Feeling and thinking on social media: emotions, affective scaffolding, and critical thinking

References

• Alfano, M. 2021. “Virtues for Agents in Directed Social Networks.” Synthese 199 (3-4): 8423–8442. doi: 10.1007/s11229-021-03169-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alfano, M., S. Cunningham, W. Meulemans, I. Rutter, M. Sondag, B. Speckmann, and E. Sullivan. 2018, October. Social Network-Epistemology.” In 2018 IEEE 14th International Conference on e-Science (e-Science), 320–321. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Alfano, M., A. E. Fard, J. A. Carter, P. Clutton, and C. Klein. 2021. “Technologically Scaffolded Atypical Cognition: The Case of YouTube’s Recommender System.” Synthese 199 (1-2): 835–858. doi: 10.1007/s11229-020-02724-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailin, S. 2002. “Critical Thinking and Science Education.” Science and Education 11 (4): 361–375. doi: 10.1023/A:1016042608621
   Google Scholar
• Bailin, S. 2006. “Critical Thinking and the Education of the Emotions.” Talking to Children About Responsibility and Control of Emotions, 13–28.
   Google Scholar
• Bailin, S., and M. Battersby. 2016. “Fostering the Virtues of Inquiry.” Topoi 35 (2): 367–374. doi:10.1007/s11245-015-9307-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailin, S., and H. Siegel. 2003. “Critical Thinking.” In Blackwell Philosophy Guides: Vol. 9. The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Education, edited by N. Blake, P. Smeyers, R. Smith, and P. Standish, 181–193. Malden, Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Bakshy, E., S. Messing, and L. A. Adamic. 2015. “Political Science. Exposure to Ideologically Diverse News and Opinion on Facebook.” Science (New York, N.Y.) 348 (6239): 1130–1132. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa1160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battersby, M. 2016. “Enhancing Rationality: Heuristics, Biases, and the Critical Thinking Project.” Informal Logic 36 (2): 99–120. doi: 10.22329/il.v36i2.4662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Béres, L., and J. Fook (Eds.). 2019. Learning Critical Reflection: Experiences of the Transformative Learning Process. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bhatt, I., and A. MacKenzie. 2019. “Just Google it! Digital Literacy and the Epistemology of Ignorance.” Teaching in Higher Education 24 (3): 302–317. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2018.1547276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowell, T., and J. Kingsbury. 2015. “Virtue and Inquiry: Bridging the Transfer Gap.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Thinking in Higher Education, edited by M. Davies and R. Barnett, 233–245. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Brady, Michael. 2013. Emotional Insight: The Epistemic Role of Emotional Experience. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Candiotto, Laura. 2022. “Epistemic Emotions and Co-Inquiry: A Situated Approach.” Topoi. January.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, Andy, and David Chalmers. 1998. “The Extended Mind.” Analysis 58 (1): 7–19. doi: 10.1093/analys/58.1.7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cocking, D., and J. Van Den Hoven. 2018. Evil Online. Vol. 15. Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Colombetti, Giovanna. 2020. “Emoting the Situated Mind A Taxonomy of Affective Material Scaffolds: A Taxonomy of Affective Material Scaffolds.” JOLMA. The Journal for the Philosophy of Language, Mind and the Arts 1 (2): 215–236.
   Google Scholar
• Colombetti, Giovanna, and Joel Krueger. 2015. “Scaffoldings of the Affective Mind.” Philosophical Psychology 28 (8): 1157–1176. doi: 10.1080/09515089.2014.976334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coninx, Sabrina, and Achim Stephan. 2021. “A Taxonomy of Environmentally Scaffolded Affectivity.” Danish Yearbook of Philosophy 54 (1): 38–64. doi: 10.1163/24689300-bja10019
   Google Scholar
• Damasio, A. R. 1994. Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. 2007. How We Think. New York: Cosimo.
   Google Scholar
• Dunne, G. 2015. “Beyond Critical Thinking to Critical Being: Criticality in Higher Education and Life.” International Journal of Educational Research 71: 86–99. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2015.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eigenberger, M. E., and K. A. Sealander. 2001. “A Scale for Measuring Students’ Anti-Intellectualism.” Psychological Reports 89 (2): 387–402. doi: 10.2466/pr0.2001.89.2.387
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elgin, C. Z. 2008. “Emotion and Understanding.” Epistemology and Emotions, 33–50.
   Google Scholar
• Fallis, D. 2016. “Mis- and Dis-Information.” In Routledge Handbooks in Philosophy. The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Information, edited by L. Floridi, 332–346. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrara, E., and Z. Yang. 2015. “Measuring Emotional Contagion in Social Media.” PloS one 10 (11): e0142390. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142390
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frau-Meigs, D., I. Velez, and J. Flores Michel. 2017. Public Policies in Media and Information Literacy in Europe: Cross-Country Comparisons. Routledge Studies in European Communication Research and Education. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fredrickson, B. L. 2004. “The Broaden-and-Build Theory of Positive Emotions.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 359 (1449): 1367–1377. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2004.1512
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredrickson, Barbara L., and Christine Branigan. 2005. “Positive Emotions Broaden the Scope of Attention and Thought-Action Repertoires.” Cognition and Emotion 19 (3): 313–332. doi: 10.1080/02699930441000238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frijda, N. H. 1986. The Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Furtak, Rick Anthony. 2018. Knowing Emotions: Truthfulness and Recognition in Affective Experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grafstein, A. 2016. “Information Literacy and Critical Thinking.” In Pathways into Information Literacy and Communities of Practice, edited by D. Sales, and M. Pinto, 3–28. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J. D. 2003. “From Neural ‘is’ to Moral ‘Ought’: What are the Moral Implications of Neuroscientific Moral Psychology?” Nature Reviews Neuroscience 14: 847–850.
   Google Scholar
• Greenstein, M., and N. Franklin. 2020. “Anger Increases Susceptibility to Misinformation.” Experimental Psychology 67 (3): 202–209. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000489
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haidt, J. 2001. “The Emotional Dog and its Rational Tail: A Social Intuitionist Approach to Moral Judgment.” Psychological Review 108: 814–834. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.814
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamby, B. 2015. “Willingness to Inquire: The Cardinal Critical Thinking Virtue.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Thinking in Higher Education, 77–87. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hendricks, C. 2006. “Trust and Suspicion in Critical Thinking as Transcendence.” Philosophy of Education Archive, 295–302.
   Google Scholar
• Hitchcock, D. 2018. “Critical Thinking.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2018th ed. Metaphysics Research Lab, edited by Edward N. Zalta. Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Huemer, M. 2005. “Is Critical Thinking Epistemically Responsible?” Metaphilosophy 36 (4): 522–531. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9973.2005.00388.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. H., and B. Hamby. 2015. “A Meta-Level Approach to the Problem of Defining ‘Critical Thinking’.” Argumentation 29 (4): 417–430. doi:10.1007/s10503-015-9356-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, Daniel. 2011. Thinking Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Kary, D. 2013. “Critical Thinking and Epistemic Responsibility.” In Virtues of Argumentation. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), May 22–25,2013. OSSA, Windsor, ON, 2014, edited by D. Mohammed, and M. Lewinski (Chairs).
   Google Scholar
• Klaczynski, P. A., and K. L. Lavallee. 2005. “Domain-specific Identity, Epistemic Regulation, and Intellectual Ability as Predictors of Belief-Biased Reasoning: A Dual-Process Perspective.” Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 92 (1): 1–24. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2005.05.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• König, P. D., and G. Wenzelburger. 2020. “Opportunity for Renewal or Disruptive Force? How Artificial Intelligence Alters Democratic Politics.” Government Information Quarterly 37 (3): 101489. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2020.101489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, Joel. 2020. “Schizophrenia and the Scaffolded Self.” Topoi 39 (3): 597–609. doi: 10.1007/s11245-018-9547-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, Joel, and Lucy Osler and University of Arkansas Press. 2019. “Engineering Affect: Emotion Regulation, the Internet, and the Techno-Social Niche.” Philosophical Topics 47 (2): 205–231. doi: 10.5840/philtopics201947223
   Google Scholar
• Lacewing, M. 2005. “Emotional Self-Awareness and Ethical Deliberation.” Ratio 18 (1): 65–81. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9329.2005.00271.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazarus, R. S. 1991. Emotion and Adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lutzke, L., C. Drummond, P. Slovic, and J. Árvai. 2019. “Priming Critical Thinking: Simple Interventions Limit the Influence of Fake News About Climate Change on Facebook.” Global Environmental Change 58: 101964. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, C. 2002. “Critical Reflection, Self-Knowledge, and the Emotions.” Philosophical Explorations 5 (3): 186–206. doi:10.1080/10002002108538732.
   Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, A., and I. Bhatt. 2020. “Lies, Bullshit and Fake News: Some Epistemological Concerns.” Postdigital Science and Education 2 (1): 9–13. doi: 10.1007/s42438-018-0025-4
   Google Scholar
• Maiese, Michelle. 2017. “Transformative Learning, Enactivism, and Affectivity.” Studies in Philosophy and Education 36 (2): 197–216. doi: 10.1007/s11217-015-9506-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marabini, A. 2022. Critical Thinking and Epistemic Injustice. Vol. 20. Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-95714-8.
   Google Scholar
• Marin, Lavinia, and Sabine Roeser. 2020. “Emotions and Digital Well-Being: The Rationalistic Bias of Social Media Design in Online Deliberations’.” In Ethis of Digital Well-Being: A Multidiscplinary Approach, edited by Christopher Burr, and Luciano Floridi, 139–150. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, M., M. Alfano, and B. De Bruin. 2021. “Epistemic Vice Predicts Acceptance of Covid-19 Misinformation.” Episteme, 1–22. doi: 10.1017/epi.2021.18
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. T., and C. McFarland. 1987. “Pluralistic Ignorance: When Similarity is Interpreted as Dissimilarity.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53 (2): 298–305. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.53.2.298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, B. N., and R. Parker. 1986. Critical Thinking: Evaluating Claims and Arguments in Everyday Life. Mountain View: Mayfield.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, C. Thi. 2020. “Echo Chambers and Epistemic Bubbles.” Episteme; Rivista Critica Di Storia Delle Scienze Mediche E Biologiche 17 (2): 141–161.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, Martha. 2001. Upheavals of Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pariser, E. 2011. The Filter Bubble: What the Internet is Hiding from you. New York: Penguin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, R. 1981. “Teaching Critical Thinking in the “Strong” Sense: A Focus On Self-Deception.” World Views, and a Dialectical Mode of Analysis. Informal Logic 4: 2.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, R., and L. Elder. 2009. “Critical Thinking, Creativity, Ethical Reasoning: A Unity of Opposites.” In Morality, Ethics, and Gifted Minds, edited by T. Cross and D. Ambrose, 117–131. New York: Springer US.
   Google Scholar
• Pennycook, G., and D. G. Rand. 2019. “Lazy, not Biased: Susceptibility to Partisan Fake News is Better Explained by Lack of Reasoning than by Motivated Reasoning.” Cognition 188: 39–50. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, R. S. 1972. Reason, Morality and Religion. The Swarthmore Lectures. London: Friends Home Service Committe.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, R. C. 2003. Emotions: An Essay in Aid of Moral Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roeser, Sabine. 2010. “Emotional Reflection About Risks.” In Emotions and Risky Technologies, edited by S. Roeser, 231–244. Dodrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Roeser, Sabine. 2011. Moral Emotions and Intuitions. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Roeser, Sabine. 2018. “Socially Extended Moral Deliberation About Risks: A Role for Emotions and Art.” In, Socially Extended Epistemology, edited by J. Adam Carter, Andy Clark, Jesper Kallestrup, S. Orestis Palermos, and Duncan Pritchard, 157–172. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roeser, Sabine, and Udo Pesch. 2016. “An Emotional Deliberation Approach to Risk.” Science, Technology and Human Values 41: 274–297. doi: 10.1177/0162243915596231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saarinen, Jussi A. 2020. “What Can the Concept of Affective Scaffolding Do for Us?” Philosophical Psychology 33 (6): 820–839. doi: 10.1080/09515089.2020.1761542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scriven, M., and R. Paul. 1987. Statement. National Council for Excellence in Critical Thinking. https://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/defining-critical-thinking/766
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, P., and M. Hannafin. 2004. “Scaffolding Critical Thinking in an Online Course: An Exploratory Study.” Journal of Educational Computing Research 31 (2): 181–208. doi: 10.2190/TMC3-RXPE-75MY-31YG
   Google Scholar
• Sherman, N. 1989. The Fabric of Character: Aristotle’s Theory of Virtue. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, H. 1989. “The Rationality of Science, Critical Thinking, and Science Education.” Synthese 80 (1): 9–41. doi: 10.1007/BF00869946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon, R. C. 1993. The Passions: Emotions and the Meaning of Life. Indianapolis: Hackett Pub. Co.
   Google Scholar
• Steinert, S. 2021. “Corona and Value Change. The Role of Social Media and Emotional Contagion.” Ethics and Information Technology 23 (1): 59–68. doi: 10.1007/s10676-020-09545-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, E., M. Sondag, I. Rutter, W. Meulemans, S. Cunningham, B. Speckmann, and M. Alfano. 2020. “Vulnerability in Social Epistemic Networks.” International Journal of Philosophical Studies 28 (5): 731–753. doi: 10.1080/09672559.2020.1782562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thayer-Bacon, B. 1998. “Transforming and Redescribing Critical Thinking: Constructive Thinking.” Studies in Philosophy and Education 17 (2/3): 123–148. doi: 10.1023/A:1005166416808
   Google Scholar
• Thayer-Bacon, B. J. 2000. Transforming Critical Thinking: Thinking Constructively. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Norden, Bryan. 2004/2019. ‘Mencius’, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/mencius/
   Google Scholar
• Van Woerkom, M. 2010. “Critical Reflection as a Rationalistic Ideal.” Adult Education Quarterly 60 (4): 339–356. doi: 10.1177/0741713609358446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahl-Jorgensen, K. 2018. “The Emotional Architecture of Social Media.” In A Networked Self. A Networked Self and Platforms, Stories, Connections, edited by Z. Papacharissi, 77–93. New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Weeks, B. E. 2015. “Emotions, Partisanship, and Misperceptions: How Anger and Anxiety Moderate the Effect of Partisan Bias on Susceptibility to Political Misinformation.” Journal of Communication 65 (4): 699–719. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, R. F., M. E. Toplak, and K. E. Stanovich. 2008. “Heuristics and Biases as Measures of Critical Thinking: Associations with Cognitive Ability and Thinking Dispositions.” Journal of Educational Psychology 100 (4): 930-941. doi: 10.1037/a0012842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winans, A. E. 2012. “Cultivating Critical Emotional Literacy: Cognitive and Contemplative Approaches to Engaging Difference.” College English 75 (2): 150–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zagzebski, L. 2003. “Emotion and Moral Judgment.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (1): 104–112. doi: 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2003.tb00245.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zollman, K. J. 2013. “Network Epistemology: Communication in Epistemic Communities.” Philosophy Compass 8 (1): 15–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2012.00534.x
   Google Scholar