References
- Baily, A., and S. M. Wilkins. 2018. “Contemporary Hylomorphism.” Oxford Bibliographies in Philosophy.
- Calosi, C. forth. “Is Parthood Identity?” Synthese.
- Casati, R., and A. Varzi. 1999. Parts and Places: The Structure of Spatial Representation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Fine, K. 1999. “Things and Their Parts.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 23 (1): 61–74.
- Gilmore, C. 2006. “Where in the Relativistic World Are We?” Philosophical Perspectives 20 (1): 199–236.
- Gilmore, C. 2008. “Persistence and Location in Relativistic Spacetime.” Philosophy Compass 3 (6): 1224–1254.
- Gilmore, C., and M. Leonard. 2020. “Composition and the Logic of Location: An Argument for Regionalism.” Mind; A Quarterly Review of Psychology and Philosophy 129 (513): 159–178.
- Koslicki, K. 2008. The Structure of Objects. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Koslicki, K. 2018. Form, Matter, Substance. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Markosian, N. 2014. “A Spatial Approach to Mereology.” In Mereology and LocationS. Kleinschmidt, 69–90. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Merricks, T. 1999. “Persistence, Parts, and Presentism.” Noûs 33 (3): 421–438.
- Parsons, J. 2000. “Must a Four-Dimensionalist Believe in Temporal Parts.” The Monist 83 (3): 399–418.
- Parsons, J. 2007. “Theories of Location.” In Oxford Studies in Metaphysics, edited by K. Bennett, and D. W. Zimmerman, Vol. 3, 201–232. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Rea, M. 1995. “The Problem of Material Constitution.” Philosophical Review 104: 525–552.
- Sanford, D. H. 2011. “Can a Sum Change Its Parts?” Analysis 71 (2): 235–239.
- Sattig, T. 2006. The Language and Reality of Time. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Sider, T. 2001. Four-dimensionalism: An Ontology of Persistence and Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Van Inwagen, P. 2006. “Can Merelogical Sums Change Their Parts?” The Journal of Philosophy 103 (12): 614–630.