Publication Cover
Inquiry
An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy
Latest Articles
3,703
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

A dogma of speech act theory

Received 27 Apr 2019, Accepted 15 Sep 2019, Published online: 09 Mar 2020

References

  • Alston, William P. 2000. Illocutionary Acts and Sentence Meaning. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  • Austin, John L. 1975. How to Do Things with Words. 2nd ed. Edited by Marina Sbisà and J. O. Urmson. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Bauer, Nancy. 2015. How to Do Things with Pornography. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.
  • Brewer, Bill. 1993. “The Integration of Spatial Vision and Action.” In Spatial Representation, edited by Naomi M. Eilan, 294–316. Cambridge: Blackwell.
  • Cavell, Stanley. 2005. “Passionate and Performative Utterance.” In Philosophy the Day After Tomorrow, 155–191. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.
  • Cohen, Ted. 1973. “Illocutions and Perlocutions.” Foundations of Language 9 (4): 492–503.
  • Danto, Arthur C. 1965. “Basic Actions.” American Philosophical Quarterly 2 (2): 141–148.
  • Davidson, Donald. 2001. “Agency.” In Essays on Actions and Events, 43–61. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Ford, Anton. 2014. “Action and Passion.” Philosophical Topics 42 (1): 13–42. doi: 10.5840/philtopics20144212
  • Gustafsson, Martin. 2012. “Trusting One’s Senses: McDowell on Belief, Experience, and Justification.” In Rethinking Epistemology 2, edited by Günther Abel and James Conant, 375–393. Berlin: De Gruyter.
  • Gustafsson, Martin. This issue. On the Distinction Between Uptake and Perlocutionary Object: The Case of Issuing and Obeying Orders.
  • Habermas, Jürgen. 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. I: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Translated by T. McCarthy. Boston: Beacon.
  • Haddock, Adrian. 2005. “At One with Our Actions, but at Two with Our Bodies: Hornsby’s Account of Action.” Philosophical Explorations 8: 157–172. doi: 10.1080/13869790500095939
  • Hinton, John M. 1967. “VI.—Visual Experiences.” Mind; A Quarterly Review of Psychology and Philosophy 76 (April): 217–227. doi: 10.1093/mind/LXXVI.302.217
  • Hornsby, Jennifer. 1994. “Illocution and Its Significance.” In Foundations of Speech Act Theory, edited by Savas Tsohatzidis, 187–207. London: Routledge.
  • Hornsby, Jennifer. 2008. “A Disjunctive Conception of Acting for Reasons.” In Disjunctivism: Perception, Action, Knowledge, edited by Fiona Macpherson and Adrian Haddock, 244–261. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Langton, Rae. 1993. “Speech Acts and Unspeakable Acts.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 22 (4): 293–330.
  • Lavin, Douglas. 2013. “Must There Be Basic Action?” Noûs 47 (2): 273–301. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0068.2012.00876.x
  • Lockhart, Jennifer, and Thomas Lockhart. 2017. “Moral Luck and the Possibility of Agential Disjunctivism.” European Journal of Philosophy 26 (1): 308–332. doi: 10.1111/ejop.12226
  • Martin, Michael G. F. 2002. “The Transparency of Experience.” Mind and Language 17: 376–425. doi: 10.1111/1468-0017.00205
  • McDowell, John. 1994. Mind and World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • McDowell, John. 1998. “Knowledge by Hearsay.” In Meaning, Knowledge, and Reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • McDowell, John. 2009. “The Disjunctive Conception of Experience as Material for a Transcendental Argument.” In The Engaged Intellect. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Radford, Colin. 1969. “Knowing and Telling.” The Philosophical Review 78 (3): 326–336. doi: 10.2307/2183830
  • Sbisà, Marina. 2013. “Locution, Illocution, Perlocution.” In Pragmatics of Speech Actions, edited by Marina Sbisá, and Ken Turner, 25–75. Berlin: De Gruyter.
  • Searle, John. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Snowdon, Peter F. 1980–81. “XI—Perception, Vision and Causation.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 81: 175–192. doi: 10.1093/aristotelian/81.1.175
  • Stuchlik, Joshua. 2013. “From Volitionalism to the Dual Aspect Theory of Action.” Philosophia 41: 867–886. doi: 10.1007/s11406-013-9414-9