Fonts of wider letter shapes improve letter recognition in parafovea and periphery

References

• Atilgan, N., Y.-Z. Xiong, and G. E. Legge. 2020. “Reconciling Print-Size and Display-Size Constraints on Reading.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 117 (48): 30276–30284. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2007514117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beier, S., J.-B. Bernard, and E. Castet. 2018. “Numeral Legibility and Visual Complexity.” Paper presented at the Design as a catalyst for change - DRS International Conference 2018, Limerick, Ireland, June 25–28.
   Google Scholar
• Beier, S., and M. C. Dyson. 2014. “The Influence of Serifs on ‘h’ and ‘i’: Useful Knowledge from Design-Led Scientific Research.” Visible Language 47 (3): 74–95.
   Google Scholar
• Beier, S., and K. Larson. 2010. “Design Improvements for Frequently Misrecognized Letters.” Information Design Journal 18 (2): 118–137. doi:https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.18.2.03bei.
   Google Scholar
• Beier, S., and C. A. T. Oderkerk. 2019. “Smaller Visual Angles Show Greater Benefit of Letter Boldness than Larger Visual Angles.” Acta Psychologica 199: 102904. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102904.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, C. 1950. “Experiments on the Legibility of Symbols of Different Width and Height.” Acta Ophthalmol 28 (4): 423–434. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-3768.1950.tb05375.x.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, C. 2009. “Some Experiments on the Width of Symbols as Determinant of Legibility.” Acta Ophthalmologica 26 (4): 517–550. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-3768.1948.tb03189.x.
   Google Scholar
• Bernard, J.-B., C. Aguilar, and E. Castet. 2016. “A New Font, Specifically Designed for Peripheral Vision, Improves Peripheral Letter and Word Recognition, but Not Eye-Mediated Reading Performance.” PLoS One 11 (4): e0152506. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouma, H. 1970. “Interaction Effects in Parafoveal Letter Recognition.” Nature 226 (5241): 177–178. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/226177a0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C.-M., and Y.-J. Lin. 2016. “Effects of Different Text Display Types on Reading Comprehension, Sustained Attention and Cognitive Load in Mobile Reading Contexts.” Interactive Learning Environments 24 (3): 553–571. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2014.891526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, S. T., and D. R. Coates. 2019. “Spatio-Temporal Dependencies of Letter Feature Processing.” Journal of Vision 19 (10): 65b. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/19.10.65b.
   Google Scholar
• Chung, S. T., and G. E. Legge. 2009. “Precision of Position Signals for letters.” Vision Res 49 (15): 1948–1960. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2009.05.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, S. T., J. S. Mansfield, and G. E. Legge. 1998. “Psychophysics of Reading. XVIII. The Effect of Print Size on Reading Speed in Normal Peripheral Vision.” Vision Research 38 (19): 2949–2962. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989(98)00072-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coates, D. R., J.-B. Bernard, and S. T. L. Chung. 2019. “Feature Contingencies When Reading Letter Strings.” Vision Research 156: 84–95. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2019.01.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coates, D. R., J. M. Chin, and S. T. Chung. 2013. “Factors Affecting Crowded Acuity: Eccentricity and Contrast.” Optometry and Vision Science 90 (7): 628–638. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0b013e31829908a4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobres, J., S. T. Chrysler, B. Wolfe, N. Chahine, and B. Reimer. 2017. “Empirical Assessment of the Legibility of the Highway Gothic and Clearview Signage Fonts.” Transportation Research Record 2624 (1): 1–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.3141/2624-01.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobres, J., B. Reimer, and N. Chahine. 2016. “The Effect of Font Weight and Rendering System on Glance-Based Text Legibility.” Paper presented at the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Ann Arbor, MI, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Dobres, J., B. Reimer, L. Parikhal, E. Wean, and N. Chahine. 2015. “The Incredible Shrinking Letter: How Font Size Affects the Legibility of Text Viewed in Brief Glances.” Paper presented at the 8th International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design, Lake City, UT, June 22–25.
   Google Scholar
• Dyson, M. C., and S. Beier. 2016. “Investigating Typographic Differentiation: Italics Are More Subtle than Bold for Emphasis.” Information Design Journal 22 (1): 3–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.22.1.02dys.
   Google Scholar
• Hautala, J., J. Hyönä, and M. Aro. 2011. “Dissociating Spatial and Letter-Based Word Length Effects Observed in Readers’ Eye Movement Patterns.” Vision Research 51 (15): 1719–1727. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2011.05.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, J. 2016. “Introducing OpenType Variable Fonts.” Medium. https://medium.com/variable-fonts/https-medium-com-tiro-introducing-opentype-variable-fonts-12ba6cd2369
   Google Scholar
• Hustwit, G. 2007. Helvetica. London, UK: Swiss Dots, Ltd.; Brooklyn, NY: Plexifilm.
   Google Scholar
• Kesten, H. 1958. “Accelerated Stochastic Approximation.” The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 29 (1): 41–59. doi:https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177706705.
   Google Scholar
• Kolers, P. A., R. L. Duchnicky, and D. C. Ferguson. 1981. “Eye Movement Measurement of Readability of CRT Displays.” Human Factors 23 (5): 517–527. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/001872088102300502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latham, K., and D. Whitaker. 1996. “A Comparison of Word Recognition and Reading Performance in Foveal and Peripheral Vision.” Vision Research 36 (17): 2665–2674. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(96)00022-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levi, D. M. 2008. “Crowding-An Essential Bottleneck for Object Recognition: A Mini-Review.” Vision Research 48 (5): 635–654. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2007.12.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathôt, S., D. Schreij, and J. Theeuwes. 2012. “OpenSesame: An Open-Source, Graphical Experiment Builder for the Social Sciences.” Behavior Research Methods 44 (2): 314–324. doi:https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0168-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, S. A. 2006. “Effects of Number-of-Letters on Eye Movements during Reading Are Independent from Effects of Spatial Word Length.” Visual Cognition 13 (1): 89–98. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280500143367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minakata, K., and S. Beier. 2021. “The Effect of Font Width on Eye Movements during Reading.” Applied Ergonomics 97: 103523. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nandy, A. S., and B. S. Tjan. 2007. “The Nature of Letter Crowding as Revealed by First-and Second-Order Classification Images.” Journal of Vision 7 (2): 5. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/7.2.5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelli, D. G., M. Palomares, and N. J. Majaj. 2004. “Crowding is Unlike Ordinary Masking: Distinguishing Feature Integration from Detection.” Journal of Vision 4 (12): 1136–1169. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/4.12.12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelli, D. G., K. A. Tillman, J. Freeman, M. Su, T. D. Berger, and N. J. Majaj. 2007. “Crowding and Eccentricity Determine Reading Rate.” Journal of Vision 7 (2): 20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/7.2.20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K. 1998. “Eye Movements in Reading and Information Processing: 20 Years of Research.” Psychological Bulletin 124 (3): 372–422. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., A. D. Well, A. Pollatsek, and J. H. Bertera. 1982. “The Availability of Useful Information to the Right of Fixation in Reading.” Perception & Psychophysics 31 (6): 537–550. doi:https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03204186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reimer, B., B. Mehler, J. Dobres, J. F. Coughlin, S. Matteson, D. Gould, N. Chahine, and V. Levantovsky. 2014. “Assessing the Impact of Typeface Design in a Text-Rich Automotive User Interface.” Ergonomics 57 (11): 1643–1658. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2014.940000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roethlein, B. E. 1912. “The Relative Legibility of Different Faces of Printing Types.” The American Journal of Psychology 23 (1): 1–36. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/1413112.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, S., R. Chakravarthi, and D. G. Pelli. 2014. “The Bouma Law of Crowding, Revised: Critical Spacing is Equal across Parts, Not Objects.” Journal of Vision 14 (6): 10–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/14.6.10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rovamo, J., V. Virsu, and R. Näsänen. 1978. “Cortical Magnification Factor Predicts the Photopic Contrast Sensitivity of Peripheral Vision.” Nature 271 (5640): 54–56. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/271054a0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawyer, B. D., J. Dobres, N. Chahine, and B. Reimer. 2017. “The Cost of Cool: Typographic Style Legibility in Reading at a Glance.” Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 61 (1): 833–837. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213601698.
   Google Scholar
• Sayim, B., and H. Taylor. 2019. “Letters Lost: Capturing Appearance in Crowded Peripheral Vision Reveals a New Kind of Masking.” Psychological Science 30 (7): 1082–1086. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619847166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd, M., J. M. Findlay, and R. J. Hockey. 1986. “The Relationship between Eye Movements and Spatial Attention.” The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A 38 (3): 475–491. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14640748608401609.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Slattery, T. J. 2016. “Eye Movements: From Psycholinguistics to Font Design.” In Digital Fonts and Reading, 54–78. Singapore, Singapore: World Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Strasburger, H. 2005. “Unfocussed Spatial Attention Underlies the Crowding Effect in Indirect Form Vision.” Journal of Vision 5 (11): 1024–1037. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/5.11.8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treitman, R., B. D. Sawyer, and S. Rodrigo. 2020. “This Changes Everything: New Approaches to Reading.” Adobe MAX. https://www.adobe.com/max/2020/sessions/this-changes-everything-new-approaches-to-reading-s6826.html
   Google Scholar
• Treutwein, B. 1995. “Adaptive Psychophysical Procedures.” Vision Research 35 (17): 2503–2522. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(95)00016-X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virsu, V., and J. Rovamo. 1979. “Visual Resolution, Contrast Sensitivity, and the Cortical Magnification Factor.” Experimental Brain Research 37 (3): 475–494. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00236818.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waller, R. 2007. “Comparing Typefaces for Airport Signs.” Information Design Journal 15 (1): 1–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.15.1.01wal.
   Google Scholar
• White, S. J., T. Warren, and E. D. Reichle. 2011. “Parafoveal Preview during Reading: Effects of Sentence Position.” Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance 37 (4): 1221–1238. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, D., G. E. Legge, G. Wagoner, and S. T. Chung. 2014. “Sensory Factors Limiting Horizontal and Vertical Visual Span for Letter Recognition.” Journal of Vision 14 (6): 3. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/14.6.3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J.-Y., G.-L. Zhang, L. Liu, and C. Yu. 2012. “Whole Report Uncovers Correctly Identified but Incorrectly Placed Target Information under Visual Crowding.” Journal of Vision 12 (7): 5–11. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/12.7.5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar