Autonomous technology – sources of confusion: a model for explanation and prediction of conceptual shifts

REFERENCES

• Bainbridge, L.1983. “Ironies of Automation.” Automatica19 (6): 775–779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balfe, N., J. R.Wilson, S.Sharples, and T.Clarke. 2012. “Development of Design Principles for Automated Systems in Transport Control.” Ergonomics55 (1): 37–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BEA (Bureau d'Enquètes et d'Analyses pour la sécurité de l'aviation civile). 2012. On the Accident on 1st June 2009 to the Airbus A330-203 Registered F-GZCP Operated by Air France, flight AF 447 Rio de Janeiro–Paris, BEA Final Report.
   Google Scholar
• Bekier, M., B. R. C.Molesworth, and A.Williamson. 2011. “Defining the Drivers for Accepting Decision Making Automation in Air Traffic Management.” Ergonomics54 (4): 347–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benbasat, I., and R. W.Zmud. 1999. “Empirical Research in Information Systems: The Practice of Relevance.” MIS Quarterly23 (1): 3–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billings, C. E.1997. Aviation Automation: The Search for a Human-Centered Approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Boulding, K. E.1956. “General Systems Theory – The Skeleton of Science.” Management Science2 (3): 197–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brehmer, B.1992. “Dynamic Decision Making: Human Control of Complex Systems.” Acta Psychologica81: 211–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brehmer, B., and R.Allard. 1991. “Real-Time Dynamic Decision Making. Effects of Task Complexity and Feedback Delays.” In Distributed Decision Making: Cognitive Models for Cooperative Work, edited by J.Rasmussen, B.Brehmer, and J.Leplat. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Checkland, P., and J.Scholes. 1999. Soft Systems Methodology in Action. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, J. Y. C., and P. I.Terrence. 2009. “Effects of Imperfect Automation and Individual Differences on Concurrent Performance of Military and Robotics Tasks in a Simulated Multitasking Environment.” Ergonomics52 (8): 907–920.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Churchman, C. W.1967. “Guest Editorial: Wicked Problems.” Management Science14 (4): B141–B142.
   Google Scholar
• Davenport, T. H., and M. L.Markus. 1999. “Rigor vs. Relevance Revisited: Response to Benbasat and Zmud.” MIS Quarterly23 (1): 19–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dourish, P.2004. “What We Talk About When We Talk About Context.” Personal and Ubiquitous Computing8 (1): 19–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, H. L.1972. What Computers Can't Do: A Critique of Artificial Reason. 1st ed.New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, H. L.1992. What Computers Still Can't Do: A Critique of Artificial Reason. 1st ed.Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, H. L., and S. E.Dreyfus. 1988. Mind Over Machine. Reprint. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Endsley, M. R., and D. B.Kaber. 1999. “Level of Automation Effects on Performance, Situation Awareness and Workload in a Dynamic Control Task.” Ergonomics42 (3): 462–492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erlandsson, M., and A.Jansson. 2007. “Collegial Verbalization – A Case Study on a New Method on Information Acquisition.” Behaviour & Information Technology26 (6): 535–543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erlandsson, M., and A.Jansson. 2013. “Verbal Reports and Domain-Specific Knowledge: A Comparison between Collegial and Retrospective Verbalisation.” Cognition, Technology & Work15 (3): 239–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funke, G., G.Matthews, J. S.Warm, and A. K.Emo. 2007. “Vehicle Automation: A Remedy for Driver Stress?” Ergonomics50 (8): 1302–1323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, B. E.2007. Cognitive Psychology: Connecting Mind, Research and Everyday Experience. New York: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, J.1999. “Emergence as a Construct: History and Issues.” Emergence1 (1): 49–72.
   Google Scholar
• Graziano, A. M., and M. L.Raulin. 2007. Research Methods, A Process of Inquiry. 6th ed.Boston: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Gunetti, P., H.Thompson, and T.Dodd. 2013. “Autonomous Mission Management for UAVs Using Soar Intelligent Agents.” International Journal of Systems Science44 (5): 831–852.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjørland, B.2009. “Concept Theory.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology60 (8): 1519–1536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoc, J.-M.2000. “From Human–Machine Interaction to Human–Machine Cooperation.” Ergonomics43 (7): 833–843.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoc, J.-M.2008. “Cognitive Ergonomics: A Multidisciplinary Venture.” Ergonomics51 (1): 71–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollnagel, E., and D. D.Woods. 2005. Joint Cognitive Systems: Foundations of Cognitive Systems Engineering. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Huppertz, G.2011. Technology Forecast (TF) for Sub-System Type C02.08, Unmanned Land/Sea/Air Vehicles, Nano Air Vehicles. Stockholm: Fraunhofer INT, commissioned by the Swedish Defence Material Administration, FMV, UNCLASSIFIED No. 11FMV2150-27.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchins, E.1995. Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jansson, A., E.Olsson, and M.Erlandsson. 2006. “Bridging the Gap between Analysis and Design: Improving Existing Driver Interfaces with Tools from the Framework of Cognitive Work Analysis.” Cognition, Technology & Work8: 41–49.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D.2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. Reprint. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, I.1785. “Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysic of Morals.” [e-text] Accessed May 6, 2013. http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/5682.
   Google Scholar
• Kavathatzopoulos, I.2010. “Robots and Systems as Autonomous Ethical Agents.” In Towards Creative Technology for the 21st Century. Presented at the 11th International Conference on Intelligent Technologies, InTech 20108, 5–9. Bangkok: Assumption University.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, G. A., J.Orasanu, R.Calderwood, and C. E.Zsambok. 1993. Decision Making in Action: Models and Methods. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Laaksoharju, M.2010. “Let Us Be Philosophers! Computerized Support for Ethical Decision Making.” IT Licentiate thesis 2010-005, Department of Information Technology, Uppsala University.
   Google Scholar
• Lanier, J.2011. You Are not a Gadget. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lintern, G.2005. “What Is a Cognitive System?” In Proceedings of the Fourteenths International Symposium on Aviation Psychology. Presented at the ISAP 2005, 398–402, Dayton, OH.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, G. A.1955. “The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two, Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information.” Psychological Review101 (2): 343–352.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, C. W.1980. “Human Autonomy and the Natural Right to be Free.” The Journal of Libertarian StudiesIV (4): 379–392.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, M.2011. Technology Forecast (TF) for Sub-System Type C02.08, Unmanned Land/Sea/Air Vehicles, Biomimetic UUV. Stockholm: Fraunhofer INT, commissioned by the Swedish Defence Material Administration, FMV, UNCLASSIFIED No. 11FMV2150-23.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, A.1980. “Physical Symbol Systems.” Cognitive Science4: 135–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, A., and H. A.Simon. 1972. Human Problem Solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J.1992. “The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations.” Organization Science3 (3): 398–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parasuraman, R.2000. “Designing Automation for Human Use: Empirical Studies and Quantitative Models.” Ergonomics43 (7): 931–951.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parasuraman, R., T. B.Sheridan, and C. D.Wickens. 2000. “A Model for Types and Levels of Human Interaction with Automation.” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans30 (3): 286–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rachels, J.2009. The Elements of Moral Philosophy. London: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, J.1974. The Human Data Processor as a System Component: Bits and Pieces of a Model. Roskilde, Denmark: Denish Atomic Energy Commission, No. M-1722.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, J.1978. Operator/Technician Errors in Calibration, Setting, and Testing Nuclear Power Plant Equipment. Roskilde, Denmark: Risö National Laboratory, Electronics Department, No. N-17-78.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, J.1979a. On the Structure of Knowledge – A Morphology of Mental Models in a Man–Machine System Context. Roskilde, Denmark: Risö National Laboratory, Electronics Department, No. M-2192.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, J.1979b. Preliminary Analysis of Human Error Cases in U.S. License Event Reports. Roskilde, Denmark: Risö National Laboratory, Electronics Department, No. N-8-79.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, J.1983. “Skills, Rules, and Knowledge; Signals, Signs, and Symbols, and Other Distinctions in Human Performance Models.” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics13 (3): 257–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, J.1986. Information Processing and Human–Machine Interaction: An Approach to Cognitive Engineering. New York: North Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, J., and A.Jensen. 1973. A Study of Mental Procedures in Electronic Trouble Shooting. Roskilde, Denmark: Danish Atomic Energy Commission, Research Establishment Risö, No. Risö-M-1582.
   Google Scholar
• Reason, J.1990. Human Error. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reason, J.2000. “Safety Paradoxes and Safety Culture.” Injury Control & Safety Promotion7 (1): 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, E. S.1996. The Necessity of Experience. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rittel, H. W., and M. M.Webber. 1973. “Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning.” Policy Sciences4: 155–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Röttger, S., K.Bali, and D.Manzey. 2009. “Impact of Automated Decision Aids on Performance, Operator Behaviour and Workload in a Simulated Supervisory Control Task.” Ergonomics52 (5): 512–523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarter, N. B., and D. D.Woods. 1995. “How in the World Did We Ever Get into That Mode? Mode Error and Awareness in Supervisory Control.” Human Factors37 (1): 5–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauer, J., C.-S.Kao, and D.Wastell. 2012. “A Comparison of Adaptive and Adaptable Automation under Different Levels of Environmental Stress.” Ergonomics55 (8): 840–853.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauer, J., C.-S.Kao, D.Wastell, and P.Nickel. 2011. “Explicit Control of Adaptive Automation under Different Levels of Environmental Stress.” Ergonomics54 (8): 755–766.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searle, J. R.1980. “Minds, Brains, and Programs.” The Behavioral and Brain Sciences3 (3): 417–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shannon, C. E., and W.Weaver. 1969. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Squire, P. N., and R.Parasuraman. 2010. “Effects of Automation and Task Load on Task Switching During Human Supervision of Multiple Semi-Autonomous Robots in a Dynamic Environment.” Ergonomics53 (8): 951–961.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanton, N. A., and M. S.Young. 1998. “Vehicle Automation and Driving Performance.” Ergonomics41 (7): 1014–1028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanton, N. A., and M. S.Young. 2005. “Driver Behaviour with Adaptive Cruise Control.” Ergonomics48 (10): 1294–1313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stensson, P.2010. “Thoughts About the Consequences of Inappropriate Application of Systems Engineering.” In Proceedings of the 7th European Systems Engineering Conference. Presented at the EuSEC 2010, Stockholm: INCOSE.
   Google Scholar
• Sterman, J. D.2002. “All Models Are Wrong: Reflections on Becoming a Systems Scientist.” System Dynamics Review18 (4): 501–531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suchman, L. A.1987. Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human–Machine Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sullins, J. P.2002. “The Ambiguous Ethical Status of Autonomous Robots.” [online]. Accessed 23 May, 2009. https://www.aaai.org/Papers/Symposia/Fall/2005/FS-05-06/FS05-06-019.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Taleb, N. N.2010. The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable. 2nd ed.New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, G.2011. “Wake-Up Call; The Lessons of AF447 and Other Recent High-Automation Aircraft Incidents Have Wide Training Implications.” Air Transport World, October 5: 39–43.
   Google Scholar
• Turing, A. M.1950. “Computing Machinery and Intelligence.” Mind59 (236): 443–460.
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., and D.Kahneman. 1974. “Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.” Science185: 1124–1131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., and D.Kahneman. 1981. “The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice.” Science211: 453–458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vicente, K. J.1999. Cognitive Work Analysis: Toward Safe, Productive, and Healthy Computer-Based Work. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Waraich, Q. R. (‘Raza'), T. A.Mazzuchi, S.Sarkani, and D. F.Rico. 2013. “Minimizing Human Factors Mishaps in Unmanned Aircraft Systems.” Ergonomics in Design: The Quarterly of Human Factors Applications21 (1): 25–32.
   Google Scholar
• Weaver, W.1948. “Science and Complexity.” American Scientist36: 536–544.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Woods, D. D., and E.Hollnagel. 2006. Joint Cognitive Systems: Patterns in Cognitive Systems. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Young, M. S., and N. A.Stanton. 2007a. “What's Skill Got to Do with It? Vehicle Automation and Driver Mental Workload.” Ergonomics50 (8): 1324–1339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, M. S., and N. A.Stanton. 2007b. “Back to the Future: Brake Reaction Times for Manual and Automated Vehicles.” Ergonomics50 (1): 46–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar