Pollen morphology and ultrastructure of Quercus with focus on Group Ilex (=Quercus subgenus Heterobalanus (Oerst.) Menitsky): implications for oak systematics and evolution

References

• Beug H-J. 2004. Leitfaden der Pollenbestimmung für Mitteleuropa und angrenzende Gebiete. München: Friedrich Pfeil.
   Google Scholar
• Borsch T, Wilde V. 2000. Pollen variability within species, populations, and individuals, with particular reference to Nelumbo nucifera. In: Harley M, Blackmore S, Morton C, eds. Pollen and spores: Morphology and biology, 285–299. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.
   Google Scholar
• Camus A. 1936–1938. Les Chênes. Monographie du genre Quercus. Tome I. Genre Quercus, sous-genre Cyclobalanopsis, sous-genre Euquercus (sections Cerris et Mesobalanus). Texte. Paris: Paul Lechevalier.
   Google Scholar
• Camus A. 1938–1939. Les Chênes. Monographie du genre Quercus. Tome II. Genre Quercus, sous-genre Euquercus (sections Lepidobalanus et Macrobalanus). Texte. Paris: Paul Lechevalier.
   Google Scholar
• Camus A. 1952–1954. Les Chênes. Monographie du genre Quercus. Tome III. Genre Quercus, sous-genre Euquercus (sections Protobalanus et Lobatae) et genre Lithocarpus. Texte. Paris: Paul Lechevalier.
   Google Scholar
• Colombo PM, Lorenzoni FC, Grigoletto F. 1983. Pollen grain morphology supports the taxonomical discrimination of Mediterranean oaks (Quercus, Fagaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 141: 273–284. doi:10.1007/BF00989007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crepet WL, Daghlian CP. 1980. Castaneoid inflorescences from the Middle Eocene of Tennessee and the diagnostic value of pollen (at the subfamily level) in the Fagaceae. American Journal of Botany 67: 739–757. doi:10.2307/2442667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crepet WL, Nixon KC. 1989a. Earliest megafossil evidence of Fagaceae: Phylogenetic and biogeographic implications. American Journal of Botany 76: 842–855. doi:10.2307/2444540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crepet WL, Nixon KC. 1989b. Extinct transitional Fagaceae from the Oligocene and their phylogenetic implications. American Journal of Botany 76: 1493–1505. doi:10.2307/2444437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denk T. 2003. A phylogeny of Fagus L. (Fagaceae) based on morphological data. Plant Systematics and Evolution 240: 55–81. doi:10.1007/s00606-003-0018-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denk T, Grimm GW. 2009. Significance of pollen characteristics for infrageneric classification and phylogeny in Quercus (Fagaceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 170: 926–940. doi:10.1086/600134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denk T, Grimm GW. 2010. The oaks of western Eurasia: Traditional classifications and evidence from two nuclear markers. Taxon 59: 351–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denk T, Grimm GW, Hemleben V. 2005. Patterns of molecular and morphological differentiation in Fagus (Fagaceae): Phylogenetic implications. American Journal of Botany 92: 1006–1016. doi:10.3732/ajb.92.6.1006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denk T, Grímsson F, Zetter R. 2012. Fagaceae from the Early Oligocene of Central Europe: Persisting New World and emerging Old World biogeographic links. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 169: 7–20. doi:10.1016/j.revpalbo.2011.09.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denk T, Tekleva MV. 2006. Comparative pollen morphology and ultrastructure of Platanus, implications for phylogeny and evaluation of the fossil record. Grana 45: 195–221. doi:10.1080/00173130600873901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dettmann ME, Jarzen DM. 1991. Pollen evidence for Late Cretaceous differentiation of Proteaceae in southern polar forests. Canadian Journal of Botany 69: 901–906. doi:10.1139/b91-116
   Google Scholar
• Doyle JA. 2005. Early evolution of angiosperm pollen as inferred from molecular and morphological phylogenetic analyses. Grana 44: 227–251. doi:10.1080/00173130500424557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle JA, Endress PK. 2000. Morphological phylogenetic analysis of basal angiosperms: Comparison and combination with molecular data. International Journal of Plant Sciences 161: SS121–SS153. doi:10.1086/317578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle JA, Endress PK. 2010. Integrating Early Cretaceous fossils into the phylogeny of living angiosperms: Magnoliidae and eudicots. Journal of Systematics and Evolution 48: 1–35. doi:10.1111/j.1759-6831.2009.00058.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle JA, Le Thomas A. 1997. Significance of palynology for phylogeny of Annonaceae: Experiments with removal of pollen characters. Plant Systematics and Evolution 206: 133–159. doi:10.1007/BF00987945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endress PK, Doyle JA. 2009. Reconstructing the ancestral angiosperm flower and its initial specializations. American Journal of Botany 96: 22–66. doi:10.3732/ajb.0800047
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flora of China Editorial Committee. 1999. Flora of China, Cycadaceae through Fagacaeae, Vol. 4. St. Louis: Missouri Botanical Garden Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flora of North America Editorial Committee. 1997. Flora of North America North of Mexico, Magnoliophyta: Magnoliidae and Hamamelidae, Vol. 3. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friis EM, Crane PR, Pedersen KR. 1988. Reproductive structures of Cretaceous Platanaceae. Biologiske Skrifter 31: 1–55.
   Google Scholar
• Friis EM, Crane PR, Pedersen KR, Bengtson S, Donoghue PCJ, Grimm GW, Stampanoni M. 2007. Phase-contrast X-ray microtomography links Cretaceous seeds with Gnetales and Bennettitales. Nature 450: 549–552. doi:10.1038/nature06278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herendeen PS, Crane PR, Drinnan AN. 1995. Fagaceous flowers, fruits, and cupules from the Campanian (Late Cretaceous) of Central Georgia, USA. International Journal of Plant Sciences 156: 93–116. doi:10.1086/297231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesse M, Halbritter H, Zetter R, Weber M, Buchner R, Frosch-Radivo A, Ulrich S. 2009. Pollen terminology – An illustrated handbook. Wien, New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hofmann C-C. 2010. Microstructure of Fagaceae pollen from Austria (Palaeocene/Eocene boundary) and Hainan Island (?Middle Eocene). Abstracts of the 8th European Palaeobotany-Palynology Conference, Budapest, Hungary, 6–10 July 2010, 119.
   Google Scholar
• Hofmann C-C, Mohamed O, Egger H. 2011. A new terrestrial palynoflora from the Palaeocene/Eocene boundary in the northwestern Tethyan realm (St. Pankraz, Austria). Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 166: 295–310. doi:10.1016/j.revpalbo.2011.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huysmans S, Dessein S, Smets E, Robbrecht E. 2003. Pollen morphology of NW European representatives confirms monophyly of Rubieae (Rubiaceae). Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 127: 219–240. doi:10.1016/S0034-6667(03)00121-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Organization for Plant Information (IOPI). 1996–2007. Provisional global plant checklist. International Organization for Plant Information, online database. http://www.bgbm.org/iopi/gpc/default.asp; accessed 19 February 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Kuprianova AL. 1962. Palynological data to the systematics of the Fagales and Urticales. Soviet Reports from the First International Palynological Conference, Tucson, AZ, USA, 23–27 April 1962, 17–25. Moscow: Academy of Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Makino M, Hayashi R, Takahara H. 2009. Pollen morphology of the genus Quercus by scanning electron microscope. Scientific Reports of Kyoto Prefectural University, Life and Environmental Sciences 61: 53–81.
   Google Scholar
• Manchester SR, Crane PR. 1983. Attached leaves, inflorescences, and fruits of Fagopsis, an extinct genus of fagaceous affinity from the Oligocene Florissant flora of Colorado, U.S.A. American Journal of Botany 70: 1147–1164. doi:10.2307/2443285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manos PS, Cannon CH, Oh S-H. 2008. Phylogenetic relationships and taxonomic status of the paleoendemic Fagaceae of western North America: Recognition of a new genus, Notholithocarpus. Madroño 55: 181–190. doi:10.3120/0024-9637-55.3.181
   Google Scholar
• Manos PS, Stanford AM. 2001. The historical biogeography of Fagaceae: Tracking the Tertiary history of temperate and subtropical forests of the Northern Hemisphere. International Journal of Plant Sciences 162: SS77–SS93. doi:10.1086/323280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manos PS, Zhou Z-K, Cannon CH. 2001. Systematics of Fagaceae: Phylogenetic tests of reproductive trait evolution. International Journal of Plant Sciences 162: 1361–1379. doi:10.1086/322949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathews S. 2009. Phylogenetic relationships among seed plants: Persistent questions and the limits of molecular data. American Journal of Botany 96: 228–236. doi:10.3732/ajb.0800178
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menitsky ÛL. 1984. Duby asii. Leningrad: Nauka.
   Google Scholar
• Menitsky ÛL. 2005. Oaks of Asia. Enfield: Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Nagels A, Muasya AM, Huysmans S, Vrijdaghs A, Smets E, Vinckier S. 2009. Palynological diversity and major evolutionary trends in Cyperaceae. Plant Systematics and Evolution 277: 117–142. doi:10.1007/s00606-008-0111-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson S, Praglowski J. 1992. Erdtmann’s handbook of palynology. 2nd edition. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.
   Google Scholar
• Nixon KC. 1993. Infrageneric classification of Quercus (Fagaceae) and typification of sectional names. Annales des Sciences Forestières 50: 25s–34s. doi:10.1051/forest:19930701
   Google Scholar
• Oh S-H, Manos PS. 2008. Molecular phylogenetics and cupule evolution in Fagaceae as inferred from nuclear CRABS CLAW sequences. Taxon 57: 434–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Praglowski J. 1982. Fagaceae L., Fagoideae. World Pollen and Spore Flora 11: 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Praglowski J. 1984. Fagaceae Dumort. Castaneoideae Oerst. World Pollen and Spore Flora 13: 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Punt W, Hoen PP, Blackmore S, Nilsson S, Le Thomas A. 2007. Glossary of pollen and spore terminology. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 143: 1–81. doi:10.1016/j.revpalbo.2006.06.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowley JR. 1996. Exine origin, development and structure in pteridophytes, gymnosperms and angiosperms. In: Jansonius J, McGregor DC, eds. Palynology, principles and applications, 443–462. Dallas: American Association of Stratigraphic Palynologists Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Rowley JR, Gabarayeva NI. 2004. Microspore development in Quercus robur (Fagaceae). Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 132: 115–132. doi:10.1016/j.revpalbo.2004.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz O. 1936. Entwurf zu einem naturlichen System der Cupuliferen und der Gattung Quercus L. Notizblatt des Königlichen botanischen Gartens und Museums zu Berlin 13 (116): 1–22. doi:10.2307/3994908
   Google Scholar
• Sims HJ, Herendeen PS, Crane PR. 1998. New genus of fossil Fagaceae from the Santonian (Late Cretaceous) of Central Georgia, U.S.A. International Journal of Plant Sciences 159: 391–404. doi:10.1086/297559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon AM. 1983a. Pollen morphology and plant taxonomy of white oaks in eastern North America. American journal of botany 70: 481–494. doi:10.2307/2443159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon AM. 1983b. Pollen morphology and plant taxonomy of red oaks in eastern North America. American Journal of Botany 70: 495–507. doi:10.2307/2443160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone DE, Broome CR. 1975. Juglandaceae A. Rich. ex Kunth. World Pollen and Spore Flora 4: 1–35.
   Google Scholar
• Takahashi M, Friis EM, Herendeen PS, Crane PR. 2008. Fossil flowers of Fagales from the Kamikitaba locality (Early Coniacian; Late Cretaceous) of northeastern Japan. International Journal of Plant Sciences 169: 899–907. doi:10.1086/589933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tekleva MV, Denk T. 2012. Sporoderm ultrastructure of Platanus quedlinburgensis Pacltová emend. Tschan, Denk & von Balthazar from the Late Cretaceous of Germany. Acta Palaeobotanica 52: 177–191.
   Google Scholar
• Van Benthem F, Clarke GCS, Punt W. 1984. The northwest European pollen flora, 33. Fagaceae. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 42: 87–110. doi:10.1016/0034-6667(84)90063-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker JW, Doyle JA. 1975. The bases of angiosperm phylogeny: Palynology. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 62: 664–723. doi:10.2307/2395271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther H, Zetter R. 1993. Zur Entwicklung der paläogenen Fagaceae Mitteleuropas. Palaeontographica B 230: 183–194.
   Google Scholar
• Wang H, He H-J, Chen J-Q, Lu L. 2010. Palynological data on Illiciaceae and Schisandraceae confirm phylogenetic relationships within these two basally-branching angiosperm families. Flora - Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants  205: 221–228. doi:10.1016/j.flora.2009.02.004
   Google Scholar
• Wang P, Pu F. 2004. Pollen morphology and biogeography of Fagaceae. Guangzhou: Guangdong Science and Technology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wang P, Pu F, Zheng Z-H. 1998. Palynological evidence for taxonomy of Trigonobalanus (Fagaceae). Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica 36: 238–241.
   Google Scholar
• Wortley AH, Funk VA, Robinson H, Skvarla JJ, Blackmore S. 2007. A search for pollen morphological synapomorphies to classify rogue genera in Compositae (Asteraceae). Review of Palaeobotany And Palynology 146: 169–181. doi:10.1016/j.revpalbo.2007.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wortley AH, Funk VA, Skvarla JJ. 2008. Pollen and the evolution of Arctotideae (Compositae). The Botanical Review 74: 438–466. doi:10.1007/s12229-008-9014-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar