Porous 3D hydroxyapatite/polyurethane composite scaffold for bone tissue engineering and its in vitro degradation behavior

References

• L. Lin et al., Development of ciprofloxacin and nano-hydroxyapatite dual-loaded polyurethane scaffolds for simultaneous treatment of bone defects and osteomyelitis, Mater. Lett. 253, 86 (2019). DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2019.06.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. K. Chattopadhyay, and K. Raju, Structural engineering of polyureathane coatings for high performance applications, Prog. Polym. Sci. 32 (3), 352 (2007). DOI: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2006.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. Tang et al., Influence of hydrodynamic pressure on the proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of bonemesenchymal stromal cells seeded on polyurethane scaffolds, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 105 (12), 3445 (2017). DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.36197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Stéphanie et al., Interactions of coronary artery smooth muscle cells with 3D porous polyurethane scaffolds, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 87, 293 (2009). DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.31972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Pavlova and M. Draganova, Biocompatible and biodegradable polyurethane polymers, Biomaterials 14 (13), 1024 (1993). DOI: 10.1016/0142-9612(93)90196-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Kornicka et al., Polyurethane-polylactide-based material doped with resveratrol decreases senescence and oxidative stress of adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal stem cell (ASCs), RSC Adv. 7 (39), 24070 (2017). DOI: 10.1039/C7RA02334K.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. A. Skarja, and K. A. Woodhouse , Synthesis and characterization of degradable polyurethane elastomers containing and amino acid-based chain extender, J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 9 (3), 271 (1998). 10.1163/156856298X00659 DOI: 10.1163/156856298x00659.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. M. Benoit , Degradation of polyurethane foams used in the Même breast implant, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 27 (10), 1341 (1993). DOI: 10.1002/jbm.820271014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. M. Sinclair, C. L. Kerrigan, and R. Buntic, Biodegradation of the polyurethane foam covering of breast implants, Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 92 (6), 1003 (1993). 10.1097/00006534-199311000-00001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. H. Maxian, J. P. Zawadsky, and M. G. Dunn , In vitro evaluation of amorphous calcium phosphate and poorly crystallized hydroxyapatite coatings on titanium implants, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 27 (1), 111 (1993). DOI: 10.1002/jbm.820270604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Lizette et al., Static mechanical properties of hydroxyapatite (HA) powder-filled acrylic bone cements: Effect of type of HA powder, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B 72, 345 (2005). DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.30166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. M. P. Dupraz et al., Characterization of silane-treated hydroxyapatite powders for use as filler in biodegradable composites, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 30 (2), 231 (1996). DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199602)30:2<231::AID-JBM13>3.0.CO;2-P.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Haohuai et al., Preparation and characterization of aliphatic polyurethane and hydroxyapatite composite scaffold, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 112 (5), 2968 (2009). DOI: 10.1002/app.29862.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Jianjun et al., Preparation and characterization of highly porous, biodegradable polyurethane scaffolds for soft tissue applications, Biomaterials 26, 3961 (2005). : DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.10.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Karageorgiou and D. Kaplan, Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis , Biomaterials 26 (27), 5474 (2005). DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Katarzyna and G. Sylwester, Biodegradable porous polyurethane scaffolds for tissue repair and regeneration, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 79, 128 (2006). DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.30708.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. R. Jones, New trends in bioactive scaffolds: the importance of nanostructure, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 29 (7), 1275 (2009). DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2008.08.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Mohsen, M. M. S. Gity, and S. Ali, Artificial extracellular matrix for biomedical applications: biocompatible and biodegradable poly (tetramethylene ether) glycol/poly (epsilon-caprolactone diol)-based polyurethanes, J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 27 (17), 1712 (2016). DOI: 10.1080/09205063.2016.1231436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Jianyang et al., A new peptide-based urethane polymer: synthesis, biodegradation, and potential to support cell growth in vitro, Biomaterials 21, 1247 (2000). DOI: 10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00005-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. A. Baser, and D. V. Khakhar, Polytetramethylene ether glycol -glycerol blends as polyols for rigid polyurethane foams, Cell Polym. 12, 390 (1993). DOI: 10.1016/0142-9612(93)90231-P.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. Wang et al., Development of biomimetic nano-hydroxyapatite/poly(hexamethylene adipamide) composites, Biomaterials 23 (24), 4787 (2002). DOI: 10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00229-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y.-Y. Hsu et al., Effect of polymer foam morphology and density on kinetics of in vitro controlled release of isoniazid from compressed foam matrices, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 35 (1), 107 (1997). DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199704)35:1<107::AID-JBM11>3.0.CO;2-G.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. C. Greenspan, J. P. Zhong, and L. A. Torref, In vitro studies of novel CaO-SiO2-MgO system composite bioceramics, Bioceramics 19 (1), 359 (2008). DOI: 10.1007/s10856-007-3186-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Zou, and Y. Li, Synthesis and properties of a copolymer of poly(1,4-phenylene sulfide) –poly(2,4-phenylene sulfide acid) and its HA reinforced composite, Eur. Polym. J. 2, 411 (2003). DOI: 10.1016/S0014-3057(02)00109-X.
   Google Scholar
• Z. Dong, Y. Li, and Q. Zou, Degradation and biocompatibility of porous nano-hydroxyapatite/polyurethane composite scaffold for bone tissue engineering, Appl. Surf. Sci. 255 (12), 6087 (2009). 10.1016/j.apsusc.2009.01.083 DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2009.01.083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Jaya, D. D. Timothy, and W. Rizhi, Porous scaffold of gelatin–starch with nanohydroxyapatite omposite processed via novel microwave vacuum drying, Acta Biomater. 4, 932942 (2008). DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2008.01.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Mortley, H. W. Bonin, and V. T. Bui, Synthesis and properties of radiation modified thermally cured castor oil based polyurethanes, Nucl. Instrum. Methods B 265 (1), 98 (2007). DOI: 10.1016/j.nimb.2007.08.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Mark et al., The relationship between polyurethane foam microstructure and foam aging, Polymer 9, 934942 (2008). DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2008.01.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O. Lidia et al., Molecular dynamics in polyester- or polyether-urethane networks based on different diisocyanates, Polymer 49, 2662 (2008). DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2008.04.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar