Towards cooperative guidance and control of highly automated vehicles: H-Mode and Conduct-by-Wire

REFERENCES

• Altendorf, E.2012. “Entwicklung und Implementierung eines Interaktions- und Automationsbaukastens für hochautomatisierte Fahrzeuge.” Diplom Thesis, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Bernotat, R.1970. “Anthropotechnik in der Fahrzeugführung.” Ergonomics13 (3): 353–377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biester, L.2008. “Cooperative Automation in Automobiles.” PhD diss., Humboldt-University zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Billings, C. E.1997. Aviation Automation: The Search for a Human-Centred Approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Donges, E.1982. “Aspekte der Aktiven Sicherheit bei der Führung von Personenkraftwagen.” Automobil-Industrie27 (2): 183–190.
   Google Scholar
• Donges, E.2012. “Fahrerverhaltensmodelle.” In Handbuch Fahrerassistenzsysteme – Grundlagen, Komponenten und Systeme für aktive Sicherheit und Komfort, edited by H.Winner, S.Hakuli, and G.Wolf, 15–23. Wiesbaden, Germany: Vieweg+Teubner.
   Google Scholar
• Endsley, M. R., and E. O.Kiris. 1995. “The Out-Of-The-Loop Performance Problem and Level of Control in Automation.” Human Factors37 (2): 381–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flemisch, F., C. A.Adams, S. R.Conway, K. H.Goodrich, M. T.Palmer, and P. C.Schutte. 2003. The H-Metaphor as a Guideline for Vehicle Automation and Interaction. Langley, VA: NASA. Technical Memorandum: NASA/TM-2003-212672.
   Google Scholar
• Flemisch, F., M.Heesen, T.Hesse, J.Kelsch, A.Schieben, and J.Beller. 2011. “Towards a Dynamic Balance Between Humans and Automation: Authority, Ability, Responsibility and Control in Shared and Cooperative Control Situations.” International Journal of Cognition, Technology and Work – Special Issue on Human-Automation Coagency14 (1): 3–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flemisch, F., M.Heesen, J. Kelsch, J.Schindler, C.Preusche, and J.Dittrich. 2010. “Shared and Cooperative Movement Control of Intelligent Technical Systems: Sketch of the Design Space of Haptic-Multimodal Coupling Between Operator, Co-Automation, Base System and Environment.” Paper presented at the 11th IFAC/IFIP/IFORS/IEA Symposium on Analysis, Design, and Evaluation of Human-Machine Systems, Valenciennes, France, August 31–September 3.
   Google Scholar
• Flemisch, F., J.Kelsch, C.Löper, A.Schieben, and J.Schindler. 2008a. “Automation Spectrum, Inner/Outer Compatibility and Other Potentially Useful Human Factors Concepts for Assistance and Automation.” In Human Factors for Assistance and Automation, edited by D.de Waard, F.Flemisch, B.Lorenz, H.Oberheid, and K.Brookhuis, 1–16. Maastricht: Shaker.
   Google Scholar
• Flemisch, F., J. Kelsch, C. Löper, A. Schieben, J. Schindler, and M. Heesen. 2008b. “Cooperative Control and Active Interfaces for Vehicle Assistance and Automation.” Paper presented at FISITA World Automotive Congress, Munich, Germany, September 14–19.
   Google Scholar
• Flemisch, F., M. Heesen, J. Kelsch, J. Schindler, C. Preusche, and J. Dittrich. 2010. “Shared and Cooperative Movement Control of Intelligent Technical Systems: Sketch of the Design Space of Haptic-Multimodal Coupling Between Operator, Co-Automation, Base System and Environment.” Paper presented at the 11th IFAC/IFIP/IFORS/IEA Symposium on Analysis, Design, and Evaluation of Human-Machine Systems, Valenciennes, France, August 31–September 3.
   Google Scholar
• Flemisch, F., J. Kelsch, A. Schieben, and J. Schindler. 2006. “Stücke des Puzzles hochautomatisiertes Fahren: H-Metapher und H-Mode.” Paper presented at the 4. Workshop Fahrerassistenzsysteme, Löwenstein, Germany, October 4–6.
   Google Scholar
• Flemisch, F., J. Kelsch, A. Schieben, J. Schindler, C. Löper, and J.2007. “Prospective Engineering of Vehicle Automation with Design Metaphors: Intermediate Report from the H-Mode Projects.” Paper presented at the 7th Symposium on Human Machine Systems, Berlin, Germany, October 10–12.
   Google Scholar
• Flemisch, F., S. Meier, M. Baltzer, E. Altendorf, M. Heesen, S. Griesche, T. Weißgerber, M. Kienle, and D. Damböck. 2012. “Fortschrittliches Anzeige- und Interaktionssystem für die kooperative Führung hochautomatisierter Fahrzeuge: Ausgewählte Ergebnisse mit H-Mode 2D 1.0.” Paper presented at the 54. Fachausschusssitzung Anthropotechnik, Koblenz, Germany, October 30–31.
   Google Scholar
• Flemisch, F. O., and R. Onken. 1998. “The Cognitive Assistant System and its Contribution to Effective Man/Machine Interaction.” Paper presented at the RTO SCI Symposium, Monterey, CA, April 20–22.
   Google Scholar
• Flemisch, F., and A.Schieben, eds. 2010. Highly Automated Vehicles for Intelligent Transport: Validation of Preliminary Design of HAVEit Systems by Simulator Tests. Brussels: EU-Commission. Public Deliverable D33.3.
   Google Scholar
• Flemisch, F., J.Schindler, J.Kelsch, A.Schieben, and D.Dambo¨ck.2008. “Some Bridging Methods Towards a Balanced Design of Human-Machine Systems, Applied to Highly Automated Vehicles.” Paper presented at Applied Ergonomics International Conference, Las Vegas, NV, July 14–17.
   Google Scholar
• Flemisch, F. O., J. Schomerus, J. Kelsch, and U. Schmuntzsch. 2005. “Vom Fahrer zum Reiter? Zwischenbericht 2005 auf dem Weg von der H-Metapher zum H-Mode fu¨r Bodenfahrzeuge.” In Fahrer im 21. Jahrhundert, VDI-Berichte, Vol. 1919, 63–74. Duesseldorf: VDI.
   Google Scholar
• Franz, B., M.Kauer, A.Blanke, M.Schreiber, R.Bruder, and S.Geyer. 2012a. “Comparison of Two Human-Machine-Interfaces for Cooperative Maneuver-Based Driving.” Work: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment and Rehabilitation41 (1): 4192–4199.
   Google Scholar
• Franz, B., M.Kauer, R.Bruder, and S.Geyer. 2012b. “pieDrive – A New Driver-Vehicle Interaction Concept for Maneuver-Based Driving.” In Proceedings of the 2012 International IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium Workshops (W2: Workshop on Human Factors in Intelligent Vehicles), edited by R.Toledo-Moreo, L. M.Bergasa, and M. Á.Sotelo.
   Google Scholar
• Franz, B., M. Kauer, M. Schreiber, A. Blanke, S. Distler, R. Bruder, and S. Geyer. 2011. “Maneuver-Based Driving Today and in the Future – Development of a New Human-Machine Interface for Conduct-by-Wire.” Paper presented at the 6. VDI Tagung – Der Fahrer im 21. Jahrhundert, Braunschweig, Germany, November 8–9.
   Google Scholar
• Geyer, S., S. Hakuli, H. Winner, B. Franz, and M. Kauer. 2011. “Development of a Cooperative System Behavior for a Highly Automated Vehicle Guidance Concept Based on the Conduct-by-Wire Principle.” Paper presented at the 2011 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, Baden-Baden, Germany, June 5–92011.
   Google Scholar
• Geyer, S., S. Hakuli, H. Winner, B. Franz, and M. Kauer. 2012. “Ermittlung der Anforderungen an die Umfelderkennung für Conduct-by-Wire.” Paper presented at the 5. Tagung Fahrerassistenz, Munich, Germany, May 15–16.
   Google Scholar
• Gottschalk-Mazouz, N.2007. “Was ist Wissen? Überlegungen zu einem Komplexbegriff.” In Wissen in Bewegung, edited by S.Ammon, C.Heineke, and K.Selbmann, 21–40. Weilerswist: Velbrück.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths, P., and R. B.Gillespie. 2005. “Sharing Control Between Human and Automation Using Haptic Interface: Primary and Secondary Task Performance Benefits.” Human Factors47 (3): 574–590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakuli, S., R.Bruder, F.Flemisch, C.Löper, H.Rausch, M.Schreiber, and H.Winner. 2009. “Kooperative Automation.” In Handbuch Fahrerassistenzsysteme, edited by H.Winner, S.Hakuli, and G.Wolf, 641–650. Wiesbaden: Vieweg+Teubner.
   Google Scholar
• Hakuli, S., M. Kluin, S. Geyer, and H. Winner. 2010. “Development and Validation of Maneuver-Based Driver Assistance Functions for Conduct-by-Wire with IPG CarMaker.” Paper presented at the FISITA 2010 World Automotive Congress, Budapest, Hungary, May 30–June 4.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, P. A.2013. “Task Partitioning Effects in Semi-Automated Human-Machine System Performance.” Ergonomics56 (9): 1387–1399.
   Google Scholar
• Heesen, M., J. Kelsch, C. Löper, and F. Flemisch. 2010. “Haptisch-multimodale Interaktion für hochautomatisierte, kooperative Fahrzeugführung bei Fahrstreifenwechsel-, Brems- und Ausweichmanövern.” Paper presented at the 11. Braunschweiger Symposium Automatisierungs-, Assistenzsysteme und eingebettete Systeme für Transportmittel (AAET), Braunschweig, Germany, February 10–11.
   Google Scholar
• Hoc, J. M.2000. “From Human - Machine Interaction to Human – Machine Cooperation.” Ergonomics43 (7): 833–843.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoc, J. M.2001. “Towards a Cognitive Approach to Human-Machine Cooperation in Dynamic Situations.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies54: 509–540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoc, J. M., F.Mars, I.Milleville-Pennel, E.Jolly, M.Netto, and J. M.Blosseville. 2006. “Evaluation of Human-Machine Cooperation Modes in Car Driving for Safe Lateral Control in Bends: Function Delegation and Mutual Control Modes.” Le Travail Humain69: 153–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoeger, R., A. Amditis, M. Kunert, A. Hoess, F. Flemisch, H.-P. Krueger, A. Bartels, A. Beutner, and K. Pagle. 2008. “Highly Automated Vehicles for Intelligent Transport: HAVEit Approach.” Paper presented at the 15th World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems, New York, October 17–20.
   Google Scholar
• Hollnagel, E., and D. D.Woods. 1983. “Cognitive Systems Engineering: New Wine in New Bottles.” International Journal of Man-Machine Studies18: 583–600.
   Google Scholar
• Holzmann, F.2007. Adaptive Cooperation Between Driver and Assistant System. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Inagaki, T.2008. “Smart Collaboration Between Humans and Machines Based on Mutual Understanding.” Annual Reviews in Control32: 253–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISO/DIS 11270. Forthcoming. “Intelligent Transport Systems – Lane Keeping Assistance Systems (LKAS) – Performance Requirements and Test Procedures.” International Organization for Standardization. Accessed June 19. http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber = 50347.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 15622. 2010. “Intelligent Transport Systems – Adaptive Cruise Control Systems – Performance Requirements and Test Procedures.” International Organization for Standardization. Accessed June 19. http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber = 50024.
   Google Scholar
• Kauer, M., M. Schreiber, and R. Bruder. 2010. “How to Conduct a Car? A Design Example for Maneuver Based Driver-Vehicle Interaction.” Paper presented at the IEEE Intelligent Vehicle Symposium, San Diego, CA, June 21–24.
   Google Scholar
• Kienle, M., D. Damböck, J. Kelsch, F. Flemisch, and K. Bengler. 2009. “Towards an H-Mode for Highly Automated Vehicles: Driving with Side Sticks.” Paper presented at the 1st International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Essen, Germany, September 21–22.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenz, S., H. Bubb, and F. Flemisch. 2011. Personal communication.
   Google Scholar
• Löper, C., and F.Flemisch. 2009. “Ein Baustein für hochautomatisiertes Fahren: Kooperative, manöverbasierte Automation in den Projekten H-Mode und HAVEit.” In 6.Workshop Fahrerassistenzsysteme, edited by C.Stiller, and M.Maurer, 136–146. Karlsruhe: Freundeskreis Mess- und Regelungstechnik Karlsruhe e.V.
   Google Scholar
• Löper, C., J.Kelsch, and F. O.Flemisch. 2008. “Kooperative, manöverbasierte Automation und Arbitrierung als Bausteine für hochautomatisiertes Fahren.” In Automatisierungs-, Assistenzsysteme und eingebette Systeme für Transportmittel, edited by Gesamtzentrumfür Verkehr Braunschweig. Braunschweig: Gesamtzentrum für Verkehr Braunschweig.
   Google Scholar
• Meier, S., and F. Flemisch. 2013. “Wege zu einer kooperativen Fahrzeugführung: Ausgewählte Ergebnisse einer explorativen Nutzerstudie.” IAW-Spectrum07–13: 6–7.
   Google Scholar
• Merat, N., and H.Jamson. 2009. “How do Drivers Behave in a Highly Automated Car.” In Proceedings of the Fifth International Driving Symposium on Human Factor in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design, June 22–25, edited byT.Lopes, 514–521. Iowa City, IA: The University of Iowa.
   Google Scholar
• Merat, N., A. H.Jamson, F. C.Lai, and O.Carsten. 2012. “Highly Automated Driving, Secondary Task Performance, and Driver State.” Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society54 (5): 762–771.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulder, M., D. A.Abbink, and E. R.Boer. 2012. “Sharing Control with Haptics – Seamless Driver Support from Manual to Automatic Control.” Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society54 (5): 786–789.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onken, R.1999. “The Cognitive Cockpit Assistant Systems CASSY/CAMA.” Paper presented at the World Aviation Conference, San Francisco, CA, October 19–21.
   Google Scholar
• Oxford Dictionaries. 2013a. “Control.” Accessed June 19. http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/control.
   Google Scholar
• Oxford Dictionaries. 2013b. “Cooperation.” Accessed June 19. http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/cooperation.
   Google Scholar
• Oxford Dictionaries. 2013c. “Manoeuvre.” Accessed June 19. http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/manoeuvre?q = maneuver.
   Google Scholar
• Oxford Dictionaries. 2013d. “Trajectory.” Accessed June 19. http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/trajectory.
   Google Scholar
• Pacaux-Lemoine, M.-P., and S.Debernard. 2007. “Common Work Space or How to Support Cooperative Activities Between Human Operators: Application to Fighter Aircraft Engineering.” In Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics, edited by D.Harris, 796–805. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Parasuraman, R., T. B.Sheridan, and C. D.Wickens. 2000. “A Model for Types and Levels of Human Interaction with Automation.” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics – Part A: Systems and Humans30 (3): 286–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petermann, I., and B. Schlag. 2009. “Auswirkungen der Synthese von Assistenz und. Automation auf das Fahrer-Fahrzeug System.” Paper presented at the 11. Braunschweiger Symposium Automatisierungs–, Assistenzsysteme und eingebettete Systeme für Transportmittel (AAET), Braunschweig, Germany, February 10–11.
   Google Scholar
• PReVENT. 2009. “Response 3 – Code of Practice for the Design and Evaluation of ADAS.” Accessed June 19. http://www.acea.be/images/uploads/files/20090831_Code_of_Practice_ADAS.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, J.1983. “Skills, Rules, and Knowledge; Signals, Signs, and Symbols, and Other Distinctions in Human Performance Models.” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, Cybernetics13 (3): 257–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauch,N., A.Kaussner, H.-P.Krueger, S.Boverie, and F. O.Flemisch. 2010. “Measures and Countermeasures for Impaired Driver's State Within Highly Automated Driving.” Paper presented at the Transport Research Arena 2010, Brussels, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Schieben, A., M. Heesen, J. Schindler, J. Kelsch, and F. Flemisch. 2009. “The Theater-System Technique: Agile Designing and Testing of System Behavior and Interaction, Applied to Highly Automated Vehicles.” Paper presented at the 1st International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Essen, Germany, September 21–22.
   Google Scholar
• Schreiber, M., M. Kauer, and R. Bruder. 2009. “Conduct by Wire – Maneuver Catalog for Semi-Autonomous Vehicle Guidance.” Paper presented at the IEEE Intelligent Vehicle Symposium, Xi'an, China, June 3–5.
   Google Scholar
• Schreiber, M., M. Kauer, D. Schlesinger, S. Hakuli, and R. Bruder. 2010. “Verification of a Maneuver Catalog for a Maneuver-based Vehicle Guidance System.” Paper presented at the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Istanbul, Turkey, October 10–13.
   Google Scholar
• Sheridan, T. B.1970. “On How Often the Supervisor Should Sample.” IEEE Trans. Systems Science and Cybernetics6 (2): 140–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheridan, T. B.1976. “Toward a General Model of Supervisory Control.” In Monitoring Behaviour and Supervisory Control, edited by T. B.Sheridan, and G.Johannsen, 271–281. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sheridan, T. B.1988. “Task Analysis, Task Allocation and Supervisory Control.” In Handbook of Human Computer Interaction, edited by M.Helander, T. K.Landauer, and P. V.Prabhu, Chapter 5, 87–104. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• Sheridan, T. B.2002. Humans and Automation: System Design and Research Issues. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
   Google Scholar
• Sheridan, T. B., and R.Parasuraman. 2006. “Human-Automation Interaction.” In Reviews of Human Factors and Ergonomics, edited by R. S.Nickerson, 89–129. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
   Google Scholar
• Stanton, N., and M.Young. 1998. “Is Utility in the Mind of the Beholder? A Study of Ergonomics Methods.” Applied Ergonomics29 (1): 41–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swartz, D.1997. Culture and Power: The Sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar