Judges, experiencers, and taste

References

• Bach, K. 1994. “Conversational Impliciture.” Mind and Language 9: 124–162.
   Google Scholar
• Baghramian, M., and J. A. Carter. 2021. “Relativism.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by E. N. Zalta. Spring: Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, M., K. Johnson, and I. Roberts. 1989. “Passive Arguments Raised.” Linguistic Inquiry 20: 219–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, C. 2002. “The Dynamics of Vagueness.” Linguistics and Philosophy 25: 1–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, C. 2013. “Negotiating Taste.” Inquiry 56: 187–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, C., and P. Jacobson. 2007. Direct Compositionality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bartsch, R., and T. Vennemann. 1972. “The Grammar of Relative Adjectives and Comparison.” Linguistische Berichte 20: 19–32.
   Google Scholar
• Beddor, B., and A. Egan. 2018. “Might Do Better: Flexible Relativism and the QUD.” Semantics and Pragmatics 11: 1–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennis, H. 2000. “Adjectives and Argument Structure.” In Lexical Specification and Insertion, edited by P. Coopmans, M. Evaraert, and J. Grimshaw, 27–67. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Bennis, H. 2004. “Unergative Adjectives and Psych Verbs.” In The Unaccusativity Puzzle, edited by A. Alexiadou, E. Anagnostopoulou, and M. Everaert, 84–113. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bhatt, R., and R. Izvorski. 1998. “Genericity, Implicit Arguments, and Control.” In Proceedings of the Student Conference in Linguistics, Vol. 7. Cambridge: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Bhatt, R., and R. Pancheva. 2006. “Implicit Arguments.” In Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Vol. II, edited by M. Everaert and H. van Riemsdijk, 554–584. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Bierwisch, M. 1989. “The Semantics of Gradation.” In Dimensional Adjectives, edited by M. Bierwisch and E. Lang, 71–261. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Bresnan, J. 1982. “Control and Complementation.” Linguistic Inquiry 13: 343–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brody, M., and M. R. Manzini. 1988. “On Implicit Arguments.” In Mental Representation: The Interface between Language and Reality, edited by R. M. Kempson, 105–130. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burnett, H. 2014. “A Delineation Solution to the Puzzles of Absolute Adjectives.” Linguistics and Philosophy 37: 1–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bylinina, L. 2013. “The Grammar of Standards: Judge-Dependence, Purpose-Relativity, and Comparison Classes in Degree Constructions.” PhD diss., Universiteit Utrecht.
   Google Scholar
• Bylinina, L. 2017. “Judge-dependence in Degree Constructions.” Journal of Semantics 34: 291–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappelen, H., and J. Hawthorne. 2009. Relativism and Monadic Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. 1977. Essays on Form and Interpretation. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. 1982. Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. 1986. Knowledge of Language. New York: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Cinque, G. 1990a. “Ergative Adjectives and the Lexicalist Hypothesis.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 8: 1–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cinque, G. 1990b. Types of $\overline{A}$-Dependencies. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, J. 2013. “The Syntax of Personal Taste.” Philosophical Perspectives 27: 51–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cresswell, M. J. 1973. Logics and Languages. London: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Cresswell, M. J. 1977. “The Semantics of Degree.” In Montague Grammar, edited by B. Partee, 261–292. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dinges, A., and J. Zakkou. 2020. “A Direction Effect on Taste Predicates.” Philosophers’ Imprint 20: 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egan, A. 2007. “Epistemic Modals, Relativism, and Assertion.” Philosophical Studies 133: 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egan, A. 2011. “Relativism about Epistemic Modals.” In Blackwell Companion to Relativism, edited by S. Hales, 219–241. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Egan, A., J. Hawthorne, and B. Weatherson. 2005. “Epistemic Modals in Context.” In Contextualism in Philosophy, edited by G. Preyer and G. Peter, 131–168. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, S. D. 1984. “Quantifier-Pro and the LF Representation of PROarb.” Linguistic Inquiry 15: 499–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glanzberg, M. 2007. “Context, Content, and Relativism.” Philosophical Studies 136: 1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glanzberg, M. 2009/2016. “Not All Contextual Parameters are Alike.” Unpublished Manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Glanzberg, M. 2011. “More on Operators and Tense.” Analysis 71: 112–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glanzberg, M., and J. C. King. 2020. “Binding, Compositionality, and Semantic Values.” Philosophers’ Imprint 20: 1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heim, I. 1985. “Notes on Comparatives and Related Matters.” Unpublished Manuscript. University of Texas, Austin. http://semanticsarchive.net/Archive/zc0ZjY0M/.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, G. 2009. “Tough Constructions and Their Derivation.” Linguistic Inquiry 40: 535–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, J. 1997. “A Plea for Implicit Anaphora.” In Atomism and Binding, edited by H. Bennis, P. Pica, and J. Rooryck, 183–202. Dordrecht: Foris.
   Google Scholar
• Huvenes, T. 2012. “Varieties of Disagreement and Predicates of Taste.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90: 167–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeggli, O. A. 1986. “Passive.” Linguistic Inquiry 17: 587–622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, C. 1991. Purpose Clauses. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, D. 1989a. “Afterthoughts.” In Themes from Kaplan, edited by J. Almog, J. Perry, and H. Wettstein, 565–614. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, D. 1989b. “Demonstratives.” In Themes From Kaplan, edited by J. Almog, J. Perry, and H. Wettstein, 481–563. Oxford: Oxford University Press. First Publication of a Widely Circulated Manuscript Dated 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, C. 1997. “Projecting the Adjective.” PhD diss., University of California, Santa Cruz. Published by Garland, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, C. 2007. “Vagueness and Grammar: The Semantics of Relative and Absolute Gradable Adjectives.” Linguistics and Philosophy 30: 1–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, C. 2013. “Two Sources of Subjectivity.” Inquiry 56: 258–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khoo, J. 2015. “Modal Disagreements.” Inquiry 58: 511–534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khoo, J., and J. Phillips. 2019. “New Horizons for a Theory of Epistemic Modals.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 97: 309–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimball, J. P. 1971. “Super Equi-NP Deletion As Dative Deletion.” Papers From the Chicago Linguistics Society 7: 142–148.
   Google Scholar
• King, J. C. 2003. “Tense, Modality, and Semantic Value.” Philosophical Perspectives 17: 195–245.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, E. 1980. “A Semantics for Positive and Comparative Adjectives.” Linguistics and Philosophy 4: 1–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kneer, M. 2015. “Perspective in Language.” PhD diss., École des Hautes Études en Sciences Socials, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Kneer, M. 2021a. “Norms of Assertion in the United States, Germany, and Japan.” PNAS 118: 1–3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kneer, M. 2021b. “Predicates of Personal Taste: Empirical Data.” Synthese 199: 6455–6471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kneer, M. 2022. “Contextualism v. Relativism: More Empirical Data.” In Perspectives on Taste: Aesthetics, Language, Metaphysics, and Experimental Philosophy, edited by J. Wyatt, J. Zakkou, and D. Zeman. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kneer, M. under review a. “Epistemic Modal Claims: Data and ‘Data’.” Unpublished Manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Kneer, M. under review b. “Perspectival Plurality.” Unpublished Manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Knobe, J., and S. Yalcin. 2014. “Epistemic Modals and Context: Experimental Data.” Semantics and Pragmatics 7: 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Kölbel, M. 2002. Truth Without Objectivity. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kölbel, M. 2003. “Faultless Disagreement.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 104: 53–73.
   Google Scholar
• Koster, J. 1984. “On Binding and Control.” Linguistic Inquiry 15: 417–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Landau, I. 1999. “Psych-Adjectives and Semantic Selection.” Linguistics Review 16: 333–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landau, I. 2000. Elements of Control. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Landau, I. 2006. “Ways of Being Rude.” Manuscript. Ben Gurion University.
   Google Scholar
• Landau, I. 2010a. “The Explicit Syntax of Implicit Arguments.” Linguistic Inquiry 41: 357–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landau, I. 2010b. The Locative Syntax of Experiencers. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Landau, I. 2013. Control in Generative Grammar: A Research Companion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lasersohn, P. 2005. “Context Dependence, Disagreement, and Predicates of Personal Taste.” Linguistics and Philosophy 28: 643–686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasersohn, P. 2008. “Quantification and Perspective in Relativist Semantics.” Philosophical Perspectives 22: 305–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasersohn, P. 2009. “Relative Truth, Speaker Commitment, and Control of Implicit Arguments.” Synthese 166: 359–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasersohn, P. 2017. Subjectivity and Perspective in Truth-Theoretic Semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lasnik, H., and R. Fiengo. 1974. “Complement Object Deletion.” Linguistic Inquiry 5: 535–571.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, B., and M. Rappaport Hovav. 2005. Argument Realization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, D. 1970. “General Semantics.” Synthese 22: 18–67. Reprinted in Lewis (1983).
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, D. 1980. “Index, Context, and Content.” In Philosophy and Grammar, edited by S. Kanger and S. Öhman, 79–100. Dordrecht: Reidel. Reprinted in Lewis (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, D. 1983. Philosophical Papers. Volume1. vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, D. 1998. Papers in Philosophical Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• López de Sa, D. 2015. “Expressing Disagreement: A Presuppositional Indexical Contextualist Relativist Account.” Erkenntnis 80: 153–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacFarlane, J. 2003. “Future Contingents and Relative Truth.” Philosophical Quarterly 53: 321–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacFarlane, J. 2005. “Making Sense of Relative Truth.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 105: 321–339.
   Google Scholar
• MacFarlane, J. 2007. “Relativism and Disagreement.” Philosophical Studies 132: 17–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacFarlane, J. 2009. “Nonindexical Contextualism.” Synthese 166: 231–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacFarlane, J. 2014. Assessment Sensitivity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manzini, M. R. 1983. “On Control and Control Theory.” Linguistic Inquiry 14: 421–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manzini, M. R. 1992. “The Projection Principle(s): A Reexamination.” In Thematic Structure: Its Role in Grammar, edited by I. M. Roca, 271–291. Berlin: Foris.
   Google Scholar
• Marques, T. 2018. “Retractions.” Synthese 195: 3335–3359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques, T., and M. García-Carpintero. 2014. “Disageement About Taste: Commonality Presuppositions and Coordination.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 92: 701–723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauner, G., and J.-P. Koenig. 2000. “Linguistic Vs. Conceptual Sources of Implicit Agents in Sentence Comprehension.” Journal of Memory and Language 43: 110–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merchant, J. 2001. The Syntax of Silence: Sluicing, Islands, and the Theory of Ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merchant, J. 2019. “Ellipsis; A Survey of Analytical Approaches.” In Oxford Handbook of Ellipsis, edited by J. van Craenenbroeck and T. Temmerman, 19–45. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moltmann, F. 2006. “Generic One, Arbitrary PRO, and the First Person.” Natural Language Semantics14: 257–281.
   Google Scholar
• Moltmann, F. 2010. “Relative Truth and the First Person.” Philosophical Studies 150: 187–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ninan, D. 2014. “Taste Predicates and the Acquiantance Inference.” Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 24: 290–309.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, H. 2013. “A Judge-free Semantics for Predicates of Personal Taste.” Journal of Semantics 30: 103–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, J. 1996. “Thought Without Representation.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 60: 263–283.
   Google Scholar
• Pesetsky, D. 1995. Zero Syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, H. 1988. Representation and Reality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Recanati, F. 2004. Literal Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Recanati, F. 2007. Perspectival Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rett, J. 2015. The Semantics of Evaluativity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richard, M. 2004. “Contextualism and Relativism.” Philosophical Studies 119: 215–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rissman, L., K. Rawlins, and B. Landau. 2015. “Using Instrument Arguments to Understand Argument Structure for Gradient Representations.” Cognition 142: 266–290.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rizzi, L. 1986. “Null Objects in Italian and the Theory of pro.” Linguistic Inquiry 17: 501–557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roeper, T. 1987. “Implicit Arguments and the Head-complement Relation.” Linguistic Inquiry 18: 267–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safir, K. 1991. “Evaluative Predicates and the Representation of Implicit Arguments.” In Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar, edited by R. Freidin, 99–131. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sæbø, K. J. 2009. “Judgment Ascriptions.” Lingusitics and Philosophy 32: 327–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaffer, J. 2011. “Perspective in Taste Predicates and Epistemic Modals.” In Epistemic Modality, edited by A. Egan and B. Weatherson, 179–226. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, E. 2013. “Binding, Genericity, and Predicates of Personal Taste.” Inquiry 56: 278–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stalnaker, R. C. 1998. “On the Representation of Context.” Journal of Logic, Language, and Information 7: 3–19.
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, J. 2000. “Context and Logical Form.” Linguistics and Philosophy 23: 391–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson, T. 2007. “Judge Dependence, Epistemic Modals, and Predicates of Personal Taste.” Linguistics and Philosophy 30: 487–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson, T. 2009. “Relativism and the De Se Interpretation of PRO.” Proceedings of the North East Linguistics Society 38: 387–400.
   Google Scholar
• Stojanovic, I. 2007. “Talking About Taste: Disagreement, Implicit Arguments, and Relative Truth.” Linguistics and Philosophy 30: 691–706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stowell, T. 2004. “The Alignment of Arguments in Adjective Phrases.” In Perspectives on Phrase Structure: Heads and Licensing, Vol. 25 of Syntax and Semantics, edited by S. D. Rothstein, 105–135. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strawson, P. F. 1959. Individuals. London: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• von Stechow, A. 1984. “Comparing Semantic Theories of Comparison.” Journal of Semantics 3: 1–77.
   Google Scholar
• Weatherson, B. 2009. “Conditionals and Indexical Relativism.” Synthese 166: 333–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, E. 1980. “Predication.” Linguistic Inquiry 11: 203–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, E. 1985. “PRO and Subject of NP.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3: 297–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, E. 1987. “Implicit Arguments, the Binding Theory, and Control.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 5: 151–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakkou, J. 2019. “Denial and Retraction: A Challenge for Theories of Taste Predicates.” Synthese196: 1555–1573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeman, D. 2017. “Contextualist Answers to the Challenge From Disagreement.” Phenomenology and Mind 12: 62–73.
   Google Scholar