The consumers’ response to product design: a narrative review

References

• Abdel-Basset, M., L. Abdel-Fatah, and A.K. Sangaiah. 2018. “Metaheuristic Algorithms: A Comprehensive Review.” In Computational Intelligence for Multimedia Big Data on the Cloud with Engineering Applications: 185–231.
   Google Scholar
• Adelabu, O.S., T. Yamanaka, and R. Moalosi. 2013. “Retraction: Towards Kansei Evaluation of African Product Design-perspectives from Cultural Aesthetics.” International Journal of Affective Engineering 12 (2): 135–144. doi:10.5057/ijae.12.135.
   Google Scholar
• Adeyeye, K., K. She, and A. Baïri. 2017. “Design Factors and Functionality Matching in Sustainability Products: A Study of Eco-showerheads.” Journal of Cleaner Production 142: 4214–4229. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afhami, R., and S. Mohammadi-Zarghan. 2018. “The Big Five, Aesthetic Judgment Styles, and Art Interest.” Europe’s Journal of Psychology 14 (4): 764–775. doi:10.5964/ejop.v14i4.1479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aggarwal, C.C., and C.K. Reddy. 2014. Data Clustering. Algorithms and Applications. USA: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Akay, Diyar, Burcu U. Duran, Engin Duran, Brian Henson, and Fatih E. Boran. 2021. “Developing a Labeled Affective Magnitude Scale and Fuzzy Linguistic Scale for Tactile Feeling.” Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries 31 (1): 13–26. doi:10.1002/hfm.20866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akgül, E., Y. Delice, E.K. Aydoğan, and F.E. Boran. 2021. “An Application of Fuzzy Linguistic Summarization and Fuzzy Association Rule Mining to Kansei Engineering: A Case Study on Cradle Design.” Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing 13: 1–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akman, P. 2010. “‘Consumer’ versus ‘Customer’: The Devil in the Detail.” Journal of Law and Society 37 (2): 315–344. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6478.2010.00506.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Ali, M., and M. Shimoda. 2022a. “Investigation of Concurrent Multiscale Topology Optimization for Designing Lightweight Macrostructure with High Thermal Conductivity.” International Journal of Thermal Sciences 179: 107653. doi:10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2022.107653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Ali, M., and M. Shimoda. 2022b. “Toward Multiphysics Multiscale Concurrent Topology Optimization for Lightweight Structures with High Heat Conductivity and High Stiffness Using MATLAB.” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 65: 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• al-Rifaie, M.M., A. Ursyn, R. Zimmer, and M.A.J. Javid. 2017. “On Symmetry, Aesthetics and Quantifying Symmetrical Complexity.” In International Conference on Evolutionary and Biologically Inspired Music and Art, edited by A. Ekárt, A. Liapis, and M.L.C Pena, 17–32. Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Al Thobiani, Faisal, Samir Khatir, Brahim Benaissa, Emad Ghandourah, Seyedali Mirjalili, and Magd Abdel Wahab. 2022. “A Hybrid PSO and Grey Wolf Optimization Algorithm for Static and Dynamic Crack Identification.” Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics 118: 103213. doi:10.1016/j.tafmec.2021.103213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amatulli, C., M. De Angelis, and C. Donato. 2020. “An Investigation on the Effectiveness of Hedonic versus Utilitarian Message Appeals in Luxury Product Communication.” Psychology & Marketing 37 (4): 523–534. doi:10.1002/mar.21320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amini, A., T.Y. Wah, M.R. Saybani, and S.R.A.S. Yazdi. 2011. “A Study of Density-grid Based Clustering Algorithms on Data Streams.” In 2011 Eighth International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (FSKD), 1652–1656. USA: IEEE Xplore. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/conhome/6012258/proceeding
   Google Scholar
• Antinori, A., O.L. Carter, and L.D. Smillie. 2017. “Seeing It Both Ways: Openness to Experience and Binocular Rivalry Suppression.” Journal of Research in Personality 68: 15–22. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2017.03.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnheim, R. 1992. But Is It Science? In Emerging Visions of the Aesthetic Process: In Psychology, Semiology, and philosophy, edited by G.C. Cupchik and J. Laszlo, 445. USA: Cambridge university press.
   Google Scholar
• Asghar, S., G. Torrens, and R.G. Harland. 2018. “Cross-cultural iInfluences on the Semantics Ascribed to Assistive Technology Product and Its Envisaged User.” The Asian Conference on Media, Communication & Film 1 (1): 263–263 (280).
   Google Scholar
• Axelsson, J.R.C., J. Eklund, and M. Nagamachi. 2001. “Suspension and Damping of a Lowlifter Platform.– An Application of Kansei Engineering.” Systems, social and internationalisation design aspects of human-computer interaction 2: 333–337.
   Google Scholar
• Aydoğan, E.K., E. Akgul, Y. Delice, and C. Sinanoglu. 2020. “Determining of Customer’s Kansei Needs and Product Design Attributes by Rough Set Theory.” In Strategic Innovative Marketing and Tourism, 159–168. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Azemati, Hamidreza, Fatemeh Jam, Modjtaba Ghorbani, Matthias Dehmer, Reza Ebrahimpour, Abdolhamid Ghanbaran, and Frank Emmert-Streib. 2020. “The Role of Symmetry in the Aesthetics of Residential Building Façades Using Cognitive Science Methods.” Symmetry 12 (9): 1438. doi:10.3390/sym12091438.
   Google Scholar
• Bacciotti, D., Y. Borgianni, G. Cascini, and F. Rotini. 2016. “Product Planning Techniques: Investigating the Differences between Research Trajectories and Industry Expectations.” Research in Engineering Design 27 (4): 367–389. doi:10.1007/s00163-016-0223-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagozzi, R.P., M. Gopinath, and P.U. Nyer. 1999. “The Role of Emotions in Marketing.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 27 (2): 184–206. doi:10.1177/0092070399272005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, C., T. Childs, B. Henson, and S. Lillford. 2008. “Kansei Engineering Toolkit for the Packaging Industry.” The TQM Journal 20: 372–388.
   Google Scholar
• Bartolome, J.I., G. Cho, and J.-D. Cho. 2021. “Multi-sensory Color Expression with Sound and Temperature in Visual Arts Appreciation for People with Visual Impairment.” Electronics 10 (11): 1336. doi:10.3390/electronics10111336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batra, R., and O.T. Ahtola. 1991. “Measuring the Hedonic and Utilitarian Sources of Consumer Attitudes.” Marketing Letters 2 (2): 159–170. doi:10.1007/BF00436035.
   Google Scholar
• Bauerly, M., and Y. Liu. 2008. “Effects of Symmetry and Number of Compositional Elements on Interface and Design Aesthetics.” International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 24 (3): 275–287. doi:10.1080/10447310801920508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belboula, I., C.-L. Ackermann, J.-P. Mathieu, and C. Cuny. 2019. “Consumers’ Responses to Product Design: Using a Semantic Priming Task to Assess Automatic Understanding of Product Positioning.” International Journal of Market Research 61 (2): 140–156. doi:10.1177/1470785318777429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benaissa, Brahim, Nourredine Aït Hocine, Idir Belaidi, Abderrachid Hamrani, and Valeria Pettarin. 2016. “Crack Identification Using Model Reduction Based on Proper Orthogonal Decomposition Coupled with Radial Basis Functions.” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 54 (2): 265–274. doi:10.1007/s00158-016-1400-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benaissa, Brahim, Nourredine Aït Hocine, Samir Khatir, Mohamed Kamel Riahi, and Seyedali Mirjalili. 2021. “YUKI Algorithm and POD-RBF for Elastostatic and Dynamic Crack Identification.” Journal of Computational Science 55: 101451. doi:10.1016/j.jocs.2021.101451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benaissa, B., F. Hendrichovsky, K. Yishida, M. Koppen, and P. Sincak. 2018a. “Phone Application for Indoor Localization Based on Ble Signal Fingerprint.” In 2018 9th IFIP International Conference on New Technologies, Mobility and Security (NTMS), 1–5. USA: IEEE Xplore. doi:10.1109/NTMS.2018.8328729.
   Google Scholar
• Benaissa, B., M. Köppen, and K. Yoshida. 2018. “Activity and Emotion Recognition for Elderly Health Monitoring.” International Journal of Affective Engineering 17 (2): 81–88. doi:10.5057/ijae.IJAE-D-17-00020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benaissa, B., K. Yoshida, M. Köppen, and F. Hendrichovsky. 2018b. “Updatable Indoor Localization Based on BLE Signal Fingerprint.” In 2018 International Conference on Applied Smart Systems (ICASS), 1–6. USA: IEEE Xplore. doi:10.1109/ICASS.2018.8652035.
   Google Scholar
• Berlyne, D.E. 1973. “Aesthetics and Psychobiology.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 31: 205–211.
   Google Scholar
• Berlyne, D.E. 1974. Studies in the New Experimental Aesthetics: Steps toward an Objective Psychology of Aesthetic Appreciation. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Blijlevens, J., M.E.H. Creusen, and J.P.L. Schoormans. 2009. “How Consumers Perceive Product Appearance: The Identification of Three Product Appearance Attributes.” International Journal of Design 3: 27–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloch, P.H. 1995. “Seeking the Ideal Form: Product Design and Consumer Response.” Journal of Marketing 59 (3): 16–29. doi:10.2307/1252116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloch, P.H., F.F. Brunel, and T.J. Arnold. 2003. “Individual Differences in the Centrality of Visual Product Aesthetics: Concept and Measurement.” Journal of Consumer Research 29 (4): 551–565. doi:10.1086/346250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borg, I., and P.J.F. Groenen. 2005. Modern Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and Applications. Germany: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Bovea, María, Valeria Ibáñez-Forés, Victoria Pérez-Belis, Pablo Juan, Marta Braulio-Gonzalo, and Carlos Díaz-Ávalos. 2018. “Incorporation of Circular Aspects into Product Design and Labelling: Consumer Preferences.” Sustainability 10 (7): 2311. doi:10.3390/su10072311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brum, T.C., M.M. Borges, A.C. de Castro Lemonge, and L.G. Marujo. 2021. “Genetic Algorithm Applied to Packaging Shape Models Using Sustainability Criteria.” In International Joint Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, edited by Z. Anisic, B. Lalic, and D. Gracanin, 545–558. Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Brunner, C.B., S. Ullrich, P. Jungen, and F.-R. Esch. 2016. “Impact of Symbolic Product Design on Brand Evaluations.” Journal of Product & Brand Management 25 (3): 307–320. doi:10.1108/JPBM-06-2015-0896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budner, S. 1962. “Intolerance of Ambiguity as a Personality Variable 1.” Journal of Personality 30: 29–50. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1962.tb02303.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnap, A., J.R. Hauser, and A. Timoshenko. 2021. Design and Evaluation of Product Aesthetics: A Human-machine Hybrid Approach. USA: Cornell university arxiv.
   Google Scholar
• Bushong, B., L.M. King, C.F. Camerer, and A. Rangel. 2010. “Pavlovian Processes in Consumer Choice: The Physical Presence of a Good Increases Willingness-to-Pay.” American Economic Review 100 (4): 1556–1571. doi:10.1257/aer.100.4.1556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Candi, M., H. Jae, S. Makarem, and M. Mohan. 2017. “Consumer Responses to Functional, Aesthetic and Symbolic Product Design in Online Reviews.” Journal of Business Research 81: 31–39. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.08.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbon, C.-C. 2010. “The Cycle of Preference: Long-term Dynamics of Aesthetic Appreciation.” Acta Psychologica 134 (2): 233–244. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.02.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbon, C.-C. 2019. “Psychology of Design.” Design Science 5: 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cela-Conde, Camilo J., Gisèle Marty, Fernando Maestú, Tomás Ortiz, Enric Munar, Alberto Fernández, Miquel Roca, Jaume Rosselló, and Felipe Quesney. 2004. “Activation of the Prefrontal Cortex in the Human Visual Aesthetic Perception.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101 (16): 6321–6325. doi:10.1073/pnas.0401427101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chai, C., D. Bao, L. Sun, and Y. Cao. 2015. “The Relative Effects of Different Dimensions of Traditional Cultural Elements on Customer Product Satisfaction.” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 48: 77–88. doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2015.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, Y.-M., and C.-W. Chen. 2016. “Kansei Assessment of the Constituent Elements and the Overall Interrelations in Car Steering Wheel Design.” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 56: 97–105. doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2016.09.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, D., P. Cheng, S. Simatrang, and E. Joneurairatana. 2021. “Kansei Engineering as a Tool for the Design of Traditional Pattern.” Autex Research Journal 21 (1): 125–134. doi:10.2478/aut-2019-0052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, K.-H., C.-C. Liang, and Y.-H. Lee. 2019. “Design Criteria for Kansei-oriented Elderly Products.” In International Conference on Human-computer Interaction, edited by M. Kurosu, 404–413. Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Mo., Georges Fadel, Chengqi Xue, Haiyan Wang, Ivan Mata, and Yunfei Chen. 2017. “Evaluating the Cognitive Process of Color Affordance and Attractiveness Based on the ERP.” International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM) 11 (3): 471–479. doi:10.1007/s12008-015-0286-z.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, S. 2019. “Product Design Research: A Review.” In The Design Imperative, 37–54. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, M.-C., D. Law, J. Yip, and C.W.Y. Wong. 2019. “Emotional Responses to Visual Art and Commercial Stimuli: Implications for Creativity and Aesthetics.” Frontiers in Psychology 10: 14. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chew, L.H., J. Teo, and J. Mountstephens. 2016. “Aesthetic Preference Recognition of 3D Shapes Using EEG.” Cognitive Neurodynamics 10 (2): 165–173. doi:10.1007/s11571-015-9363-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Child, I.L. 1964. “Observations on the Meaning of Some Measures of Esthetic Sensitivity.” The Journal of Psychology 57: 49–64. doi:10.1080/00223980.1964.9916671.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chitturi, R. 2009. “Emotions by Design: A Consumer Perspective.” International Journal of Design 3: 7–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, J. 2021. “Material Selection: Exploring the Reliability of Material Perception Data and Its Relevance to Materials.” Metals and Materials International 27 (6): 1599–1604. doi:10.1007/s12540-019-00574-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, A.P., K.N. Cotter, and P.J. Silvia. 2019. “Reopening Openness to Experience: A Network Analysis of Four Openness to Experience Inventories.” Journal of Personality Assessment 101 (6): 574–588. doi:10.1080/00223891.2018.1467428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christopoulos, G.I., M.A. Uy, and W.J. Yap. 2019. “The Body and the Brain: Measuring Skin Conductance Responses to Understand the Emotional Experience.” Organizational Research Methods 22 (1): 394–420. doi:10.1177/1094428116681073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corradi, Guido, Erick G. Chuquichambi, Juan Ramón Barrada, Ana Clemente, and Marcos Nadal. 2020. “A New Conception of Visual Aesthetic Sensitivity.” British Journal of Psychology 111 (4): 630–658. doi:10.1111/bjop.12427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corradi, Guido, Manuel Belman, Tommaso Currò, Erick G. Chuquichambi, Carlos Rey, and Marcos Nadal. 2019. “Aesthetic Sensitivity to Curvature in Real Objects and Abstract Designs.” Acta Psychologica 197: 124–130. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.05.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creusen, M.E.H. 2011. “Research Opportunities Related to Consumer Response to Product Design.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 28 (3): 405–408. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00812.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dal Palù, Doriana, Eleonora Buiatti, Giuseppina Emma Puglisi, Olivier Houix, Patrick Susini, Claudia De Giorgi, and Arianna Astolfi. 2017. “The Use of Semantic Differential Scales in Listening Tests: A Comparison between Context and Laboratory Test Conditions for the Rolling Sounds of Office Chairs.” Applied Acoustics 127: 270–283. doi:10.1016/j.apacoust.2017.06.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David, G.C. 2005. “Ergonomic Methods for Assessing Exposure to Risk Factors for Work-related Musculoskeletal Disorders.” Occupational Medicine 55 (3): 190–199. doi:10.1093/occmed/kqi082.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Bont, C.J.P.M., J.P.L. Schoormans, and M.T.T. Wessel. 1992. “Consumer Personality and the Acceptance of Product Design.” Design Studies 13 (2): 200–208. doi:10.1016/0142-694X(92)90286-J.
   Google Scholar
• Deininger, Michael, Shanna R. Daly, Jennifer C. Lee, Colleen M. Seifert, and Kathleen H. Sienko. 2019. “Prototyping for Context: Exploring Stakeholder Feedback Based on Prototype Type, Stakeholder Group and Question Type.” Research in Engineering Design 30 (4): 453–471. doi:10.1007/s00163-019-00317-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demirbilek, O., and B. Sener. 2003. “Product Design, Semantics and Emotional Response.” Ergonomics 46 (13-14): 1346–1360. doi:10.1080/00140130310001610874.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, L., and G. Wang. 2019. “Application of EEG and Interactive Evolutionary Design Method in Cultural and Creative Product Design.” Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience 2019: 1–16. doi:10.1155/2019/1860921.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desmet, P. 2003. “A Multilayered Model of Product Emotions.” The Design Journal 6 (2): 4–13. doi:10.2752/146069203789355480.
   Google Scholar
• Desmet, P. 2003. “Measuring Emotion: Development and Application of an Instrument to Measure Emotional Responses to Products.” In Funology, edited by M.A. Blythe and A.F. Monk, 111–123. Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Desmet, P. 2004. “A Basic Typology of Product Emotions.” City 4: 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Desmet, P. 2018. “Measuring Emotion: Development and Application of an Instrument to Measure Emotional Responses to Products.” In Funology 2, edited by M.A. Blythe and A.F. Monk, 391–404. Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• DeYoung, C.G. 2015. Openness/Intellect: A. Dimension of Personality Reflecting Cognitive Exploration. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Dianat, I., J. Molenbroek, and H.I. Castellucci. 2018. “A Review of the Methodology and Applications of Anthropometry in Ergonomics and Product Design.” Ergonomics 61 (12): 1696–1720. doi:10.1080/00140139.2018.1502817.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, M., Y. Cheng, J. Zhang, and G. Du. 2021. “Product Color Emotional Design Based on a Convolutional Neural Network and Search Neural Network.” Color Research & Application 46 (6): 1332–1346. doi:10.1002/col.22668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Djamasbi, S., D.M. Strong, and M. Dishaw. 2010. “Affect and Acceptance: Examining the Effects of Positive Mood on the Technology Acceptance Model.” Decision Support Systems 48 (2): 383–394. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2009.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobriban, E. 2020. “Permutation Methods for Factor Analysis and PCA.” Annals of Statistics 48: 2824–2847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong, Yuanfa, Rongzhen Zhu, Wei Peng, Qihua Tian, Gang Guo, and Wenrong Liu. 2021. “A Fuzzy Mapping Method for Kansei Needs Interpretation considering the Individual Kansei Variance.” Research in Engineering Design 32 (2): 175–187. doi:10.1007/s00163-021-00359-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnelly, J.H., M.J. Etzel, and S. Roeth. 1973. “The Relationship between Consumers’ Category Width and Trial of New Products.” Journal of Applied Psychology 57 (3): 335–338. doi:10.1037/h0034703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erlmann, V. 1998. “How Beautiful Is Small? Music, Globalization and the Aesthetics of the Local.” Yearbook for Traditional Music 30: 12–21. doi:10.2307/768551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estrada, C.A., A.M. Isen, and M.J. Young. 1997. “Positive Affect Facilitates Integration of Information and Decreases Anchoring in Reasoning among Physicians.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 72 (1): 117–135. doi:10.1006/obhd.1997.2734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eysenck, H.J. 1940. “The General Factor in Aesthetic Judgements 1.” British Journal of Psychology General Section 31 (1): 94–102. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1940.tb00977.x.
   Google Scholar
• Eysenck, H.J. 1972. “Personal Preferences, Aesthetic Sensitivity and Personality in Trained and Untrained Subjects.” Journal of Persanlity 4: 544–557.
   Google Scholar
• Feng, Yixiong, Yuliang Zhao, Hao Zheng, Zhiwu Li, and Jianrong Tan. 2020. “Data-driven Product Design toward Intelligent Manufacturing: A Review.” International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems 17 (2): 172988142091125. doi:10.1177/1729881420911257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenko, A., and T.J.L. van Rompay. 2018. “Consumer-driven Product Design.” In Methods in Consumer Research, edited by G.A.P. Varela, Volume 2, 427–462. Netherlands: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Fillinger, M.G. 2020. “Effects of Perceptual Balance on Aesthetic Appreciation” Doctoral dissertation. University of Konstanz.
   Google Scholar
• Fingerhut, J., and J.J. Prinz. 2020. “Aesthetic Emotions Reconsidered.” The Monist 103 (2): 223–239. doi:10.1093/monist/onz037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franke, N., M. Schreier, and U. Kaiser. 2010. “The “I Designed It Myself” Effect in Mass Customization.” Management Science 56 (1): 125–140. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1090.1077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frijda, N.H. 1986. The Emotions. USA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fujiwara, K., and S. Nagasawa. 2015a. “Analysis of Psychological Factors That Influence Preference for Luxury Food and Car Brands Targeting Japanese People.” American Journal of Industrial and Business Management 05 (09): 590–600. doi:10.4236/ajibm.2015.59059.
   Google Scholar
• Fujiwara, K., and S. Nagasawa. 2015b. “Relationships among Purchase Intentions for Luxury Brands and Personality Traits Based on the Big Five.” American Journal of Industrial and Business Management 05 (11): 631–639. doi:10.4236/ajibm.2015.511063.
   Google Scholar
• Gan, Y., and Y. Hirai. 2017. “Culture Reference Product Design–Case Study of Hans J. Wegner China Chair Design.” Culture 59: 30–41.
   Google Scholar
• García, F.M., Z.G. Estupiñan, and J.C. Olarte. 2017. “Comfort Testing in Office Chair Design.” Revista UIS Ingenierias 16: 69–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilal, F.G., J. Zhang, N.G. Gilal, and R.G. Gilal. 2018. “Integrating Self-determined Needs into the Relationship among Product Design, Willingness-to-Pay a Premium, and Word-of-Mouth: A Cross-cultural Gender-specific Study.” Psychology Research and Behavior Management 11: 227–241. doi:10.2147/PRBM.S161269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez-Puerto, Gerardo, Jaume Rosselló, Guido Corradi, Cristina Acedo-Carmona, Enric Munar, and Marcos Nadal. 2018. “Preference for Curved Contours across Cultures.” Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 12 (4): 432–439. doi:10.1037/aca0000135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Götz, K.O., R. Lynn, A.R. Borisy, and H.J. Eysenck. 1979. “A New Visual Aesthetic Sensitivity Test: I. Construction and Psychometric Properties.” Perceptual and Motor Skills 49 (3): 795–802. doi:10.2466/pms.1979.49.3.795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg, Daria, Elena Ehrensperger, Michael Schulte-Mecklenbeck, Wayne D. Hoyer, Z. John Zhang, and Harley Krohmer. 2020. “The Role of Brand Prominence and Extravagance of Product Design in Luxury Brand Building: What Drives Consumers’ Preferences for Loud versus Quiet Luxury?” Journal of Brand Management 27 (2): 195–210. doi:10.1057/s41262-019-00175-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güçlütürk, Y., R.H.A.H. Jacobs, and R van Lier. 2016. “Liking versus Complexity: Decomposing the Inverted U-curve.” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 10: 112. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2016.00112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, F., X. Wang, W. Liu, and Y. Ding. 2018. “Affective Preference Measurement of Product Appearance Based on Event-related Potentials.” Cognition, Technology & Work 20 (2): 299–308. doi:10.1007/s10111-018-0463-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagtvedt, H., and V.M. Patrick. 2014. “Consumer Response to Overstyling: Balancing Aesthetics and Functionality in Product Design.” Psychology & Marketing 31 (7): 518–525. doi:10.1002/mar.20713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallihan, G.M., H. Cheong, and L.H. Shu. 2012. “Confirmation and Cognitive Bias in Design Cognition.” In International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, 913–924. USA: American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Han, J., H. Forbes, and D. Schaefer. 2019. “An Exploration of the Relations between Functionality, Aesthetics and Creativity in Design.” In Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design, 259–268. USA: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/dsi.2019.29.
   Google Scholar
• Han, J.-X., and M. Ma. 2018. “A Study on Developing the Kansei Engineering of Jewellery in Female Users: Take PANDORA Jewellery for Example.” In International Conference on Kansei Engineering & Emotion Research, edited by H. Shoji, 94–103. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Han, Y.J., J.C. Nunes, and X. Drèze. 2010. “Signaling Status with Luxury Goods: The Role of Brand Prominence.” Journal of Marketing 74 (4): 15–30. doi:10.1509/jmkg.74.4.15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, H.E., A.D. Fisk, and W.A. Rogers. 2001. “Everyday Products: Easy to Use… or Not?” Ergonomics in Design: The Quarterly of Human Factors Applications 9 (4): 12–18. doi:10.1177/106480460100900404.
   Google Scholar
• Hartono, M., and T.K. Chuan. 2011. “How the Kano Model Contributes to Kansei Engineering in Services.” Ergonomics 54 (11): 987–1004. doi:10.1080/00140139.2011.616229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashimoto, S., A. Yamada, and N. Nagata. 2019. “A Quantification Method of Composite Impression of Products by Externalized Evaluation Words of the Appraisal Dictionary with Review Text Data.” International Journal of Affective Engineering: IJAE-D 2: 59–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haug, A. 2016. “A Framework for the Experience of Product Aesthetics.” The Design Journal 19 (5): 809–826. doi:10.1080/14606925.2016.1200342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemonnet-Goujot, A., and P. Valette-Florence. 2022. “All You Need Is Love” from Product Design Value Perception to Luxury Brand Love: An Integrated Framework.” Journal of Business Research 139: 1463–1475. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.10.066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, K.M. 2017. “Global Aesthetics—What Can We Do?” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 75 (4): 339–349. doi:10.1111/jaac.12403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoegg, J., J.W. Alba, and D.W. Dahl. 2010. “The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: Influence of Aesthetics on Product Feature Judgments.” Journal of Consumer Psychology 20 (4): 419–430. doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2010.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homburg, C., M. Schwemmle, and C. Kuehnl. 2015. “New Product Design: Concept, Measurement, and Consequences.” Journal of Marketing 79 (3): 41–56. doi:10.1509/jm.14.0199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn, D., and G. Salvendy. 2009. “Measuring Consumer Perception of Product Creativity: Impact on Satisfaction and Purchasability.” Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing 19 (3): 223–240. doi:10.1002/hfm.20150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hotta, H., and M. Hagiwara. 2006. “A Fuzzy Rule Based Personal Kansei Modeling System.” In 2006 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, 1031–1037. USA: IEEE Xplore. doi:10.1109/FUZZY.2006.1681837.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, M., H. Chen, R. Luo, and P. Sun. 2018. “Assessing Appearance and Emotional Attributes of Coloured Metallic Paints.” Coloration Technology 134 (1): 59–70. doi:10.1111/cote.12317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibrahim, D. 2016. “An Overview of Soft Computing.” Procedia Computer Science 102: 34–38. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2016.09.366.
   Google Scholar
• Idemen, E., A.B. Elmadag, and M. Okan. 2021. “A Qualitative Approach to Designer as a Product Cue: Proposed Conceptual Model of Consumers Perceptions and Attitudes.” Review of Managerial Science 15 (5): 1281–1309. doi:10.1007/s11846-020-00381-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikeda, M. 2022. “History of Japanese Design.” In History of Design and Design Law, edited by T. Aso, 3–17. Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ireland, R., and A. Liu. 2018. “Application of Data Analytics for Product Design: Sentiment Analysis of Online Product Reviews.” CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology 23: 128–144. doi:10.1016/j.cirpj.2018.06.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishihara, S., M. Nagamachi, S. Schütte, and J. Eklund. 2008. “Affective Meaning: The Kansei Engineering Approach.” In Product Experience, edited by H.N.J. Schifferstein and P. Hekkert, 477–496. Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Ito, S., and T. Yamashita. 2014. “Applying Rough Set to Analyze Psychological Effect of Mascot Character Design.” International Journal of Affective Engineering 13 (3): 159–165. doi:10.5057/ijae.13.159.
   Google Scholar
• James, Thomas W., G. Keith Humphrey, Joseph S. Gati, Philip Servos, Ravi S. Menon, and Melvyn A. Goodale. 2002. “Haptic Study of Three-dimensional Objects Activates Extrastriate Visual Areas.” Neuropsychologia 40 (10): 1706–1714. doi:10.1016/s0028-3932(02)00017-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, Q., L.-C. Chen, and J. Zhang. 2019. “Perception and Preference Analysis of Fashion Colors: Solid Color Shirts.” Sustainability 11 (8): 2405. doi:10.3390/su11082405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiao, Y., and Q.-X. Qu. 2019. “A Proposal for Kansei Knowledge Extraction Method Based on Natural Language Processing Technology and Online Product Reviews.” Computers in Industry 108: 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.compind.2019.02.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, J., Y. Liu, P. Ji, and C.K. Kwong. 2019. “Review on Recent Advances in Information Mining from Big Consumer Opinion Data for Product Design.” Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering 19: 10801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jylhä, H., and J. Hamari. 2019. “An Icon That Everyone Wants to Click: How Perceived Aesthetic Qualities Predict App Icon Successfulness.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 130: 73–85. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.04.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jylhä, H., and J. Hamari. 2021. “Demographic Factors Have Little Effect on Aesthetic Perceptions of Icons: A Study of Mobile Game Icons.” Internet Research 32: 87–110.
   Google Scholar
• Kamil, M.J.M., S. Moi Li Shi, and M.N.A. Sani. 2020. “Re-assessing the Design Needs of Trans-radial Amputees in Product Design Innovation.” Wacana Seni Journal of Arts Discourse 19: 61–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, N., Y. Ren, F. Feinberg, and P. Papalambros. 2019. Form + Function: Optimizing Aesthetic Product Design via Adaptive, Geometrized Preference Elicitation. arXiv Prepr arXiv191205047. USA: Cornell University Arxiv.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, X. 2020. “Aesthetic Product Design Combining with Rough Set Theory and Fuzzy Quality Function Deployment.” Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems 39 (1): 1131–1146. doi:10.3233/JIFS-192032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, Y.-J., and S.-Y. Park. 2016. “The Perfection of the Narcissistic Self: A Qualitative Study on Luxury Consumption and Customer Equity.” Journal of Business Research 69 (9): 3813–3819. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.12.073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapferer, J.-N. 2008. The New Strategic Brand Management: Creating and Sustaining Brand Equity Long Term. USA: Kogan Page Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Karjalainen, T.-M. 2007. “It Looks like a Toyota: Educational Approaches to Designing for Visual Brand Recognition.” International Journal of Design 1: 67–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karjalainen, T., and D. Snelders. 2010. “Designing Visual Recognition for the Brand.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 27 (1): 6–22. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2009.00696.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaulio, M.A. 1998. “Customer, Consumer and User Involvement in Product Development: A Framework and a Review of Selected Methods.” Total Quality Management 9 (1): 141–149. doi:10.1080/0954412989333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kermavnar, Tjaša, Alice Shannon, and Leonard W. O'Sullivan. 2021. “The Application of Additive Manufacturing/3D Printing in Ergonomic Aspects of Product Design: A Systematic Review.” Applied Ergonomics 97: 103528. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kesebir, S., and P. Kesebir. 2017. “A Growing Disconnection from Nature Is Evident in Cultural Products.” Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science 12 (2): 258–269. doi:10.1177/1745691616662473.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kharkongor, W.B., and D. Chakrabarti. 2019. “Developing a Framework That Can Assist Designers to Identify and Incorporate Notable Cultural Elements into Products Designed for Tourists.” In International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, edited by T. Z. Ahram, 794–804. Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Knetsch, J.L., and W.-K. Wong. 2009. “The Endowment Effect and the Reference State: Evidence and Manipulations.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 71 (2): 407–413. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2009.04.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi, M. 2020. Multi-objective Aesthetic Design Optimization for Minimizing the Effect of Variation in Customer Kansei. USA: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Kobayashi, M., S. Fujita, and T. Wada. 2022. Aesthetic Design Based on the Analysis of Questionnaire Results Using Deep Learning Techniques. USA: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Kobayashi, M., and T. Kinumura. 2017. “A Method of Gathering, Selecting and Hierarchizing Kansei Words for a Hierarchized Kansei Model.” Computer-Aided Design and Applications 14 (4): 464–471. doi:10.1080/16864360.2016.1257188.
   Google Scholar
• Kobayashi, M., T. Kinumura, and M. Higashi. 2016. “A Method for Supporting Aesthetic Design Based on the Analysis of the Relationships between Customer Kansei and Aesthetic Element.” Computer-Aided Design and Applications 13 (3): 281–288. doi:10.1080/16864360.2015.1114385.
   Google Scholar
• Kobayashi, M., and K. Niwa. 2018. “Method for Grouping of Customers and Aesthetic Design Based on Rough Set Theory.” Computer-Aided Design and Applications 15 (4): 565–574. doi:10.1080/16864360.2017.1419644.
   Google Scholar
• Kobayashi, M., and T. Takeda. 2021. Product Recommendation Based on Analysis of Aesthetic Elements Used to Customer’s Favorite Products. USA: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Kocabulut, Ö., and T. Albayrak. 2019. “The Effects of Mood and Personality Type on Service Quality Perception and Customer Satisfaction.” International Journal of Culture, Tourism, and Hospitality Research 13: 98–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kodinariya, T.M., and P.R. Makwana. 2013. “Review on Determining Number of Cluster in K-Means Clustering.” International Journal 1: 90–95.
   Google Scholar
• Kortum, P. 2021. “When Human Factors Fails: Intentional and Unintentional Bad Designs.” Ergonomics in Design 3: 10648046211033900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriegel, H., P. Kröger, J. Sander, and A. Zimek. 2011. “Density‐based Clustering.” WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 1 (3): 231–240. doi:10.1002/widm.30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruskal, J.B. 1964. “Nonmetric Multidimensional Scaling: A Numerical Method.” Psychometrika 29 (2): 115–129. doi:10.1007/BF02289694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhnert, B., M. Ragni, and F. Lindner. 2017. “The Gap between Human’s Attitude towards Robots in General and Human’s Expectation of an Ideal Everyday Life Robot.” In 2017 26th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), 1102–1107. USA: IEEE Xplore. doi:10.1109/ROMAN.2017.8172441.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, M., and C.H. Noble. 2016. “Beyond Form and Function: Why Do Consumers Value Product Design?” Journal of Business Research 69 (2): 613–620. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.05.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuroda, S., T. Yoshikawa, and T. Furuhashi. 2006. “A Proposal for Comparison of Impression Evaluation Data among Individuals by Using Clustering Method Based on Distributed Structure of Data.” In International Conference on Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing, edited by W. Ziarko and Y. Yao, 891–898. Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Leder, H., B. Belke, A. Oeberst, and D. Augustin. 2004. “A Model of Aesthetic Appreciation and Aesthetic Judgments.” British Journal of Psychology 95 (Pt 4): 489–508. doi:10.1348/0007126042369811.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lévy, P. 2013. “Beyond Kansei Engineering: The Emancipation of Kansei Design.” International Journal of Design 7: 83–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., M.-D. Shieh, and C.-C. Yang. 2019. “A Posterior Preference Articulation Approach to Kansei Engineering System for Product Form Design.” Research in Engineering Design 30 (1): 3–19. doi:10.1007/s00163-018-0297-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, M., C. Wang, S. Cheng, and S. Cheng. 2011. “An Event-related Potential Study of Semantic Style-match Judgments of Artistic Furniture.” International Journal of Psychophysiology: Official Journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology 82 (2): 188–195. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.08.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, S., and Y. Wu. 2020. “Research on the Model Differentiation of Baby Carriage Based on Multidimensional Scaling Method.” Academic Journal of Engineering and Technology Science 3: 75–81.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Y. 2003. “Engineering Aesthetics and Aesthetic Ergonomics: Theoretical Foundations and a Dual-process Research Methodology.” Ergonomics 46 (13-14): 1273–1292. doi:10.1080/00140130310001610829.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., F. Li, L.H. Tang, Z. Lan, J. Cui, O. Sourina, and C.-H. Chen. 2019. “Detection of Humanoid Robot Design Preferences Using EEG and Eye Tracker.” In 2019 International Conference on Cyberworlds (CW), 219–224. USA: IEEE Xplore. doi:10.1109/CW.2019.00044.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., and O. Sourina. 2014. “Real-time Subject-dependent EEG-based Emotion Recognition Algorithm.” In Transactions on Computational Science XXIII, edited by M.L. Gavrilova, 99–223. Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Locher, P., J. Frens, and K. Overbeeke. 2008. “The Influence of Induced Positive Affect and Design Experience on Aesthetic Responses to New Product Designs.” Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 2 (1): 1–7. doi:10.1037/1931-3896.2.1.1.
   Google Scholar
• Locher, P., C. Martindale, and L. Dorfman. 2020. New Directions in Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts. United Kingdom: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Locher, P., K. Overbeeke, and S. Wensveen. 2010. “Aesthetic Interaction: A Framework.” Design Issues 26 (2): 70–79. doi:10.1162/DESI_a_00017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loewy, R. 2002. Never Leave Well Enough Alone. USA: JHU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Logkizidou, M., P. Bottomley, R. Angell, and H. Evanschitzky. 2019. “Why Museological Merchandise Displays Enhance Luxury Product Evaluations: An Extended Art Infusion Effect.” Journal of Retailing 95 (1): 67–82. doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2018.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López, Ó., C. Murillo, and A. González. 2021. “Systematic Literature Reviews in Kansei Engineering for Product Design—A Comparative Study from 1995 to 2020.” Sensors 21 (19): 6532. doi:10.3390/s21196532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lottridge, D., M. Chignell, and A. Jovicic. 2011. “Affective Interaction: Understanding, Evaluating, and Designing for Human Emotion.” Reviews of Human Factors and Ergonomics 7 (1): 197–217. doi:10.1177/1557234X11410385.
   Google Scholar
• Luo, S.-J., and Y.-N. Dong. 2017. “Role of Cultural Inspiration with Different Types in Cultural Product Design Activities.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 27 (3): 499–515. doi:10.1007/s10798-016-9359-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, M., X. Jiang, W. Liu, X. Wang, C. Zhao, D. LIU, and G.-Z. Yang. 2020. Emotional Fusion and Design Optimization Method Based on Kansei-AD: A Case Study of Laser Additive Manufacturing Equipment. USA: Research square.
   Google Scholar
• Maki, T., and H. Yanagisawa. 2019. “A Methodology for Multisensory Product Experience Design Using Cross-modal Effect: A Case of SLR Camera.” In Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design, 3801–3810. USA: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/dsi.2019.387.
   Google Scholar
• Marco Almagro, L. 2011. Statistical Methods in Kansei Engineering Studies. Polytechnic University of Cartalonia Sain.
   Google Scholar
• Marin, M.M., A. Lampatz, M. Wandl, and H. Leder. 2016. “Berlyne Revisited: Evidence for the Multifaceted Nature of Hedonic Tone in the Appreciation of Paintings and Music.” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 10: 536. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2016.00536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mata, M.P., S. Ahmed-Kristensen, P.B. Brockhoff, and H. Yanagisawa. 2017. “Investigating the Influence of Product Perception and Geometric Features.” Research in Engineering Design 28 (3): 357–379. doi:10.1007/s00163-016-0244-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormack, J., and A. Lomas. 2021. “Deep Learning of Individual Aesthetics.” Neural Computing and Applications 33 (1): 3–17. doi:10.1007/s00521-020-05376-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menninghaus, Winfried, Valentin Wagner, Eugen Wassiliwizky, Ines Schindler, Julian Hanich, Thomas Jacobsen, and Stefan Koelsch. 2019. “What Are Aesthetic Emotions?” Psychological Review 126 (2): 171–195. doi:10.1037/rev0000135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyamoto, M., and H. Yanagisawa. 2020. “Modeling Acceptable Novelty Using Information Theory.” International Symposium on Affective Science and Engineering 2020 (0): 1–4. doi:10.5057/isase.2020-C000029.
   Google Scholar
• Mohammadi-Zarghan, S., and R. Afhami. 2019. “Memento Mori: The Influence of Personality and Individual Differences on Aesthetic Appreciation of Death-related Artworks by Damien Hirst.” Mortality 24 (4): 467–485. doi:10.1080/13576275.2019.1567483.
   Google Scholar
• Morewedge, C.K., and C.E. Giblin. 2015. “Explanations of the Endowment Effect: An Integrative Review.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 19 (6): 339–348. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2015.04.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müezzinoğlu, M.K., M.L. Hidayetoğlu, and K. Yıldırım. 2021. “The Effects of Light Color Temperatures on Students’ Perceptual Evaluations in Design Studios.” Color Research & Application 46 (5): 1006–1018. doi:10.1002/col.22654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murtagh, F., and P. Contreras. 2012. “Algorithms for Hierarchical Clustering: An Overview.” WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 2 (1): 86–97. doi:10.1002/widm.53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myszkowski, N., P. Çelik, and M. Storme. 2018. “A Meta-analysis of the Relationship between Intelligence and Visual “Taste” Measures.” Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 12 (1): 24–33. doi:10.1037/aca0000099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myszkowski, N., and M. Storme. 2012. “How Personality Traits Predict Design-driven Consumer Choices.” European Journal of Psychology 8: 641–650.
   Google Scholar
• Myszkowski, N., and M. Storme. 2017. “Measuring “Good Taste” with the Visual Aesthetic Sensitivity Test-revised (VAST-R).” Personality and Individual Differences 117: 91–100. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2017.05.041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myszkowski, N., M. Storme, F. Zenasni, and T. Lubart. 2014. “Is Visual Aesthetic Sensitivity Independent from Intelligence, Personality and Creativity?” Personality and Individual Differences 59: 16–20. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2013.10.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagamachi, M. 2002. “Kansei Engineering as a Powerful Consumer-oriented Technology for Product Development.” Applied Ergonomics 33 (3): 289–294. doi:10.1016/s0003-6870(02)00019-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagamachi, M., and A.M. Lokman. 2016. Innovations of Kansei Engineering. USA: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nagano, H., S. Okamoto, and Y. Yamada. 2018. “Modeling Semantically Multilayered Affective and Psychophysical Responses toward Tactile Textures.” IEEE Transactions on Haptics 11 (4): 568–578. doi:10.1109/TOH.2018.2840703.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, H.T., and H. Feng. 2021. “Antecedents and Financial Impacts of Building Brand Love.” International Journal of Research in Marketing 38 (3): 572–592. doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2020.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble, W.S. 2006. “What Is a Support Vector Machine?” Nature Biotechnology 24 (12): 1565–1567. doi:10.1038/nbt1206-1565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman, D.A. 2004. Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things. USA: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• O’Hagan, Adrian, Thomas Brendan Murphy, Isobel Claire Gormley, Paul D. McNicholas, and Dimitris Karlis. 2016. “Clustering with the Multivariate Normal Inverse Gaussian Distribution.” Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 93: 18–30. doi:10.1016/j.csda.2014.09.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orne, M.T. 1962. “On the Social Psychology of the Psychological Experiment: With Particular Reference to Demand Characteristics and Their Implications.” American Psychologist 17 (11): 776–783. doi:10.1037/h0043424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osgood, C.E. 2009. “Semantic Differential Technique in the Comparative Study of Cultures 1.” American Anthropologist 66 (3): 171–200. doi:10.1525/aa.1964.66.3.02a00880.
   Google Scholar
• Osgood, C.E., G.J. Suci, and P.H. Tannenbaum. 1957. The Measurement of Meaning. USA: Ninth printing.
   Google Scholar
• Othman, B.A., A. Harun, N.M. De Almeida, and Z.M. Sadq. 2020. “The Effects on Customer Satisfaction and Customer Loyalty by Integrating Marketing Communication and after Sale Service into the Traditional Marketing Mix Model of Umrah Travel Services in Malaysia.” Journal of Islamic Marketing 12: 363–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ou, L., M.R. Luo, A. Woodcock, and A. Wright. 2004. “A Study of Colour Emotion and Colour Preference. Part I: Colour Emotions for Single Colours.” Color Research & Application 29 (3): 232–240. doi:10.1002/col.20010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, S.E., and K.B. Schloss. 2010. “An Ecological Valence Theory of Human Color Preference.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107 (19): 8877–8882. doi:10.1073/pnas.0906172107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, S.E., K.B. Schloss, and J. Sammartino. 2013. “Visual Aesthetics and Human Preference.” Annual Review of Psychology 64: 77–107. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, Y., A. Burnap, J. Hartley, R. Gonzalez, and P. Y. Papalambros. 2017. “Deep Design: Product Aesthetics for Heterogeneous Markets.” In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, edited by S. Matwin, S. Yu, and F. Farooq, 1961–1970. USA: ACM Digital Library.
   Google Scholar
• Parisi, S., V. Rognoli, and M. Sonneveld. 2017. “Material Tinkering. An Inspirational Approach for Experiential Learning and Envisioning in Product Design Education.” The Design Journal 20 (sup1): S1167–S1184. doi:10.1080/14606925.2017.1353059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawlak, Z., J. Grzymala-Busse, R. Slowinski, and W. Ziarko. 1995. “Rough Sets.” Communications of the ACM 38 (11): 88–95. doi:10.1145/219717.219791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawlak, Z., L. Polkowski, and A. Skowron. 2001. “Rough Set Theory.” KI 15: 38–39.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, K. 1901. “LIII. On Lines and Planes of Closest Fit to Systems of Points in Space.” The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science 2 (11): 559–572. doi:10.1080/14786440109462720.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, J., and S.B. Shu. 2009. “The Effect of Mere Touch on Perceived Ownership.” Journal of Consumer Research 36 (3): 434–447. doi:10.1086/598614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelowski, M., P.S. Markey, J.O. Lauring, and H. Leder. 2016. “Visualizing the Impact of Art: An Update and Comparison of Current Psychological Models of Art Experience.” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 10: 160. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2016.00160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira, M.J., L.M. Straker, T.A. Comans, and V. Johnston. 2016. “Inter-rater Reliability of an Observation-based Ergonomics Assessment Checklist for Office Workers.” Ergonomics 59 (12): 1606–1612. doi:10.1080/00140139.2016.1157215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plutchik, R., and H. Kellerman. 2013. Theories of Emotion. USA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poels, K., and S. Dewitte. 2006. “How to Capture the Heart? Reviewing 20 Years of Emotion Measurement in Advertising.” Journal of Advertising Research 46 (1): 18–37. doi:10.2501/S0021849906060041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Post, R.A.G., J. Blijlevens, and P. Hekkert. 2016. “‘To Preserve Unity While Almost Allowing for Chaos’: Testing the Aesthetic Principle of Unity-in-Variety in Product Design.” Acta Psychologica 163: 142–152. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.11.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pouyanfar, Samira, Saad Sadiq, Yilin Yan, Haiman Tian, Yudong Tao, Maria Presa Reyes, Mei-Ling Shyu, Shu-Ching Chen, and S.S. Iyengar. 2019. “A Survey on Deep Learning: Algorithms, Techniques, and Applications.” ACM Computing Surveys 51 (5): 1–36. doi:10.1145/3234150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiao, L., M. Efatmaneshnik, M. Ryan, and S. Shoval. 2017. “Product Modular Analysis with Design Structure Matrix Using a Hybrid Approach Based on MDS and Clustering.” Journal of Engineering Design 28 (6): 433–456. doi:10.1080/09544828.2017.1325858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin, Z., and S. Ng. 2020. “Culture as Inspiration: A Metaphorical Framework for Designing Products with Traditional Cultural Properties (TCPs).” Sustainability 12 (17): 7171. doi:10.3390/su12177171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin, Z., Y. Song, and Y. Tian. 2019. “The Impact of Product Design with Traditional Cultural Properties (TCPs) on Consumer Behavior through Cultural Perceptions: Evidence from the Young Chinese Generation.” Sustainability 11 (2): 426. doi:10.3390/su11020426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quan, H., S. Li, C. Zeng, H. Wei, and J. Hu. 2021. Big Data Driven Product Design: A Survey. arXiv Prepr arXiv210911424. USA: Cornel univesity arxiv.
   Google Scholar
• Radford, S.K., and P.H. Bloch. 2011. “Linking Innovation to Design: Consumer Responses to Visual Product Newness.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 28 (s1): 208–220. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00871.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman, Md. Mustafizur, Ajay Krishno Sarkar, Md. Amzad Hossain, Md. Selim Hossain, Md. Rabiul Islam, Md. Biplob Hossain, Julian M.W. Quinn, and Mohammad Ali Moni. 2021. “Recognition of Human Emotions Using EEG Signals: A Review.” Computers in Biology and Medicine 136: 104696. doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104696.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranaweera, A.T., B.A.S. Martin, and H.S. Jin. 2021. “What You Touch, Touches You: The Influence of Haptic Attributes on Consumer Product Impressions.” Psychology & Marketing 38 (1): 183–195. doi:10.1002/mar.21433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasche, C., and C. Koch. 2002. “Recognizing the Gist of a Visual Scene: Possible Perceptual and Neural Mechanisms.” Neurocomputing 44-46: 979–984. doi:10.1016/S0925-2312(02)00500-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razza, B., and L.C. Paschoarelli. 2015. “Affective Perception of Disposable Razors: A Kansei Engineering Approach.” Procedia Manufacturing 3: 6228–6236. doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.750.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, F. 2016. The Fight for Beauty: Our Path to a Better Future. England: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Roh, Y., G. Heo, and S.E. Whang. 2019. “A Survey on Data Collection for Machine Learning: A Big Data-ai Integration Perspective.” IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 33: 1328–1347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruder, S. 2016. An Overview of Gradient Descent Optimization Algorithms. arXiv Prepr arXiv160904747. USA: Cornel university arxiv.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Pastor, L., V. Chulvi, E. Mulet, and M. Royo. 2022. “The Relationship between Personal Intrinsic Factors towards a Design Problem and the Degree of Novelty and Circularity.” Research in Engineering Design 33 (1): 7–30. doi:10.1007/s00163-021-00374-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagnier, Camille, Emilie Loup-Escande, Domitile Lourdeaux, Indira Thouvenin, and Gérard Valléry. 2020. “User Acceptance of Virtual Reality: An Extended Technology Acceptance Model.” International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 36 (11): 993–1007. doi:10.1080/10447318.2019.1708612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schindler, Ines, Georg Hosoya, Winfried Menninghaus, Ursula Beermann, Valentin Wagner, Michael Eid, and Klaus R. Scherer. 2017. “Measuring Aesthetic Emotions: A Review of the Literature and a New Assessment Tool.” PLoS One 12 (6): e0178899. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0178899.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoen, K.L., and N. Crilly. 2012. Implicit Methods for Testing Product Preference Exploratory Studies with the Affective Simon Task. USA: Citeceer.
   Google Scholar
• Schütte, S. 2005. Engineering Emotional Values in Product Design: Kansei Engineering in Development. Sweden: Digitala Vetenskapliga Arkivet.
   Google Scholar
• Schütte, S.T.W., J. Eklund, J.R.C. Axelsson, and M. Nagamachi. 2004. “Concepts, Methods and Tools in Kansei Engineering.” Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 5 (3): 214–231. doi:10.1080/1463922021000049980.
   Google Scholar
• Sekoguchi, T., and H. Yanagisawa. 2019. “A Proposal of Mathematical Approach to Formulate Emotional Desensitization to Novelty.” International Symposium on Affective Science and Engineering 2019: 1–5. doi:10.5057/isase.2019-C000036.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, L. 2019. Embodied Cognition. USA: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, H.-C., and K.-C. Wang. 2016. “Affective Product Form Design Using Fuzzy Kansei Engineering and Creativity.” Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing 7 (6): 875–888. doi:10.1007/s12652-016-0402-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, A., F. Huo, and G. Hou. 2021. “Effects of Design Aesthetics on the Perceived Value of a Product.” Frontiers in Psychology 12:670800.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shieh, M.-D., Y. Li, and C.-C. Yang. 2018. “Comparison of Multi-objective Evolutionary Algorithms in Hybrid Kansei Engineering System for Product Form Design.” Advanced Engineering Informatics 36: 31–42. doi:10.1016/j.aei.2018.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shieh, M.-D., and Y.-E. Yeh. 2013. “Developing a Design Support System for the Exterior Form of Running Shoes Using Partial Least Squares and Neural Networks.” Computers and Industrial Engineering 65 (4): 704–718. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2013.05.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shieh, M.-D., Y.-E. Yeh, and C.-L. Huang. 2016. “Eliciting Design Knowledge from Affective Responses Using Rough Sets and Kansei Engineering System.” Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing 7 (1): 107–120. doi:10.1007/s12652-015-0307-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shouse, E. 2005. “Feeling, Emotion, Affect.” M/C Journal 8 (6). doi:10.5204/mcj.2443.
   Google Scholar
• Sierra-Pérez, J., J. Boschmonart-Rives, and J. Oliver-Solà. 2019. “Introducing Ergonomics Requirements in the Eco-design of Energy-related Products from Users’ Behaviour Approach.” Ergonomics 62 (7): 940–953. doi:10.1080/00140139.2019.1600049.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvia, P.J., and C.M. Barona. 2009. “Do People Prefer Curved Objects? Angularity, Expertise, and Aesthetic Preference.” Empirical Studies of the Arts 27 (1): 25–42. doi:10.2190/EM.27.1.b.
   Google Scholar
• Sirakaya, E., J. Petrick, and H.-S. Choi. 2004. “The Role of Mood on Tourism Product Evaluations.” Annals of Tourism Research 31 (3): 517–539. doi:10.1016/j.annals.2004.01.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, K.M. 2015. “Conditions Influencing the Development of Design Expertise: As Identified in Interior Design Student Accounts.” Design Studies 36: 77–98. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2014.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spangenberg, E.R., K.E. Voss, and A.E. Crowley. 1997. “Measuring the Hedonic and Utilitarian Dimensions of Attitude: A Generally Applicable Scale.” ACR North American Advances 24.
   Google Scholar
• Spielholz, P., B. Silverstein, M. Morgan, H. Checkoway, and J. Kaufman. 2001. “Comparison of Self-report, Video Observation and Direct Measurement Methods for Upper Extremity Musculoskeletal Disorder Physical Risk Factors.” Ergonomics 44 (6): 588–613. doi:10.1080/00140130118050.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Summerfeldt, L.J., S.J. Gilbert, and M. Reynolds. 2015. “Incompleteness, Aesthetic Sensitivity, and the Obsessive-compulsive Need for Symmetry.” Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 49 (Pt B): 141–149. doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2015.03.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundar, A., E.S. Cao, and K.A. Machleit. 2020. “How Product Aesthetics Cues Efficacy Beliefs of Product Performance.” Psychology & Marketing 37 (9): 1246–1262. doi:10.1002/mar.21355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutono, S.B. 2016. “Selection of Representative Kansei Adjectives Using Cluster Analysis: A Case Study on Car Design.” International Journal of Advanced Engineering, Management and Science 2: 239691.
   Google Scholar
• Sutono, S.B. 2018. “Exploring the Relationship between Consumers’ Emotional Perception and Product Forms: A Case Study on Car Design.” Simetris: Jurnal Teknik Mesin, Elektro dan Ilmu Komputer 9: 395–402.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, P., G. Lawson, X. Sun, and S. Sharples. 2022. “Probing Cultural Differences in Product Design and Consumer Evaluation Using Repertory Grid Analysis.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 32 (3): 1875–1894. doi:10.1007/s10798-021-09663-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavares, D.R., O. Canciglieri Junior, L.B. de M. Guimarães, and M. Rudek. 2020. “A Systematic Literature Review of Consumers’ Cognitive-affective Needs in Product Design from 1999 to 2019.” Frontiers in Neuroergonomics 1: 5.
   Google Scholar
• Teknomo, K. 2006. “K-means Clustering Tutorial.” Medicine 100: 3.
   Google Scholar
• Tomico, O., N. Mizutani, P. Levy, T. Yokoi, Y. Cho, and T. Yamanaka. 2008. “Kansei Physiological Measurements and Constructivist Psychological Explorations for Approaching User Subjective Experience.” In DS 48: Proceedings DESIGN 2008, the 10th International Design Conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 529–536. USA: Design Society.
   Google Scholar
• Tsao, Y.-C., S.-Y. Huang, and C.-W. Hung. 2019. “Design for Product Usage: A Study on the Ambient Media Image of Product Packaging.” International Journal of Organizational Innovation 12: 165–187.
   Google Scholar
• Tseng, M.M., R.J. Jiao, and C. Wang. 2010. “Design for Mass Personalization.” CIRP Annals 59 (1): 175–178. doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2010.03.097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tynan, C., S. McKechnie, and C. Chhuon. 2010. “Co-creating Value for Luxury Brands.” Journal of Business Research 63 (11): 1156–1163. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.10.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ueda, K., T. Sekoguchi, and H. Yanagisawa. 2021. “How Predictability Affects Habituation to Novelty.” PLoS One 16 (6): e0237278. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0237278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulusoy, B., N. Olguntürk, and R. Aslanoğlu. 2021. “Pairing Colours in Residential Architecture for Different Interior Types.” Color Research & Application 46 (5): 1079–1090. doi:10.1002/col.22640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Geert, E., and J. Wagemans. 2019. “Order, Complexity, and Aesthetic Preferences for Neatly Organized Compositions.” Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 15: 484–504.
   Google Scholar
• Van Geert, E., and J. Wagemans. 2020. “Order, Complexity, and Aesthetic Appreciation.” Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 14 (2): 135–154. doi:10.1037/aca0000224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Ooijen, I., M.L. Fransen, P.W.J. Verlegh, and E.G. Smit. 2017. “Packaging Design as an Implicit Communicator: Effects on Product Quality Inferences in the Presence of Explicit Quality Cues.” Food Quality and Preference 62: 71–79. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.06.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Rompay, T., and G. Ludden. 2015. “Types of Embodiment in Design: The Embodied Foundations of Meaning and Affect in Product Design.” International Journal of Design 9: 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vazquez, M.M., and T. Yamanaka. 2014. “Product Novelty Impact on User Kansei.” In KEER2014. Proceedings of the 5th Kansei Engineering and Emotion Research; International Conference; Linköping, Sweden, June 11–13, edited by S. Schütte and P. Levy, 503–516. Sweeden: Linköping University Electronic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Veelaert, L., E. Du Bois, I. Moons, and E. Karana. 2020. “Experiential Characterization of Materials in Product Design: A Literature Review.” Materials and Design 190: 108543. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlah, D., and R. Žavbi. 2020. “An Investigation into 2D and 3D Shapes Perception.” Tehnički Vjesnik 27: 37–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrána, J., and S. Mokrý. 2020. “Haptics and Its Effect on Consumers Intentions Using Neuroscientific Methods: Literature Review.” Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis 68 (2): 451–457. doi:10.11118/actaun202068020451.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, S., M. Evans, T. Cassidy, A. T. Holroyd, and J. Jung. 2018. Design Roots: Culturally Significant Designs, Products and Practices. USA: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, C.-A., T. Baird, J. Huang, J.D. Coutinho, D.C. Brien, and D.P. Munoz. 2018. “Arousal Effects on Pupil Size, Heart Rate, and Skin Conductance in an Emotional Face Task.” Frontiers in Neurology 9: 1029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, F., J. Xu, H. Zhang, and J. Yin. 2021. “Emotion Analysis of Personalized Color of Beauty Package Based on NCD Image Positioning.” Frontiers in Psychology 12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, K.-C. 2011. “A Hybrid Kansei Engineering Design Expert System Based on Grey System Theory and Support Vector Regression.” Expert Systems with Applications 38 (7): 8738–8750. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2011.01.083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., D.Y. Mo, and M.M. Tseng. 2018. “Mapping Customer Needs to Design Parameters in the Front End of Product Design by Applying Deep Learning.” CIRP Annals 67 (1): 145–148. doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2018.04.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Yahui, Suihuai Yu, Ning Ma, Jinlei Wang, Zhigang Hu, Zhuo Liu, and Jibo He. 2020. “Prediction of Product Design Decision Making: An Investigation of Eye Movements and EEG Features.” Advanced Engineering Informatics 45: 101095. doi:10.1016/j.aei.2020.101095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weichselbaum, H., H. Leder, and U. Ansorge. 2018. “Implicit and Explicit Evaluation of Visual Symmetry as a Function of Art Expertise.” i-Perception 9 (2): 2041669518761464. doi:10.1177/2041669518761464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wensveen, S.A.G. 2005. A Tangibility Approach to Affective Interaction. USA: Citeseer.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, Jianfeng, Baixi Xing, Huahao Si, Jian Dou, Jin Wang, Yuning Zhu, and Xiaojian Liu. 2020. “Product Design Award Prediction Modeling: Design Visual Aesthetic Quality Assessment via DCNNs.” IEEE Access 8: 211028–211047. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3039715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong, Y., Y. Li, P. Pan, and Y. Chen. 2016. “A Regression-based Kansei Engineering System Based on Form Feature Lines for Product Form Design.” Advances in Mechanical Engineering 8 (7): 168781401665610. doi:10.1177/1687814016656107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue, H., P.M.A. Desmet, and S.F. Fokkinga. 2020. “Mood Granularity for Design: Introducing a Holistic Typology of 20 Mood States.” International Journal of Design 14: 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamagishi, K., K. Seki, and H. Nishimura. 2018. “Requirement Analysis Considering Uncertain Customer Preference for Kansei Quality of Product.” Journal of Advanced Mechanical Design, Systems, and Manufacturing 12 (1): JAMDSM0034–JAMDSM0034. doi:10.1299/jamdsm.2018jamdsm0034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamamoto, K., T. Yoshikawa, and T. Furuhashi. 2005. “A Proposal of Clustering Method for Subjects by Individuality Based on Kansei Data Structure.” Journal of Japan Society of Kansei Engineering 6.
   Google Scholar
• Yan, Jie, Bing Lv, Jianqiang Wang, Derong Duan, Mengjia Chen, and Zequn Li. 2018. “Design and Evaluation of Silage Equipment Control Panel Based on the Theory of Emotional Design and Kansei Engineering.” MATEC Web of Conferences 176: 01004. doi:10.1051/matecconf/201817601004.
   Google Scholar
• Yanagisawa, H. 2019. “How Does Expectation Affect Sensory Experience?-A Theory of Relativity in Perception.” International Symposium on Affective Science and Engineering 2019 (0): 1–4. doi:10.5057/isase.2019-C000014.
   Google Scholar
• Yanagisawa, H., C. Miyazaki, and C. Bouchard. 2017. “Kansei Modeling Methodology for Multisensory UX Design.” In DS 87-8 Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 17) Vol 8: Human Behaviour in Design, Vancouver, Canada, August 21–25, edited by A. Maier, 159–168. USA: Design Society.
   Google Scholar
• Yanagisawa, H., S. Nakano, and T. Murakami. 2017. “A Kansei Database Framework for the Delight Design Platform.” In Advances in Affective and Pleasurable Design, edited by W. Chung and C.S. Shin, 511–518. Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Yanagisawa, H., and K. Takatsuji. 2015. “Effects of Visual Expectation on Perceived Tactile Perception: An Evaluation Method of Surface Texture with Expectation Effect.” International Journal of Design 9: 39–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Cheng, Lingang Wu, Kun Tan, Chunyang Yu, Yuliang Zhou, Ye Tao, and Yu Song. 2021. “Online User Review Analysis for Product Evaluation and Improvement.” Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research 16 (5): 1598–1611. doi:10.3390/jtaer16050090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, M., L. Lin, and S. Milekic. 2018. “Affective Image Classification Based on User Eye Movement and EEG Experience Information.” Interacting with Computers 30 (5): 417–432. doi:10.1093/iwc/iwy018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeh, Y.-E. 2020. “Prediction of Optimized Color Design for Sports Shoes Using an Artificial Neural Network and Genetic Algorithm.” Applied Sciences 10 (5): 1560. doi:10.3390/app10051560.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, H.-C., C.-J. Chou, and D.-B. Luh. 2018. “The Design Application of Behavior Observation to the User’s Experience Drop—An Exemplar of the Warning System Planned to Prevent the Collision Door.” In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Applied System Invention (ICASI), 694–698. USA: IEEE Xplore. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/conhome/8379737/proceeding.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, X., and W. Qi. 2018. “A User Study of Wearable EEG Headset Products for Emotion Analysis.” In Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Algorithms, Computing and Artificial Intelligence, 1–7. USA: ACM Digital Library.
   Google Scholar
• Yun, M.H., S.H. Han, S.W. Hong, and J. Kim. 2003. “Incorporating User Satisfaction into the Look-and-Feel of Mobile Phone Design.” Ergonomics 46 (13–14): 1423–1440. doi:10.1080/00140130310001610919.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, A., H. Liu, S. Zhang, and J. Ouyang. 2021. “Evaluation and Design Method for Product Form Aesthetics Based on Deep Learning.” IEEE Access 9: 108992–109003. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3101619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, F., J. Ayoub, Q. Xu, and X. Jessie Yang. 2020. “A Machine Learning Approach to Customer Needs Analysis for Product Ecosystems.” Journal of Mechanical Design 142:13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, F., Y. Ji, and R. Jiao. 2020. Emotional Design: An Overview. USA: The University of Michigan Library. https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/163319?show=full
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, X., P.-L.P. Rau, M. Ohkura., T. Laohakangvalvit, and B. Wang. 2022. “A Deep Learning-based Approach to Facilitate Cross-cultural Kansei Design.” In International Conference on Human-computer Interaction, edited by R. Nugent, 145–160. Germany: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-06038-0_11
   Google Scholar