836
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

GEOGRAPHY IN THE BIG DATA AGE: AN OVERVIEW OF THE HISTORICAL RESONANCE OF CURRENT DEBATES

References

  • Amin, A., and N. Thrift. 2002. Cities: Reimaging the Urban. London: Polity.
  • Anderson, C. 2008. The End of Theory: The Data Deluge Makes the Scientific Method Obsolete. http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/magazine/16-07/pb_theory.
  • Ash, J., R. Kitchin, and A. Leszczynski. 2016. Digital Turn, Digital Geographies? Progress in Human Geography 1–19.
  • Balchin, W., and A. Coleman. 1967. Cartography and Computers. The Cartographer 4: 120–127.
  • Barnes, T. J. 2001. Lives Lived and Lives Told: Biographies of Geography’s Quantitative Revolution. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 19 (4): 409–429.
  • Barnes, T. J. 2003. The Place of Locational Analysis: A Selective and Interpretive History. Progress in Human Geography 27 (1): 69–95.
  • Barnes, T. 2007. “Not Only … But Also”: Quantitative and Critical Geography. The Professional Geographer 61 (3): 292–300.
  • Barnes, T. 2013. Big Data, Little History. Dialogues in Human Geography 3 (3): 297–302.
  • Bell, D. 1973. The Coming of Post-Industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting. Harmondsworth, U.K.: Penguin.
  • Bell, D. 1979. The Social Framework of the Information Society. In The Computer Age: A Twenty-Year View, edited by M. Dertouzous and L. Moses, 163–211. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
  • Bell, G., T. Hey, and A. Szalay. 2009. Beyond the Data Deluge. Science 323 (5919): 1297–1298.
  • Benjamin, M. 2001. The Digital Divide: Facing a Crisis or Creating a Myth? Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
  • Bondi, L., and M. Domosh. 1992. Other Figures in Other Places: On Feminism, Postmodernism, and Geography. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 10 (2): 199–213.
  • Boyd, D. and K. Crawford. 2012. Critical questions for big data. Information. Communication and Society 15 (5): 662–679.
  • Cambra, P. J., A. Gonçalves, and F. Moura. 2019. The Digital Pedestrian Network in Complex Urban Contexts: A Primer Discussion on Typological Specifications. Finisterra-Revista Portuguesa de Geografia LIV (110): 155–170.
  • Capel, H. 1983. Filosofía y Ciencia en la Geografía Contemporánea. Contemporánea. Barcelona: Barcanova.
  • Caron, C., D. Goyer, S. Roche, and A. Jaton. 2008. GISc Journals Ranking and Evaluation: An International Delphi Study. Transactions in GIS 12: 293–321.
  • Cartier, C. 2013. What’s Territorial about China? From Geopolitical Narratives to the ‘Administrative Area Economy.’ Eurasian Geography and Economics 54 (1): 57–77.
  • Castells, M. 2000. The Rise of the Network Society, The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Vol. I. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
  • Castells, M. 2004. A Galáxia Internet, Reflexões sobre a Internet, Negócios e Sociedade. Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.
  • Chrisman, N. 2005. Full Circle: More than Just Social Implications of GIS. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization 40 (4): 23–35.
  • Christaller, W. 1966. Central Places in Southern Germany. London: Prentice Hall.
  • Cons, J. 2016. Sensitive Space: Fragmented Territory at the India-Bangladesh Border. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
  • Crawford, K. 2013. The Hidden Biases of Big Data. Harvard Business Review Blog, 1. https://hbr.org/2013/04/the-hidden-biases-in-big-data.
  • Cresswell, T. 2013. Geographic Thought. A Critical Introduction. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Croll, A. 2012. Big Data is Our Generation’s Civil Rights Issue, and We Don’t Know It. In Big Data Now: Current Perspectives from O’Reilly Radar, edited by O’Reilly Radar Team, 55–59. Sebastopol, Calif: O’Reilly Media.
  • DeLyser, D., and D. Sui. 2013a. Crossing the Qualitative Quantitative Divide II: Inventive Approaches to Big Data, Mobile Methods, and Rhythmanalysis. Progress in Human Geography 37 (2): 293–305.
  • DeLyser, D., and D. Sui. 2013b. Crossing the Qualitative Quantitative Chasm III: Enduring Methods, Open Geography, Participatory Research, and the Fourth Paradigm. Progress in Human Geography 38 (2): 294–307.
  • Dixon, D. P., and J. P. Jones. 1998. My Dinner with Derrida, or Spatial Analysis and Poststructuralism Do Lunch. Environment and Planning A 30 (2): 247–260.
  • Elwood, S. 2000. Information for Change: The Social and Political Impacts of Geographic Information Technologies. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Elwood, S. 2006. Beyond Cooptation or Resistance: Urban Spatial Politics, Community Organizations, and GISbased Spatial Narratives. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 96 (2): 323–341.
  • Elwood, S., M. Goodchild, and D. Sui. 2012. Researching Volunteered Geographic Information: Spatial Data, Geographic Research, and New Social Practice. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 102 (3): 571–590.
  • Feldman, M. P. 1994. The Geography of Innovation. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
  • Fisher, P. 2007. Valediction. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 21: 1165–1170.
  • Floridi, L. 2012. Big Data and Their Epistemological Challenge. Philosophy and Technology 25 (4): 435–437.
  • Gillespie, A., and H. Williams. 1988. Telecommunications and the Reconstruction of Regional Comparative Advantage. Environment and Planning A 20 (10): 1311–1321.
  • Goodchild, M. F. 1992. Geographical Information Science. International Journal of Geographic Information Systems 6: 31–45.
  • Goodchild, M. F. 2004a. GISc, Geography, Form, and Process. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 94 (4): 709–714.
  • Goodchild, M. F. 2004b. The Validity and Usefulness of Laws in Geographic Information Science and Geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 94 (2): 300–303.
  • Goodchild, M. F. 2010. Twenty Years of Progress: GISc in 2010. Journal of Spatial Information Science 1: 3–20.
  • Goodchild, M. F. 2018. Reimagining the History of GIS. Annals of GIS 24 (1): 1–8.
  • Goodchild, M. F., M. Egenhofer, K. Kemp, D. Mark, and E. Sheppard. 1999. Introduction to the Varenius Project. International Journal of Geographic Information Science 13: 731–745.
  • Goodchild, M. F., M. Yuan, and T. J. Cova. 2007. Towards a General Theory of Geographic Representation in GIS. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 21: 239–260.
  • Goddard, J. 1995. ICTs Space and Place: Theoretical and Policy Challenges. Workshop on Informatics and Telecom Tectonics: Information Technology, Policy, Telecommunications and the Meaning of Space.
  • Goddard, J. 1992. New Technology and the Geography of the UK Information Economy. In Understanding information Business, Technology and Geography, edited by K. Robbins, 178–201. London: Belhaven.
  • González-Bailón, S. 2013. Big Data and the Fabric of Human Geography. Dialogues in Human Geography 3 (3): 292–296.
  • Gorman, S. 2013. The Danger of a Big Data Episteme and the Need to Evolve Geographic Information Systems. Dialogues in Human Geography 3 (3): 285–291.
  • Gould, P. 1981. Letting the Data Speak for Themselves. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 71 (2): 166–176.
  • Graham, M. 2010. Neogeography and the Palimpsests of Place. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 101 (4): 422–436.
  • Graham, M. 2013. Geography/Internet: Ethereal Alternate Dimensions of Cyberspace or Grounded Augmented Realities? The Geographical Journal 179 (2): 177–182.
  • Graham, M., and T. Shelton. 2013. Geography and the Future of Big Data, Big Data and the Future of Geography. Dialogues in Human Geography 3 (3): 255–261.
  • Graham, S. 1998. The End of Geography or the Explosion of Place? Conceptualizing Space, Place and Information Technology. Progress in Human Geography 22 (2): 165–185.
  • Graham, S., and S. Marvin. 1996. Telecommunications and the City: Electronic Spaces, Urban Places. London: Routledge.
  • Gregory, D. 1994. Geographical Imaginations. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Hacking, I. 1990. The Taming of Chance. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hägerstrand, T. 1967. Innovation Diffusion as a Spatial Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Haggett, P. 1965. Locational Analysis in Human Geography. London: Edward Arnold.
  • Haklay, M. 2013. Neogeography and the Delusion of Democratization. Environment and Planning A 45 (1): 55–69.
  • Haklay, M., A. Singleton, and C. Parker. 2008. Web Mapping 2.0: The Neogeography of the GeoWeb. Geography Compass 2 (6): 2011–2039.
  • Hall, P., and P. Preston. 1988. The Carrier Wave: New Information Technology and the Geography of Innovation, 1846–2003. London: Unwin Hyman.
  • Haraway, D. 1988. Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies 14 (3): 575–599.
  • Haraway, D. 1991. Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge.
  • Harley, J. B. 1989. Deconstructing the Map. Cartographica 26 (2): 1–20.
  • Hepworth, M. 1990. Geography of the Information Economy. New York: Guilford.
  • Keller, E. F., and H. E. Longino. 1996. Feminism and Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Kellermann, A. 1993. Telecommunications and Geography. London: Belhaven.
  • Kidd, J. 2014. Museums in the New Mediascape: Transmedia, Participation, Ethics. Farnham, U.K.: Ashgate.
  • Kitchin, R. 2013. Big Data and Human Geography: Opportunities, Challenges and Risks. Dialogues in Human Geography 3 (3): 262–267.
  • Kitchin, R. 2014a. The Data Revolution. Big Data, Open Data, Data Infrastructures and Their Consequences. London: Sage.
  • Kitchin, R. 2014b. Big Data, New Epistemologies and Paradigm Shifts. Big Data and Society 1 (1): 1–12.
  • Kitchin, R., and M. Dodge. 2014. Code/Space. Software and Everyday Life. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
  • Kwan, M. P. 2002. Feminist Visualization: Re-envisioning GIS as a Method in Feminist Geographic Research. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 92 (4): 645–661.
  • Lake, R. W. 1993. Planning and Applied Geography: Positivism, Ethics, and Geographic Information Systems. Progress in Human Geography 17: 404–413.
  • Leonelli, S. 2012. Introduction: Making Sense of Data-driven Research in the Biological and Biomedical Sciences. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43 (1): 1–3.
  • Leszczynski, A. 2009. Rematerializing GIScience. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 27: 609–615.
  • Leszczynski, A. 2014. On the Neo in Neogeography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 104 (1): 60–79.
  • Leszczynski, A., and S. Elwood. 2014. Feminist Geographies of New Spatial Media. Canadian Geographer 59: 12–28.
  • Mark, D. M. 2003. Geographic Information Science: Defining the Field. London: Taylor and Francis.
  • Mayer-Schonberger, V., and K. Cukier. 2013. Big Data: A Revolution that Will Transform How We Live, Work and Think. London: John Murray.
  • Miller, H. J. 2010. The Data Avalanche Is Here. Shouldn’t We Be Digging? Journal of Regional Science 50 (1): 181–201.
  • Miller, H. J., and M. F. Goodchild. 2015. Data-driven Geography. GeoJournal 80 (4): 449–461.
  • Osborne, T., E. Warner, P. I. Jones, and B. Resch. 2018. Performing Social Media: Artistic Approaches to Analysing Big Data. GeoHumanities: 1–13.
  • Painter, J. 2008. Cartographic Anxiety and the Search for Regionality. Environment and Planning A 40: 342–361.
  • Pavlovskaya, M. 2006. Theorizing with GIS: A Tool for Critical Geographies? Environment and Planning A 38 (11): 2003–2020.
  • Pickles, J. 1995. Ground Truth: The Social Implications of Geographic Information Systems. New York: Guilford.
  • Pickles, J. 1997. Tool or Science? GIS, Technoscience and the Theoretical Turn. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 87: 363–72.
  • Porter, T. 1996. Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
  • Prensky, M. 2009. H. Sapiens Digital: From Digital Immigrants and Digital Natives to Digital Wisdom. Innovate 5 (3): Article 1.
  • Pruitt, E. L. 1979. The Office of Naval Research and Geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 69: 103–108.
  • Ramaswamy, S. 2010. The Goddess and the Nation: Mapping Mother India. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.
  • Raper, J. 2009. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology. Medford, N.J.: Information Today.
  • Reitsma, F. 2013. Revisiting the ‘Is GIScience a science?’ Debate (or Quite Possibly Scientific Gerrymandering). International Journal of Geographical Information Science 27 (2): 211–221.
  • Rose, G., and A. Willis. 2018. Seeing the Smart City on Twitter: Colour and the Affective Territories of Becoming Smart. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space: 1–17.
  • Rua, J., and M. Abreu. 2004. Construindo uma boa relação com a História. Geo UERJ 15–16:193–216.
  • Russom, P. 2011. Big Data Analytics. Towi Research.
  • Sayer, A. 1984. Method in Social Research: A Realist Approach. London: Hutchinson.
  • Schaefer, F. 1953. Exceptionalism in Geography: A Methodological Examination. Annals of the Association American Geographers 43 (3): 226–249.
  • Schuurman, N. 1999. Critical GIS: Theorizing an Emerging Discipline. Cartographica 36 (4): 1–99.
  • Schuurman, N. 2000. Trouble in the Heartland: GIS and Its Critics in the 1990s. Progress in Human Geography 24 (4): 569–290.
  • Schuurman, N. 2002. Women and Technology in Geography: A Cyborg Manifesto for GIS. The Canadian Geographer 46 (3): 258–265.
  • Schuurman, N. 2006. Formalization Matters: Critical GIS and Ontology Research. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 96 (4): 726–739.
  • Schuurman, N., and G. Pratt. 2002. Care of the Subject: Feminism and Critiques of GIS. Gender, Place and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography 9 (3): 291–299.
  • Smith, N. 1992. History and Philosophy of Geography: Real Wars, Theory Wars. Progress in Human Geography 16: 257–71.
  • Strasser, B. J. 2012. Data-driven Sciences: From Wonder Cabinets to Electronic Databases. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43 (1): 85–87.
  • Sui, D., and D. DeLyser. 2012. Crossing the Qualitative-Quantitative Chasm I: Hybrid Geographies, the Spatial Turn, and Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI). Progress in Human Geography 36 (1): 111–124.
  • Taylor, P. J. 1990. GIS. Political Geography Quarterly 9: 211–212.
  • Taylor, P. J. 1991. Further Thoughts on Geography and GIS. Environment and Planning A 23: 1087–1090.
  • Thatcher, J., J. Eckert, and A. Shears. 2018. Thinking Big Data in Geography. New Regimes, New Research. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
  • Thrift, N., and S. French. 2002. The Automatic Production of Space. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 27 (3): 309–335.
  • Tobler, W. R. 1959. Automation and Cartography. The Geographical Review 49 (4): 526–534.
  • Tobler, W. R. 1970. A Computer Movie Simulating Urban Growth in the Detroit Region. Economic Geography 46: 234–240.
  • Tomlinson, R. F. 1968. A Geographic Information System for Regional Planning. In Land Evaluation, edited by G. A. Stewart, 200–210. Melbourne, Australia: Macmillan.
  • von Thünen, J. 1826. [1966]. Der Isolierte Staat in Beziehung auf Landwirtschaftslehre und Nationalökonomie, Translated by C. M. Wartenberg, [Von Thünen’s Isolated State]. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
  • Wilson, M. 2017. New Lines: Critical GIS and the Trouble of the Map. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Wright, D., M. Goodchild, and J. Proctor. 2004. Demystifying the Persistent Ambiguity of GIS as ‘Tool’ Versus ‘Science’. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 87 (2): 346–362.
  • Wyly, E. 2014. Automated (Post)Positivism. Urban Geography 35 (5): 669–690.
  • Yang, A., H. Fan, N. Jing, Y. Sun, and A. Zipf. 2016. Temporal Analysis on Contribution Inequality in OpenStreetMap: A Comparative Study for Four Countries. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 5 (1): 5.
  • Zebracki, M., and J. Luger. 2018. Digital Geographies of Public Art: New Global Politics. Progress in Human Geography 1–20.
  • Zikopoulos, P. C., C. Eaton, D. deRoos, T. Deutsch, and G. Lapis. 2012. Understanding Big Data. New York: McGraw Hill.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.