Structured ergonomic guidance in early design phases by analysing the user-product interaction

References

• Balters, S., M. Bisballe Jensen, and M. Steinert. 2015. “Physiological and Sensorial Based Quantification of Human-Object-Interaction-the QOSI Matrix.” In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on on Engineering Design (ICED15) Vol 11: Human Behaviour in Design, Design Education, edited by C. Weber, S. Husung, G. Cascini, M. Cantamessa, D. Marjanović, and M. Bordegoni, 121–132. Glasgow: The Design Society.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, K., C. Courage, and K. Caine. 2005. Understanding Your Users: A Practical Guide to User Requirements Methods, Tools, and Techniques. Morgan Kaufmann Series in Interactive Technologies. Boston, MA: Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Bender, B., & Gericke, K., eds. 2021. Pahl/Beitz Konstruktionslehre: Methoden und Anwendung erfolgreicher Produktentwicklung (9. Auflage). Berlin: Springer Vieweg.
   Google Scholar
• Biermann, H., H. Weißmantel, and T. Pöser. 1997. Regelkatalog SENSI-Geräte: Bedienungsfreundlich und barrierefrei durch das richtige Design. Darmstadt: Institute of Electromechanical Design.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, C. M., and K. J. Vicente. 2000. “A Participant-Observer Study of Ergonomics in Engineering Design: how Constraints Drive Design Process.” Applied Ergonomics 31: 73–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DIN. 1987. Physical Strength of Man - Part 4: Maximum Isometric Action Forces (Isodynes). (DIN 33411-1). Berlin: Beuth.
   Google Scholar
• DIN. 2009. Sicherheit von Maschinen – Ergonomische Gestaltungsgrundsätze. (DIN EN ISO 614-1). Berlin: Beuth.
   Google Scholar
• DIN 2020. Ergonomics – Human Body dimensions – Part 2: Values. (DIN 33402-2). Berlin: Beuth.
   Google Scholar
• Dowlatshahi, S. 1994. “A Morphological Approach to Product Design in a Concurrent Engineering Environment.” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 9 (5): 324–332. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01781286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenko, A., H. N. J. Schifferstein, and P. Hekkert. 2010. “Shifts in Sensory Dominance between Various Stages of User-Product Interactions.” Applied Ergonomics 41 (1): 34–40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2009.03.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freudenthal, A. 1999. The Design of Home Appliances for Young and Old Consumers. Series Ageing and Ergonomics. Vol. 2. Delft: Delft University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Glende, S. 2010. “Entwicklung eines Konzepts zur nutzergerechten Produktentwicklung mit Fokus auf die "Generation plus".” Dissertation, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, E. B., and J. R. Brockmole. 2017. Sensation and Perception. 10th ed. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Heslin, P. A. 2009. “Better than Brainstorming? Potential Contextual Boundary Conditions to Brainwriting for Idea Generation in Organizations.” Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 82 (1): 129–145. doi:https://doi.org/10.1348/096317908X285642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISO. 2006. Ease of Operation of Everyday Products - Part 1: Design Requirements for Context of use and User Characteristics. (ISO 20282-1:2006). London: ISO.
   Google Scholar
• ISO. 2008. Ergonomics of Human-System Interaction - Part 410: Design Criteria for Physical Input Devices. (ISO 9241-410:2008). London: ISO.
   Google Scholar
• ISO. 2019. Ergonomics of Human-System Interaction - Part 210: Human-Centred Design for Interactive Systems. (ISO 9241-210:2019). London: ISO.
   Google Scholar
• Karwowski, W. 2012. “The Discipline of Human Factors and Ergonomics.” In Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics, edited by G. Salvendy, 3–37. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Karwowski, W., M. M. Soares, and N. Stanton. 2011. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Consumer Product Design: Methods and Techniques. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pahl, G., W. Beitz, J. Feldhusen, and K.-H. Grote. 2007. Engineering Design. London: Springer London.
   Google Scholar
• Rupp, C. 2014. Requirements-Engineering und -Management: Aus der Praxis von klassisch bis agil. 6th ed. München: Hanser.
   Google Scholar
• Schifferstein, H. N. J. 2006. “The Perceived Importance of Sensory Modalities in Product Usage: A Study of Self-Reports.” Acta Psychologica 121 (1): 41–64. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.06.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schröppel, T., J. Miehling, and S. Wartzack. 2019. “Konzept zur Identifikation relevanter Produkteigenschaften zur Unterstützung einer positiven User Experience.”. In Entwickeln Entwerfen Erleben in Produktentwicklung und Design 2019 Band 2, edited by R. Stelzer and J. Krzywinski, 205–218. Dresden: TUD Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schröppel, T., J. Miehling, and S. Wartzack. 2020. “How to Identify Relevant Product Properties in the Context of User-Product Interaction?” Procedia CIRP 91: 615–620. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2020.02.219.
   Google Scholar
• Seeger, H. 2005. Design technischer Produkte, Produktprogramme und -systeme. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Skepper, Narelle, Leon Straker, and Clare Pollock. 2000. “A Case Study of the Use of Ergonomics Information in a Heavy Engineering Design Process.” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 26 (3): 425–435. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8141(00)00017-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanton, N. A. 2006. “Hierarchical Task Analysis: Developments, Applications, and Extensions.” Applied Ergonomics 37 (1): 55–79. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2005.06.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanton, N. A., P. M. Salmon, L. Rafferty, G. Walker, C. Baber, and D. P. Jenkins. 2013. Human Factors Methods: A Practical Guide for Engineering and Design. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suh, N. P. 1989. The Principles of Design. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waller, S., J. Goodman-Deane, M. Bradley, I. Hosking, P. Langdon, and P. J. Clarkson. 2013. “Inclusive Design Toolkit – Exclusion Calculator.” Retrieved from http://calc.inclusivedesigntoolkit.com/
   Google Scholar
• Wartzack, S., T. Schröppel, A. Wolf, and J. Miehling. 2019. “Roadmap to Consider Physiological and Psychological Aspects of User-Product Interactions in Virtual Product Engineering.” Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design 1 (1): 3989–3998. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.406.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, C. 2005. “CPM/PDD - An Extended Theoretical Approach to Modelling Products and Product Development Processes.” In Proceedings of the 2nd German-Israeli Symposium on Advances in Methods and Systems for Development of Products and Processes, edited by H. Bley, H. Jansen, F.-L. Krause, and M. Shpitalni, 159–179. Stuttgart: Fraunhofer-IRB-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, A., J. Miehling, and S. Wartzack. 2020a. “Challenges in Interaction Modelling with Digital Human models – A Systematic Literature Review of Interaction Modelling Approaches.” Ergonomics 63 (11): 1442–1458. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2020.1786606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, A., J. Miehling, and S. Wartzack. 2020b. “Elementary Affordances: A Study on Physical User-Product Interactions.” Procedia CIRP 91: 621–626. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2020.02.220.
   Google Scholar
• Zink, K. J., and K. Fischer. 2013. “Do we Need Sustainability as a New Approach in Human Factors and Ergonomics?” Ergonomics 56 (3): 348–356. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2012.751456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar