A Kantian quality of will account of excuses

References

• Allison, Henry. 1990. Kant’s Theory of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Allison, Henry. 2004. Kant’s Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defense. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arpaly, Nomy. 2003. Unprincipled Virtue: An Inquiry into Moral Agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, J. L. 1957. “A Plea for Excuses: The Presidential Address.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 57: 1–30. doi: 10.1093/aristotelian/57.1.1
   Google Scholar
• Blöser, Claudia. 2015. “Degrees of Responsibility in Kant’s Practical Philosophy.” Kantian Review 20 (2): 183–209. doi: 10.1017/S1369415415000011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frierson, Patrick R. 2014. Kant’s Empirical Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frierson, Patrick R. 2018. “Another Look at Kant and Degrees of Responsibility.” Con-Textos Kantianos 8: 348–369.
   Google Scholar
• Gressis, Rob. 2010a. “Recent Work on Kantian Maxims I: Established Approaches.” Philosophy Compass 5 (3): 216–227. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2009.00254.x
   Google Scholar
• Gressis, Rob. 2010b. “Recent Work on Kantian Maxims II.” Philosophy Compass 5 (3): 228–239. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2009.00255.x
   Google Scholar
• Hobbes, Thomas. 1991. Leviathan. Edited by Richard Tuck. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, Immanuel. 1996a. Practical Philosophy. Edited by Mary J. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, Immanuel. 1996b. Religion and Rational Theology. Edited by Allen W. Wood and George Di Giovanni. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, Immanuel. 1997a. Lectures on Ethics. Edited by Peter Heath and J. B. Schneewind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, Immanuel. 1997b. Lectures on Metaphysics. Edited by Karl Ameriks and Steve Naragon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, Immanuel. 1998. Critique of Pure Reason. Edited by Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, Immanuel. 2007. Anthropology, History, and Education. Edited by Günter Zöller and Robert B. Louden. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Korsgaard, Christine M. 1996. Creating the Kingdom of Ends. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Korsgaard, Christine M. 2009. Self-Constitution: Agency, Identity, and Integrity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nelkin, Dana Kay. 2011. Making Sense of Freedom and Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nelkin, Dana Kay. 2016. “Difficulty and Degrees of Moral Praiseworthiness and Blameworthiness.” Noûs 50 (2): 356–378. doi: 10.1111/nous.12079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill, Onora. 1989. “Consistency in Action.” In Constructions of Reason, 81–104. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, Onora. 2013. Acting on Principle: An Essay on Kantian Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parfit, Derk. 2011. On What Matters. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pereboom, Derk. 2001. Living without Free Will. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pereboom, Derk. 2006. “Kant on Transcendental Freedom.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73 (3): 537–567. doi: 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2006.tb00548.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen, Gideon. 2008. “Kleinbart the Oblivious and Other Tales of Ignorance and Responsibility.” Journal of Philosophy 105 (10): 591–610. doi: 10.5840/jphil20081051023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders, Joe. 2019. “Kant and Degrees of Responsibility.” Journal of Applied Philosophy 36 (1): 137–154. doi: 10.1111/japp.12293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneewind, J. B. 1997. “Introduction.” In Immanuel Kant: Lectures on Ethics, edited by Peter Heath and J. B. Schneewind, xiii–xxvii. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scholten, Matthé. 2016. “Schizophrenia and Moral Responsibility: A Kantian Essay.” Philosophia 44 (1): 205–225. doi:10.1007/s11406-015-9685-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholten, Matthé. 2018. “Moral Worth and Moral Responsibility.” In Proceedings of the 12th International Kant Congress, edited by V. L. Waibel, M. Ruffing, and D. Wagner, 2165–2172. Berlin: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110467888-207.
   Google Scholar
• Scholten, Matthé. 2020. “Ought Implies Can, Asymmetrical Freedom, and the Practical Irrelevance of Transcendental Freedom.” European Journal of Philosophy. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.12548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shoemaker, David. 2013. “Qualities of Will.” Social Philosophy and Policy 30 (1-2): 95–120. doi: 10.1017/S0265052513000058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strawson, P. F. 2008. “Freedom and Resentment.” In Freedom and Resentment and Other Essays, 1–28. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vilhauer, Benjamin. 2004. “Can We Interpret Kant as a Compatibilist about Determinism and Moral Responsibility?” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 12 (4): 719–730. doi: 10.1080/0960878042000279341
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, R. Jay. 1994. Responsibility and the Moral Sentiments. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar