Palynological and geographical characterisation of Spanish oak honeydew honeys

References

• Accorti M, Persano L, Piazza MG, Sabatini AG. 1986. Schede di caratterizzazione delle principali qualitá di mieli Italian. Apicoltura 2: 3–35.
   Google Scholar
• Bentabol A, Hernández-García Z, Rodríguez-Galdón B, Rodríguez-Rodríguez E, Díaz-Romero C. 2011. Differentiation of blossom and honeydew honeys using multivariate analysis on the physicochemical parameters and sugar composition. Food Chemistry 126: 664–672. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.11.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binazzi A, Scheurer S. 2009. Atlas of the honeydew producing conifer aphids of Europe. Rome: ARACNE Editrice.
   Google Scholar
• Bogdanov S, Ruoff K, Persano Oddo L. 2004. Physico-chemical methods for the characterisation of unifloral honeys: A review. Apidologie 35 (extra issue): S4–S17. doi:10.1051/apido:2004047.
   Google Scholar
• Carter CI, Maslen NR. 1982. Conifer Lachnids. In: Forestry commission bulletin 58. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Castro-Vázquez L, Díaz-Maroto MC, Pérez-Coello MS. 2006. Volatile composition and contribution to the aroma of Spanish honeydew honeys. Identification of a new chemical marker. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 54: 4809–4813. doi:10.1021/jf0604384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conti ME, Stripeikis J, Campanella L, Cucina D, Tudino MB. 2007. Characterization of Italian honeys (Marche Region) on the basis of their mineral content and some typical quality parameters. Chemistry Central Journal 1: 14. doi:10.1186/1752-153X-1-14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delabie JHC. 2001. Trophobiosis between formicidae and hemiptera (Sternorrhyncha and Auchenorrhyncha): An overview. Neotropical Entomology 30: 501–516. doi:10.1590/S1519-566X2001000400001.
   Google Scholar
• Díez MJ. 1987. Clave general de tipos polínicos. In: Valdés B, Díez MJ, Fernández I, eds. Atlas polínico de Andalucía Occidental. Sevilla, 21–61. Sevilla: Instituto de Desarrollo Régional, Universidad Sevilla Excelentísima Diputación Cádiz.
   Google Scholar
• Díez MJ, Andrés C, Terrab A. 2004. Physiochemical parameters and pollen analysis of Moroccan honeydew honeys. International Journal of Food Science and Technology 39: 167–176. doi:10.1046/j.0950-5423.2003.00769.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimou M, Katsaros J, Klonari KT, Thrasyvoulou A. 2006. Discriminating pine and fir honeydew honeys by microscopic characteristics. Journal of Apicultural Research and Bee World 45: 16–21. doi:10.1080/00218839.2006.11101319.
   Google Scholar
• Dobre I, Alexe P, Escuredo O, Seijo CM. 2013. Palynological evaluation of selected honeys from Romania. Grana 52: 113–121. doi:10.1080/00173134.2012.724443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdtman G. 1960. The acetolysis method. A revised description. Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift 54: 561–564.
   Google Scholar
• Escuredo O, Fernández-González M, Seijo MC. 2012. Differentiation of blossom honey and honeydew honey from Northwest Spain. Agriculture 2: 25–37. doi:10.3390/agriculture2010025.
   Google Scholar
• Escuredo O, Míguez M, Fernández-González M, Seijo MC. 2013. Nutritional value and antioxidant activity of honeys produced in a European Atlantic area. Food Chemistry 138: 851–856. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.11.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2002. Council Directive 2001/110/CE of 20 December 2001 concerning honey. Official Journal of the European Communities L10: 47–52.
   Google Scholar
• Jaafar K, Haidar J, Kuraydiyyah S, Ghaddar T, Knio K, Ismail B, Toufeili I. 2017. Physicochemical, melissopalynological and antioxidant properties of artisanal honeys from Lebanon. Journal of Food Scince & Technology 54: 2296–2305. doi:10.1007/s13197-017-2667-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerković I, Marijanović Z. 2010. Oak (Quercus frainetto Ten.) honeydew honey approach to screening of volatile organic composition and antioxidant capacity (DPPH and FRAP Assay). Molecules 15: 3744–3756. doi:10.3390/molecules15053744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krakar D. 2012. Characteristics of Croatian oak honeydew honey from the Požega Valley. Radovi Zavoda za znanstveni i umjetniĉki rad u Požegi 1: 375–397.
   Google Scholar
• Louveaux J, Maurizio A, Vorwohl G. 1978. Methods of melissopalynology. Bee World 59: 139–157. doi:10.1080/0005772X.1978.11097714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madejczyk M, Baralkiewicz D. 2008. Characterization of Polish rape and honeydew honey according to their mineral contents using ICP-MS and F-AAS/AES. Analytical Chimica Acta 617: 11–17. doi:10.1016/j.aca.2008.01.038.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maschwitz U, Dumpert K, Tuck K. 1986. Ants feeding on anal exudate from tortricid larvae: A new type of trophobiosis. Journal of Natural History 20: 1041–1050. doi:10.1080/00222938600770751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maurizio A. 1939. Untersuchungen zur quantitativen pollenanalyse des honigs. Mitteilungen aus dem Gebiete der Lebensmittel-Untersuchung und -Hygiene 30: 27–72.
   Google Scholar
• Maurizio A. 1979. Microscopy of honey. In: Crane E, ed. Honey. A comprehensive Survey, 240–257. London: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Persano Oddo L, Piro R. 2004. Main European unifloral honeys: Descriptive sheets. Apidologie 35: 38–81. doi:10.1051/apido:2004049.
   Google Scholar
• Persano Oddo L, Ricciardelli D’Albore G. 1989. Nomenclatura melissopalinológica. Apicoltura 5: 63–72.
   Google Scholar
• Pisani P, Protano G, Riccobono F. 2008. Minor and trace elements in different honey types produced in Siena County (Italy). Food Chemistry 107: 1553–1560. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.09.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Primorac L, Angelkov B, Mandic ML, Kenjeric D, Nedeljko M, Flanjak I, Pirički AP, Arapceska M. 2009. Comparison of the Croatian and Macedonian honeydew honey. Journal of Central European Agriculture 10: 263–270.
   Google Scholar
• Purcărea C, Chiş AM, Dżugan M, Popovici D. 2014. Physical-chemical and biochemical characterization of selected Romanian and Polish honeydew honey. Studia Universitatis “Vasile Goldiş”. Seria Ştiinţele Vieţii 24: 251–256.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez Flores MS, Escuredo O, Seijo MC. 2015. Assessment of physicochemical and antioxidant characteristics of Quercus pyrenaica honeydew honeys. Food Chemistry 166: 101–106. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.05.156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruoff K, Lugin W, Kilchenmann V, Bosset JO, von der Ohe K, von der Ohe W, Amadò R. 2007. Authentication of the botanical origin of honey using profiles of classical measurands and discriminant analysis. Apidologie 38: 438–452. doi:10.1051/apido:2007027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rybak-Chmielewska H, Szczęsna T, Waś E, Jaśkiewicz K, Teper D. 2013. Characteristics of Polish unifloral honeys IV. Honeydew honey, mainly Abies alba L.. Journal of Apicultural Science 57: 51–59. doi:10.2478/jas-2013-0006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seijo MC, Escuredo O, Fernández-González M. 2011. Fungal diversity in honeys from northwest Spain and their relationship to the ecological origin of the product. Grana 50: 55–62. doi:10.1080/00173134.2011.559555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simova S, Atanassov A, Shishiniova M, Bankova V. 2012. A rapid differentiation between oak honeydew honey and nectar and other honeydew honeys by NMR spectroscopy. Food Chemistry 134: 1706–1710. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.03.071.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsigouri A, Passaloglou-Katrali M, Sabatakou O. 2004. Palynological characteristics of different unifloral honeys from Greece. Grana 43: 122–128. doi:10.1080/00173130310017643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar