SCALAR POLITICS AND NETWORK RELATIONS IN THE GOVERNANCE OF HIGHLY SKILLED MIGRATION

REFERENCES

• Ambrosini, M. 2020. The Urban Governance of Asylum as a “Battleground”: Policies of Exclusion and Efforts of Inclusion in Italian Towns. Geographical Review. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00167428.2020.1735938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjurstrøm, H. 2011. Politikk for Global Kompetanse—Tiltrekke Internasjonal Kompetanse [Policies for Global Competence—Attract International Competence]. Oslo, Norway: Ministry of Labor.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N. 2001. The Limits to Scale? Methodological Reflections on Scalar Structuration. Progress in Human Geography 25: 591–614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H. 2005. Reconfiguring Environmental Governance: Towards a Politics of Scales and Networks. Political Geography 24: 875–902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caponio, T., and M. Borkert. 2010. The Local Dimension of Migration Policymaking. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cerna, L. 2013. Understanding the Diversity of EU Migration Policy in Practice: The Implementation of the Blue Card Initiative. Policy Studies 34: 180–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, A., and J. McCarthy. 2014. Reviewing Rescaling: Strengthening the Case for Environmental Considerations. Progress in Human Geography 39: 3–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collinge, C. 1999. Self-Organisation of Society by Scale: A Spatial Reworking of Regulation Theory. Environment and Planning. D, Society & Space 17: 557–574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cope, M. 2010. Coding Qualitative Data. In Qualitative Research Methods in Human Geography, edited by I. Hay, 281–294. Toronto: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dicken, P., P. F. Kelly, K. Olds, and H. Wai‐Chung. 2001. Chains and Networks, Territories and Scales: Towards a Relational Framework for Analysing the Global Economy. Global Networks 1: 89–112.
   Google Scholar
• Dowding, K. 1995. Model or Metaphor? A Critical Review of the Policy Network Approach. Political Studies 1: 136–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, G. 1996. Welfare States in Transition: National Adaptations in Global Economies. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, G. P. 1995. Modes of Immigration Politics in Liberal Democratic States. International Migration Review 29: 881–902.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, G. P., and A. E. Kessler. 2008. Political Economy and Migration Policy. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 34: 655–678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geddes, A. 2005. Neoliberalism and Local Governance—Cross-National Perspectives and Speculations. Policy Studies 26: 359–377.
   Google Scholar
• Glick Schiller, N. 2012. A Comparative Relative Perspective on the Relationship between Migrants and Cities. Urban Geography 33: 870–903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glick Schiller, N., and A. Çaglar, eds. 2011. Locating Migration. Rescaling Cities and Migrants. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herod, A., and M. W. Wright. 2002a. Geographies of Power: Placing Scale. Oxford, U.K: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• _____. 2002b. Introduction: Scales of Praxis. In Geographies of Power, edited by A. Herod and M. W. Wright, 215-223. Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Iacono, R. 2019. The Norwegian Oil Bonanza and the Scandinavian Model in Comparative Perspective. Comparative Economic Studies 61 (1): 63–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. 1997. Capitalism and Its Future: Remarks on Regulation, Government and Governance. Review of International Political Economy 4: 561–581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. 2009. Avoiding Traps, Rescaling States, Governing Europe. In Leviathan Undone? Towards a Political Economy of Scale, edited by R. Keil and R. Mahon, 87–104. Vancouver, Canada: University of British Columbia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B., N. Brenner, and M. Jones. 2008. Theorizing Sociospatial Relations. Environment and Planning. D, Society & Space 26: 389–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joppke, C. 1999. Immigration and the Nation-State: The United States, Germany, and Great Britain. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Khan, M. 2019. Contested Ground: Network Governance in Australia’s Migration Industry. International Migration 57 (3): 295–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klijn, E. H. 1996. Analyzing and Managing Policy Processes in Complex Networks. A Theoretical Examination of the Concept Policy Network and Its Problems. Administration & Society 28: 90–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koopmans, R., P. Statham, M. Giugni, and F. Passy. 2008. The Denationalization of Immigration Politics: Is It Happening and Who Benefits? In Of States, Rights and Social Closure, edited by O. Schmidtke and S. Ozcurumez, 225–256. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kunz, R., S. Lavenex, and M. Panizzon, eds. 2011. Multilayered Migration Governance. Abingdon, U.K: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lahav, G. 2000. The Rise of Nonstate Actors in Migration Regulation in the United States and Europe: Changing the Gatekeepers or Bringing Back the State. In Immigration Research for a New Century: Multidisciplinary Perspectives, edited by N. Foner, R. G. Rumbaut, and S. J. Gold, 215–241. New York: The Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Leitner, H. 1997. Reconfiguring the Spatiality of Power: The Construction of a Supranational Migration Framework for the European Union. Political Geography 16: 123–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leitner, H. 2004. The Politics of Scale and Networks of Spatial Connectivity: Transnational Interurban Networks and the Rescaling of Political Governance in Europe. In Geographies of Power. Placing Scale, edited by E. Sheppard and R. B. McMaster, 236–255. Malden, Mass: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Leitner, H., C. Pavlik, and E. Sheppard. 2002. Networks, Governance, and the Politics of Scale: Inter-Urban Networks and the European Union. In Geographies of Power. Placing Scale, edited by A. Herod and M. Wright, 274–303. Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell Publishers. 274–303.
   Google Scholar
• Lund, G. 2012. The Role of Politics in Attracting and Retaining Global Talent. Presentation at the Global Mobility Forum, Oslo, Norway, 18 October.
   Google Scholar
• Macleod, G., and M. Goodwin. 1999. Space, Scale and State Strategy: Rethinking Urban and Regional Governance. Progress in Human Geography 23: 503–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marston, S. A., J. P. I. Jones, and K. Woodward. 2005. Human Geography Without Scale. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 30: 416–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, B. 2009. Is Scale a Chaotic Concept? Notes on Processes of Scale Production. In Leviathan Undone? Towards a Political Economy of Scale, edited by R. Keil and R. Mahon, 51–66. Vancouver, Canada: University of British Columbia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Petroleum and Energy. 2020. Oil and Gas 2020. https://www.regjeringen.no/en/topics/energy/oil-and-gas/id1003/.
   Google Scholar
• Moretti, E. 2012. The New Geography of Jobs. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• Musterd, S., and O. Gritsai. 2013. The Creative Knowledge City in Europe: Structural Conditions and Urban Policy Strategies for Competitive Cities. European Urban and Regional Studies 20: 343–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman, E. S., C. Cook, and A. Cohen. 2014. Chapter 1. Introduction: Why the Politics of Scale Matter in the Governance of Water. In Negotiating Water Governance, edited by E. S. Norman, C. Cook, and A. Cohen, 1–16. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian Petroleum. 2020. Employment in the Petroleum Industry. https://www.norskpetroleum.no/en/economy/employment/
   Google Scholar
• NRK. 2016. Oslo Får Sin Første Offentlige Internasjonale Skole [Oslo Gets Its First Public International School]. https://www.nrk.no/osloogviken/oslo-far-sin-forste-offentlige-internasjonale-skole-1.12799227.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2019. OECD Economics Survey Norway. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Oslo Business Region. 2015. The Oslo Region Brand Management Strategy. Oslo: Oslo Business Region.
   Google Scholar
• Oslo Chamber of Commerce. 2013. Kompetanseinnvandring - Hvordan Gjør Vi Norge Til Et Foretrukket Land? [Talent Migration—How Do We Make Norway a Preferred Country?]. Oslo, Norway: Oslo Chamber of Commerce.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, D. E. 2005. Rescaling International Political Economy: Subnational States and the Regulation of the Global Political Economy. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, J., and A. Tickell. 1994. Searching for a New Institutional Fix: The after Fordist Crisis and Global-Local Disorder. In Post Fordism: A Reader, edited by A. Amin, 280–316. Malden, Mass: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, J. 2002. Neoliberalizing Space. Antipode 34: 380–404.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, J. 2003. Policy Networks. Reihe Politikwissenschaft Political Science Series. Vienna, Austria: Institute for Advanced Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, J., and E Bomberg. 1999. Decision-Making in the European Union. Basingstoke, U.K.: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Piper, N. 2009. Migration and Social Development. Organizational and Political Dimensions. Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.
   Google Scholar
• Plöger, J., and A. Becker. 2015. Social Networks and Local Incorporation—Grounding High-Skilled Migrants in Two German Cities. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 41: 1517–1535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. 1996. The New Governance: Governing Without Government. Political Studies 44: 652–667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R., and D. Marsh. 1992. New Directions in the Study of Policy Networks. European Journal of Policy Research 21: 181–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salt, J. 1997. International Movements of the Highly Skilled. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Scholten, P. W. A. 2013. Agenda Dynamics and the Multi-Level Governance of Intractable Policy Controversies: The Case of Migrant Integration Policies in the Netherlands. Policy Sciences 46 (3): 217–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheppard, E., and R. B. McMaster. 2004. Scale and Geographic Inquiry: Contrasts, Intersections, and Boundaries. In Rethinking International SkilledMigration, edited by E. Sheppard and R. B. McMaster, 256–267. Malden, Mass: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Somerville, W., and S. W. Goodman. 2010. The Role of Networks in the Development of UK Migration Policy. Political Studies 58: 951–970.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statham, P., and A. Geddes. 2006. Elites and the ‘Organised Public’: Who Drives British Immigration Politics and in Which Direction? West European Politics 29: 248–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics Norway. 2015. Labour Force Survey, Seasonally-Adjusted Figures, March 2015. Oslo, Norway. http://ssb.no/en/arbeid-og-lonn/statistikker/akumnd.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics, Norway. 2020. Immigrants and Norwegian-Born to Immigrant Parents. Oslo, Norway: Statistics Norway. https://www.ssb.no/en/befolkning/statistikker/innvbef/aar
   Google Scholar
• Stavanger Chamber of Commerce. 2014. New in the Stavanger and Haugesund Region. Stavanger, Norway: Stavanger Chamber of Commerce.
   Google Scholar
• Stoker, G. 1998. Governance as Theory: Five Propositions. International Social Science Journal 50: 17–28.
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. 1997. Neither Global nor Local: “Glocalization” and the Politics of Scale. In Spaces of Globalization: Reasserting the Power of the Local, edited by K. Cox, 137–166. New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. 2000. Authoritarian Governance, Power, and the Politics of Rescaling. Environment and Planning. D, Society & Space 18: 63–76.
   Google Scholar
• Togral Koca, B. 2019. Bordering Practices, Refugees, and Civil Society: The Case of Berlin. Geographical Review 109: 544–561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Triadafilopoulos, T. 2013. Wanted and Welcome? Policies for Highly Skilled Immigrants in Comparative Perspective. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• van Riemsdijk, M., and Q. Wang, eds. 2017. Rethinking International Skilled Migration. Abingdon, U.K: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• van Riemsdijk, M. 2012. (Re)scaling Governance of Skilled Migration in Europe: Divergence, Harmonization, and Contestation. Population, Space and Place 18 (3): 344–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Riemsdijk, M. 2017. Homogenizing the City: Place Marketing to Attract Skilled Migrants to Stavanger and Kongsberg. In Rethinking International Skilled Migration, edited by M. van Riemsdijk and Q. Wang, 173–193. Abingdon, U.K.: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zapata-Barrero, R., T. Caponio, and P. Scholten. 2017. Theorizing the ‘Local Turn’ in A Multi-Level Governance Framework of Analysis: A Case Study in Immigrant Policies. International Review of Administrative Sciences 83 (2): 241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar