Concept pluralism in conceptual engineering

References

• Ball, D. 2020. “Revisionary Analysis Without Meaning Change (Or, Could Women be Analytically Oppressed?).” In Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics, edited by A. Burgess, H. Cappelen, and D. Plunkett, 35–58. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brigandt, I. 2010. “The Epistemic Goal of a Concept: Accounting for the Rationality of Semantic Change and Variation.” Synthese 177 (1): 1211–1241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burge, T. 1979a. “Individualism and the Mental.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 4: 73–121.
   Google Scholar
• Burge, T. 1979b. “Sinning Against Frege.” Philosophical Review 88: 398–432. Reprinted in Burge (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burge, T. 1986. “Intellectual Norms and Foundations of Mind.” Journal of Philosophy 83 (12): 697–720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burge, T. 1990. “Frege on Sense and Linguistic Meaning.” In The Analytic Tradition, edited by D. Bell, and N. Cooper, 30–60. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Reprinted with a postscript in Burge (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Burge, T. 2005. Truth, Thought, Reason: Essays on Frege. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burge, T. 2014. Origins of Objectivity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cappelen, H. 2018. Fixing Language: An Essay on Conceptual Engineering. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deutsch, M. 2020. “Conceptual Analysis Without Concepts.” Synthese, doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02775-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eklund, M. 2017. Choosing Normative Concepts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haslanger, S. 2006. “Gender and Race: (What) Are They? (What) Do We Want Them to Be?” Noûs 34 (1): 31–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horgan, T., and M. Timmons. 1991. “New Wave Moral Realism Meets Moral Twin Earth.” Journal of Philosophical Research 16: 447–465.
   Google Scholar
• Jackman, H. 1999. “We Live Forwards but Understand Backwards: Linguistic Practices and Future Behaviour.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 80: 157–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackman, H. 2005. “Temporal Externalism, Deference, and our Ordinary Linguistic Practice.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86: 365–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kripke, S. 1972. Naming and Necessity. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ludlow, P. 2014. Living Words: Meaning Underdetermination and the Dynamic Lexicon. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nado, J. 2019. “Conceptual Engineering, Truth and Efficacy.” Synthese, doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02096-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinder, M. 2020. “Conceptual Engineering, Metasemantic Externalism and Speaker-Meaning.” Mind; A Quarterly Review of Psychology and Philosophy, doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzz069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plunkett, D., and T. Sundell. 2020. “Metalinguistic Negotiation and Speaker Error.” Inquiry 62 (1–2): 142–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prinzing, M. 2018. “The Revisionist’s Rubric: Conceptual Engineering and the Discontinuity Problem.” Inquiry 61 (8): 854–880.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, H. 1970. “Meaning and Reference.” Journal of Philosophy 70: 699–711.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, S. 2007. “There is no Viable Notion of Narrow Content.” In Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Mind, edited by B. P. McLaughlin, and J. D. Cohen, 20–23. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, S. 2014. “Minds and Morals.” Philosophical Issues 24 (1): 393–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawyer, S. 2018. “The Importance of Concepts.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 118 (2): 127–147.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, S. 2020a. “Talk and Thought.” In Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics, edited by A. Burgess, H. Cappelen, and D. Plunkett, 379–395. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, S. 2020b. “Truth and Objectivity in Conceptual Engineering.” Inquiry 63 (9-10): 1001–1022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawyer, S. 2020c. “The Nature of Content: A Critique of Yli-Vakkuri and Hawthorne.” Inquiry. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2020.1805702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawyer, S. 2020d. “The Role of Concepts in Fixing Language.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 50 (5): 555–565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shields, M. 2020. “Conceptual Change in Perspective.” Inquiry 63 (9-10): 930–958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomasson, A. 2003. “Realism and Human Kinds.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67: 580–609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomasson, A. 2020. “A Pragmatic Method for Normative Conceptual Work.” In Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics, edited by A. Burgess, H. Cappelen, and D. Plunkett, 435–458. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yli-Vakkuri, J., and J. Hawthorne. 2018. Narrow Content. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar