The great typography bake-off: comparing legibility at-a-glance

References

• Arditi, A., and J. Cho. 2005. “Serifs and Font Legibility.” Vision Research 45 (23): 2926–2933. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2005.06.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckers, N., S. Schreiner, P. Bertrand, B. Mehler, and B. Reimer. 2017. “Comparing the Demands of Destination Entry Using Google Glass and the Samsung Galaxy S4 during Simulated Driving.” Applied Ergonomics 58: 25–34. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2016.05.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernard, M. L., B. S. Chaparro, M. M. Mills, and C. G. Halcomb. 2003. “Comparing the Effects of Text Size and Format on the Readibility of Computer-Displayed Times New Roman and Arial Text.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 59 (6): 823–835. doi:10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00121-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernard, M., C. H. Liao, and M. Mills. 2001. “The Effects of Font Type and Size on the Legibility and Reading Time of Online Text by Older Adults.” Paper presented at CHI ‘01 Extended Abstracts, 175–176. New York, NY, USA: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Boyarski, D., C. Neuwirth, J. Forlizzi, and S. H. Regli. 1998. “A Study of Fonts Designed for Screen Display.” Presented at the CHI ‘98: Proceedings of The SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 87–94. New York, NY, USA: ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Cai, H., P. A. Green, and J. J. Kim. 2013. “Estimating the Legibility of a Single Letter E Viewed at Different Display Angles.” Applied Ergonomics 44 (4): 575–587. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2012.11.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, P., and A. Holick. 2005. “Maximizing Legibility of Unlit Freeway Guide Signs with Clearview Font and Combinations of Retroreflective Sheeting Materials.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1918 (1): 26–34. doi:10.1177/0361198105191800104.
   Google Scholar
• Chaparro, B. S., A. D. Shaikh, A. Chaparroa, and E. C. Merkle. 2010. “Comparing the Legibility of Six ClearType Typefaces to Verdana and Times New Roman.” Information Design Journal 18 (1): 36–49. doi:10.1075/idj.18.1.04cha.
   Google Scholar
• Dobres, J., N. Chahine, B. Reimer, D. Gould, B. Mehler, and J. F. Coughlin. 2016. “Utilising Psychophysical Techniques to Investigate the Effects of Age, Typeface Design, Size and Display Polarity on Glance Legibility.” Ergonomics 59 (10): 1377–1391. doi:10.1080/00140139.2015.1137637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobres, J., S. T. Chrysler, B. Wolfe, N. Chahine, and B. Reimer. 2017. “Empirical Assessment of the Legibility of the Highway Gothic and Clearview Signage Fonts.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2624 (1): 1–8. doi:10.3141/2624-01.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobres, J., K. Klarl, J. Kindelsberger, and B. Reimer. 2018. TypeTester: A Case Study of Behavioral Data Collection Using a Smartphone Platform. MIT AgeLab Technical Report 2018-1 (December 6, 2018). Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Dufau, Stephane, Jon Andoni Duñabeitia, Carmen Moret-Tatay, Aileen McGonigal, David Peeters, F.-Xavier Alario, David A. Balota, Marc Brysbaert, Manuel Carreiras, Ludovic Ferrand, Maria Ktori, Manuel Perea, Kathy Rastle, Olivier Sasburg, Melvin J. Yap, Johannes C. Ziegler, and Jonathan Grainger. 2011. “Smart Phone, Smart Science: How the Use of Smartphones Can Revolutionize Research in Cognitive Science.” PLoS One 6 (9): e24974. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0024974.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gould, J. D., L. Alfaro, V. Barnes, R. Finn, N. Grischkowsky, and A. Minuto. 1987. “Reading is Slower from CRT Displays than from Paper: attempts to Isolate a Single-Variable Explanation.” Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 29 (3): 269–299. doi:10.1177/001872088702900303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gould, J. D., L. Alfaro, R. Finn, B. Haupt, and A. Minuto. 1987. “Reading from CRT Displays Can Be as Fast as Reading from Paper.” Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 29 (5): 497–517. doi:10.1177/001872088702900501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holleran, P. A., and K. G. Bauersfeld. 1993. Vertical Spacing of Computer-Presented Text.” Paper presented at CHI '93: INTERACT '93 and CHI '93 Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 179–180.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, D.-L., P.-L. Patrick Rau, and Y. Liu. 2009. “Effects of Font Size, Display Resolution and Task Type on Reading Chinese Fonts from Mobile Devices.” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 39 (1): 81–89. doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2008.09.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IEC. 2019. Road vehicles – Ergonomic aspects of transport information and control systems – Specifications and test procedures for in-vehicle visual presentation (No. 150082009).
   Google Scholar
• Internetlivestats. 2019. https://www.internetlivestats.com/google-search-statistics/.
   Google Scholar
• Josephson, S. 2008. “Keeping Your Readers’ Eyes on the Screen: An Eye-Tracking Study Comparing Sans Serif and Serif Typefaces.” Visual Communication Quarterly 15 (1–2): 67–79. doi:10.1080/15551390801914595.
   Google Scholar
• Kember, P., and D. Varley. 1987. “The Legibility and Readability of a Visual Display Unit at Threshold.” Ergonomics 30 (6): 925–931. doi:10.1080/00140138708969788.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ko, Y. H. 2017. “The Effects of Luminance Contrast, Colour Combinations, Font, and Search Time on Brand Icon Legibility.” Applied Ergonomics 65: 33–40. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2017.05.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leek, M. R. 2001. “Adaptive Procedures in Psychophysical Research.” Perception & Psychophysics 63 (8): 1279–1292. doi:10.3758/BF03194543.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legge, G. E., and C. A. Bigelow. 2011. “Does Print Size Matter for Reading? A Review of Findings from Vision Science and Typography.” Journal of Vision 11 (5): 8–8. doi:10.1167/11.5.8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitt, H. 1971. “Transformed up‐down Methods in Psychoacoustics.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 49 (2B): 467–477. doi:10.1121/1.1912375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, D. E., and R. W. Schvaneveldt. 1971. “Facilitation in Recognizing Pairs of Words: evidence of a Dependence between Retrieval Operations.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 90 (2): 227–234. doi:10.1037/h0031564.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Paterson, K. B., V. A. McGowan, and T. R. Jordan. 2013. “Filtered Text Reveals Adult Age Differences in Reading: evidence from Eye Movements.” Psychology and Aging 28 (2): 352–364. doi:10.1037/a0030350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peirce, JW. 2007. “PsychoPy - Psychophysics Software in Python.” Journal of Neuroscience Methods 162 (1–2): 8–13. doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.11.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reimer, Bryan, Bruce Mehler, Jonathan Dobres, Joseph F. Coughlin, Steve Matteson, David Gould, Nadine Chahine, and Vladimir Levantovsky. 2014. “Assessing the Impact of Typeface Design in a Text-Rich Automotive User Interface.” Ergonomics 57 (11): 1643–1658. doi:10.1080/00140139.2014.940000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samost, Aubrey, David Perlman, August G. Domel, Bryan Reimer, Bruce Mehler, Alea Mehler, Jonathan Dobres, and Thomas McWilliams. 2015. “Comparing the Relative Impact of Smartwatch and Smartphone Use While Driving on Workload, Attention, and Driving Performance.” Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 59 (1): 1602–1606. doi:10.1177/1541931215591347.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, B. D., J. Dobres, N. Chahine, and B. Reimer. 2017. “The Cost of Cool: Typographic Style Legibility in Reading at-a-Glance.” Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 61 (1): 833–837. doi:10.1177/1541931213601698.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, B. D., V. S. Finomore, A. A. Calvo, and P. A. Hancock. 2014. “Google Glass: A Driver Distraction Cause or Cure?” Human Factors 56 (7): 1307–1321. doi:10.1177/0018720814555723.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheedy, J., Y.-C. Tai, M. Subbaram, S. Gowrisankaran, and J. Hayes. 2008. “ClearType Sub-Pixel Text Rendering: Preference, Legibility and Reading Performance.” Displays 29 (2): 138–151. doi:10.1016/j.displa.2007.09.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, A. B., and A. E. Fitzhugh. 1989. “Modelling Character Legibility.” Society for Information Display Digest of Technical Papers 20: 360–363.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe, B., J. Dobres, A. Kosovicheva, R. Rosenholtz, and B. Reimer. 2016. “Reduction in Legibility with Degradation in Older and Younger Observers.” Journal of Vision 16 (12): 1420–1420. doi:10.1167/16.12.1420.
   Google Scholar