The illusion of the relevance of difficulty in evaluations of moral responsibility

References

• Arpaly, Nomy. 2003. Unprincipled Virtue: An Inquiry Into Moral Agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arpaly, Nomy. 2016. “Review of Achievement.” Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews. https://ndpr.nd.edu/reviews/achievement/.
   Google Scholar
• Bradford, Gwen. 2015. Achievement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bradford, Gwen. 2017. “Hard to Know.” In Responsibility: The Epistemic Condition, 180–198.
   Google Scholar
• Coates, Justin. 2022. “Degrees of Responsibility.” In The Oxford Handbook of Moral Responsibility, edited by Dana Kay Nelkin and Derk Pereboom, 111. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crisp, Roger. 2017. “Moral Luck and Equality of Moral Opportunity.” Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 91 (1): 1–20. doi:10.1093/arisup/akx002.
   Google Scholar
• Dunkle, I. D. 2019. “The Competition Account of Achievement-Value.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 100 (4): 1018–1046.
   Google Scholar
• Faraci, David, and David Shoemaker. 2010. “Insanity, Deep Selves, and Moral Responsibility: The Case of JoJo.” Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1 (3): 319–332.
   Google Scholar
• Faraci, David, and David Shoemaker. 2014. “Huck vs. JoJo: Moral Ignorance and the (A)symmetry of Praise and Blame.” In Oxford Studies in Experimental Philosophy, Oxford Studies in Experimental Philosophy, edited by Joshua Knobe, Tania Lombrozo, and Shaun Nichols, chap. 2, 7–27. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forsberg, L., and A. Skelton. 2020. “Achievement and Enhancement.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 50 (3): 322–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerrero, Alex. 2017. “Intellectual Difficulty and Moral Responsibility.” In Responsibility: The Epistemic Condition, edited by Jan Willem Wieland and Philip Robichaud, 199–218. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hartford, Anna. 2022. “Difficulty & Quality of Will: Implications for Moral Ignorance.” Philosophical Explorations 25 (2): 141–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartman, R. J. 2019. “Moral Luck and the Unfairness of Morality.” Philosophical Studies 176 (12): 3179–3197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan, Patrick. 2015. “Review of Achievement.” Social Theory and Practice 41 (4): 759–764.
   Google Scholar
• Hirji, Sukaina. 2019. “Not Always Worth the Effort: Difficulty and the Value of Achievement.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 100 (2): 525–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markovits, Julia. 2010. “Acting for the Right Reasons.” Philosophical Review 119 (2): 201–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, Elinor. 2019. Ways to be Blameworthy: Rightness, Wrongness, and Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McElwee, Brian. 2022. “Cost and Psychological Difficulty: Two Aspects of Demandingness.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy (Online First), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Nelkin, Dana K. 2016. “Difficulty and Degrees of Moral Praiseworthiness and Blameworthiness.” Noûs 50 (2): 356–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piovarchy, Adam. 2021. “Situationism, Capacities and Culpability.” Philosophical Studies 179 (6): 1997–2027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robbins, P., F. Alvear, and P. Litton. 2021. “Good Deeds and Hard Knocks: The Effect of Past Suffering on Praise for Moral Behavior.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 97: 104216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, Angela. 2007. “On Being Responsible and Holding Responsible.” The Journal of Ethics 11 (4): 465–484.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Angela. 2012. “Attributability, Answerability, and Accountability: In Defense of a Unified Account.” Ethics 122 (3): 575–589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, Angela. 2015. “Responsibility as Answerability.” Inquiry 58 (2): 99–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tierney, Hannah. 2019. “Quality of Reasons and Degrees of Responsibility.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 97 (4): 661–672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Kriegstein, Hasko. 2019. “On Being Difficult: Towards an Account of the Nature of Difficulty.” Philosophical Studies 176 (1): 45–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, Susan. 1987. “Sanity and the Metaphysics of Self.” In Responsibility, Character, and the Emotions: New Essays in Moral Psychology, edited by Ferdinand Schoeman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar