175
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

How green was my valley: forest canopy density in relation to topography and anthropogenic effects in Manipur valley, India

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 137-150 | Received 25 Dec 2017, Accepted 27 Jun 2018, Published online: 23 Jul 2018

References

  • Akike, S., & Samanta, S. (2016). Land Use/Land Cover and Forest Canopy Density Monitoring of Wafi-Golpu Project Area, Papua New Guinea. Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection, 4(08), 1.
  • Azizi, Z. (2008). Forest canopy density estimating using satellite images. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 37(B8),1127–1130.
  • Baccini, A., Goetz, S. J., Walker, W. S., Laporte, N. T., Sun, M., Sulla-Menashe, D., & Houghton, R. A. (2012). Estimated carbon dioxide emissions from tropical deforestation improved by carbon-density maps. Nature Climate Change, 2(3), 182–185.
  • Banerjee, K., Panda, S., Bandyopadhyay, J., & Jain, M. K. (2014). Forest canopy density mapping using advance geospatial technique. International Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering & Technology, 1(7), 358–363.
  • Baynes, J. (2004). Assessing forest canopy density in a highly variable landscape using Landsat data and FCD Mapper software. Australian Forestry, 67(4), 247–253.
  • Bhaduri, B., Bright, E., Coleman, P., & Urban, M. L. (2007). LandScan USA: A high-resolution geospatial and temporal modeling approach for population distribution and dynamics. GeoJournal, 69, 103–117.
  • Blodgett, C., Jakubauskas, M., Price, K., & Martinko, E. (2000). Remote Sensing-based Geostatistical Modeling of Forest Canopy Structure. ASPRS 2000 Annual Conference, Washington, D.C., May 22–26.
  • Cakir, G., Sivrikaya, F., & Keles, S. (2008). Forest cover change and fragmentation using Landsat data in Maçka State Forest Enterprise in Turkey. Environmental Monitoring & Assessment, 137, 51–66.
  • Census of India. (2011). General Population Totals, Census of India – 2011 Manipur. Census of India website: http://www.censusindia.net.
  • Chander, G., & Markham, B. (2003). Revised Landsat-5 TM radiometric calibration procedures and postcalibration dynamic ranges. IEEE Transactions on geoscience and remote sensing, 41(11), 2674–2677.
  • Chandrashekhar, M. B., Saran, S., Raju, P. L. N., & Roy, P. S. (2005). Forest canopy density stratification: How relevant is biophysical spectral response modelling approach? Geocarto International, 20(1), 15–21.
  • Chauhan, N. (2004). Mapping, monitoring and modeling of landscape for biodiversity characterization in Baratang Forest Division, Andaman and Nicobar Islands. Ph.D. diss., (unpubl.), University of Pune & Indian Institute of Remote Sensing, Dehradun.
  • Christenson, E., Elliott, M., Banerjee, O., Hamrick, L., & Bartram, J. (2014). Climate-related hazards: A method for global assessment of urban and rural population exposure to cyclones, droughts, and floods. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 11, 2169–2192.
  • de la Barrera, F., & Henriquez, C. (2017). Vegetation cover change in growing urban agglomerations in Chile. Ecological Indicators, 81, 265–273.
  • DeFries, R. S., Rudel, T., Uriarte, M., & Hansen, M. (2010). Deforestation driven by urban population growth and agricultural trade in the twenty-first century. Nature Geoscience, 3(3), 178–181.
  • Deka, J., Tripathi, O. P., & Khan, M. L. (2013). Implementation of forest canopy density model to monitor tropical deforestation. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 41(2), 469–475.
  • Devi, A. K., Khan, M. L., & Tripathi, R. S. (2005). Sacred groves of Manipur, northeast India: Biodiversity value, status and strategies for their conservation. Biodiversity and Conservation, 14, 1541–1582.
  • Diaz, S., Fargione, J., Chapin, F. S., III, & Tilman, D. (2006). Biodiversity loss threatens human well-being. PLoS Biol, 4(8), e277.
  • Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). (2000). Global Forest Resource Assessment 2000. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
  • Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). (2005). Global Forest Resource Assessment 2005. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
  • Freitas, S. R., Hawbaker, T. J., & Metzger, J. P. (2010). Effects of roads, topography, and land use on forest cover dynamics in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Forest Ecology and Management, 259(3), 410–417.
  • FSI. (2015). State of Forest Report 2015, Forest Survey of India (Dehra Dun: Ministry of Environment & Forests).
  • Fujihara, Y., Takase, K., Chono, S., Ichion, E., Ogura, A., & Tanaka, K. (2017). Influence of topography and forest characteristics on snow distributions in a forested catchment. Journal of Hydrology, 546, 289–298.
  • Gibson, L., Lee, T. M., Koh, L. P., Brook, B. W., Gardner, T. A., Barlow, J., … Sodhi, N. S. (2011). Primary forests are irreplaceable for sustaining tropical biodiversity. Nature, 478(369), 378–381.
  • Gill, S. J., Biging, G. S., & Murphy, E. C. (2000). Modeling conifer tree crown radius and estimating canopy cover. Forest Ecology and Management, 126(3), 405–416.
  • Godinho, S., Gil, A., Guiomar, N., Neves, N., & Pinto-Correia, T. (2016). A remote sensing-based approach to estimating montado canopy density using the FCD model: A contribution to identifying HNV farmlands in southern Portugal. Agroforestry systems, 90(1), 23–34.
  • Hansen, M. C., Potapov, P. V., Moore, R., Hancher, M., Turubanova, S. A., Tyukavina, A., … Townshend, J. R. G. (2013). High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science, 342(6160), 850–853.
  • IDAHO. (2005). Idaho Forest Products Commission. Health of Idaho’s Forests- USDA Forest Service. Northern Region, Report No. 99-4. Retrieved from http://www.idahoforests.org/health1.htm).
  • INCCA. (2010). Indian Network for Climate Change Assessment. Climate Change and India: A 4 × 4 Assessment A sectoral and regional analysis for 2030s. Retrieved from http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/fin-rpt-incca.pdf.
  • Jamal, M., & Mandal, S. (2016). Monitoring forest dynamics and landslide susceptibility in Mechi–Balason interfluves of Darjiling Himalaya, West Bengal using forest canopy density model (FCDM) and Landslide Susceptibility Index model (LSIM). Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 2(4), 184.
  • Jeganathan, C., Dadhwal, V. K., Gupta, K., & Raju, P. L. N. (2009). Comparison of MODIS vegetation continuous field—Based forest density maps with IRS-LISS III derived maps. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 37(4), 539–549.
  • Jennings, S. B., Brown, N. D., & Sheil, D. (1999). Assessing forest canopies and understorey illumination: Canopy closure, canopy cover and other measures. Forestry, 72(1), 59–74.
  • Jensen, J. R. (2005). Information extraction using artificial intellegence. In J. R. Jensen (Ed.), Introductory digital image processing (pp. 314–322). New Jersey: Pearson, Prentice Hall.
  • JOFCA. (2003). FCD-Mapper Ver. 2. User Guide. Yokohama, Japan: International Tropical Timber Organisation and Japan Overseas Forestry Consultants Association.
  • Joshi, C., De Leeuw, J., Skidmore, A. K., Van Duren, I. C., & Van Oosten, H. (2006). Remotely sensed estimation of forest canopy density: A comparison of the performance of four methods. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 8(2), 84–95.
  • Li, H., & Liu, Q. (2008). Comparison of NDBI and NDVI as indicators of surface urban heat island effect in MODIS imagery. In D. Li, J. Gong, & H. Wu, (Eds.), International conference on earth observation data processing and analysis (ICEODPA). Proceedings of SPIE (pp. 728503-1) Bellingham, WA: SPIE.
  • Li, J. J., Wang, X. R., Wang, X. J., Ma, W. C., & Zhang, H. (2009). Remote sensing evaluation of urban heat island and its spatial pattern of the Shanghai metropolitan area China. Ecological Complexity, 6(4), 413–420.
  • Loi, D. T., Chou, T. Y., & Fang, Y. M. (2017). Integration of GIS and Remote Sensing for Evaluating Forest Canopy Density Index in Thai Nguyen Province, Vietnam. International Journal of Environmental Science and Development, 8(8), 539.
  • Ma, M., Singh, R. B., & Hietala, R. (2012). Human driving forces for ecosystem services in the Himalayan region. Environmental Economics, 3(1), 51–55.
  • Mahato, M. B. (2001). Quantification of forest growing stock using remote sensing data for planning and management: A case study of Tikauli forest in Chitawan district, Nepal. In Paper presented at the 22nd Asian Conference on Remote Sensing, 5–9 November, Singapore.
  • Moein, A. T. S., Darvish, S. A., & Namiranian, M. (2008). Evaluation of FCD model for estimation of forest density using Landsat 7 imagery (case study: Chalus Forest). Iranian Journal Of Forest and Poplar Research, 16(1), 124–138.
  • Mon, M. S., Kajisa, T., Mizoue, N., & Yoshida, S. (2010). Monitoring deforestation and forest degradation in the Bago Mountain Area, Myanmar using FCD Mapper. Journal of Forest Planning, 15(2), 63–72.
  • Mon, M. S., Mizoue, N., Htun, N. Z., Kajisa, T., & Yoshida, S. (2012). Estimating forest canopy density of tropical mixed deciduous vegetation using Landsat data: A comparison of three classification approaches. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 33(4), 1042–1057.
  • Nandy, S., Joshi, P. K., & Das, K. K. (2003). Forest canopy density stratification using biophysical modeling. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 31(4), 291–297.
  • NAP (2009). National Afforestation Programme Revised Operational Guidelines 2009, National Afforestation & Eco-development Board. Ministry of Environment & Forests. Retrieved from http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/NAP_Guidelines_0.pdf.
  • Paletto, A., & Tosi, V. (2009). Forest canopy cover and canopy closure: Comparison of assessment techniques. European Journal of Forest Research, 128(3), 265–272.
  • Panta, M. (2003). Analysis of Forest Canopy Density and Factors affecting it, using RS and GIS Techniques (A Case Study from Chitwan District of Nepal). Masters diss. (unpubl.). Retrieved from https://www.itc.nl/library/papers_2003/msc/nrm/panta.pdf.
  • Panta, M., Kim, K., & Joshi, C. (2008). Temporal mapping of deforestation and forest degradation in Nepal: Applications to forest conservation. Forest Ecology and Management, 256(9), 1587–1595.
  • Panta, M., & Kim, K. H. (2006). Spatio-temporal Dynamic Alteration of Forest Canopy Density based on Site Associated Factor: View from Tropical Forest of Nepal. Korean Journal of Remote Sensing, 22(5), 313–323.
  • Pawe, C. K., & Saikia, A. (2017). Unplanned urban growth: Land use/land cover change in the Guwahati Metropolitan Area, India. Geografisk Tidsskrift-Danish Journal of Geography, 118(1), 88–100.
  • Polydoros, A., & Cartalis, C. (2015). Assessing the impact of urban expansion to the state of thermal environment of peri-urban areas using indices. Urban Climate, 14, 166–175.
  • Puyravaud, J. P. (2003). Standardizing the calculation of the annual rate of deforestation. Forest Ecology and Management, 177, 593–596.
  • Rashid, I., Bhat, M. A., & Romshoo, S. A. (2017). Assessing changes in the above ground biomass and carbon stocks of Lidder valley, Kashmir Himalaya, India. Geocarto International, 32(7), 717–734.
  • Rautiainen, M., Stenberg, P., & Nilson, T. (2005). Estimating canopy cover in Scots pine stands. Silva Fennica, 39(1), 137–142.
  • Reddy, C. S., Jha, C. S., Dadhwal, V. K., Krishna, P. H., Pasha, S. V., Satish, K. V., … Diwakar, P. G. (2016). Quantification and monitoring of deforestation in India over eight decades (1930–2013). Biodiversity and conservation, 25(1), 93–116.
  • Rikimaru, A. (1996). LANDSAT TM Data Processing Guide for Forest Canopy Density Mapping and Monitoring Model. In ITTO workshop on Utilization of Remote Sensing in Site Assessment and Planning for Rehabilitation of Logged-over Forest. July 30–August 1, Bangkok, Thailand.
  • Rikimaru, A. (2003). Concept of FCD mapping model and semi-expert system. FCD Mapper Ver.2 User Guide (pp. 32–45). International Tropical Timber Organization and Japan Overseas Forestry Consultants Association, Tokyo.
  • Rikimaru, A., & Miyatake, S. (1997). Development of forest canopy density mapping and monitoring model using indices of vegetation, bare soil and shadow. Presented paper at the 18th Asian Conference on Remote Sensing, 20–24 October, Malaysia.
  • Rikimaru, A., Roy, P. S., & Miyatake, S. (2002). Tropical forest cover density mapping. Tropical Ecology, 43(1), 39–47.
  • Rodriguez-Galiano, V. F., Ghimire, B., Rogan, J., Chica-Olmo, M., & Rigol-Sanchez, J. P. (2012). An assessment of the effectiveness of a random forest classifier for land-cover classification. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 67, 93–104.
  • Sadeghi, V., Ebadi, H., & Ahmadi, F. F. (2013). A new model for automatic normalization of multitemporal satellite images using Artificial Neural Network and mathematical methods. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37(9), 6437–6445.
  • Sahana, M., Sajjad, H., & Ahmed, R. (2015). Assessing spatio-temporal health of forest cover using forest canopy density model and forest fragmentation approach in Sundarban reserve forest, India. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 1(4), 49.
  • Saikia, A. (1998). Shifting cultivation, population and sustainability: The changing context of north-east India. Development, 41, 97–100.
  • Saikia, A. (2013). Over-exploitation of forests: A case study from North East India. Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Saikia, A., Hazarika, R., & Sahariah, D. (2013). Land-use/land-cover change and fragmentation in the Nameri Tiger Reserve, India. Geografisk Tidsskrift-Danish Journal of Geography, 113(1), 1–10.
  • SAPCC. (2013). Manipur state action plan on climate change, 2013. Government of Manipur, Imphal: Directorate of Environment.
  • Sharma, K., Robeson, S. M., Thapa, P., & Saikia, A. (2017). Landuse/land-cover change and forest fragmentation in the Jigme Dorji National Park, Bhutan. Physical Geography, 38(1), 18–35.
  • Sukarna, R. M., & Syahid, Y. (2015). FCD application of landsat for monitoring mangrove in Central Kalimantan. The Indonesian Journal of Geography, 47(2), 160–170.
  • Trincsi, K., & Turner, S. (2014). Mapping mountain diversity: Ethnic minorities and land use land cover change in Vietnam’s borderlands. Land Use Policy, 41, 484–497.
  • Tsering, K., Sharma, E., Chettri, N., & Shrestha, A. (2012). Climate change vulnerability in the Eastern Himalayas. ICIMOD, Kathmandu. Retrieved from http://www.preventionweb.net/files/14744_climatechangevulnerabilityofmountai.pdf.
  • Vincini, M., & Reeder, D. (2000). Minnaert topographic normalization of Landsat TM imagery in rugged forest areas. International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 33(B7/4; PART 7), 1642–1646.
  • Vuohelainen, A. J., Coad, L., Marthews, T. R., Malhi, Y., & Killeen, T. J. (2012). The effectiveness of contrasting protected areas in preventing deforestation in Madre de Dios, Peru. Environmental Management, 50, 645–663.
  • Wohlfart, C., Mack, B., Liu, G., & Kuenzer, C. (2017). Multi-faceted land cover and land use change analyses in the Yellow River Basin based on dense Landsat time series: Exemplary analysis in mining, agriculture, forest, and urban areas. Applied Geography, 85, 73–88.
  • Zha, Y., Gao, J., & Ni, S. (2003). Use of normalized difference built-up index in automatically mapping urban areas from TM imagery. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 24(3), 583–594.
  • Zielewska-Büttner, K., Adler, P., Ehmann, M., & Braunisch, V. (2016). Automated detection of forest gaps in spruce dominated stands using canopy height models derived from stereo aerial imagery. Remote Sensing, 8(3), 175.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.