How do pedestrians distribute their visual attention when walking through a parking garage? An eye-tracking study

References

• Arai, Y., S. Yokota, K. Yamada, A. Matsumoto, D. Chugo, and H. Hashimoto. 2017. “Analysis of Gaze Information on Actual Pedestrian Behavior in Open Space—Which Body Part of an Oncoming Pedestrian do People Gaze At?” Paper presented at IEEE/SICE International Symposium on System Integration (SII), 704–709. doi:10.1109/SII.2017.8279304.
   Google Scholar
• Aupetit, S., S. Espié, and S. Bouaziz. 2015. “Naturalistic Study of Riders’ Behaviour in Lane-Splitting Situations.” Cognition, Technology & Work 17 (2): 301–313. doi:10.1007/s10111-014-0293-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballard, D. H., M. M. Hayhoe, and J. B. Pelz. 1995. “Memory Representations in Natural Tasks.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 7 (1): 66–80. doi:10.1162/jocn.1995.7.1.66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banzhaf, H., D. Nienhüser, S. Knoop, and J. M. Zöllner. 2017. “The Future of Parking: A Survey on Automated Valet Parking with an Outlook on High Density Parking.” Paper presented at IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), 1827–1834. doi:10.1109/IVS.2017.7995971.
   Google Scholar
• Bazilinskyy, P., D. Dodou, and J. C. F. De Winter. 2019. “Survey on eHMI Concepts: The Effect of Text, Color, and Perspective.” Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 67: 175–194. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2019.10.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazilinskyy, P., D. Dodou, and J. C. F. De Winter. 2020. “External Human-Machine Interfaces: Which of 729 colors is best for signaling ‘Please (do not) cross’?” IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (SMC). doi:10.1109/SMC42975.2020.9282998.
   Google Scholar
• Cefkin, M., J. Zhang, E. Stayton, and E. Vinkhuyzen. 2019. “Multi-Methods Research to Examine External HMI for Highly Automated Vehicles.” In HCI in Mobility, Transport, and Automotive Systems. HCII 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, edited by H. Krömker, vol. 11596, 46–64. Cham: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-22666-4_4.
   Google Scholar
• De Clercq, K., A. Dietrich, J. P. Núñez Velasco, J. De Winter, and R. Happee. 2019. “External Human-Machine Interfaces on Automated Vehicles: Effects on Pedestrian Crossing Decisions.” Human Factors 61 (8): 1353–1370. doi:10.1177/0018720819836343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Winter, J. C. F., Y. B. Eisma, C. D. D. Cabrall, P. A. Hancock, and N. A. Stanton. 2019. “Situation Awareness Based on Eye Movements in Relation to the Task Environment.” Cognition, Technology & Work 21 (1): 99–111. doi:10.1007/s10111-018-0527-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deb, S., L. J. Strawderman, and D. W. Carruth. 2018. “Investigating Pedestrian Suggestions for External Features on Fully Autonomous Vehicles: A Virtual Reality Experiment.” Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 59: 135–149. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2018.08.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dey, D., A. Habibovic, A. Löcken, P. Wintersberger, B. Pfleging, A. Riener, M. Martens, and J. Terken. 2020. “Taming the eHMI Jungle: A Classification Taxonomy to Guide, Compare, and Assess the Design Principles of Automated Vehicles' External Human-Machine Interfaces.” Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives 7: 100174. doi:10.1016/j.trip.2020.100174.
   Google Scholar
• Dey, D. D., A. Habibovic, B. Pfleging, M. H. Martens, and J. Terken. 2020. “Color and Animation Preferences for a Light Band eHMI in Interactions between Automated Vehicles and Pedestrians.” Paper presented at Proceedings of the CHI 2020 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. doi:10.1145/3313831.3376325.
   Google Scholar
• Dey, D.,. F. Walker, M. Martens, and J. Terken. 2019. “Gaze Patterns in Pedestrian Interaction with Vehicles: Towards Effective Design of External Human-Machine Interfaces for Automated Vehicles.” Paper presented at Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, 369–378. 10.1145/3342197.3344523
   Google Scholar
• Eisma, Y. B., S. Van Bergen, S. M. Ter Brake, M. T. T. Hensen, W. J. Tempelaar, and J. C. F. De Winter. 2019. “External Human-Machine Interfaces: The Effect of Display Location on Crossing Intentions and Eye Movements.” Information 11 (1): 13. doi:10.3390/info11010013.
   Google Scholar
• Faas, S. M., and M. Baumann. 2019. “Light-Based External Human Machine Interface: Color Evaluation for Self-Driving Vehicle and Pedestrian Interaction.” Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 63 (1): 1232–1236. doi:10.1177/1071181319631049.
   Google Scholar
• Faas, S. M., L.-A. Mathis, and M. Baumann. 2020. “External HMI for Self-Driving Vehicles: Which Information Shall Be Displayed?” Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 68: 171–186. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2019.12.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fotios, S., J. Uttley, C. Cheal, and N. Hara. 2015. “Using Eye-Tracking to Identify Pedestrians’ Critical Visual Tasks, Part 1.” Lighting Research & Technology 47 (2): 133–148. doi:10.1177/1477153514522472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraedrich, E., S. Beiker, and B. Lenz. 2015. “Transition Pathways to Fully Automated Driving and Its Implications for the Sociotechnical System of Automobility.” European Journal of Futures Research 3 (1): 11. doi:10.1007/s40309-015-0067-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fridman, L., B. Mehler, L. Xia, Y. Yang, L. Y. Facusse, and B. Reimer. 2019. “To Walk or not to Walk: Crowdsourced Assessment of External Vehicle-to-Pedestrian Displays.” Paper presented at Proceedings of Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Gliga, T., M. Elsabbagh, A. Andravizou, and M. Johnson. 2009. “Faces Attract Infants' Attention in Complex Displays.” Infancy: The Official Journal of the International Society on Infant Studies 14 (5): 550–562. doi:10.1080/15250000903144199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensch, A. C., I. Neumann, M. Beggiato, J. Halama, and J. F. Krems. 2020. “How Should Automated Vehicles Communicate?–Effects of a Light-Based Communication Approach in a Wizard-of-Oz Study.” In Advances in Human Factors of Transportation. AHFE 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, edited by N. Stanton, vol. 964, 79–91. Cham: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-20503-4_8.
   Google Scholar
• interACT. 2017. “Designing cooperative interaction of automated vehicles with other road users in mixed traffic environments.” https://www.interact-roadautomation.eu
   Google Scholar
• Kaleefathullah, A. A., N. Merat, Y. M. Lee, Y. B. Eisma, R. Madigan, J. Garcia, and J. C. F. De Winter. 2021. “External Human-Machine Interfaces can be misleading: An examination of trust development and misuse in a CAVE-based pedestrian simulation environment.” Human Factors. doi:10.1177/0018720820970751.
   Google Scholar
• Land, M. F. 2006. “Eye Movements and the Control of Actions in Everyday Life.” Progress in Retinal and Eye Research 25 (3): 296–324. doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2006.01.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lappi, O., P. Rinkkala, and J. Pekkanen. 2017. “Systematic Observation of an Expert Driver's Gaze Strategy-An On-Road Case Study.” Frontiers in Psychology 8: 620. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00620.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, B., W. Dong, Z. Zhan, S. Wang, and L. Meng. 2020. “Differences in the Gaze Behaviours of Pedestrians Navigating between Regular and Irregular Road Patterns.” ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 9 (1): 45. doi:10.3390/ijgi9010045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mantuano, A., S. Bernardi, and F. Rupi. 2017. “Cyclist Gaze Behavior in Urban Space: An Eye-Tracking Experiment on the Bicycle Network of Bologna.” Case Studies on Transport Policy 5 (2): 408–416. doi:10.1016/j.cstp.2016.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millard-Ball, A. 2018. “Pedestrians, Autonomous Vehicles, and Cities.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 38 (1): 6–12. doi:10.1177/0739456X16675674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, D., R. Currano, G. E. Strack, and D. Sirkin. 2019. “The Case for Implicit External Human-Machine Interfaces for Autonomous Vehicles.” Paper presented at Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, 295–307. doi:10.1145/3342197.3345320.
   Google Scholar
• Nissan. 2015. “IDS Concept.” https://www.nissan.co.uk/experience-nissan/concept-cars/ids-concept.html
   Google Scholar
• Rupi, F., and K. J. Krizek. 2019. “Visual Eye Gaze While Cycling: analysing Eye Tracking at Signalised Intersections in Urban Conditions.” Sustainability 11: 6089. doi:10.3390/su11216089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, J., M. Freeth, K. J. Simpson, and K. Thwaites. 2019. “Visual Engagement with Urban Street Edges: insights Using Mobile Eye-Tracking.” Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability 12 (3): 259–278. doi:10.1080/17549175.2018.1552884.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, T., J. Kobbert, B. Zandi, and T. Q. Khanh. 2020. “Displaying the Driving State of Automated Vehicles to Other Road Users: An International, Virtual Reality-Based Study as a First Step for the Harmonized Regulations of Novel Signaling Devices.” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems. 10.1109/TITS.2020.3032777.
   Google Scholar
• Tobii. 2018. “When do I use the I-VT Attention filter?” https://connect.tobiipro.com/s/article/When-do-I-use-the-I-VT-Attention-filter?language=en_US
   Google Scholar
• Trefzger, M., T. Blascheck, M. Raschke, S. Hausmann, and T. Schlegel. 2018. “A Visual Comparison of Gaze Behavior from Pedestrians and Cyclists.” Paper presented at Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications. doi:10.1145/3204493.3204553.
   Google Scholar
• Underwood, G., D. Crundall, and P. Chapman. 2011. “Driving Simulator Validation with Hazard Perception.” Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 14 (6): 435–446. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2011.04.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlakveld, W. P. 2014. “A Comparative Study of Two Desktop Hazard Perception Tasks Suitable for Mass Testing in Which Scores Are Not Based on Response Latencies.” Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 22: 218–231. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2013.12.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlakveld, W., S. Van der Kint, and M. P. Hagenzieker. 2020. “Cyclists’ Intentions to Yield for Automated Cars at Intersections When They Have Right of Way: Results of an Experiment Using High-Quality Video Animations.” Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 71: 288–307. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2020.04.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volvo Cars. 2018. “360c.” https://www.volvocars.com/intl/cars/concepts/360c
   Google Scholar
• Wu, D. W. L., W. F. Bischof, N. C. Anderson, T. Jakobsen, and A. Kingstone. 2014. “The Influence of Personality on Social Attention.” Personality and Individual Differences 60: 25–29. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2013.11.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, B., J. De Winter, S. Varotto, R. Happee, and M. Martens. 2019. “Determinants of Take-over Time from Automated Driving: A Meta-Analysis of 129 Studies.” Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 64: 285–307. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2019.04.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar