Meaning without content: on the metasemantics of register

References

• Abbott, B. 2006. “Where Have Some of the Presuppositions Gone?” In Drawing the Boundaries of Meaning: Neo-Gricean Studies in Pragmatics and Semantics in Honor of Laurence R. Horn, edited by B. J. Birner and G. Ward, 1–20. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Allan, K. 2007. “The Pragmatics of Connotation.” Journal of Pragmatics 39 (6): 1047–1057. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2006.08.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, L., and E. Lepore. 2013. “Slurring Words.” Nous (Detroit, Mich ) 47 (1): 25–48. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0068.2010.00820.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bach, K. 1999. “The Myth of Conventional Implicature.” Linguistics and Philosophy 22 (4): 327–366. doi:10.1023/A:1005466020243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bach, K. 2006. “The Top 10 Misconceptions About Implicature.” In Drawing the Boundaries of Meaning: Neo-Gricean Studies in Pragmatics and Semantics in Honor of Laurence R. Horn, edited by B. J. Birner, and G. Ward, 21–30. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Bach, K., and R. M. Harnish. 1979. Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beaver, D., and J. Stanley. 2018. “Toward a Non-Ideal Philosophy of Language.” Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 39 (2): 503–547.
   Google Scholar
• Bohnert, H. G. 1945. “The Semiotic Status of Commands.” Philosophy of Science 12 (4): 302–315.
   Google Scholar
• Brandom, R. 1994. Making it Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cappelen, H., and J. Dever. 2019. Bad Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Diaz-Legaspe, J., C. Liu, and R. J. Stainton. 2020. “Slurs and Register: A Case Study in Meaning Pluralism.” Mind & Language 35 (2): 156–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drainville, R., and J. Saul. (forthcoming). “Visual and Linguistic Dogwhistles.” In Oxford Handbook of Applied Philosophy of Language, edited by L. Anderson and E. Lepore. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344441861_Visual_and_Linguistic_Dogwhistles.
   Google Scholar
• Dummett, M. 1981. Frege: Philosophy of Language. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dummett, M. 1991. The Logical Basis of Metaphysics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frege, G. 1892. “Über Sinn und Bedeutung.” Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik 100: 25–50.
   Google Scholar
• Frege, G. 1897. “Logik.” In Gottlob Frege: Nachgelassene Schriften, edited by H. Hermes, F. Kambartel, and F. Kaulbach, 137–163. Felix Meiner: Hamburg.
   Google Scholar
• Gazdar, G. 1979. Pragmatics: Implicature, Presupposition, and Logical Form. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gentzen, G. 1935. “Untersuchungen über das logische Schließen.” Mathematische Zeitschrift 35 (176-210): 405–431.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. 1963. Behavior in Public Places: Notes on the Social Organization of Gatherings. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grice, H. P. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gutzmann, D. 2015. Use-Conditional Meaning: Studies in Multidimensional Semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hom, C. 2008. “The Semantics of Racial Epithets.” Journal of Philosophy 105 (8): 416–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn, L. R. 2007. “Toward a Fregean Pragmatics: Voraussetzung, Nebengedanke, Andeutung.” In Explorations in Pragmatics, edited by L. R. Horn and I. Kecskes, 39–69. Berlin: de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Horn, L. R. 2013. “I Love me Some Datives: Expressive Meaning, Free Datives, and F-Implicature.” In Beyond Expressives: Explorations in Use-Conditional Meaning, edited by D. Gutzmann and H.-M. Gärtner, 151–199. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, R. A. 1996. Sociolinguistics (2nd ed). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Iten, C. 2005. Linguistic Meaning, Truth Conditions and Relevance: The Case of Concessives. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, D. 1989. “Demonstratives: An Essay on the Semantics, Logic, Metaphysics and Epistemology of Demonstratives and Other Indexicals.” In Themes from Kaplan, edited by J. Almog, J. Perry, and H. Wettstein, 481–563. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, D. ms. What is Meaning? Explorations in the Theory of Meaning as Use. (Brief Version - Draft #1).
   Google Scholar
• Katz, J. J. 1977. Propositional Structure and Illocutionary Force: A Study of the Contribution of Sentence Meaning to Speech Acts. Hassocs: The Harvester Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kortum, R. D. 2013. Varieties of Tone: Frege, Dummett and the Shades of Meaning. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lepore, E., and M. Stone. 2018. “Slurs and Tone.” In Eva Picardi on Language, Analysis and History, edited by A. Coliva, P. Leonardi, and S. Moruzzi, 205–217. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• McCready, E. 2019. The Semantics and Pragmatics of Honorification: Register and Social Meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neale, S. 1992. “Paul Grice and the Philosophy of Language.” Linguistics and Philosophy 15: 509–559. doi:10.1007/BF00630629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogden, C. K., and I. A. Richards. 1946. The Meaning of Meaning: A Study of the Influence of Language Upon Thought and of the Science of Symbolism (Eighth ed.). New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
   Google Scholar
• Picardi, E. 2007. “On Sense, Tone and Accompanying Thoughts.” In The Philosophy of Michael Dummett, edited by R. E. Auxier and L. E. Hahn, 491–520. Chicago: Open Court.
   Google Scholar
• Pinker, S. 2007. The Stuff of Thought: Language as a Window Into Human Nature. New York: Viking.
   Google Scholar
• Potts, C. 2005. The Logic of Conventional Implicatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Potts, C. 2007. “The Expressive Dimension.” Theoretical Linguistics 33 (2): 165–198. doi:10.1515/TL.2007.011.
   Google Scholar
• Potts, C. 2015. “Presupposition and Implicature.” In The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory, edited by S. Lappin and C. Fox, 2nd ed., 168–202. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Predelli, S. 2013. Meaning Without Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sander, T. 2019. “Two Misconstruals of Frege’s Theory of Colouring.” The Philosophical Quarterly 69 (275): 374–392. doi:10.1093/pq/pqy054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sander, T. 2021. “Fregean Side-Thoughts.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 99 (3): 455–471. doi:10.1080/00048402.2020.1795216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sander, T. 2022. “Taxonomizing Non-at-Issue Contents.” Grazer Philosophische Studien 99 (1): 50–77. doi:10.1163/18756735-00000154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlenker, P. 2007. “Expressive Presuppositions.” Theoretical Linguistics 33 (2): 237–245. doi:10.1515/TL.2007.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Textor, M. 2011. Frege on Sense and Reference. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tsohatzidis, S. L. 2007. “Pronouns of Address and Truth Conditions.” Linguistics 30: 569–575.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, D. 2016. “Reassessing the Conceptual-Procedural Distinction.” Lingua. International Review of General Linguistics. Revue internationale De Linguistique Generale 175: 5–19. doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2015.12.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar