Clearing the way for participatory data stewardship in artificial intelligence development: a mixed methods approach

References

• Ajzen, I. 1991. “The Theory of Planned Behavior.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50 (2): 179–211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I., and M. Fishbein. 1975. “A Bayesian Analysis of Attribution Processes.” Psychological Bulletin 82 (2): 261–277. doi:10.1037/h0076477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreoni, J. 1990. “Impure Altruism and Donations to Public Goods: A Theory of Warm-Glow Giving.” The Economic Journal 100 (401): 464–477. doi:10.2307/2234133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, J.E., H. Ward, and J. Yoon. 2021. “UTAUT as a Model for Understanding Intention to Adopt AI and Related Technologies among Librarians.” The Journal of Academic Librarianship 47 (6): 102437. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Araujo, T., J. Ausloos, W. van Atteveldt, F. Loecherbach, J. Moeller, J. Ohme, D. Trilling, B. van de Velde, C. de Vreese, and K. Welbers. 2022. “Osd2f: An Open-Source Data Donation Framework.” Computational Communication Research 4 (2): 372–387. doi:10.31235/osf.io/xjk6t.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, T.W. 2013. “The Importance of a Priori Sample Size Estimation in Strength and Conditioning Research.” Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 27 (8): 2323–2337. doi:10.1519/JSC.0b013e318278eea0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belanche, D., L.V. Casalo, and C. Flavian. 2019. “Artificial Intelligence in FinTech: understanding Robo-Advisors Adoption among Customers.” Industrial Management & Data Systems 119 (7): 1411–1430. doi:10.1108/IMDS-08-2018-0368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bietz, M., K. Patrick, and C. Bloss. 2019. “Data Donation as a Model for Citizen Science Health Research.” Citizen Science: Theory and Practice 4 (1): 1–11. doi:10.5334/cstp.178.
   Google Scholar
• Birhane, A., W. Isaac, V. Prabhakaran, M. Díaz, M.C. Elish, I. Gabriel, and S. Mohamed. 2022. “Power to the People? Opportunities and Challenges for Participatory AI.” Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization 1–8. doi:10.1145/3551624.3555290.
   Google Scholar
• Bonney, R., H. Ballard, R. Jordan, E. McCallie, T. Phillips, J. Shirk, C. Wilderman. 2009. Public Participation in Scientific Research: Defining the Field and Assessing Its Potential for Informal Science Education. A CAISE Inquiry Group Report.A CAISE Inquiry Group Report.
   Google Scholar
• Bowerman, B.L., and R.T. O’Connell. 1990. Linear Statistical Models: An Applied Approach. USA: Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Buolamwini, J., and T. Gebru. 2018. “Gender Shades: Intersectional Accuracy Disparities in Commercial Gender Classification.” Paper presented at the Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency, April, 2020. https://proceedings.mlr.press/v81/buolamwini18a.html
   Google Scholar
• Carlo, G., M.A. Okun, G.P. Knight, and M.R.T. de Guzman. 2005. “The Interplay of Traits and Motives on Volunteering: Agreeableness, Extraversion and Prosocial Value Motivation.” Personality and Individual Differences 38 (6): 1293–1305. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2004.08.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centre for Data Ethics and Innovation. 2021. “BritainThinks: Trust in Data” Accessed December, 2022. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/britainthinks-trust-in-data
   Google Scholar
• Centre for Data Ethics and Innovation. 2022. “Public Attitudes to Data and AI: Tracker Survey.” Accessed March, 2023. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/public-attitudes-to-data-and-ai-tracker-survey
   Google Scholar
• Chan, A., C.T. Okolo, Z. Terner, and A. Wang. 2021. “The Limits of Global Inclusion in AI Development.” Accessed March, 2022. https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.01265
   Google Scholar
• Chaudhry, I.S., R.Y. Paquibut, and H. Chabchoub. 2022. “Factors Influencing Employees Trust in AI; It’s Adoption at Work: Evidence from United Arab Emirates.” In 2022 International Arab Conference on Information Technology (ACIT), 1–7. IEEE. doi:10.1109/acit57182.2022.9994226.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, T.E., D.Y. Lam, and A.C. Yeung. 2006. “Adoption of Internet Banking: An Empirical Study in Hong Kong.” Decision Support Systems 42 (3): 1558–1572. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2006.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, Y. 2020. “A Study of Employee Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence Technology.” European Journal of Management and Business Economics 30 (3): 318–330. doi:10.1108/EJMBE-06-2020-0158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choung, H., P. David, and A. Ross. 2022. “Trust in ai and Its Role in the Acceptance of ai Technologies.” International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 39 (9): 1727–1739. doi:10.1080/10447318.2022.2050543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow, A., and B. Perrigo. 2023. “The AI Arms Race is Changing Everything.” Time. Accessed February, 2023. https://time.com/6255952/ai-impact-chatgpt-microsoft-google/.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. 2013. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. USA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Couldry, N., C. Rodriguez, G. Bolin, J. Cohen, G. Goggin, M.M. Kraidy, K. Iwabuchi, K.-S. Lee, J. Qiu, and I. Volkmer. 2018. “Inequality and Communicative Struggles in Digital Times: A Global Report on Communication for Social Progress.” Accessed January, 2023. https://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1001&context=cargc_strategicdocuments
   Google Scholar
• Davis, F.D. 1985. A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-User Information Systems: Theory and Results. USA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, F.D. 1989. “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology.” MIS Quarterly 13 (3): 319–340. doi:10.2307/249008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deloitte and Reform. 2018. “Citizens, Government and Business: The State of the State 2017-18.” Accessed January, 2023. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/uk/Documents/public-sector/deloitte-uk-the-state-of-the-state-report-2017.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dinev, T., and P. Hart. 2006. “An Extended Privacy Calculus Model for e-Commerce Transactions.” Information Systems Research 17 (1): 61–80. doi:10.1287/isre.1060.0080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donia, J., and J.A. Shaw. 2021. “Co-Design and Ethical Artificial Intelligence for Health: An Agenda for Critical Research and Practice.” Big Data & Society 8 (2): 205395172110652. doi:10.1177/20539517211065248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2017. “Special Eurobarometer 460-Attitudes towards the Impact of Digitisation and Automation on Daily Life.” Accessed January, 2023. https://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/communication
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2022. “The Digital Services Act Package.” Accessed March, 2023. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/digital-services-act-package
   Google Scholar
• Evans, R., and E. Ferguson. 2014. “Defining and Measuring Blood Donor Altruism: A Theoretical Approach from Biology, Economics and Psychology.” Vox Sanguinis 106 (2): 118–126. doi:10.1111/vox.12080.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eyers, J. 2021. Banks Warned using AI in Loan Assessments could ‘Awaken a Zombie’. Australian Financial Review. https://www.afr.com/companies/financial-services/banks-warned-using-ai-in-loan-assessments-could-awaken-a-zombie-20210615-p5814i
   Google Scholar
• Faul, F., E. Erdfelder, A. Buchner, and A.-G. Lang. 2009. “Statistical Power Analyses Using G*Power 3.1: Tests for Correlation and Regression Analyses.” Behavior Research Methods 41 (4): 1149–1160. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, E. 2015. “Mechanism of Altruism Approach to Blood Donor Recruitment and Retention: A Review and Future Directions.” Transfusion Medicine 25 (4): 211–226. doi:10.1111/tme.12233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, E., and C. Lawrence. 2016. “Blood Donation and Altruism: The Mechanisms of Altruism Approach.” ISBT Science Series 11 (S1): 148–157. doi:10.1111/voxs.12209.
   Google Scholar
• Fietta, V., F. Zecchinato, B. Di Stasi, M. Polato, and M. Monaro. 2022. “Dissociation between Users’ Explicit and Implicit Attitudes toward Artificial Intelligence: An Experimental Study.” IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems 52 (3): 481–489. doi:10.1109/THMS.2021.3125280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M. 2008. “A Reasoned Action Approach to Health Promotion.” Medical Decision Making: An International Journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making 28 (6): 834–844. doi:10.1177/0272989x08326092.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., I. Ajzen, and A. Belief. 1975. Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Gado, S., R. Kempen, K. Lingelbach, and T. Bipp. 2021. “Artificial Intelligence in Psychology: How Can we Enable Psychology Students to Accept and Use Artificial Intelligence?.” Psychology Learning & Teaching 21 (1): 37–56. doi:10.1177/14757257211037149.
   Google Scholar
• Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D.W. (2003). Trust and Tam in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model. MIS Quarterly, 27(1): 51–90. doi:10.2307/30036519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbons, F.X., M. Gerrard, H. Blanton, and D.W. Russell. 1998. “Reasoned Action and Social Reaction: Willingness and Intention as Independent Predictors of Health Risk.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74 (5): 1164–1180. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillath, O., T. Ai, M.S. Branicky, S. Keshmiri, R.B. Davison, and R. Spaulding. 2021. “Attachment and Trust in Artificial Intelligence.” Computers in Human Behavior 115: 106607. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2020.106607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez Ortega, A., J. Bourgeois, and G. Kortuem. 2022. “Reconstructing Intimate Contexts through Data Donation: A Case Study in Menstrual Tracking Technologies.” Paper presented at the NordiCHI '22: Nordic Human-Computer Interaction Conference, Aarhus, Denmark, October 2022. doi:10.1145/3546155.3546646.
   Google Scholar
• Goyal, M., T. Knackstedt, S. Yan, and S. Hassanpour. 2020. “Artificial Intelligence-Based Image Classification Methods for Diagnosis of Skin Cancer: Challenges and Opportunities.” Computers in Biology and Medicine 127: 104065.doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.104065. PMC: 33246265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, X., X. Han, X. Zhang, Y. Dang, and C. Chen. 2015. “Investigating m-Health Acceptance from a Protection Motivation Theory Perspective: Gender and Age Differences.” Telemedicine Journal and e-Health 21 (8): 661–669. doi:10.1089/tmj.2014.0166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gursoy, D., O.H. Chi, L. Lu, and R. Nunkoo. 2019. “Consumers Acceptance of Artificially Intelligent (AI) Device Use in Service Delivery.” International Journal of Information Management 49: 157–169. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.03.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrington, C., S. Erete, and A.M. Piper. 2019. “Deconstructing Community-Based Collaborative Design: Towards More Equitable Participatory Design Engagements.” Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3 (CSCW): 1–25. doi:10.1145/3359318.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoofnagle, C.J., J. King, S. Li, and J. Turow. 2010. “How Different Are Young Adults from Older Adults When It Comes to Information Privacy Attitudes and Policies?” SSRN Electronic Journal 1–20. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1589864.
   Google Scholar
• Jarrahi, M.H., C. Lutz, K. Boyd, C. Oesterlund, and M. Willis. 2023. “Artificial Intelligence in the Work Context.” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 74 (3): 303–310. doi:10.1002/asi.24730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, A.D., T.T. Kessler, J.C. Brill, and P. Hancock. 2021. “Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Meta-Analytic Findings.” Human Factors 65 (2): 337–359. doi:10.1177/00187208211013988.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapoor, A., and R.S. Whitt. 2021. “Nudging towards Data Equity: The Role of Stewardship and Fiduciaries in the Digital Economy.” SSRN Electronic Journal 1–18. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3791845.
   Google Scholar
• Kaye, S.-A., I. Lewis, S. Forward, and P. Delhomme. 2020. “A Priori Acceptance of Highly Automated Cars in Australia, France, and Sweden: A Theoretically-Informed Investigation Guided by the TPB and UTAUT.” Accident; Analysis and Prevention 137: 105441. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2020.105441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, S., S.-A. Kaye, and O. Oviedo-Trespalacios. 2022. “A Multi-Industry Analysis of the Future Use of AI Chatbots.” Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies 2022: 1–14. doi:10.1155/2022/2552099.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, S., S.-A. Kaye, and O. Oviedo-Trespalacios. 2023. “What Factors Contribute to the Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence? A Systematic Review.” Telematics and Informatics 77: 101925. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2022.101925.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lashbrook, A. 2018. Ai-driven Dermatology could Leave Dark-skinned Patients Behind. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2018/08/machine-learning-dermatology-skin-color/567619/
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, N., and N. Oh. 2021. “Enabling Data Sharing for Social Benefit through Data Trusts.” Accessed March, 2023. https://gpai.ai/projects/data-governance/data-trusts/enabling-data-sharing-for-social-benefit-through-data-trusts.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Leslie, D., A. Mazumder, A. Peppin, M.K. Wolters, and A. Hagerty. 2021. “Does “AI” Stand for Augmenting Inequality in the Era of Covid-19 Healthcare?” BMJ (Clinical Research ed.) 372: n304. doi:10.1136/bmj.n304.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lin, H.-C., T. Yun-Fang, H. Gwo-Jen, and H. Hsin. 2021. “From Precision Education to Precision Medicine: Factors Affecting Medical Staff’s Intention to Learn to Use AI Applications in Hospitals.” Journal of Educational Technology & Society 24 (1): 123–137. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26977862.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, K., and D. Tao. 2022. “The Roles of Trust, Personalization, Loss of Privacy, and Anthropomorphism in Public Acceptance of Smart Healthcare Services.” Computers in Human Behavior 127: 107026. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2021.107026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Z., J. Shan, and Y. Pigneur. 2016. “The Role of Personalized Services and Control: An Empirical Evaluation of Privacy Calculus and Technology Acceptance Model in the Mobile Context.” Journal of Information Privacy and Security 12 (3): 123–144. doi:10.1080/15536548.2016.1206757.
   Google Scholar
• Lockey, S., N. Gillespie, and S. Curtis. 2020. Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Australian Insights. Accessed March, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Luo, J., and G. Gao. 2022. “Donor Recognition: A Double‐Edged Sword in Charitable Giving.” Journal of Philanthropy and Marketing 28 (1): 1–20. doi:10.1002/nvsm.1772.
   Google Scholar
• McMahon, R., and M. Byrne. 2008. “Predicting Donation among an Irish Sample of Donors and Nondonors: Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior.” Transfusion 48 (2): 321–331. doi:10.1111/j.1537-2995.2007.01526.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memon, A.M., and A. Memon. 2021. “Exploring Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence Amongst Healthcare Personnel: A Case in a Private Medical Centre.” International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science 3 (9): 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer-Waarden, B.L., and J. Cloarec. 2021. “Baby, You Can Drive my Car”: Psychological Antecedents That Drive Consumers’ Adoption of AI-Powered Autonomous Vehicles [Article].” Technovation 109: 102348. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monteith, S., T. Glenn, J. Geddes, P.C. Whybrow, E. Achtyes, and M. Bauer. 2022. “Expectations for Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Psychiatry.” Current Psychiatry Reports 24 (11): 709–721. doi:10.1007/s11920-022-01378-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mujcic, R., and A. Leibbrandt. 2018. “Indirect Reciprocity and Prosocial Behaviour: Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment.” The Economic Journal 128 (611): 1683–1699. doi:10.1111/ecoj.12474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mun, Y.Y., J.D. Jackson, J.S. Park, and J.C. Probst. 2006. “Understanding Information Technology Acceptance by Individual Professionals: Toward an Integrative View.” Information & Management 43 (3): 350–363. doi:10.1016/j.im.2005.08.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Na, S., S. Heo, S. Han, Y. Shin, and Y. Roh. 2022. “Acceptance Model of Artificial Intelligence (ai)-Based Technologies in Construction Firms: Applying the Technology Acceptance Model (Tam) in Combination with the Technology–Organisation–Environment (Toe) Framework.” Buildings 12 (2): 90. doi:10.3390/buildings12020090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadkarni, S., & Gupta, R. (2007). “A Task-Based Model of Perceived Website Complexity.” MIS Quarterly 31 (3): 501–524. doi:10.2307/25148805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazaretsky, T., M. Ariely, M. Cukurova, and G. Alexandron. 2022. “Teachers’ Trust in AI‐Powered Educational Technology and a Professional Development Program to Improve It.” British Journal of Educational Technology 53 (4): 914–931. doi:10.1111/bjet.13232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkes, E., J. Hardinges, J. Crowe, J. Massey, and S. Moriniere. 2023. “Defining Responsible Data Stewardship.” Accessed April 2023. https://theodi.org/insights/reports/defining-responsible-data-stewardship/
   Google Scholar
• Patel, R., A. Peppin, V. Pavel, J. Brennan, I. Parker, and C. Safak. 2021. “Participatory Data Stewardship.” Accessed March, 2023. https://www.adalovelaceinstitute.org/report/participatory-data-stewardship/
   Google Scholar
• Peppin, A. 2022. “Who Cares What the Public Think?” https://www.adalovelaceinstitute.org/evidence-review/public-attitudes-data-regulation/
   Google Scholar
• Piantadosi, S.T. 2023. [@spiantado]. Yes, ChatGPT Is Amazing and Impressive. No, @OpenAI Has Not Come Close to Addressing the Problem of Bias. Filters Appear to be Bypassed with Simple Tricks, and Superficially Masked. And What Is Lurking Inside Is Egregious. Twitter. Accessed March 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Pilz, D., and H. Gewald. 2013. “Does Money Matter? Motivational Factors for Participation in Paid-and Non-Profit-Crowdsourcing Communities.” Paper presented at the 11th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik, Leipzig, March 2023. https://twitter.com/spiantado/status/1599462375887114240?lang=en. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/270811012_Does_Money_Matter_Motivational_Factors_for_Participation_in_Paid-and_Non-Profit-Crowdsourcing_Communities
   Google Scholar
• Platt, J., and S. Kardia. 2015. “Public Trust in Health Information Sharing: Implications for Biobanking and Electronic Health Record Systems.” Journal of Personalized Medicine 5 (1): 3–21. doi:10.3390/jpm5010003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomery, E.A., F.X. Gibbons, M. Reis-Bergan, and M. Gerrard. 2009. “From Willingness to Intention: Experience Moderates the Shift from Reactive to Reasoned Behavior.” Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin 35 (7): 894–908. doi:10.1177/0146167209335166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rafique, H., A.O. Almagrabi, A. Shamim, F. Anwar, and A.K. Bashir. 2020. “Investigating the Acceptance of Mobile Library Applications with an Extended Technology Acceptance Model (Tam).” Computers & Education 145: 103732. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter, G., C. Borzikowsky, B.F. Hoyer, M. Laudes, and M. Krawczak. 2021. “Secondary Research Use of Personal Medical Data: Patient Attitudes towards Data Donation.” BMC Medical Ethics 22 (1): 164. doi:10.1186/s12910-021-00728-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridsdale, C., J. Rothwell, M. Smit, H. Ali-Hassan, M. Bliemel, D. Irvine, D. Kelley, S. Matwin, and B. Wuetherick. 2015. “Strategies and Best Practices for Data Literacy Education: Knowledge Synthesis Report.” Dalhouse University. doi:10.13140/RG.2.1.1922.5044.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, A., and M. Maccarone. 2022. “AI Narratives and Unequal Conditions. Analyzing the Discourse of Liminal Expert Voices in Discursive Communicative Spaces.” Telecommunications Policy 47 (5): 102462. doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2022.102462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidthuber, L., D. Hilgers, and K. Randhawa. 2021. “Public Crowdsourcing: Analyzing the Role of Government Feedback on Civic Digital Platforms.” Public Administration 100 (4): 960–977. doi:10.1111/padm.12811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seger, E., A. Ovadya, B. Garfinkel, D. Siddarth, and A. Dafoe. 2023. “Democratising AI: Multiple Meanings, Goals, and Methods.” In Proceedings of the 2023 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, 715–722. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2303.12642.
   Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N., and B. Gallo Cordoba. 2022. “Australian Public Understandings of Artificial Intelligence.” AI & Society 37 (4): 1645–1662. doi:10.1007/s00146-021-01268-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seo, K.H., and J.H. Lee. 2021. “The Emergence of Service Robots at Restaurants: Integrating Trust, Perceived Risk, and Satisfaction.” Sustainability, 13 (8): 4431. doi:10.3390/su13084431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Septianto, F., F. Tjiptono, W. Paramita, and T.M. Chiew. 2020. “The Interactive Effects of Religiosity and Recognition in Increasing Donation.” European Journal of Marketing 55 (1): 1–26. doi:10.1108/EJM-04-2019-0326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, S., and N. Ramakrishnan. 2023. Is ChatGPT Biased? A Review. doi:10.31219/osf.io/9xkbu.
   Google Scholar
• Skatova, A., and J. Goulding. 2019. “Psychology of Personal Data Donation.” PLoS One 14 (11): e0224240. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0224240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sloane, M. 2019. “Inequality is the Name of the Game. Thoughts on the Emerging Field of Technology, Ethics and Social Justice.” Paper presented at the Weizenbaum Conference 2019 Challenges of Digital Inequity, Berlin, Germany. doi:10.34669/wi.cp.
   Google Scholar
• Sloane, M., E. Moss, O. Awomolo, and L. Forlano. 2020. “Participation Is Not a Design Fix for Machine Learning.” In Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization, 1–6. Washington, DC. doi:10.1145/3551624.3555285.
   Google Scholar
• Song, Y.W. 2019. “User Acceptance of an Artificial Intelligence (AI) Virtual Assistant: An Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model.” Thesis, DDU. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ddu&AN=194F628A9A233EB6&site=ehost-live&scope=site.
   Google Scholar
• Sousa, S., and G. Beltrão. 2021. “Factors Influencing Trust Assessment in Technology.” Paper presented at the IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Proceedings, Part V, August 30 – September 3, 2021, Bari, Italy. Accessed March, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85607-6_49#Sec2
   Google Scholar
• Spitale, G., N. Biller-Andorno, and F. Germani. 2023. “AI Model GPT-3 (Dis) Informs us Better than Humans.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.11924.
   Google Scholar
• Srinivasan, A. 2021. The Right to Sex. UK: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Stracke, C.M. 2020. “Open Science and Radical Solutions for Diversity, Equity and Quality in Research: A Literature Review of Different Research Schools, Philosophies and Frameworks and Their Potential Impact on Science and Education.”. In 17–37. Singapore: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-981-15-4276-3_2.
   Google Scholar
• Swisher, K. 2023. On With Kara Swisher. In Sam Altman on What Makes Him ‘Super Nervous’ About AI The OpenAI Co-founder Thinks Tools like GPT-4 Will Be Revolutionary. But He’s Wary of Downsides. https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2023/03/on-with-kara-swisher-sam-altman-on-the-ai-revolution.html
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, B., F.X. Gibbons, and M. Gerrard. 2002. “Risk Perception and Prototype Perception: Independent Processes Predicting Risk Behavior.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 28 (7): 986–999. doi:10.1177/014616720202800711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Eeuwen, M. 2017. “Mobile Conversational Commerce: Messenger Chatbots as the Next Interface between Businesses and Consumers.” University of Twente. Accessed March, 2023. http://purl.utwente.nl/essays/71706
   Google Scholar
• van Empelen, P., and G. Kok. 2006. “Condom Use in Steady and Casual Sexual Relationships: Planning, Preparation and Willingness to Take Risks among Adolescents.” Psychology & Health 21 (2): 165–181. doi:10.1080/14768320500229898.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., and F.D. Davis. 2000. “A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies.” Management Science 46 (2): 186–204. doi:10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., & Davis, F.D. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly 27(3): 425–478. doi:10.2307/30036540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, T. 2018. 2062: The World That ai Made. Australia: La Trobe University Press.
   Google Scholar
• White, K.M., B.E. Poulsen, and M.K. Hyde. 2017. “Identity and Personality Influences on Donating Money, Time, and Blood.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 46 (2): 372–394. doi:10.1177/0899764016654280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittlestone, J., R. Nyrup, A. Anexandrova, K. Dihal, and S. Cave. 2019. “Ethical and Societal Implications of Algorithms, Data, and Artificial Intelligence: A Roadmap for Research.” Accessed December, 2022. https://www.nuffieldfoundation.org/sites/default/files/files/Ethical-and-Societal-Implications-of-Data-and-AI-report-Nuffield-Foundat.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wijnhoven, F., M. Ehrenhard, and J. Kuhn. 2015. “Open Government Objectives and Participation Motivations.” Government Information Quarterly 32 (1): 30–42. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2014.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiang, Yifan, Lanqin Zhao, Zhenzhen Liu, Xiaohang Wu, Jingjing Chen, Erping Long, Duoru Lin, Yi Zhu, Chuan Chen, Zhuoling Lin, and Haotian Lin. 2020. “Implementation of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: Status Analysis and Development Suggestions.” Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 102: 101780. doi:10.2147/PPA.S225952.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, K., Z. Zeng, H. Peng, and Y. Jiang. 2019. “Attitudes of Chinese Cancer Patients toward the Clinical Use of Artificial Intelligence.” Patient Preference and Adherence 13: 1867–1875. volume doi:10.2147/ppa.s225952.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yigitcanlar, T., K. Degirmenci, and T. Inkinen. 2022. “Drivers behind the Public Perception of Artificial Intelligence: Insights from Major Australian Cities.” AI & Society: 1–21. doi:10.1007/s00146-022-01566-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, A. 2018. “About the Data Stewards Network.” Accessed March, 2023. https://medium.com/data-stewards-network/about-the-data-stewards-network-1cb9db0c0792
   Google Scholar