Effects of anomalous characters and small stroke omissions on eye movements during the reading of Chinese sentences

References

• Chan, A. H. S., and A. W. Y.Ng. 2012. “Effects of Display Factors on Chinese Proofreading Performance and Preferences.” Ergonomics55 (11): 1316–1330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinese Lexicon. 2003 [CD-ROM] Produced by State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Technology and Systems, Tsinghua University and Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Retrieved from Chinese Linguistic Data Consortium. http://www.chineseldc.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Engbert, R., A.Longtin, and R.Kliegl. 2002. “A Dynamical Model of Saccade Generation in Reading Based on Spatially Distributed Lexical Processing.” Vision Research42 (5): 621–636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geng, L.2010. “The Research of Network Typos from the Perspective of Pinyin Input Method.” Master thesis, Shanghai Normal University.
   Google Scholar
• Hatta, T., A.Kawakami, and K.Tamaoka. 2002. “Errors in Writing Japanese Kanji: A Comparison of Japanese Schoolchildren, Colleage Students and Second-Language Learners of Japanese.” Asia Pacific Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing7: 157–166.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, J. M., and F.Ferreira. 1990. “Effects of Foveal Processing Difficulty on the Perceptual Span in Reading: Implications for Attention and Eye Movement Control.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition16 (3): 417–429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoosain, R.1992. “Psychological Reality of the Word in Chinese.” In Language Processing in Chinese, edited by H. C.Chen and O. J. L.Tzeng, 111–130. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Kaakinen, J. K., and J.Hyönä. 2010. “Task Effects on Eye Movements during Reading.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition36 (6): 1561–1566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennison, S. M., and C.Clifton. 1995. “Determinants of Parafoveal Preview Benefit in High and Low Working Memory Capacity Readers: Implications for Eye Movement Control.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition21 (1): 68–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kliegl, R., A.Nuthmann, and R.Engbert. 2006. “Tracking the Mind during Reading: The Influence of Past, Present, and Future Words on Fixation Durations.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General135 (1): 12–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X., K.Bicknell, P.Liu, W.Wei, and K.Rayner. 2014. “Reading Is Fundamentally Similar across Disparate Writing Systems: A Systematic Characterization of How Words and Characters Influence Eye Movements in Chinese Reading.” Journal of Experiment Psychology: General143 (2): 895–913.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X., P.Liu, and K.Rayner. 2011. “Eye Movement Guidance in Chinese Reading: Is There a Preferred Viewing Location?” Vision Research51: 1146–1156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X., K.Rayner, and K. R.Cave. 2009. “On the Segmentation of Chinese Words during Reading.” Cognitive Psychology58: 525–552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, P., W.Li, N.Lin, and X.Li. 2013. “Do Chinese Readers Follow the National Standard Rules for Word Segmentation during Reading?” PLoS One8 (2): e55440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan, F. A.1999. “Errors in Copy Typewriting.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance25 (6): 1760–1773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, S. A., R. H. S.Carpenter, and R. C.Shillcock. 2005. “An Anatomically Constrained, Stochastic Model of Eye Movement Control in Reading.” Psychological Review112 (4): 814–840.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perea, M., and J.Acha. 2009. “Space Information Is Important for Reading.” Vision Research49 (15): 1994–2000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A., Y.Liu, and L. H.Tan. 2005. “The Lexical Constituency Model: Some Implications of Research on Chinese for General Theories of Reading.” Psychological Review112 (1): 43–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollatsek, A., E. D.Reichle, and K.Rayner. 2006. “Tests of the E-Z Reader Model: Exploring the Interface between Cognition and Eye-Movement Control.” Cognitive Psychology52 (1): 1–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pynte, J., A.Kennedy, and S.Ducrot. 2004. “The Influence of Parafoveal Typographical Errors on Eye Movements in Reading.” European Journal of Cognitive Psychology16 (1–2): 178–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K.1979. “Eye Guidance in Reading: Fixation Locations within Words.” Perception8: 21–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K.1998. “Eye Movements in Reading and Information Processing: 20 Years of Research.” Psychological Bulletin124 (3): 372–422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K.2009. “Eye Movements and Attention in Reading, Scene Perception, and Visual Search.” The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology62 (8): 1457–1506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., X.Li, B. J.Juhasz, and G.Yan. 2005. “The Effect of Word Predictability on the Eye Movements of Chinese Readers.” Psychonomic Bulletin and Review12 (6): 1089–1093.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., X.Li, and A.Pollatsek. 2007. “Extending the E-Z Reader Model of Eye Movement Control to Chinese Readers.” Cognitive Science31: 1021–1033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., T.Warren, B. J.Juhasz, and S. P.Liversedge. 2004. “The Effect of Plausibility on Eye Movements in Reading.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition30 (6): 1290–1301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichle, E. D., A.Pollatsek, D. L.Fisher, and K.Rayner. 1998. “Toward a Model of Eye Movement Control in Reading.” Psychological Review105 (1): 125–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichle, E. D., K.Rayner, and A.Pollatsek. 2003. “The E-Z Reader Model of Eye-Movement Control in Reading: Comparisons to Other Models.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences26: 445–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichle, E. D., T.Warren, and K.McConnell. 2009. “Using E-Z Reader to Model Effects of Higher-Level Language Processing on Eye Movements during Reading.” Psychonomic Bulletin and Review16 (1): 1–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reilly, R., and R.Radach. 2006. “Some Empirical Tests of an Interactive Activation Model of Eye Movement Control in Reading.” Cognitive Systems Research7 (1): 34–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter, E. M., R.Engbert, and R.Kliegl. 2006. “Current Advances in SWIFT.” Cognitive Systems Research7 (1): 23–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schotter, E. R., K.Bicknell, I.Howard, R.Levy, and K.Rayner. 2014. “Task Effects Reveal Cognitive Flexibility Responding to Frequency and Predictability: Evidence from Eye Movements in Reading and Proofreading.” Cognition131 (1): 1–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shu, H., W.Zhou, M.Yan, and R.Kliegl. 2011. “Font Size Modulates Saccade-Target Selection in Chinese Reading.” Attention, Perception & Psychophysics73: 482–490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, J. L., and G. W.McConkie. 2003. “Where Do Chinese Readers Send Their Eyes?” In The Mind's Eye: Cognitive and Applied Aspects of Eye Movement Research, edited by J.Hyona, R.Radach, and H.Deubel, 159–176. Oxford: Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• Wei, W., X.Li, and A.Pollatsek. 2013. “Word Properties of a Fixated Region Affect Outgoing Saccade Length in Chinese Reading.” Vision Research80: 1–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, S. J., and S. P.Liversedge. 2006. “Foveal Processing Difficulty Does Not Modulate Non-Foveal Orthographic Influences on Fixation Positions.” Vision Research46 (3): 426–437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, G., X.Bai, C.Zang, Q.Bian, L.Cui, W.Qi, K.Rayner, and S. P.Liversedge. 2012. “Using Stroke Removal to Investigate Chinese Character Identification during Reading: Evidence from Eye Movements.” Reading and Writing25 (5): 951–979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, M., R.Kliegl, E. M.Richter, A.Nuthmann, and H.Shu. 2010. “Flexible Saccade-Target Selection in Chinese Reading.” The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology63 (4): 705–725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, G., H.Tian, X.Bai, and K.Rayner. 2006. “The Effect of Word and Character Frequency on the Eye Movements of Chinese Readers.” British Journal of Psychology97: 259–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, H., and G. W.McConkie. 1999. “Reading Chinese: Some Basic Eye-Movement Characteristics.” In Reading Chinese Script, edited by J.Wang, A. W.Inhoff, and H.Chen, 207–222. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, J., A.Staub, N.Li, S. P.Wang, and K.Rayner. 2012. “Plausibility Effects When Reading One- and Two-Character Words in Chinese: Evidence from Eye Movements.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition38 (6): 1801–1809.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zang, C., F.Liang, X.Bai, G.Yan, and S. P.Liversedge. 2013. “Interword Spacing and Landing Position Effects during Chinese Reading in Children and Adults.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance39 (3): 720–734.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zola, D.1984. “Redundancy and Word Perception during Reading.” Perception & Psychophysics36 (3): 277–284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar