Publication Cover
Inquiry
An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy
Latest Articles
140
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The illusion of the relevance of difficulty in evaluations of moral responsibility

Received 17 Aug 2021, Accepted 15 Sep 2022, Published online: 05 Oct 2022

References

  • Arpaly, Nomy. 2003. Unprincipled Virtue: An Inquiry Into Moral Agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Arpaly, Nomy. 2016. “Review of Achievement.” Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews. https://ndpr.nd.edu/reviews/achievement/.
  • Bradford, Gwen. 2015. Achievement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Bradford, Gwen. 2017. “Hard to Know.” In Responsibility: The Epistemic Condition, 180–198.
  • Coates, Justin. 2022. “Degrees of Responsibility.” In The Oxford Handbook of Moral Responsibility, edited by Dana Kay Nelkin and Derk Pereboom, 111. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Crisp, Roger. 2017. “Moral Luck and Equality of Moral Opportunity.” Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 91 (1): 1–20. doi:10.1093/arisup/akx002.
  • Dunkle, I. D. 2019. “The Competition Account of Achievement-Value.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 100 (4): 1018–1046.
  • Faraci, David, and David Shoemaker. 2010. “Insanity, Deep Selves, and Moral Responsibility: The Case of JoJo.” Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1 (3): 319–332.
  • Faraci, David, and David Shoemaker. 2014. “Huck vs. JoJo: Moral Ignorance and the (A)symmetry of Praise and Blame.” In Oxford Studies in Experimental Philosophy, Oxford Studies in Experimental Philosophy, edited by Joshua Knobe, Tania Lombrozo, and Shaun Nichols, chap. 2, 7–27. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Forsberg, L., and A. Skelton. 2020. “Achievement and Enhancement.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 50 (3): 322–338.
  • Guerrero, Alex. 2017. “Intellectual Difficulty and Moral Responsibility.” In Responsibility: The Epistemic Condition, edited by Jan Willem Wieland and Philip Robichaud, 199–218. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Hartford, Anna. 2022. “Difficulty & Quality of Will: Implications for Moral Ignorance.” Philosophical Explorations 25 (2): 141–158.
  • Hartman, R. J. 2019. “Moral Luck and the Unfairness of Morality.” Philosophical Studies 176 (12): 3179–3197.
  • Hassan, Patrick. 2015. “Review of Achievement.” Social Theory and Practice 41 (4): 759–764.
  • Hirji, Sukaina. 2019. “Not Always Worth the Effort: Difficulty and the Value of Achievement.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 100 (2): 525–548.
  • Markovits, Julia. 2010. “Acting for the Right Reasons.” Philosophical Review 119 (2): 201–242.
  • Mason, Elinor. 2019. Ways to be Blameworthy: Rightness, Wrongness, and Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • McElwee, Brian. 2022. “Cost and Psychological Difficulty: Two Aspects of Demandingness.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy (Online First), 1–16.
  • Nelkin, Dana K. 2016. “Difficulty and Degrees of Moral Praiseworthiness and Blameworthiness.” Noûs 50 (2): 356–378.
  • Piovarchy, Adam. 2021. “Situationism, Capacities and Culpability.” Philosophical Studies 179 (6): 1997–2027.
  • Robbins, P., F. Alvear, and P. Litton. 2021. “Good Deeds and Hard Knocks: The Effect of Past Suffering on Praise for Moral Behavior.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 97: 104216.
  • Smith, Angela. 2007. “On Being Responsible and Holding Responsible.” The Journal of Ethics 11 (4): 465–484.
  • Smith, Angela. 2012. “Attributability, Answerability, and Accountability: In Defense of a Unified Account.” Ethics 122 (3): 575–589.
  • Smith, Angela. 2015. “Responsibility as Answerability.” Inquiry 58 (2): 99–126.
  • Tierney, Hannah. 2019. “Quality of Reasons and Degrees of Responsibility.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 97 (4): 661–672.
  • von Kriegstein, Hasko. 2019. “On Being Difficult: Towards an Account of the Nature of Difficulty.” Philosophical Studies 176 (1): 45–64.
  • Wolf, Susan. 1987. “Sanity and the Metaphysics of Self.” In Responsibility, Character, and the Emotions: New Essays in Moral Psychology, edited by Ferdinand Schoeman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.