Re-engineering knowledge: a case study in pluralist conceptual engineering

References

• Brown, J. 2008. “Subject-Sensitive Invariantism and the Knowledge Norm for Practical Reasoning.” Nous 42 (2): 167–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, J. 2010. “Knowledge and Assertion.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 81 (3): 549–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, J. 2012. “Assertion and Practical Reasoning: Common or Divergent Epistemic Standards?” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 84 (1): 123–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, E. 1990. Knowledge and the State of Nature: An Essay in Conceptual Synthesis. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• DeRose, K. 2002. “Assertion, Knowledge, and Context.” The Philosophical Review 111 (2): 167–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fantl, Jeremy, and Matthew McGrath. 2002. “Evidence, Pragmatics, and Justification.” The Philosophical Review 111 (1): 67–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fassio, D., and R. McKenna. 2015. “Revisionary Epistemology.” Inquiry 58 (7–8): 755–779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannon, Michael. 2013. “The Practical Origins of Epistemic Contextualism.” Erkenntnis 78: 899–919.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannon, M. 2019. What’s the Point of Knowledge? A Function-First Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Presss.
   Google Scholar
• Haslanger, S. 2000. “Gender and Race: (What) are They? (What) Do We Want them to Be?” Noûs 34 (1): 31–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haslanger, S. 2020. “How Not to Change the Subject.” In Shifting Concepts: The Philosophy and Psychology of Conceptual Variation, edited by T. Marques, and A. Wikforss, 235–259. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hawthorne, J. 2004. Knowledge and Lotteries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hawthorne, J., and J. Stanley. 2008. “Knowledge and Action.” The Journal of Philosophy 105 (10): 571–590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, M. 2003. “Who Cares What You Know?” The Philosophical Quarterly 53 (210): 105–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kappel, K. 2010. “On Saying That Someone Knows: Themes from Craig.” In Social Epistemology, edited by A. Haddock, A. Millar, and D. Pritchard, 69–88. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kauppinen, A. 2018. “Epistemic Norms and Epistemic Accountability.” Philosophers’ Imprint 18 (8): 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelp, C. 2011. “What’s the Point of “Knowledge” Anyway?” Episteme; Rivista Critica Di Storia Delle Scienze Mediche E Biologiche 8 (1): 53–66.
   Google Scholar
• Lackey, J. 2007. “Norms of Assertion.” Nous 41 (4): 594–626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehrer, K. 1965. “Knowledge, Truth and Evidence.” Analysis 25 (5): 168–175.
   Google Scholar
• Magnus, P. D., and J. Cohen. 2003. “Williamson on Knowledge and Psychological Explanation.” Philosophical Studies 116 (1): 37–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prinzing, M. 2018. “The Revisionist’s Rubric: Conceptual Engineering and the Discontinuity Objection.” Inquiry 61 (8): 854–880.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, S. 2002. “Testimony, Knowledge, and Epistemic Goals.” Philosophical Studies 110: 139–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rysiew, P. 2012. “Epistemic Scorekeeping.” In Knowledge Ascriptions, edited by J. Brown, and M. Gerken, 270–293. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scharp, K. 2013. Replacing Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simion, M., and C. Kelp. 2019. “Conceptual Innovation, Function First.” Noûs, doi:10.1111/nous.12302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley, J. 2005. Knowledge and Practical Interests. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strawson, P. F. 1963. “Carnap’s Views on Conceptual Systems Versus Natural Languages in Analytic Philosophy.” In The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, edited by P. A. Schilpp, 503–518. La Salle: Open Court.
   Google Scholar
• Thomasson, A. L. 2020. “A Pragmatic Method for Conceptual Ethics.” In Conceptual Ethics and Conceptual Engineering, edited by H. Cappelen, D. Plunkett, and A. Burgess, 435–458. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turri, J. 2010. “Epistemic Invariantism and Speech Act Contextualism.” Philosophical Review 119 (1): 77–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiner, M. 2009. “The (Mostly Harmless) Inconsistency of Knowledge Ascriptions.” Philosopher’s Imprint 9: 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, B. 1973. “Deciding to Believe.” In B. Williams, Problems of the Self, 136–151. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, T. 1996. “Knowing and Asserting.” The Philosophical Review 105 (4): 489–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, T. 2000. Knowledge and its Limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar