Methodological deflationism and metaphysical grounding: from because via truth to ground

References

• Bar-On, D., and K. Simmons. 2007. “The use of force against deflationism: Assertion and truth.” In Truth and Speech Acts: Studies in the Philosophy of Language, 61–89. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Berto, F., and D. Nolan. 2021. “Hyperintensionality.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, E. N., Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, Summer 2021 edition.
   Google Scholar
• Bolzano, B. 2015. Theory of science. Edited by P. Rusnock and R. George. Oxford: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Correia, F. 2010. “Grounding and Truth-functions.” Logique Et Analyse 53 (211): 251–279.
   Google Scholar
• Correia, F. 2017. “An Impure Logic of Representational Grounding.” Journal of Philosophical Logic 46 (5): 507–538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, H. 1994. “Deflationist Views of Meaning and Content.” Mind 103 (411): 249–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, H. 2006. “Compositional Principles Vs. Schematic Reasoning.” The Monist 89 (1): 9–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fine, K. 2010. “Some Puzzles of Ground.” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 51 (1): 97–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fine, K. 2012. “Guide to ground.” In Metaphysical grounding: Understanding the structure of reality, edited by F. Correia and B. Schnieder, 37–80. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, A. 1993a. “A Critique of Deflationism.” Philosophical Topics 21 (2): 57–81.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, A. 1993b. “Minimalism.” Philosophical Perspectives 7: 359–369.
   Google Scholar
• Halbach, V. 2014. Axiomatic Theories of Truth (2nd ed). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halbach, V., and G. Leigh. 2022. The Road to Paradox: A guide to syntax, truth, and modality. Oxford and Gothenburg: Manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Heck, R. K. 2018. “The Logical Strength of Compositional Principles.” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 59 (1): 1–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heck, R. K. 2021. “Disquotationalism and the Compositional Principles.” In Modes of Truth: The Unified Approach to Modality, Truth, and Paradox, edited by C. Nicolai and J. Stern, 115–150. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hofweber, T.. 2009. “Ambitious, Yet Modest, Metaphysics.” In Metametaphysics. New Semantics on the Foundations of Ontology, edited by D. Chalmers, D. Manley, and R. Wasserman, 260–289. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Horwich, P. 1998a. Meaning. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Horwich, P. 1998b. Truth. 2nd ed, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Horwich, P. 2010. “Being and truth.” In Truth-Meaning-Reality, edited by P. Horwich, 300–322. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• King, J. C. 2007. The Nature and Structure of Content. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Korbmacher, J. 2017. “Axiomatic Theories of Partial Ground I.” Journal of Philosophical Logic 47: 161–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koslicki, K. 2015. “The Coarse-grainedness of Grounding.” In Oxford Studies in Metaphysics, 306–344. vol. 9, Oxford studies in metaphysics.
   Google Scholar
• Koslicki, K. 2020. “Skeptical Doubts.” In Routledge Handbook of Metaphysical Grounding, edited by M. Raven, 164–175. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Künne, W. 2003. Conceptions of Truth. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lange, M. 2016. Because Without Cause: non-causal explanations in science and mathematics. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Litland, J. E. 2015. “Grounding, Explanation, and the Limit of Internality.” Philosophical Review 124 (4): 481–532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litland, J. E. 2017. “Grounding Ground.” Oxford Studies in Metaphysics 10: 279–316.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, T. 1993. “On Denoting Propositions and Facts.” Philosophical Perspectives 7: 441–460.
   Google Scholar
• Poggiolesi, F. 2016. “On Defining the Notion of Complete and Immediate Formal Grounding.” Synthese193 (10): 3147–3167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poggiolesi, F. 2018. “On Constructing a Logic for the Notion of Complete and Immediate Formal Grounding.” Synthese 195 (3): 1231–1254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poggiolesi, F. 2020. “Logics of Grounding.” In Routledge Handbook for Metaphysical Grounding, edited by M. Raven, 213–227. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Poggiolesi, F. 2022. “Grounding and Propositional Identity: A Solution to Wilhelms Inconsistencies.” Logic and Logical Philosophy 1–6. Online First.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poggiolesi, F., and F Genco. 2021. “Conceptual (and Hence Mathematical) Explanation, Conceptual Grounding and Proof.” Erkenntnis 1–27. Online First.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quine, W. V. O. 1956. “Quantifiers and Propositional Attitudes.” The Journal of Philosophy 53 (5): 177–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quine, W. V. O. 1970. Philosophy of Logic. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, G. 2010. “Metaphysical Dependence: Grounding and Reduction.” In Modality, edited by B. Hale and A. Hoffmann, 109–136. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schaffer, J. 2009. “On What Grounds What.” In Metametaphysics. New Semantics on the Foundations of Ontology, edited by D. Chalmers, D. Manley, and R. Wasserman, 347–383. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schaffer, J. 2012. “Grounding, transitivity, and contrastivity.” In Metaphysical grounding: Understanding the structure of reality, edited by F. Correia and B. Schnieder, 122–138. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schnieder, B. 2011. “A Logic for ‘because’.” The Review of Symbolic Logic 4 (3): 445–465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnieder, B. 2016. “In Defence of a Logic for ‘because’.” Journal of Applied Non-classical Logics 26 (2): 160–171.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder-Heister, P. 2018. “Proof-Theoretic Semantics.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, E. N., Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, Spring 2018 edition.
   Google Scholar
• Shaheen, J. L. 2017. “Ambiguity and Explanation.” Inquiry 60 (8): 839–866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, J. 2014. “Modality and Axiomatic Theories of Truth II: Kripke-Feferman.” The Review of Symbolic Logic 7 (2): 299–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, J. 2016. Toward Predicate Approaches to Modality. (Trends in Logic, vol. 44). Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Troelstra, A. S., and H. Schwichtenberg. 2000. Basic Proof Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tsohatzidis, S. L. 2015. “A Problem for a Logic of ‘because’.” Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics25 (1): 46–49.
   Google Scholar
• Wilhelm, I. 2021. “Grounding and Propositional Identity.” Analysis 81 (1): 80–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. M. 2014. “No Work for a Theory of Grounding.” Inquiry 57: 535–579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar