Is there an empirical case for semantic perception?

References

• Allott, Nick. “On Inference, Encapsulation and Utterance Interpretation.” Inquiry. This issue.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azzouni, Jody. 2013. Semantic Perception: How the Illusion of a Common Language Arises and Persists. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bealer, George. 1992. “Incoherence of Empiricism. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society.” Supplementary Volume 66: 99–138.
   Google Scholar
• Block, Ned. 2014. “Seeing-as in the Light of Vision Science.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 89: 560–572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Block, Ned. Forthcoming. The Border Between Seeing and Thinking.
   Google Scholar
• Boghossian, Paul. 2014. “What is Inference?” Philosophical Studies 169: 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brogaard, Berit. 2012. “Phenomenal Seemings and Sensible Dogmatism.” In Seemings and Justification: New Essays on Dogmatism and Phenomenal Conservatism, edited by C. Tucker, 270–292. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brogaard, Berit. 2017. “The Publicity of Meaning and the Perceptual Approach to Speech Comprehension.” Protosociology 34: 144–162.
   Google Scholar
• Brogaard, Berit. 2018. “In Defense of Hearing Meaning.” Synthese 195 (7): 2967–2983.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brogaard, Berit. 2020. “Seeing and Hearing Meanings: A Non-Inferential Approach to Speech Comprehension.” In Inference and Consciousness, edited by Timothy Chan and Anders Nes, 99–124. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Buckner, Cameron. 2019. “Rational Inference: The Lowest Bounds.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 98: 697–724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burge, Tyler. 1999. “Comprehension and Interpretation.” In The Philosophy of Donald Davidson, edited by Lewis Edwin Hahn, 229–250. Chicago: Open Court.
   Google Scholar
• Burge, Tyler. 2010. Origins of Objectivity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burge, Tyler. 2014. “Reply to Block: Adaptation and the Upper Border of Perception.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 89: 573–583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burge, Tyler. 2018. “Iconic Representation: Maps, Pictures, and Perception.” In The Map and the Territory: Exploring the Foundations of Science, Thought and Reality, edited by Wuppuluri Shyam and Francisco Antonio Dorio, 79–100. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Burge, Tyler. 2020. “Entitlement: The Basis for Epistemic Warrant.” In Epistemic Entitlement, edited by Peter Graham and Nikolaj Pedersen, 37–142. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, Susan. 2009. The Origin of Concepts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, Sam. Forthcoming. “Mapping the Visual Icon.” The Philosophical Quarterly.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eichenbaum, H. 2004. “The Hippocampus, Memory, and Place Cells: Is It Spatial Memory or a Memory Space?” Neuron 44 (1): 109–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F., and J. Nye. 2017. “The Modularity of Sentence Processing Reconsidered.” In On Concepts, Modules, and Language: Cognitive Science at its Core, edited by R. G. De Almeida, and L. R. Gleitman, 64–85. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flowers, John H, and Doris J Lohr. 1985. “How Does Familiarity Affect Visual Search for Letter Strings?” Perception & Psychophysics 37 (6): 557–567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fodor, Jerry. 1983. Modularity of Mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fodor, Jerry. 2007. “The Revenge of the Given.” In Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Mind, edited by Brian P. McLaughlin and Jonathan D. Cohen, 105–116. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Fricker, Elizabeth. 2003. “Understanding and Knowledge of What is Said.” In Epistemology of Language, edited by A. Barber, 325–366. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, D. 1991. “How Mental Systems Believe.” American Psychologist 46: 101–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, Steven. 2017a. “Perception and the Origins of Temporal Representation.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 98 (S1): 2017. 275–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, Steven. 2017b, February 2017. “Cognitive Penetrability and Attention.” Frontiers in Psychology 22. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, Steven. 2020. “Probabilistic Representations in Perception: Are There Any, and What Would They Be?” Mind & Language 35: 377–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafri, A., and C. Firestone. 2021. “The Perception of Relations.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 25: 475–492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanif, Hashim, Brielle Perler, and Jason Barton. 2013. “The Visual Representations of Words and Style in Text: An Adaptation Study.” Brian Research 1518: 61–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, Christine R, Harold E Pashler, and Pashler Coburn. 2004. “Moray Revisited: High Priority Affective Stimuli and Visual Search.” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A 57 (1): 1–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartsuiker, Robert, and Agnes Moors. 2017. “On the Automaticity of Language Processing.” In Entrenchment and the Psychology of Language Learning: How we Reorganize and Adapt Linguistic Knowledge, edited by H.-J. Schmid, 201–225. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Helton, Grace. 2016. “Recent Issues in High-Level Perception.” Philosophy Compass 11: 851–862.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazanina, Nina, Jeffrey Bowers, and William Idsardi. 2018. “Phonemes: Lexical Access and Beyond.” Psychonomic Bulletin Review 25: 560–585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinoshita, Sachiko, Bianca De Wit, and Dennis Norris. 2017. “The Magic of Words Reconsidered: Investigating the Automaticity of Reading Color-Neutral Words in the Stroop Task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning.” Memory, and Cognition 43 (3): 369–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinoshita, Sachiko, and Dennis Norris. 2012. “Task-dependent Masked Priming Effects in Visual Word Recognition.” Frontiers in Psychology, doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosslyn, Stephen. 1980. Image and Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Labuschagne, Elsa, and Derek Besner. 2015. “Automaticity Revisited: When Print Doesn’t Activate Semantics.” Frontiers in Psychology 6 (117): 1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lande, Kevin. Compositionality and context in perception. Under review.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson, Jonas, and Andrew Smith. 2011. “fMRI Repetition Suppression: Neuronal Adaptation or Stimulus Expectation?” Cerebral Cortex  22: 567–576.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, Jiayi, Daniel Lassiter, and Judith Degen. 2021. “Syntactic Satiation is Driven by Speaker-Specific Adaptation.” Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society 43: 1493–1499.
   Google Scholar
• Malmgren, Anna-Sara. 2018. “Varieties of Inference?” Philosophical Issues 28: 221–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandelbaum, Eric. 2014. “Thinking is Believing.” Inquiry 57: 55–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nes, Anders. 2016. “On What we Experience When we Hear People Speak.” Phenomenology and Mind 10: 58–85.
   Google Scholar
• Nes, Anders. (Non)Conceptual Representation of Meaning in Utterance Comprehension.” Inquiry. This issue.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nes, Anders, Kristoffer Sundberg, and Sebastian Watzl. Forthcoming. “The Perception/Cognition Distinction.” Inquiry.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neta, Ram. 2013. “What is an Inference?” Philosophical Issues 23: 388–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Callaghan, Casey. 2011. “Against Hearing Meanings.” The Philosophical Quarterly 61: 783–807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmeri, Thomas. 2003. “Automaticity.” In Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science, edited by L. Nadel, 1–27. London: Nature Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, Dean. 2002. “Why Knowledge is Unnecessary for Understanding Language.” Mind 111: 519–555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettit, Dean. 2009. “On the Epistemology and Psychology of Speech Perception.” The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 5: 1–43.
   Google Scholar
• Pietroski, Paul. 2018. Conjoining Meanings: Semantics Without Truth-Values. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, Hilary. 1981. Reason, Truth, and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pylyshyn, Zenon. 2002. “Mental Imagery: In Search of a Theory.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25: 157–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quilty-Dunn, Jake. 2020. “Perceptual Pluralism.” Nous 54: 807–838.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quilty-Dunn, Jake, and Eric Mandelbaum. 2018. “Inferential Transitions.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 96: 532–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rey, Georges. 2007. “Meta-atheism: Religious Avowal as Self-Deception.” In Philosophers Without Gods: Meditations on Atheism and the Secular Life, edited by Louise Antony, 243–265. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rissman, Jesse, and Anthony Wagner. 2012. “Distributed Representations in Memory: Insights from Functional Brain Imaging.” Annual Review of Psychology 61: 101–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuel, Arthur. 1997. “Lexical Activation Produces Potent Phonemic Percepts.” Cognitive Psychology 32: 97–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheepers, Christoph, Patrick Sturt, Catherine Martin, Andriy Myachykov, Kay Teevan, and Izabela Viskupova. 2011. “Structural Priming Across Cognitive Domains: From Simple Arithmetic to the Relative Clause Attachment.” Psychological Science 22: 1319–1326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serences, John T, Edward F Ester, Edward K Vogel, and Edward Awh. 2009. “Stimulus-specific Delay Activity in Human Primary Visual Cortex.” Psychological Science 20 (2): 207–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepard, Roger. 1978. “The Mental Image.” American Psychologist 33 (2): 125–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepard, Roger, and Susan Chipman. 1970. “Second-order Isomorphism of Internal Representations: Shapes of States.” Cognitive Psychology 1: 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel, Susanna. 2006. “Which Properties are Represented in Perception?” In Perceptual Experience, edited by T. Gendler and J. Hawthorne, 481–503. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Soraci, S., J. Franks, M. Carlin, T. Hoehn, and J. Hardy. 1992. “A “pop-out” Effect with Words and non-Words.” Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 30 (4): 290–292.
   Google Scholar
• Stainton, Robert. 2007. Words and Thoughts: Subsentences, Ellipsis, and the Philosophy of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, Jason. 2005. “Hornsby on the Phenomenology of Speech.” The Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 79: 131–146.
   Google Scholar
• Suzuki, S. 2005. “High-level Pattern Coding Revealed by Brief Shape Aftereffects.” In Fitting the Mind to the World: Adaptation and Aftereffects in High-Level Vision, Advances in Visual Cognition Series, Vol. 2., edited by C. Clifford, and G. Rhodes, 135–172. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tian, X., and D. E. Huber. 2010. “Testing an Associative Account of Semantic Satiation.” Cognitive Psychology 60: 267–290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treisman, A. 1985. “Preattentive Processing in Vision.” Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing 31: 156–177.
   Google Scholar
• Treisman, A., and J. Souther. 1985. “Search Asymmetry: A Diagnostic for Preattentive Processing of Separable Features.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 114 (3): 285–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, Michael. 2015. “Visual Adaptation.” Annual Review of Vision Science 1: 547–567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellwood, A., R. Pancheva, V. Hacquard, and C. Phillips. 2018. “The Anatomy of a Comparative Illusion.” Journal of Semantics 35: 543–583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witzel, Christoph. 2019. “Misconceptions About Color Categories.” Review of Philosophy and Psychology 10: 499–540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, Jeremy. 2018. Visual Search. In Stevens’ Handbook of Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, Fourth Edition. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, Yaoda. 2017. “Reevaluating the Sensory Account of Visual Working Memory Storage.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 21: 794–815.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, Qian, Chaz Firestone, Jonathan Flombaum, and Justin Halberda. Working memory is more than sensory recruitment: Evidence from (non-)interference. Under review.
   Google Scholar
• Yuan, Jie, Sarah Carr, Guosheng Ding, Shimin Fu, and John Xuexin Zhang. 2017. “An Associative Account of Orthographic Satiation in Chinese Characters.” Reading and Writing 30: 631–651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar