Automation function and malfunction: effects on human performance in accident handling tasks

References

• Avril, E. 2023. “Providing Different Levels of Accuracy about the Reliability of Automation to a Human Operator: impact on Human Performance.” Ergonomics 66 (2): 217–226. doi:10.1080/00140139.2022.2069870.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartlett, M. L., and J. S. McCarley. 2021. “Ironic Efficiency in Automation-Aided Signal Detection.” Ergonomics 64 (1): 103–112. doi:10.1080/00140139.2020.1809716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billings, C. E. (1996). Aviation Automation: The Search for a Human-centered Approach. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Visser, E. J., R. Pak, and T. H. Shaw. 2018. “From ‘Automation’ to ‘Autonomy’: The Importance of Trust Repair in Human–Machine Interaction.” Ergonomics 61 (10): 1409–1427. doi:10.1080/00140139.2018.1457725.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dzindolet, M. T., H. P. Beck, L. G. Pierce, and L. A. Dawe. 2001. A Framework of Automation Use (Report No. ARL-TR-2412). A. R. Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Dzindolet, M. T., S. A. Peterson, R. A. Pomranky, L. G. Pierce, and H. P. Beck. 2003. “The Role of Trust in Automation Reliance.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 58 (6): 697–718. doi:10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00038-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endsley, M. R. 1995. “Measurement of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems.” Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 37 (1): 65–84. doi:10.1518/001872095779049499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endsley, M. R. 2017. “From Here to Autonomy: Lessons Learned from Human-Automation Research.” Human Factors 59 (1): 5–27. doi:10.1177/0018720816681350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endsley, M., and R. Kaber, D. B. 1999. “Level of Automation Effects on Performance, Situation Awareness and Workload in a Dynamic Control Task.” Ergonomics 42 (3): 462–492. doi:10.1080/001401399185595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., E. Erdfelder, A.-G. Lang, and A. Buchner. 2007. “G*Power 3: A Flexible Statistical Power Analysis Program for the Social, Behavioral, and Biomedical Sciences.” Behavior Research Methods 39 (2): 175–191. doi:10.3758/bf03193146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, A., J. Miles, and Z. Field. 2012. “14.6. Mixed Designs as a GLM.” In Discovering Statistics Using R, 617. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Hoff, K. A., and M. Bashir. 2015. “Trust in Automation: Integrating Empirical Evidence on Factors That Influence Trust.” Human Factors 57 (3): 407–434. doi:10.1177/0018720814547570.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogg, D. N., K. Folles⊘, F. Strand-Volden, and B. Torralba. 1995. “Development of a Situation Awareness Measure to Evaluate Advanced Alarm Systems in Nuclear Power Plant Control Rooms.” Ergonomics 38 (11): 2394–2413. doi:10.1080/00140139508925275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamieson, G. A., and G. Skraaning. 2019. “The Absence of Degree of Automation Trade-Offs in Complex Work Settings.” Human Factors 62 (4): 516–529. doi:10.1177/0018720819842709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jian, J.-Y., A. M. Bisantz, and C. G. Drury. 2000. “Foundations for an Empirically Determined Scale of Trust in Automated Systems.” International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics 4 (1): 53–71. doi:10.1207/S15327566IJCE0401_04.
   Google Scholar
• Kunze, A., S. J. Summerskill, R. Marshall, and A. J. Filtness. 2019. “Automation Transparency: implications of Uncertainty Communication for Human-Automation Interaction and Interfaces.” Ergonomics 62 (3): 345–360. doi:10.1080/00140139.2018.1547842.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. D., and K. A. See. 2004. “Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance.” Human Factors 46 (1): 50–80. doi:10.1518/hfes.46.1.50_30392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J., and N. Moray. 1992. “Trust, Control Strategies and Allocation of Function in Human-Machine Systems.” Ergonomics 35 (10): 1243–1270. doi:10.1080/00140139208967392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madhavan, P., D. A. Wiegmann, and F. C. Lacson. 2006. “Automation Failures on Tasks Easily Performed by Operators Undermine Trust in Automated Aids.” Human Factors 48 (2): 241–256. doi:10.1518/001872006777724408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manzey, D., J. Reichenbach, and L. Onnasch. 2012. “Human Performance Consequences of Automated Decision Aids: The Impact of Degree of Automation and System Experience.” Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making 6 (1): 57–87. doi:10.1177/1555343411433844.
   Google Scholar
• Merlo, J. L., C. D. Wickens, and M. Yeh. 1999. “Effect of Reliability on Cue Effectiveness and Display Signaling.” University of Illinois Institute of Aviation Tech. Report ARL-99-4/ARMY-FEDLAB-99-3.
   Google Scholar
• Moray, N., and T. Inagaki. 2000. “Attention and Complacency.” Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 1 (4): 354–365. doi:10.1080/14639220052399159.
   Google Scholar
• Mosier, K. L., L. J. Skitka, S. Heers, and M. D. Burdick. 1997. “Patterns in the Use of Cockpit Automation.” In Human-Automation Interaction: Research and Practice, edited by M. Mouloua & J. Koonce, 167–173. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc., Inc.
   Google Scholar
• O’Hara, J. M., and J. C. Higgins. 2010. Human-System Interfaces to Automatic Systems: Review Guidance and Technical Basis (BNL-91017-2010). https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1013461
   Google Scholar
• O’Hara, J. M., J. C. Higgins, S. A. Fleger, and P. A. Pieringer. 2012. Human Factors Engineering Program Review Model (NUREG-0711). Washington, DC: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
   Google Scholar
• Onnasch, L., C. D. Wickens, H. Li, and D. Manzey. 2014. “Human Performance Consequences of Stages and Levels of Automation: An Integrated Meta-Analysis.” Human Factors 56 (3): 476–488. doi:10.1177/0018720813501549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parasuraman, R. 2000. “Designing Automation for Human Use: Empirical Studies and Quantitative Models.” Ergonomics 43 (7): 931–951. doi:10.1080/001401300409125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parasuraman, R., and D. H. Manzey. 2010. “Complacency and Bias in Human Use of Automation: An Attentional Integration.” Human Factors 52 (3): 381–410. doi:10.1177/0018720810376055.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parasuraman, R., and V. Riley. 1997. “Humans and Automation: Use, Misuse, Disuse, Abuse.” Human Factors 39 (2): 230–253. doi:10.1518/001872097778543886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parasuraman, R., T. B. Sheridan, and C. D. Wickens. 2000. “A Model for Types and Levels of Human Interaction with Automation.” IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics A, 30 (3): 286–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarter, N. B., and D. D. Woods. 1994. “Pilot Interaction with Cockpit Automation II: An Experimental Study of Pilots’ Model and Awareness of the Flight Management System.” The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 4 (1): 1–28. doi:10.1207/s15327108ijap0401_1.
   Google Scholar
• Sarter, N. B., and D. D. Woods. 1995. “How in the World Did We Ever Get into That Mode? Mode Error and Awareness in Supervisory Control.” Human Factors 37 (1): 5–19. doi:10.1518/001872095779049516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarter, N. B., D. D. Woods, and C. E. Billings. 1997. “Automation Surprises.”. In G. Salvendy (Ed.), Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics. New York: John Wiley & Sons. doi:10.1518/001872097778667997.
   Google Scholar
• Saßmannshausen, T., P. Burggräf, M. Hassenzahl, and J. Wagner. 2022. “Human Trust in Otherware – a Systematic Literature Review Bringing All Antecedents Together.” Ergonomics 66 (7): 976–998. doi:10.1080/00140139.2022.2120634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauer, J., A. Chavaillaz, and D. Wastell. 2016. “Experience of Automation Failures in Training: effects on Trust, Automation Bias, Complacency and Performance.” Ergonomics 59 (6): 767–780. doi:10.1080/00140139.2015.1094577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheridan, T., W. Verplank, and T. Brooks. 1978. Human and Computer Control of Undersea Teleoperators. Cambridge: MIT Man-Machine Systems Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Tatasciore, M., V. K. Bowden, T. A. W. Visser, S. I. C. Michailovs, and S. Loft. 2019. “The Benefits and Costs of Low and High Degree of Automation.” Human Factors 62 (6): 874–896. doi:10.1177/0018720819867181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickens, C. D., B. A. Clegg, A. Z. Vieane, and A. L. Sebok. 2015. “Complacency and Automation Bias in the Use of Imperfect Automation.” Human Factors 57 (5): 728–739. doi:10.1177/0018720815581940.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickens, C. D., H. Li, A. Santamaria, A. Sebok, and N. B. Sarter. 2010. “Stages and Levels of Automation: An Integrated Meta-Analysis.” Human Factors 56 (3): 476–488. doi:10.1177/154193121005400425.
   Google Scholar
• Woods, D. D. 1994. Cognitive Demands and Activities in Dynamic Fault Management: Abduction and Disturbance Management. London: Taylor & Francis, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Woods, D. D., and R. I. Cook. 2006. “Incidents – Markers of Resilience or Brittleness.” In Resilience Engineering: Concepts and Precepts, edited by E. Hollnagel, D. D. Woods, and N. Leveson, 69–76. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar