Development of local authorities in EU-member states between 1950–2011

References

• Backes, C. W., & Woude, V. D. W. (2013). The Netherlands-local authorities in the Polder-Dutch municipalities and provinces. In C. Panara & M. Varney (Eds.), Local Government in Europe: The ‘fourth’ level in the EU multilayered system of governance (pp. 231–254). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bajmócy, P. (2011). The role of borders in the demographic trends of Hungary. Forum geografic, X, 212–219. doi:10.5775/fg.2067-4635.2011.002.d
   Google Scholar
• Beksta, A., & Petkevicius, A. (2000). Local government in Lithuania. In T. Horvath (Ed.), Decentralisation: Experiments and reforms (pp. 165–216). Budapest: LGI-OSI.
   Google Scholar
• Bies, K., & Tekse, K. (1980). Migration and settlement – Hungary. Laxenburg: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
   Google Scholar
• Blom-Hansen, J. (2010). Municipal amalgamations and common pool problems: The Danish local government reform in 2007. Scandinavian Political Studies, 33, 51–73. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9477.2009.00239.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouvier, J. (2012). Local Government in Belgium. In Á. M. Moreno (Ed.), Local government in the member states of the European Union: A comparative legal perspective (pp. 45–68). Madrid: INAP.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, R., Humphreys, P. C., O’Donnell, O., O’Riordan, J., & Timonen, V. (2003). Changing local government – A review of the local government modernisation programme: CPMR research report 5. Dublin: Institute of Public Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Census of population of Ireland 1956 – Population, area and valuation of each district electoral division and of each larger unit of area. (1957). Dublin: Central Statistics Office Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Census of population of Ireland 1961 – Population, area and valuation of each district electoral division and of each larger unit of area. (1963). Dublin: Central Statistics Office Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Census of population of Ireland 1981 – population of district electoral division, towns and larger unit of area. (1982). Dublin: Central Statistics Office Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Censuses in Slovenia 1948–1991. (2002). Ljublana: Statistical Office of the Republic of Slovenia.
   Google Scholar
• Ceuninck, K., Reynaert, H., & Valcke, T. (2010, September). The relationship between local and regional government: The flemish case. Paper presented at the meeting of 32nd Conference of the European Group for Public Administration (EGPA), Toulouse, France.
   Google Scholar
• Chorianopoulos, I. (2012). State spatial restructuring in Greece: Forced rescaling, unresponsive localities. European Urban and Regional Studies, 19, 331–348. doi:10.1177/0969776411430351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christoffersen, H., & Bo Larsen, K. (2007). Economies of scale in Danish municipalities: Expenditure effects versus quality effects. Local Government Studies, 33, 77–95. doi:10.1080/03003930601081283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chryssafis, G. (2011, April). Administrative reform of Greek first level local government: A critical approach based on a case of Epirus region. Paper presented on 61st Annual International Conference, Transforming Politics: New Synergies, London, Great Britain.
   Google Scholar
• ColorBrewer 2.0: Color advice for cartography. Retrieved October 15, 2015, from http://www.colorbrewer2.org
   Google Scholar
• Cortese, A. (2009). La riduzione del numero dei Comuni: un tema che meriterebbe maggiore attenzione [Reducing the number of municipalities: An issue that deserves more attention]. Rome: Università degli Studi Roma Tre, Dipartimento di Economia.
   Google Scholar
• Csachová, S., & Nestorová-Dická, J. (2011). Territorial structure of local government in the Slovak Republic, the Czech Republic and the Hungarian Republic–comparative view. Geografický časopis, 63, 209–225.
   Google Scholar
• Daugirdas, V., & Maèiulytë, J. (2006). Decentralizacija ir teritorinë savivalda lietuvoje [Decentralization and local government in Lithuania]. Politologija, 43, 91–110.
   Google Scholar
• De Vries, M. S. (2008). Stability despite reforms: Structural asymmetries in Dutch local policy networks. Local Government Studies, 34, 221–243. doi:10.1080/03003930701852286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellwein, T., & Holtmann, E. (1999). 50 Jahre Bundesrepublik Deutschland: Rahmenbedingungen-Entwicklungen-Perspektiven [50 years Federal Republic of Germany: Framework, developments, perspectives]. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Erlingsson, G. Ó. (2005). Modelling secessions from municipalities. Scandinavian Political Studies, 28, 141–159. doi:10.1111/j.0080-6757.2005.00125.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estudio sobre el Registro de Entidades Locales [Study on the registration of local entities]. (2009). Madrid: Ministerio de Política Territorial.
   Google Scholar
• Font, J., Suárez, R. G., & Parrado-Díez, S. (1999). Intergovernmental partnerships at the local level in Spain: Mancomunidades and consortia in a comparative perspective. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Gamper, A. (2012). Local government in Austria. In Á. M. Moreno (Ed.), Local Government in the member States of the European Union: A comparative legal perspective (pp. 23–44). Madrid: INAP.
   Google Scholar
• Geys, B., Heyndels, B., & Vermeir, J. (2006). Explaining the formation of minimal coalitions: Anti-system parties and anti-pact rules. European Journal of Political Research, 45, 957–984. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00640.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greve, E. (2012). Local government in Denmark. In Á. M. Moreno (Ed.), Local Government in the member States of the European Union: A comparative legal perspective (pp. 135–156). Madrid: INAP.
   Google Scholar
• Hajdú, Z. (1988). Reforms of administrative division in Hungary 1950–1984. In É. Orosz (Ed.), Spatial organization and regional development (pp. 36–53). Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Hanes, N., & Wikström, M. (2010). Amalgamation impacts on local growth: Are voluntary municipal amalgamations more efficient than compulsory amalgamatios? Canadian Journal of Regional Science, 33, 57–70.
   Google Scholar
• Hanes, N., Wikstrom, M., & Wangmar, E. (2012). Municipal preferences for state-imposed amalgamations: An empirical study based on the Swedish municipal reform of 1952. Urban Studies, 49, 2733–2750. doi:10.1177/0042098011429488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, J. B. (2007, November). What price municipal amalgamations? Expenditure behaviour by Danish local governments in the years before the mergers in, 2007. Paper presented at the meeting of conference of the Nordic local government researchers, Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Hertzog, R. (2012). Local government in France. In Á. M. Moreno (Ed.), Local government in the member states of the European Union: A comparative legal perspective (pp. 203–232). Madrid: INAP.
   Google Scholar
• Himsworth, C. (2012). Local government in the UK. In Á. M. Moreno (Ed.), Local government in the member states of the European Union: A comparative legal perspective (pp. 663–683). Madrid: INAP.
   Google Scholar
• Historický lexikón obcí Slovenskej republiky 1970–2001 [Historical lexicon of municipalities in the Slovak Republic 1970–2001]. (2003). Bratislava: Štatistický úrad SR.
   Google Scholar
• Hlepas, N. K. (2005). Greece: Country report. Barcelona: Universtitat Autonoma de Barcelona.
   Google Scholar
• Horvath, T. (Ed.). (2000). Decentralisation: Experiments and reforms. Budapest: LGI-OSI.
   Google Scholar
• Illeris, S. (1979). Recent development of the settlement systems of advanced market economy countries. Geografisk Tidsskrift-Danish Journal of Geography, 79, 49–56. doi:10.1080/00167223.1979.10649105
   Google Scholar
• Jugoslavija 1918–1988. Statistični godišnjak [Yugoslavia 1918–1988. Statistics Yearbooks]. (1989). Beograd: Savezni závod za Statistiku.
   Google Scholar
• Kaczmarek, T. (2005). Struktury terytorialno-administracyjne i ich reformy w krajach europejskich [The territorial-administrative structures and reform in European countries]. Poznaň: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.
   Google Scholar
• Kandeva, E. (Ed.). (2001). Stabilisation of local governments. Budapest: LGI-OSI.
   Google Scholar
• Kemkers, R. (2010). Ten countries – Twenty years administrative reforms in ten new EU-members two decades after revolution. European Spatial Research and Policy, 17, 119–142.
   Google Scholar
• Klimovský, D. (2009). O možných riešeniach fragmentovanej lokálnej sídelnej štruktúry [Possible solutions of fragmented local residential structure]. Acta Politologica, 1, 182–213.
   Google Scholar
• Klobučník, M., & Bačík, V. (2016). Local self-government structure in the EU member states in 2011. Journal of Maps, 12, 671–675. doi:10.1080/17445647.2015.1060181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulesza, M., & Sześciło, A. (2012). Local government in Poland. In Á. M. Moreno (Ed.), Local government in the member states of the European Union: A comparative legal perspective (pp. 485–504). Madrid: INAP.
   Google Scholar
• La Población de Espana [Population of Spain]. (1975). Paris: The Committee for International Cooperation in National Research in Demography.
   Google Scholar
• Le code officiel géographique (COG), avant, pendant et autour [The official geographic code (COG), before, during and around]. (2008). Paris: Département de la coordination statistique, Direction de la Coordination Statistique et des Relations Internationales.
   Google Scholar
• Local and regional government in Europe – Structures and competences. (2012). Brussels: Council of European Municipalities and Regions.
   Google Scholar
• Local Government Act (Northern Ireland) 1972 (1972). Belfast: Parliament of Northern Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Local Government (Boundaries) Act (Northern Ireland) 1971 (1971). Belfast: Parliament of Northern Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Local Government Reform. (1997). Analysis of experience selected countries. New York, NY: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Lovacká, S. (2009). Geografické aspekty komunálnej reformy v Slovenskej republike [Geographical aspects of communal reform in the Slovak Republic]. Geographia Cassoviensis, 3, 5–104.
   Google Scholar
• Madleňák, T. (2009). Vývoj územno-správneho usporiadania Poľska po roku 1945 [Development of territorial-administrative arrangement of Poland after 1945]. Geografická revue, 5, 63–79.
   Google Scholar
• Mäenpää, O. (2012). Local government in Finland. In Á. M. Moreno (Ed.), Local government in the member states of the European Union: A comparative legal perspective (pp. 185–202). Madrid: INAP.
   Google Scholar
• Matthiessen, C. W. (1981). Settlement change and political response. Geografisk Tidsskrift-Danish Journal of Geography, 81, 55–66. doi:10.1080/00167223.1981.10649136
   Google Scholar
• Maurel, M. C. (1989). Administrative reforms in eastern Europe: An overview. In R. Bennett (Ed.), Territory and administration in Europe (pp. 111–123). London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Meldon, M., Kenny, M., & Walsh, J. A. (2003). Local government, local development and citizen participation: Lessons from Ireland. In W. R. Lovan, M. Murray, & R. Shaffer (Eds.), Participatory governance – Planning, conflict mediation and public decision making in civil society (pp. 41–62). Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Misiunas, R. J., & Taagepera, R. (1993). The Baltic states, years of dependence, 1940–1990. Irvine: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno, Á. M. (2012). Local government in Spain. In Á. M. Moreno (Ed.), Local government in the member states of the European Union: A comparative legal perspective (pp. 599–636). Madrid: INAP.
   Google Scholar
• Nancu, D., Persu, M., & Damian, N. (2011). The evolution and territorial distribution of rural population in romania at the beginning of the 21st century. Forum geografic, X, 220–228. doi:10.5775/fg.2067-4635.2011.004.d
   Google Scholar
• Nijkamp, P., & Goede, E. (2002). Urban development in the Netherlands: New perspectives. Amsterdam: Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Econometrie.
   Google Scholar
• Nižňanský, V. (2004). Komunálna reforma: Materiál pre verejnú diskusiu [Communal reform: Material for public debate]. Bratislava: Úrad vlády SR.
   Google Scholar
• Panara, C., & Varney, M. (2013). Local government in Europe: The ‘fourth’ level in the EU multilayered system of governance. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Püttner, G. (2007). Handbuch der kommunalen Wissenschaft und Praxis: Band 3 Kommunale Aufgaben und Aufgabenerfüllung [Handbook of local science and practice: Volume 3 municipal tasks and task performance]. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Regions in the European Union – Nomenclature of territorial units for statistics NUTS 2013/EU-28. (2015). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Reiljan, J., Timpmann, K., & Olenko, K. (2003). Key issues in developing the public administration system of Estonia before joining the European Union. Tartu: University of Tartu, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Săgeată, D. R. (2006). Deciziile politico-administrative şi organizarea teritoriului [Political-administrative decisions and territorial organization]. Bucureşti: Universităţii Naţionale de Apărare.
   Google Scholar
• Santos, J. A. (1985). Regionalização – Processo Histórico [Regionalization – Historical process]. Lisboa: Livros Horizonte.
   Google Scholar
• Scannell, Y. (2012). Local government in Ireland. In Á. M. Moreno (Ed.), Local government in the member states of the European Union: A comparative legal perspective (pp. 309–338). Madrid: INAP.
   Google Scholar
• Schefold, D. (2012). Local government in Germany. In Á. M. Moreno (Ed.), Local government in the member states of the European Union: A comparative legal perspective (pp. 233–256). Madrid: INAP.
   Google Scholar
• Silva, C. N. (1993). Réformes concernant la coopération inter-municipale et les limites: nouvelles tendences au Portugal [Reforms concerning intermunicipal cooperation and limits: New trends in Portugal]. Bulletin de la Société Languedocienne de Géographie, 3–4, 281–299.
   Google Scholar
• Silva, C. N. (2002). Local and regional government: Continuity and innovation in local governance. In S. Syrett (Ed.), Contemporary Portugal: Dimensions of economic and political change (pp. 197–220). Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Silva, J. (2008). Local governments in Portugal. Urban Public Economics Review, 9, 55–74.
   Google Scholar
• Sootla, G., Kalev, L., & Kersten, K. (2009). Perspectives of local government amalgamations in a transition society: The case of Estonia. Studies of Transition States and Societies, 1, 52–65.
   Google Scholar
• Spáč, P., & Sloboda, D. (2014). Municipalizácia, volebný systém a možnosti participácie v miestnej samospráve na Slovensku [Municipalisation, the electoral system and the possibility of participation in local government in Slovakia]. Piešťany: Komunálne výskumné a poradenské centrum.
   Google Scholar
• Statisticky lexikon obcí ČSSR 1965 [Statistical Lexicon of Municipalities of Czechoslovakia in 1965]. (1966). Praha: Ústrední komise lidové kontroly a štatistiky a Ministerstvo vnitra.
   Google Scholar
• Statisticky lexikon obcí republiky Československé 1955 [Statistical Lexicon of Municipalities of Czechoslovakia in 1955]. (1955). Praha: Ústrední komise lidové kontroly a štatistiky a Ministerstvo vnitra.
   Google Scholar
• Statistisches Jahrbuch der Deutschen Demokratischen Republik 1962 [Statistical yearbook of the German Democratic Republic in 1962]. (1962). Berlin: Veb deutscher Zentralverlag.
   Google Scholar
• Statistisches Jahrbuch der Deutschen Demokratischen Republik 1971 [Statistical yearbook of the German Democratic Republic in 1971]. (1971). Berlin: Hereausgegeben von der Staatlichen Zentralverwaltung für Statistik.
   Google Scholar
• Statistisches Jahrbuch der Deutschen Demokratischen Republik 1981 [Statistical yearbook of the German Democratic Republic in 1981]. (1981). Berlin: Hereausgegeben von der Staatlichen Zentralverwaltung für Statistik.
   Google Scholar
• Statistisches Jahrbuch der Deutschen Demokratischen Republik 1990 [Statistical yearbook of the German Democratic Republic in 1990]. (1990). Berlin: Hereausgeber Statistisches Amt der DDR.
   Google Scholar
• Swianiewicz, P. (Ed.). (2002). Consolidation or fragmentation? The size of local governments in central and eastern Europe. Budapest: LGI-OSI.
   Google Scholar
• Swianiewicz, P. (Ed.). (2010). Territorial consolidation reforms in Europe. Budapest: LGI-OSI.
   Google Scholar
• The Local Government Act 1972. (1974). London: Parliament of the United Kingdom.
   Google Scholar
• The Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973. (1975). London: Parliament of the United Kingdom.
   Google Scholar
• The Local Government etc. (Scotland) Act 1994. (1994). London: Parliament of the United Kingdom.
   Google Scholar
• The size of municipalities, efficiency and citizen participation. (1995). Council of Europe: Strasbourg.
   Google Scholar
• Vaičiūnienė, J. (2008, November). The administrative-territorial reform in Lithuania: History and today. Paper presented at the meeting of lessons learned from territorial consolidation reforms – The European experience, Warszawa, Poland.
   Google Scholar
• Vanags, E. (2005). Development of local government reforms in Latvia. Viešoji politika ir administravimas, 13, 15–24.
   Google Scholar
• Vanags, E., & Vilka, I. (2002). Local government reform in the baltic countries. In N. Kersting & A. Vetter (Eds.), Reforming local government in Europe: Closing the gap between democracy and efficiency (pp. 309–322). Opladen: Leske + Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Vanags, E., & Vilka, I. (2006). Local government in the baltic states: Similar but different. Local Government Studies, 32, 623–637. doi:10.1080/03003930600896244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandelli, L. (2012). Local government in Italy. In: Á. M. Moreno (Ed.), Local government in the member States of the european Union: A comparative legal perspective (pp. 339–364). Madrid: INAP.
   Google Scholar
• Vilka, I. (2012). Local government in Latvia. In Á. M. Moreno (Ed.), Local government in the member states of the European Union: A comparative legal perspective (pp. 365–388). Madrid: INAP.
   Google Scholar
• Vrangbæk, K. (2010). Structural reform in Denmark: Central reform processes in a decentralized environment in 2007. In P. Swianiewicz (Ed.), Territorial consolidation reforms in Europe (pp. 27–44). Budapest: LGI-OSI.
   Google Scholar
• Wastl-Walter, D. (2000). Gemeinden in Österreich: im Spannungsfeld von staatlichem System und lokaler Lebenswelt [Municipalities in Austria: The tension between national system and local living environment]. Wien: Böhlau.
   Google Scholar
• Wollmann, H. (2008). Comparing local government reforms in England, Sweden, France and Germany: Between continuity and change, divergence and convergence. Berlin: Humboldt-Universität, Institute of Social Science.
   Google Scholar
• Yoder, J. A. (2003). Decentralisation and regionalisation after communism: Administrative and territorial reform in Poland and the Czech Republic. Europe-Asia Studies, 55, 263–286. doi:10.1080/0966813032000055877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Žuljić, S. (2001). Regionalno i teritorijalno ustrojstvo Hrvatske u razdoblju [Regional and territorial organization of Croatian period]. Ekonomski Pregled, 52, 3–28.
   Google Scholar