Biometric Technologies, Data and the Sensory Work of Border Control

References

• Aas, Katja Franko, Helene Oppen Gundhus and Heidi Mork Lomell (eds.). 2010. Technologies of InSecurity: The Surveillance of Everyday Life. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Adey, Peter. 2012. Borders, Identification and Surveillance. In Routledge Handbook of Surveillance Studies, edited by K. Ball, K. Haggerty and D. Lyon, 193–200. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Amoore, Louise & Alexandra Hall. 2009. Taking People Apart: Digitised Dissection and the Body at the Border. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 27:444–464. doi: https://doi.org/10.1068/d1208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amoore, Louise & Volha Piotukh. 2015. Life Beyond Big Data: Governing with Little Analytics. Economy and Society, 44(3):341–366. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2015.1043793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreas, Peter. 2000. Border Games: Policing the U.S.-Mexico Divide. New York: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barth, Fredrik. 1969. Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of Cultural Difference. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Bassetti, Chiara. 2018. Airport Security Contradictions: Interorganizational Entanglements and Changing Work Practices. Ethnography, 19(3):288–311. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138117696513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigo, Didier. 2005. Frontier Controls in the European Union: Who is in Control? In Controlling Frontiers: Free Movement into and within Europe, edited by D. Bigo and E. Guild, 49–99. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Biometric Institute. 2015. Is a Photo a Biometric? https://www.biometricsinstitute.org/faq-16 (Accessed 28 March 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Buolamwini, Joy & Timnit Gebru. 2018. Gender Shades: Intersectional Accuracy Disparities in Commercial Gender Classification. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, 81:1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Fassin, Didier. 2013. Enforcing Order: An Ethnography of Urban Policing. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, Gregory. 2011. The Migration Apparatus: Security, Labor, and Policymaking in the European Union. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, Gregory. 2019. The Gray Zone: Sovereignty, Human Smuggling, and Undercover Police Investigation in Europe. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gates, Kelly A. 2011. Our Biometric Future: Facial Recognition Technology and the Culture of Surveillance. New York: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gates, Kelly A. & Shoshana Magnet. 2009. The New Media of Surveillance. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grasseni, Christina. 2007. Good Looking: Learning to be a Cattle Breeder. In Skilled Visions: Between Apprenticeship and Standards, edited by C. Grasseni, 47–66. New York: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Grasseni, Christina. 2011. Skilled Visions: Toward an Ecology of Visual Inscriptions. In Made to be Seen: Perspectives on the History of Visual Anthropology, edited by M. Banks and J. Ruby, 19–44. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haggerty, Kevin D. & Richard V. Ericson. 2000. The Surveillant Assemblage. British Journal of Sociology, 51(4):605–622. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00071310020015280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann, Mia Rosa Koss, Nadja Kirchhoff Hestehave, Lotte Høgh & Kira Vrist Rønn. 2018. Knowing from Within. Nordisk Politiforskning, 5(1):7–27. doi: https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1894-8693-2018-01-03
   Google Scholar
• Heyman, Josiah. 2001. Class and Classification at the U.S.-Mexico Border. Human Organization, 60(2):128–140. doi: https://doi.org/10.17730/humo.60.2.de2cb46745pgfrwh
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heyman, Josiah. 2004. Ports of Entry as Nodes in the World System. Identities, 11(3):303–327. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10702890490493518
   Google Scholar
• Hofer, Franziska & Adrian Schwaninger. 2005. Using Threat Image Projection Data for Assessing Individual Screener Performance. WIT Transactions on the Built Environment, 82:417–426. doi: https://doi.org/10.2495/SAFE050411
   Google Scholar
• Holmberg, Lars. 2000. Discretionary Leniency and Typological Guilt: Results from a Danish Study of Police Discretion. Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention, 1(2):179–194. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/140438500300076171
   Google Scholar
• Holmberg, Lars. 2003. Policing Stereotypes: A Qualitative Study of Police Work in Denmark. Glienicke/Berlin: Galda + Wilch Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Iparraguirre, Gonzalo. 2017. Anticipation as Presence of the Future. In Handbook of Anticipation, edited by Roberto Poli, 1–18. Cham: Springer. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31737-3_101-1.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, Elida K. U. & Ursula Rao. 2018. The Truth of the Error: Making Identity and Security through Biometric Discrimination. In Bodies as Evidence: Security, Knowledge, and Power, edited by M. Maguire, U. Rao and N. Zurawski, 24–42. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kristensen, Marlene Paulin. 2019. Relocating Europe: Border Officials and Their Everyday Attempts to Stabilise Borders (PhD Thesis). Copenhagen: UCPH.
   Google Scholar
• Latham, Alan. 1999. The Power of Distraction: Distraction, Tactility, and Habit in the Work of Walter Benjamin. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 17:451–473. doi: https://doi.org/10.1068/d170451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyon, David. 2003. Airports as Data Filters: Converging Surveillance Systems after September 11th. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 1(1):13–20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/14779960380000222
   Google Scholar
• Lyon, David, Kevin Haggerty & Kirstie Ball. 2012. Introducing Surveillance Studies. In Routledge Handbook of Surveillance Studies, edited by Kirstie Ball, Kevin Haggerty and David Lyon, 1–11. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Magnet, Shoshana Amielle. 2011. When Biometrics Fail: Gender, Race, and Technology of Identity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maguire, Mark & Ursula Rao. 2018. Introduction: Bodies as Evidence. In Bodies as Evidence: Security, Knowledge, and Power, edited by M. Maguire, U. Rao and N. Zurawski, 1–23. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 2004. The World of Perception. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Møhl, Perle. 2011. Mise en Scène, Knowledge and Participation: Considerations of a Filming Anthropologist. Visual Anthropology, 24(3):227–245. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/08949468.2010.508707
   Google Scholar
• Møhl, Perle. 2018. Border Control and Blurred Responsibilities at the Airport. In Security Blurs: The Politics of Plural Security Provision, edited by T. Diphoorn and E. Grassiani, 118–135. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Møhl, Perle. 2020. ‘Is it a donkey?’ Presences, senses and figuration in human-technological border control. In The Biometric Border World: Technologies, Bodies and Identities on the Move, edited by K.F. Olwig et al., 100–114. London: Routledge. doi:https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367808464.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, Bryce C., Ricardo Gomez & Verónica Guajardo. 2017. Sensors, Cameras, and the New ‘Normal’ in Clandestine Migration: How Undocumented Migrants Experience Surveillance at the U.S.-Mexico Border. Surveillance and Society, 15(1):21–41. doi: https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v15i1.5604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapiscan. 2018. Threat Image Projection. https://www.rapiscansystems.com/en/products/radiation_detection/productsrapiscan_threat_image_projection (Accessed 04 December 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Salter, Mark B. 2005. At the Threshold of Security: A Theory of International Borders. In Global Surveillance and Policing. Borders, Security, Identity, edited by E. Zureik and M.B. Salter, 36–50. Devon: Willan Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Sausdal, David. 2018. The Last Policeman: On the Globalisation of Local Policing. (PhD Thesis). Stockholm: Stockholm University.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, James C. 1998. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Snijder, Max. 2016. Biometrics, Surveillance and Privacy. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Sturken, Marita & Lisa Cartwright. 2009. Practices of Looking: An Introduction to Visual Culture. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van der Ploeg, Irma. 2012. The Body as Data in the Age of Information. In Routledge Handbook of Surveillance Studies, edited by K. Ball, K. Haggerty and D. Lyon, 176–183. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vigh, Henrik. 2018. Lives Opposed: Perceptivity and Tacticality in Conflict and Crime. Social Anthropology, 26(4):487–501. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8676.12545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willoughby, Angus. 2017. Biometric Surveillance and the Right to Privacy. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 36(3):41–45. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/MTS.2017.2728736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, Dean & Leanne Weber. 2008. Surveillance, Risk and Preemption on the Australian Border. Surveillance and Society, 5(2):124–141.
   Google Scholar