Content internalism and testimonial knowledge

References

• Audi, R. 1997. “The Place of Testimony in the Fabric of Knowledge and Justification.” American Philosophical Quarterly 34: 405–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begby, E. 2014. “Lexical Norms, Language Comprehension, and the Epistemology of Testimony.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 44: 324–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bezuidenhout, A. 1997. “The Communication of de re Thoughts.” Noûs 31: 197–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burge, T. 1979. “Individualism and the Mental.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 4: 73–121.
   Google Scholar
• Burge, T. 1988. “Individualism and Self-Knowledge.” Journal of Philosophy 85: 649–663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burge, T. 1993. “Content Preservation.” The Philosophical Review 102: 457–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappelen, H., and E. Lepore. 2007. “Relevance Theory and Shared Content.” In Advances in Pragmatics, edited by N. Burton-Roberts, 115–135. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers, D. 2004. “Epistemic Two-Dimensional Semantics.” Philosophical Studies 118: 153–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalmers, D., and F. Jackson. 2001. “Conceptual Analysis and Reductive Explanation.” Philosophical Review 110: 315–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crane, T. 1991. “All the Difference in the World.” The Philosophical Quarterly 41: 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everett, A. 2005. “Recent Defenses of Descriptivism.” Mind and Language 20: 103–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, H. 1994. “Deflationist Views of Meaning and Content.” Mind 103: 249–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fine, K. 2012. “Counterfactuals without Possible Worlds.” Journal of Philosophy 109: 221–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fodor, J. 1994. The Elm and the Expert. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fricker, E. 1994. “Against Gullibility.” In Knowing from Words, edited by B. K. Matilal, and A. Chakrabarti, 125–161. Boston: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Fricker, E. 2003. “Understanding and Knowledge of What Is Said.” In The Epistemology of Language, edited by A. Barber, 325–366. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fricker, E. 2006. “Testimony and Epistemic Autonomy.” In The Epistemology of Testimony, edited by J. Lackey, and E. Sosa, 225–253. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fricker, E. 2012. “Stating and Insinuating.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes 86: 61–94.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, S. 2001. “Testimonially Based Knowledge from False Testimony.” The Philosophical Quarterly 51: 512–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, S. 2004. “Radical Interpretation, Understanding, and the Testimonial Transmission of Knowledge.” Synthese 138: 387–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, S. 2006. “Reductionism and the Distinctiveness of Testimonial Knowledge.” In The Epistemology of Testimony, edited by J. Lackey, and E. Sosa, 127–144. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, S. 2007. Anti-Individualism: Mind and Language, Knowledge and Justification. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, S. 2015. “Anti-Individualism, Comprehension and Self-Knowledge.” In Externalism, Self-Knowledge and Skepticism, edited by S. Goldberg, 184–196. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heck, R. 1995. “The Sense of Communication.” Mind 104: 79–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, F. 1998a. From Metaphysics to Ethics: A Defence of Conceptual Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, F. 1998b. “Reference and Description Revisited.” Noûs 32: 201–218.
   Google Scholar
• Jeshion, R. 2002. “The Epistemological Argument against Descriptivism.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64: 325–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallestrup, J. 2012. “Actually-Rigidified Descriptivism Revisited.” Dialectica 66: 5–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kripke, S. 1980. Naming and Necessity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kroon, F. 1987. “Causal Descriptivism.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 65: 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lackey, J. 1999. “Testimonial Knowledge and Transmission.” The Philosophical Quarterly 49: 471–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martí, G. 2020. “Names, Descriptions and Causal Descriptions. Is the Magic Gone?” Topoi 39: 357–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDowell, J. 1981. “Anti-Realism and the Epistemology of Understanding.” In Meaning and Understanding, edited by H. Parret, and J. Bouveresse, 225–248. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Millikan, R. 1984. Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peet, A. 2016. “Testimony and the Epistemic Uncertainty of Interpretation.” Philosophical Studies 173: 395–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peet, A. 2019. “Knowledge-Yielding Communication.” Philosophical Studies 176: 3303–3327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plantinga, A. 1974. The Nature of Necessity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pollock, J. 2015. “Social Externalism and the Problem of Communication.” Philosophical Studies 172: 3229–3251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollock, J. 2020. “Holism, Conceptual Role, and Conceptual Similarity.” Philosophical Psychology 33: 396–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, H. 1975. “The Meaning of ‘Meaning’.” In Language, Mind & Knowledge, edited by K. Gunderson, 131–193. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rapaport, W. 2003. “What Did You Mean by That? Misunderstanding, Negotiation, and Syntactic Semantics.” Minds and Machines 13: 397–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeter, L., and F. Schroeter. 2016. “Semantic Deference Versus Semantic Coordination.” American Philosophical Quarterly 53: 193–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segal, G. 2000. A Slim Book about Narrow Content. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Soames, S. 1998. “The Modal Argument: Wide Scope and Rigidified Descriptions.” Noûs 32: 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley, J. 1997. “Names and Rigid Designation.” In A Companion to the Philosophy of Language, edited by R. Hale, and C. Wright, 555–585. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar