.2010.496477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revelle, W.2010. Psych: Procedures for Personality and Psychological Research. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University. http://personality-project.org/r/psych.manual.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Schmid, J., and J.Leiman. 1957. “The Development of Hierarchical Factor Solutions.” Psychometrika22 (1): 53–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, G.1978. “Estimating the Dimension of a Model.” The Annals of Statistics6 (2): 461–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stelmaszewska, H., B.Fields, and A.Blandford. 2008. “Emotion and Technology: An Empirical Study.” In Emotion in HCI: Joint Proceedings of the 2005, 2006, and 2007 International Workshops, edited by C.Peter, R.Beale, E.Crane, L.Axelrod, and G.Blyth, 48–53. Stuttgart: Fraunhofer-Informationszentrum Raum und Bau.
   Google Scholar
• Steyer, R., P.Schwenkmezger, M.Eid, and P.Notz. 1991. Condition Measurement and Latent-State-Trait-Models. Trier: Arbeitsbericht zum DFG-Projekt Ste 411/3-1, [Befindlichkeitsmessung und Latent-State-Trait-Modelle].
   Google Scholar
• Traue, H. C., F.Ohl, K.Limbrecht, S.Scherer, H.Kessler, H.Hoffmann, S.Scherer, M.Kozyba, A.Scheck, and S.Walter. (in press). “Framework for Emotions and Dispositions in Man–Companion Interaction.” In Speech, Gaze and Affect: Concepts of Reactive and Natural Human–Machine Interaction Techniques Employing ECAs with Personality and Different Human-Like Communicative-Dialog Tactics, edited by N.Campbell, and M.Rojc. NH: Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Turkle, S.2010. “In Good Company? On the Threshold of Robotic Companions.” In Close Engagements with Artificial Companions: Key Social, Psychological, Ethical and Design Issues, edited by Y.Wilks, 24–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Uden, L.2007. “Activity Theory for Designing Mobile Learning.” International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation.1 (1): 81–102.
   Google Scholar
• Walter, S., J.Kim, D.Hrabal, S. C.Crawcour, H.Kessler, and H. C.Traue. 2013. “Transsituational Individual-Specific Biopsychological Classification of Emotions.” Classification of Emotions.43 (4): 988–995. 10.1109/TSMCA.2012.2216869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter, S., K.Limbrecht, S.Crawcour, V.Hrabal, and H. C.Traue. 2012. “The Individual Adaption Module (iAM): A Framework for Individualization and Calibration of Companion Technologies.” In Advances in Affective and Pleasurable Design (Advances in Human Factors and Ergonomics Series), edited by J. G.Li. Hove: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Walter, S., S.Scherer, M.Schels, M.Glodek, D.Hrabal, M.Schmidt, R.Böck, K.Limbrecht, H. C.Traue, and F.Schwenker. 2011. “Multimodal Emotion Classification in Naturalistic User Behavior.” In Conference on Human–Computer Interaction. Towards Mobile and Intelligent Interaction Environments. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, edited by J. A.Jacko, 603–611. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wilks, Y.2010. “Introducing Artificial Companions.” In Close Engagements with Artificial Companions. Key Social, Psychological, Ethical and Design Issues, edited by Y.Wilks, 35–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar