Normative roles, conceptual variance, and ardent realism about normativity

Works cited

• Baker, Derek. 2018. “Skepticism about Ought Simpliciter.” In Oxford Studes in Metaethics. Vol. 13., edited by R. Shafer-Landau, 230–252. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blackburn, Simon. 1998. Ruling Passions. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burgess, Alexis. Forthcoming. “Never Say ‘Never Say ‘Never’?” In Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics, edited by A. Burgess, H. Cappelen, and D. Plunkett. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burgess, Alexis, and David Plunkett. 2013a. “Conceptual Ethics I.” Philosophy Compass 8 (12): 1091–1101. doi: 10.1111/phc3.12086
   Google Scholar
• Burgess, Alexis, and David Plunkett. 2013b. “Conceptual Ethics II.” Philosophy Compass 8 (12): 1102–1110. doi: 10.1111/phc3.12085
   Google Scholar
• Cappelen, Herman. 2018. Fixing Language: An Essay on Conceptual Engineering. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Copp, David. 2005. “Moral Naturalism and Three Grades of Normativity.” In Normativity and Naturalism, edited by P. Schaber, 7–46. Frankfurt: Ontos-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Darwall, Stephen L. 2006. The Second-Person Standpoint: Morality, Respect, and Accountability. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eklund, Matti. 2017. Choosing Normative Concepts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Enoch, David. 2006. “Agency, Shmagency: Why Normativity Won't Come from What is Constitutive of Action.” Philosophical Review 115 (2): 169–198. doi: 10.1215/00318108-2005-014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enoch, David. 2011. Taking Morality Seriously: A Defense of Robust Realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Faraci, David, and Tristram McPherson. 2017. “Ethical Judgment and Motivation.” In The Routledge Handbook of Metaethics, edited by T. McPherson and D. Plunkett, 308–323. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbard, Allan. 1990. Wise Choices, Apt Feelings: A Theory of Normative Judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbard, Allan. 2003. Thinking How to Live. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Korsgaard, Christine M. 1996. The Sources of Normativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, David. 1983. “New Work for a Theory of Universals.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61 (4): 343–377. doi: 10.1080/00048408312341131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manne, Kate. 2014. “Internalism about Reasons: Sad but True?” Philosophical Studies 167 (1): 89–117. doi: 10.1007/s11098-013-0234-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPherson, Tristram. 2011. “Against Quietist Normative Realism.” Philosophical Studies 154 (2): 223–240. doi: 10.1007/s11098-010-9535-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPherson, Tristram. 2018a. “Authoritatively Normative Concepts.” In Oxford Studies in Metaethics. Vol. 13., edited by R. Shafer-Landau, 253–277. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McPherson, Tristram. 2018b. “Review of Choosing Normative Concepts.” Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews. https://ndpr.nd.edu/news/choosing-normative-concepts/.
   Google Scholar
• McPherson, Tristram. 2019. “Ardent Realism without Referential Normativity.” Inquiry. doi:10.1080/0020174X.2019.1656373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPherson, Tristram, and David Plunkett. 2017. “The Nature and Explanatory Ambitions of Metaethics.” In The Routledge Handbook of Metaethics, edited by T. McPherson and D. Plunkett, 1–25. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McPherson, Tristram, and David Plunkett. Forthcoming. “Conceptual Ethics and The Methodology of Normative Inquiry.” In Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics, edited by A. Burgess, H. Cappelen, and D. Plunkett. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parfit, Derek. 2011. On What Matters. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Plunkett, David, and Scott Shapiro. 2017. “Law, Morality, and Everything Else: General Jurisprudence as a Branch of Metanormative Inquiry.” Ethics 128 (1): 37–68. doi: 10.1086/692941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Railton, Peter. 1986. “Moral Realism.” The Philosophical Review 95: 163–207. doi: 10.2307/2185589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Railton, Peter. 2003. Facts, Values, and Norms: Essays Toward a Morality of Consequence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scharp, Kevin. 2013. Replacing Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, Mark. 2007. Slaves of The Passions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sider, Theodore. 2011. Writing the Book of the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Silverstein, Matthew. 2017. “Ethics and Practical Reasoning.” Ethics 127 (2): 353–382. doi: 10.1086/688741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skarsaune, Knut Olav. Manuscript. Metaethics as Conceptual Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Michael. 1994. The Moral Problem. Cambridge: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Street, Sharon. 2006. “A Darwinian Dilemma for Realist Theories of Value.” Philosophical Studies 127 (1): 109–166. doi: 10.1007/s11098-005-1726-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiffany, Evan. 2007. “Deflationary Normative Pluralism.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 37 (5): 231–262.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, Daniel. 2018. “Fictional Normativity and Normative Authority.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy. doi:10.1080/00455091.2018.1433795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar