376
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

UNDERSTANDING EVANGELICAL PROTESTANT IDENTITY, RELIGIOSITY, EXTREME WEATHER, AND AMERICAN PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS OF GLOBAL WARMING, 2006-2016

References

  • Abramowitz, A. I., and K. L. Saunders. 2008. Is Polarization a Myth? The Journal of Politics 70 (2): 542–555.
  • Barker, D. C., and D. H. Bearce. 2013. End-times Theology, the Shadow of the Future, and Public Resistance to Addressing Global Climate Change. Political Research Quarterly 66 (2): 267–279.
  • Borick, C. P., and B. G. Rabe. 2010. A Reason to Believe: Examining the Factors that Determine Individual Views on Global Warming. Social Science Quarterly 91 (3): 777–800.
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Environmental Public Health Tracking Network. [www.cdc.gov/ephtracking].
  • Dunlap, R. E., and A. M. McCright. 2008. A Widening Gap: Republican and Democratic Views on Climate Change. Environment 50: 26–35.
  • Dunlap, R. E., C. Xiao, and A. M. McCright. 2001. Politics and Environment in America: Partisan and Ideological Cleavages in Public Support for Environmentalism. Environmental Politics 10 (4): 23–48.
  • Ecklund, E. H., C. P. Scheitle, J. Peifer, and D. Bolger. 2017. Examining Links between Religion, Evolution Views, and Climate Change Skepticism. Environment and Behavior 49 (9): 985–1006.
  • Egan, P. J., and M. Mullin. 2012. Turning Personal Experience into Political Attitudes: The Effect of Local Weather on Americans’ Perceptions about Global Warming. J. Polit. 74 (3): 796–809.
  • Egan, P. J.. 2017. Climate Change: US Public Opinion. Annual Review of Political Science 20: 209–227.
  • Ellingson, S., V. A. Woodley, and A. Paik. 2012. The Structure of Religious Environmentalism: Movement Organizations, Interorganizational Networks, and Collective Action. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 51 (2): 266–285.
  • Guth, J. L., and others. 1995. Faith and the Environment: Religious Beliefs and Attitudes on Environmental Policy. American Journal of Political Science 39: 364–382.
  • Hamilton, L. C., and B. D. Keim. 2009. Regional Variation in Perceptions about Climate Change. Int. J. Climatol. 29: 2348–2352.
  • Hamilton, L. C., and M. D. Stampone, 2013. Blowin’ in the Wind: Short-term Weather and Belief in Anthropogenic Climate Change. Wea. Climate Soc. 5: 112–119
  • Hayhoe, K., and A. Farley. 2009. A Climate for Change: Global Warming Facts for Faith-based Decisions. New York, NY: FaithWords.
  • Hitzhusen, G. E. 2007. Judeo‐Christian Theology and the Environment: Moving Beyond Skepticism to New Sources for Environmental Education in the United States. Environmental Education Research 13 (1): 55–74.
  • Howe, P., E. Markowitz, T. M. Lee, C. Y. Ko, and A. Leiserowitz. 2013. Global Perceptions of Local Temperature Change. Nat. Climate Change 3: 352–356 [doi:10.1038/nclimate1768].
  • Jacobson, G. C. 2005. Polarized Politics and the 2004 Congressional and Presidential Elections. Political Science Quarterly 120 (2): 199–218.
  • Jones, R. P., D. Cox, and J. Navarro-Rivera. 2014. Believers, Sympathizers, and Skeptics: Why Americans Are Conflicted about Climate Change, Environmental Policy and Science. PRRI/AAR Religions, Values, and Climate Change Survey. Public Religion Research Institute and American Academy of Religion.
  • Kanagy, C. L., and H. M. Nelsen. 1995. Religion and Environmental Concern: Challenging the Dominant Assumptions. Review of Religious Research 37(1): 33–45.
  • Kellstedt, P. M., S. Zahran, and A. Vedlitz. 2008. Personal Efficacy, the Information Environment, and Attitudes toward Global Warming and Climate Change in the United States. Risk Analysis 28 (1): 113–126.
  • Krosnick, J. A., A. L. Holbrook, and P. S. Visser. 2000. The Impact of the Fall 2007 Debate about Global Warming on American Public Opinion. Public Underst. Sci. 9: 239–60.
  • Leiserowitz, A. 2006. Climate Change Risk Perception and Policy Preferences: The Role of Affect, Imagery, and Values. Climatic Change 77 (1–2): 45–72.
  • Malka, A., J. A. Krosnick, and G. Langer. 2009. The Association of Knowledge with Concern about Global Warming: Trusted Information Sources Shape Public Thinking. Risk Analysis 29: 633–47
  • Marjanac, S., and P. Lindene. 2018. Extreme Weather Event Attribution Science and Climate Change Litigation: An Essential Step in the Causal Chain? Journal of Energy and Natural Resources Law 36 (3): 265–298.
  • McCarty, N., K. T. Poole, and H. Rosenthal. 2016. Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Boston: MIT Press.
  • McCright, A. M. 2009. The Social Bases of Climate Change Knowledge, Concern, and Policy Support in the U.S. General Public. Hofstra Law Rev. 37: 1017–1046.
  • McCright, A. M., and R. E. Dunlap. 2000. Challenging Global Warming as a Social Problem: An Analysis of the Conservative Movement’s Counter Claims. Social Problems 47(4):499–522.
  • McCright, A. M.. 2003. Defeating Kyoto: The Conservative Movement’s Impact on U.S. Climate Change Policy. Social Problems 5 (3): 348–373.
  • McCright, A. M.. 2010. Anti-Reflexivity: The American Conservative Movement’s Success in Undermining Climate Science and Policy. Theory, Culture, and Society 27 (2–3): 100–133.
  • McCright, A. M.. 2011. The Politicization of Climate Change and Polarization in the American Public’s Views of Global Warming, 2001–2010. Sociol. Quart. 52: 155–194.
  • Myers, T, M. C. Nisbet, E. W. Maibach, and A. A. Leiserowitz. 2012. A Public Health Frame Arouses Hopeful Emotions about Climate Change. Climatic Change 113: 1105–12.
  • Newman, B., and others. 2016. Religion and Environmental Politics in the US House of Representatives. Environmental Politics 25 (2): 289–314.
  • Oreskes, N., and E. M. Conway. 2010. Merchants of Doubt. New York: Bloomsbury Press.
  • Pew Research Center. 2007. Global Warming: A Divide on Causes and Solutions. [http://people-press.org/reports/pdf/303.pdf].
  • Pew Research Center. cited 2012. More Say There Is Solid Evidence of Global Warming. [http://www.people-press.org/2012/10/15/more-say-there-is-solid-evidence-of-global-warming/].
  • Pew Research Center. cited 2016. The Politics of Climate: Polarized Views about Climate Issues Stretch from the Causes and Cures for Climate Change to Trust in Climate Scientists and Their Research. But Most Americans Support a Role for Scientists in Climate Policy, and There Is Bipartisan Support for Expanding Solar, Wind Energy. [http://www.pewinternet.org/2016/10/04/the-politics-of-climate/].
  • Expanding Solar. cited 2017. The Partisan Divide on Political Values Grows Even Wider. [https://www.people-press.org/2017/10/05/the-partisan-divide-on-political-values-grows-even-wider/].
  • Pew Research Center. n.d. Questionnaire Design. [http://www.pewresearch.org/methodology/u-s-survey-research/questionnaire-design/].
  • Public Religion Research Institute. cited 2014. Believers, Sympathizers, and Skeptics: Why Americans are Conflicted about Climate Change, Environmental Policy, and Science. [https://www.prri.org/research/believers-sympathizers-skeptics-americans-conflicted-climate-change-environmental-policy-science/].
  • Schuldt, J. P., S. Roh, and N. Schwarz. 2015. Questionnaire Design Effects in Climate Change Surveys: Implications for the Partisan Divide. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 658 (1): 67–85.
  • Shao, W. 2016. Are Actual Weather and Perceived Weather the Same? Understanding Perceptions of Local Weather and Their Effects on Risk Perceptions of Global Warming. Journal of Risk Research 19 (6): 722–742.
  • Shao, W.. 2016. 2017. Weather, Climate, Politics or God? – Determinants of American Public Opinions toward Global Warming. Environmental Politics. [doi: 10.1080/09644016.2016.1223190].
  • Shao, W., and K. Goidel. 2016. Seeing Is Believing? An Examination of Perceptions of Local Weather Conditions and Climate Change among Residents in the US Gulf Coast. Risk Analysis 36 (11): 2136–2157.
  • Shao, W., B. D. Keim, J. C. Garand, and L. C. Hamilton. 2014. Weather, Climate, and the Economy: Explaining Risk Perceptions of Global Warming, 2001–10. Weather, Climate, and Society 6 (1): 119–134.
  • Sherkat, D. E., and C. G. Ellison. 2007. Structuring the Religion‐environment Connection: Identifying Religious Influences on Environmental Concern and Activism. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 46 (1): 71–85.
  • Smith, N., and A. Leiserowitz. 2013. American Evangelicals and Global Warming. Global Environmental Change 23: 1009–1017.
  • Suparan, G., and N. Oreskes. 2017. Assessing ExxonMobil’s Climate Change Communications (1977–2014). Environmental Research Letters 12: 084019.
  • Truelove, H. B., and J. Joireman. 2009. Understanding the Relationship between Christian Orthodoxy and Environmentalism: The Mediating Role of Perceived Environmental Consequences. Environment and Behavior 41(6): 806–820.
  • Villar, A., and J. A. Krosnick. 2011. Global Warming vs. Climate Change, Taxes vs. Prices: Does Word Choice Matter? Climatic Change 105 (1–2): 1–12.
  • White, L. 1967. The Historical Roots of Our Ecologic Crisis. Science 155: 1203–1207.
  • Wilkinson, K. K., 2010, Climate’s Salvation? Why and How American Evangelicals Are Engaging with Climate Change. Environment 52: 47–57.
  • Wilkinson, K. K.. 2012. Between God & Green: How Evangelicals Are Cultivating a Middle Ground on Climate Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.