References
- Bertram, C. 2003. Rousseau and the Social Contract. London: Routledge.
- Bratman, M. 1993. “Shared Intention.” Ethics 104: 97–113.
- Bratman, M. 1999. “Shared Intention and Mutual Obligation.” In Faces of Intention, edited by M. Bratman, 130–141. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Cassirer, Ernst. 1954. The Question of Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Translated by P. Gay. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
- Cassirer, Ernst. 1970. Rousseau, Kant, Goethe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Cohen, J. 2010. Rousseau: A Free Community of Equals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Collins, S. 2019. Group Duties: Their Existence and Their Implications for Individuals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Dent, N. J. H. 1988. Rousseau. Oxford: Blackwell.
- Enoch, D. 2006. “Agency, Schmagency: Why Normativity Won’t Come from What is Constitutive of Action.” Philosophical Review 115 (2): 169–198.
- Ferrero, L. 2009. “Constitutivism and the Inescapability of Agency.” Oxford Studies in Metaethics 4: 303–333.
- Gilbert, M. 1989. On Social Facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Gilbert, M. 1990. “Walking Together: A Paradigmatic Social Phenomenon.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy XV: 1–14.
- Gilbert, M. 2006. A Theory of Political Obligation: Membership, Commitment and the Bonds of Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Hasan, Rafeeq. 2016. “Autonomy and Happiness in Rousseau’s Justification of the State.” The Review of Politics 78: 391–417.
- Hasan, Rafeeq. 2018. “Rousseau on the Ground of Obligation: Reconsidering the Social Autonomy Interpretation.” European Journal of Political Theory 17 (2): 233–243.
- Katsafanas, P. 2013. Agency and the Foundations of Ethics: Nietzschean Constitutivism. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Kolodny, N. 2005. “Why Be Rational?” Mind; A Quarterly Review of Psychology and Philosophy 114 (455): 509–563.
- Korsgaard, C. 2009. Self-Constitution: Agency, Identity, and Integrity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Korsgaard, C. 2014. “The Normative Constitution of Agency.” In Rational and Social Agency: The Philosophy of Michael Bratman, edited by G. Yaffe and M. Vargas, 190–214. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Miller, D. 2008. “Gilbert, A Theory of Political Obligation.” The Philosophical Quarterly 58 (233): 755–757.
- Neuhouser, Frederick. 2003. Foundations of Hegel’s Social Theory: Actualizing Freedom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Neuhouser, Frederick. 2008. Rousseau’s Theodicy of Self-Love: Evil, Rationality and the Drive for Recognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Nisbet, H. B. 1943. “Rousseau and Totalitarianism.” The Journal of Politics 5 (2): 93–114.
- Pettit, P., and C. List. 2011. Group Agency: The Possibility, Design and Status of Corporate Agents. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Rawls, J. 1999. A Theory of Justice. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Rawls, J. 2008. Lectures in the History of Political Philosophy. Edited by S. Freeman. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Schofield, P. 2012. “The Commonwealth as Agent: Group Action, the Common Good, and the General Will.” Doctoral Dissertation. Cambridge: Harvard University.
- Schweikard, D., and H. B. Schmid. 2020. “Collective Intentionality.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2021 edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/collective-intentionality/
- Searle, J. 1990. “Collective Intentions and Actions.” In Intentions in Communication, edited by P. Cohen, J. Morgan, and M. Pollack, 401–415. Cambridge: MIT Press.
- Searle, J. 2010. Making the Social World: The Structure of Human Civilization. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Shapiro, S. 2014. “Massively Shared Agency.” In Rational and Social Agency: Essays on the Philosophy of Michael Bratman, edited by M. Vargas and G. Yaffe, 257–293. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Skyrms, Brian. 2004. The Stag Hunt and the Evolution of Social Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Tuomela, R., and K. Miller. 1988. “We-Intentions.” Philosophical Studies 53: 367–389.
- Velleman, D. 2000. The Possibility of Practical Reason. Oxford: Clarendon Press.