Agency modulates interactions with automation technologies

References

• Aarts, Henk, Ruud Custers, and Daniel M. Wegner. 2005. “On the Inference of Personal Authorship: Enhancing Experienced Agency by Priming Effect Information.” Consciousness and Cognition 14 (3): 439–458. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2004.11.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adler, Rachel F., and Raquel Benbunan-Fich. 2012. “Juggling on a High Wire: Multitasking Effects on Performance.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 70 (2): 156–168. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2011.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Annett, John. 2002. “Subjective Rating Scales: Science or Art?” Ergonomics 45 (14): 966–987. doi:10.1080/00140130210166951.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, Albert. 1999. “A Social Cognitive Theory of Personality.” In Handbook of Personality, edited by L. Pervin and O. John, 154–196. New York: Guilford Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, Albert, Claudio Barbaranelli, Gian Vittorio Caprara, and Concetta Pastorelli. 1996. “Mechanisms of Moral Disengagement in the Exercise of Moral Agency.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71 (2): 364.10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banks, Victoria A., Neville A. Stanton, and Catherine Harvey. 2013. “What the Crash Dummies Don’t Tell You: The Interaction between Driver and Automation in Emergency Situations.” In 16th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC 2013), 2280–2285. doi:10.1109/ITSC.2013.6728567.
   Google Scholar
• Banks, Victoria A., Neville A. Stanton, and Catherine Harvey. 2014. “Sub-Systems on the Road to Vehicle Automation: Hands and Feet Free but Not ‘Mind’free Driving.” Safety Science 62: 505–514.10.1016/j.ssci.2013.10.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, Sheldon. 1988. “Pilot Control.” In Human Factors in Aviation, edited by E. L. Wiener and D. C. Nagel, 347–386. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, Gordon, Denis Besnard, and Dominic Riley. 2007. “Cognitive Mismatches in the Cockpit: Will They Ever Be a Thing of the past?” Applied Ergonomics 38 (4): 417–423. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2007.01.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BEA. 2012. Final Report on the Accident on 1st June 2009 to the Airbus A330-203 registered F-GZCP operated by Air France flight AF 447 Rio de Janeiro – Paris. Paris: Bureau D’Enquêtes et d’Analyses pour la securite de l’aviation civile, made available to the public on www.bea.aero.
   Google Scholar
• Bednark, Jeffery G., and Elizabeth A. Franz. 2014. “Agency Attribution: Event-Related Potentials and Outcome Monitoring.” Experimental Brain Research 232 (4): 1117–1126.10.1007/s00221-014-3821-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berberian, Bruno, Jean-Christophe Sarrazin, Patrick Le Blaye, and Patrick Haggard. 2012. “Automation Technology and Sense of Control: A Window on Human Agency.” PLoS One 7 (3): doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0034075.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berberian, Bruno, Patrick Le Blaye, Christian Schulte, Nawfel Kinani, and Pern Ren Sim. 2013. “Data Transmission Latency and Sense of Control.” In Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. Understanding Human Cognition, edited by Don Harris, 3–12. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 8019. Berlin: Springer. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-39360-0_1. 10.1007/978-3-642-39360-0
   Google Scholar
• Borg, Jana Schaich, Catherine Hynes, John Van Horn, Scott Grafton, and Walter Sinnott-Armstrong. 2006. “Consequences, Action, and Intention as Factors in Moral Judgments: An FMRI Investigation.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 18 (5): 803–817.10.1162/jocn.2006.18.5.803
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bratman, Michael E. 2007. Structures of Agency: Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195187717.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Caspar, Emilie A., Julia F. Christensen, Axel Cleeremans, and Patrick Haggard. 2016. “Coercion Changes the Sense of Agency in the Human Brain.” Current Biology. 26 (5): 585–592. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2015.12.067.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caspar, Emilie A., Laurène Vuillaume, Pedro A. Magalhães De Saldanha da Gama, and Axel Cleeremans. 2017. “The Influence of (Dis)Belief in Free Will on Immoral Behavior.” Frontiers in Psychology 8: doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambon, Valerian, and Patrick Haggard. 2012. “Sense of Control Depends on Fluency of Action Selection, Not Motor Performance.” Cognition 125 (3): 441–451. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.07.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christoffersen, Klaus, and David D. Woods. 2002. “1. How to Make Automated Systems Team Players.” In Advances in Human Performance and Cognitive Engineering Research, 2:1–12. Advances in Human Performance and Cognitive Engineering Research 2. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Comstock, J. Raymond, and Ruth J. Arnegard. 1992. The Multi-Attribute Task Battery for Human Operator Workload and Strategic Behavior Research. Hampton: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Langley Research Center. http://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19920007912
   Google Scholar
• Coyle, David, James Moore, Per Ola Kristensson, Paul Fletcher, and Alan Blackwell. 2012. “I Did That! Measuring Users’ Experience of Agency in Their Own Actions.” In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2025–2034. CHI ‘12. New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/2207676.2208350.
   Google Scholar
• Dekker, Sidney W. A., and David. D. Woods. 2002. “MABA-MABA or Abracadabra? Progress on Human-Automation Co-Ordination.” Cognition, Technology & Work 4 (4): 240–244. doi:10.1007/s101110200022.
   Google Scholar
• Deroo, Mathieu, Jean-Michel Hoc, and Franck Mars. 2012. “Influence of Risk Expectation on Haptically Cued Corrective Manoeuvres During near Lane Departure.” Ergonomics 55 (4): 465–475. doi:10.1080/00140139.2011.647094.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desmond, Paula A., and Thomas W. Hoyes. 1996. “Workload Variation, Intrinsic Risk and Utility in a Simulated Air Traffic Control Task: Evidence for Compensatory Effects.” Safety Science 22 (1–3): 87–101. doi:10.1016/0925-7535(96)00008-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutch Safety Board. 2010. Crashed during Approach, Boeing 737–800, near Amsterdam Schiphol Airport, 25 February 2009. The Hague: Dutch Safety Board, made available to the public on www.safetyboard.nl.
   Google Scholar
• Efron, Bradley, and Robert J. Tibshirani. 1993. An Introduction to the Bootstrap. New York: Chapman & Hall.10.1007/978-1-4899-4541-9
   Google Scholar
• Eitam, Baruch, Patrick M. Kennedy, and E. Tory Higgins. 2013. “Motivation from Control.” Experimental Brain Research 229 (3): 475–484. doi:10.1007/s00221-012-3370-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ENDSLEY, Mica R. 1999. “Level of Automation Effects on Performance, Situation Awareness and Workload in a Dynamic Control Task.” Ergonomics 42 (3): 462–492.10.1080/001401399185595
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, Alexander, and Neville A. Stanton. 2016. “The Chatty Co-Driver: A Linguistics Approach to Human-Automation-Interaction.” In Contemporary Ergonomics and Human Factors 2016: Proceedings of the International Conference on Ergonomics & Human Factors.
   Google Scholar
• Farrer, Chlöé, Nicolas Franck, Nicolas Georgieff, D. Chris, Jean Decety Frith, and Marc Jeannerod. 2003. “Modulating the Experience of Agency: A Positron Emission Tomography Study.” NeuroImage 18 (2): 324–333. doi:10.1016/S1053-8119(02)00041-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitts, Paul M., Richard E. Jones, and John L. Milton. 1950. “Eye Movements of Aircraft Pilots during Instrument-Landing Approaches.” Aeronautical Engineering Review 9 (2): 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Flemisch, Frank, Matthias Heesen, Tobias Hesse, Johann Kelsch, Anna Schieben, and Johannes Beller. 2011. “Towards a Dynamic Balance between Humans and Automation: Authority, Ability, Responsibility and Control in Shared and Cooperative Control Situations.” Cognition, Technology & Work 14 (1): 3–18. doi:10.1007/s10111-011-0191-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franck, Nicolas, Chlöé Farrer, Nicolas Georgieff, Michel Marie-Cardine, Jean Daléry, Thierry d’Amato, and Marc Jeannerod. 2001. “Defective Recognition of One’s Own Actions in Patients with Schizophrenia.” American Journal of Psychiatry 158 (3): 454–459. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.158.3.454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frith, Chris D. 2014. “Action, Agency and Responsibility.” Neuropsychologia 55: 137–142. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.09.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frith, Chris D., Sarah-Jayne Blakemore, and Daniel M. Wolpert. 2000. “Explaining the Symptoms of Schizophrenia: Abnormalities in the Awareness of Action.” Brain Research Reviews 31 (2): 357–363.10.1016/S0165-0173(99)00052-1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ghazizadeh, Mahtab, John D. Lee, and Linda Ng Boyle. 2011. “Extending the Technology Acceptance Model to Assess Automation.” Cognition, Technology & Work 14 (1): 39–49. doi:10.1007/s10111-011-0194-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gold, Christian, Daniel Damböck, Lutz Lorenz, and Klaus Bengler. 2013. “‘Take over!’ How Long Does It Take to Get the Driver Back into the Loop?” In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 57th Annual Meeting. Santa Monica: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.doi:10.1177/1541931213571433
   Google Scholar
• Haggard, Patrick. 2017. “Sense of Agency in the Human Brain.” Nature Reviews Neuroscience 18 (4): 196–207. doi:10.1038/nrn.2017.14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, Peter A. 2014. “Automation: How Much is Too Much?” Ergonomics 57 (3): 449–454. doi:10.1080/00140139.2013.816375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, Peter A., and Willem B. Verwey. 1997. “Fatigue, Workload and Adaptive Driver Systems.” Accident Analysis & Prevention 29 (4): 495–506. doi:10.1016/S0001-4575(97)00029-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HOC, Jean-Michel. 2001. “Towards a Cognitive Approach to Human–Machine Cooperation in Dynamic Situations.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 54 (4): 509–540. doi:10.1006/ijhc.2000.0454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoc, Jean-Michel, Mark S. Young, and Jean-Marc Blosseville. 2009. “Cooperation between Drivers and Automation: Implications for Safety.” Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 10 (2): 135–160. doi:10.1080/14639220802368856.
   Google Scholar
• Horberry, Tim, Alan Stevens, and Michael A. Regan. 2014. Driver Acceptance of New Technology: Theory. Measurement and Optimisation: Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchins, Edwin. 1995. “How a Cockpit Remembers Its Speeds.” Cognitive Science 19 (3): 265–288.10.1207/s15516709cog1903_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacob, Robert J., and Keith S. Karn. 2003. “Eye Tracking in Human-Computer Interaction and Usability Research: Ready to Deliver the Promises.” In The Mind’s Eye: Cognitive and Applied Aspects of Eye Movement Research, edited by J. Hyönä, R. Radach and H. Deubel, 573–605. Amsterdam: Elsevier.10.1016/B978-044451020-4/50031-1
   Google Scholar
• Kitchin, Joanne, and Chris Baber. 2016. “A Comparison of Shared and Distributed Situation Awareness in Teams through the Use of Agent-Based Modelling.” Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 17 (1): 8–41.10.1080/1463922X.2015.1106616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, Gary, David D. Woods, Jeffrey M. Bradshaw, Robert R. Hoffman, and Paul J. Feltovich. 2004. “Ten Challenges for Making Automation a ‘Team Player’ in Joint Human-Agent Activity.” IEEE Intelligent Systems 19 (6): 91–95.10.1109/MIS.2004.74
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo, Jeamin, Jungsuk Kwac, Ju Wendy, Martin Steinert, Larry Leifer, and Clifford Nass. 2014. “Why Did My Car Just Do That? Explaining Semi-Autonomous Driving Actions to Improve Driver Understanding, Trust, and Performance.” International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing 9 (4): 269–275. doi:10.1007/s12008-014-0227-2.
   Google Scholar
• Kühn, Simone, Ivan Nenchev, Patrick Haggard, Marcel Brass, Jürgen Gallinat, and Martin Voss. 2011. “Whodunnit? Electrophysiological Correlates of Agency Judgements.” PLoS ONE 6 (12): e28657. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0028657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Goff, Kevin. 2016. Agentivity in Highly Automated Systems, Dissertation thesis, Aix-Marseille University.
   Google Scholar
• Le Goff, Kevin, Arnaud Rey, and Bruno Berberian. 2015. “Toward a Model for Effective Human-Automation Interaction: The Mediated Agency.” In International Conference on Digital Human Modeling and Applications in Health, Safety, Ergonomics and Risk Management. Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, John D., and Neville Moray. 1994. “Trust, Self-Confidence, and Operators’ Adaptation to Automation.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 40 (1): 153–184. doi:10.1006/ijhc.1994.1007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, John D., and Katrina A. See. 2004. “Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance.” Human Factors 46 (1): 50–80. doi:10.1518/hfes.46.1.50_30392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Peng, Shiwei Jia, Tingyong Feng, Qiang Liu, Tao Suo, and Hong Li. 2010. “The Influence of the Diffusion of Responsibility Effect on Outcome Evaluations: Electrophysiological Evidence from an ERP Study.” NeuroImage 52 (4): 1727–1733. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.04.275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Peng, Chunhui Han, Yi Lei, Clay B. Holroyd, and Hong Li. 2011. “Responsibility Modulates Neural Mechanisms of Outcome Processing: An ERP Study.” Psychophysiology 48 (8): 1129–1133. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01182.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limerick, Hannah, David Coyle, and James W. Moore. 2014. “The Experience of Agency in Human-Computer Interactions: A Review.” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8: doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limerick, Hannah, James W. Moore, and David Coyle. 2015. “Empirical Evidence for a Diminished Sense of Agency in Speech Interfaces.” In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 3967–3970. ACM Press. doi:10.1145/2702123.2702379.
   Google Scholar
• McEneaney, John E. 2009. “Agency Attribution in Human-Computer Interaction.” In Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics, edited by Harris Don, 81–90. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 5639. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-02728-4_9.10.1007/978-3-642-02728-4
   Google Scholar
• McEneaney, John E. 2013. “Agency Effects in Human-Computer Interaction.” International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 29 (12): 798–813. doi:10.1080/10447318.2013.777826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molloy, Robert, and Raja Parasuraman. 1996. “Monitoring an Automated System for a Single Failure: Vigilance and Task Complexity Effects.” Human Factors 38 (2): 311–322. doi:10.1177/001872089606380211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, James W., and P. C. Fletcher. 2012. “Sense of Agency in Health and Disease: A Review of Cue Integration Approaches.” Consciousness and Cognition 21 (1): 59–68. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2011.08.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, James W., Daniel M. Wegner, and Patrick Haggard. 2009. “Modulating the Sense of Agency with External Cues.” Consciousness and Cognition 18 (4): 1056–1064. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2009.05.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moretto, Giovanna, Eamonn Walsh, and Patrick Haggard. 2011. “Experience of Agency and Sense of Responsibility.” Consciousness and Cognition 20 (4): 1847–1854. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2011.08.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarro, Jordan, Franck Mars, and Jean-Michel Hoc. 2007. “Lateral Control Assistance for Car Drivers: A Comparison of Motor Priming and Warning Systems.” Human Factors 49 (5): 950–960.10.1518/001872007X230280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarro, Jordan, Franck Mars, Jean-François Forzy, Myriam El-Jaafari, and Jean-Michel Hoc. 2010. “Objective and Subjective Evaluation of Motor Priming and Warning Systems Applied to Lateral Control Assistance.” Accident Analysis & Prevention 42 (3): 904–912. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2009.07.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman, Donald. 1990. “The ‘Problem’ with Automation: Inappropriate Feedback and Interaction, Not ‘Over-Automation.’” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences 327 (1241): 585–593. doi:10.1098/rstb.1990.0101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obhi, Sukhvinder S., and Preston Hall. 2011. “Sense of Agency in Joint Action: Influence of Human and Computer Co-Actors.” Experimental Brain Research 211 (3–4): 663–670. doi:10.1007/s00221-011-2662-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacherie, Elisabeth. 2008. “The Phenomenology of Action: A Conceptual Framework.” Cognition 107 (1): 179–217.10.1016/j.cognition.2007.09.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacherie, Elisabeth. 2012. “The Phenomenology of Joint Action: Self-Agency Vs. Joint-Agency.” In Joint Attention: New Developments, edited by Axel Seemann, 343–389. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parasuraman, Raja, Robert Molloy, and Indramani L. Singh. 1993. “Performance Consequences of Automation-Induced ‘Complacency’.” The International Journal of Aviation Psychology 3 (1): 1–23. doi:10.1207/s15327108ijap03011.
   Google Scholar
• Parasuraman, Raja, Thomas B. Sheridan, and Christopher D. Wickens. 2008. “Situation Awareness, Mental Workload, and Trust in Automation: Viable, Empirically Supported Cognitive Engineering Constructs.” Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making 2 (2): 140–160. doi:10.1518/155534308X284417.
   Google Scholar
• Payre, William, Julien Cestac, and Patricia Delhomme. 2015. “Fully Automated Driving: Impact of Trust and Practice on Manual Control Recovery.” Human Factors 58 (2): 229–241. doi:10.1177/0018720815612319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner, Michael I. 1978. Chronometric Explorations of Mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Posner, Michael I., and David E. Presti. 1987. “Selective Attention and Cognitive Control.” Trends in Neurosciences 10 (1): 13–17.10.1016/0166-2236(87)90116-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner, Michael I., Charles R. Snyder, and Brian J. Davidson. 1980. “Attention and the Detection of Signals.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 109 (2): 160.10.1037/0096-3445.109.2.160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeves, Byron, and Clifford Nass. 1996. The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Television, and New Media like Real People and Places. vol. xiv. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rudisill, Marianne. 1995. “Line Pilots’ Attitudes about and Experience with Flight Deck Automation: Results of an International Survey and Proposed Guidelines.” In Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, edited by R. S. Jensen and L. A. Rakovan, 288–293. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University.
   Google Scholar
• Salmon, Paul M., Neville A. Stanton, Guy H. Walker, Daniel Jenkins, Darshna Ladva, Laura Rafferty and Mark Young. 2009. “Measuring Situation Awareness in Complex Systems: Comparison of Measures Study.” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 39 (3): 490–500.10.1016/j.ergon.2008.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• San Martín, René. 2012. “Event-Related Potential Studies of Outcome Processing and Feedback-Guided Learning.” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 6: doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santiago-Espada, Yamira, Robert Myer, Kara Latorella, and James Comstock. 2011. “The Multi-Attribute Task Battery (MATB-II).” Software for Human Performance and Workload Research: A User’s Guide. NASA/TM-2011-217164.
   Google Scholar
• Sarter, Nadine B., and David D. Woods. 1995. “How in the World Did We Ever Get into That Mode? Mode Error and Awareness in Supervisory Control.” Human Factors 37 (1): 5–19. doi:10.1518/001872095779049516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarter, Nadine B., David D. Woods, and Charles E. Billings. 1997. “Automation Surprises.” Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics 2: 1926–1943.
   Google Scholar
• Sato, Atsushi. 2009. “Both Motor Prediction and Conceptual Congruency between Preview and Action-Effect Contribute to Explicit Judgment of Agency.” Cognition 110 (1): 74–83. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.10.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheridan, Thomas B., and William L. Verplank. 1978. Human and Computer Control of Undersea Teleoperators. Cambridge, MA: Technical report for the Office of Naval Research.10.21236/ADA057655
   Google Scholar
• Shneiderman, Ben, and Catherine Plaisant. 2004. Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction. Reading, MA: Pearson Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Stanton, Neville A. 2016. “Distributed Situation Awareness.” Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 17 (1): 1–7. doi:10.1080/1463922X.2015.1106615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanton, Neville A., Alain Dunoyer, and Adam Leatherland. 2011. “Detection of New in-Path Targets by Drivers Using Stop & Go Adaptive Cruise Control.” Applied Ergonomics 42 (4): 592–601.10.1016/j.apergo.2010.08.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanton, N. A., R. Stewart, D. Harris, R. J. Houghton, C. Baber, R. McMaster, P. Salmon, G. Hoyle, G. Walker, M. S. Young, M. Linsell, R. Dymott, and D. Green. 2006. “Distributed Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems: Theoretical Development and Application of an Ergonomics Methodology.” Ergonomics 49 (12–13): 1288–1311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Synofzik, Matthis, Gottfried Vosgerau, and Axel Lindner. 2009. “Me or Not Me – An Optimal Integration of Agency Cues?” Consciousness and Cognition 18 (4): 1065–1068. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2009.07.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Synofzik, Matthis, Gottfried Vosgerau, and Martin Voss. 2013. “The Experience of Agency: An Interplay between Prediction and Postdiction.” Frontiers in Psychology 4: doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timm, Jana, Iria SanMiguel, Julian Keil, Erich Schröger, and Marc Schönwiesner. 2014. “Motor Intention Determines Sensory Attenuation of Brain Responses to Self-Initiated Sounds.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 26 (7): 1481–1489. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsakiris, Manos, and Patrick Haggard. 2005. “Experimenting with the Acting Self.” Cognitive Neuropsychology 22 (3–4): 387–407. doi:10.1080/02643290442000158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, Viswanath. 2000. “Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model.” Information Systems Research 11 (4): 342–365. doi:10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verberne, Frank, Jaap Ham, and Cees Midden. 2012a. “Trust in Smart Systems: Sharing Driving Goals and Giving Information to Increase Trustworthiness and Acceptance of Smart Systems in Cars.” Human Factors 54 (5): 799–810. doi:10.1177/0018720812443825.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verberne, Frank, Jaap Ham, and Cees Midden. 2012b. “Trusting Automation Technology for Safer Roads: The Effect of Shared Driving Goals.” Persuasive Technology, 57.
   Google Scholar
• Wegner, Daniel M., and Thalia Wheatley. 1999. “Apparent Mental Causation: Sources of the Experience of Will.” American Psychologist 54 (7): 480–492. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.54.7.480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegner, Daniel M., Betsy Sparrow, and Lea Winerman. 2004. “Vicarious Agency: Experiencing Control over the Movements of Others.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 86 (6): 838–848. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.6.838.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcox, Rand. 2010. Fundamentals of Modern Statistical Methods: Substantially Improving Power and Accuracy. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.10.1007/978-1-4419-5525-8
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox, Rand. 2011. Modern Statistics for the Social and Behavioral Sciences: A Practical Introduction. Boca Raton, FL: CRC press.
   Google Scholar
• Xiong, Huimin, Linda Ng Boyle, Jane Moeckli, Benjamin R. Dow, and Timothy L. Brown. 2012. “Use Patterns among Early Adopters of Adaptive Cruise Control.” Human Factors 54 (5): 722–733. doi:10.1177/0018720811434512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, Mark S., and Neville A. Stanton. 2007. “What's Skill Got to Do with It? Vehicle Automation and Driver Mental Workload.” Ergonomics 50 (8): 1324–1339. doi:10.1080/00140130701318855.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, Mark S., Karel A. Brookhuis, Christopher D. Wickens, and Peter A. Hancock. 2015. “State of Science: Mental Workload in Ergonomics.” Ergonomics 58 (1): 1–17. doi:10.1080/00140139.2014.956151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar