Answering machines: how to (epistemically) evaluate a search engine

References

• Anderson, Elizabeth. 1993. Values in Ethics and Economics. Boston, Mass: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anshelevich, Elliot, Aris Filos-Ratsikas, Nisarg Shah, and Alexandros A. Voudouris. 2021. “Distortion in Social Choice Problems: The First 15 Years and Beyond.” ArXiv:2103.00911 [Cs, Econ], March. http://arxiv.org/abs/2103.00911.
   Google Scholar
• Barabási, Albert-László. 2002. Linked: The New Science of Networks. Cambridge. Mass: Perseus.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, Ruha. 2019. Race After Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code. Medford, MA: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Brin, Sergey, and Lawrence Page. 1998. “The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine.” Computer Networks and ISDN Systems 30 (1–7): 107–117. doi:10.1016/S0169-7552(98)00110-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castillo, Carlos. 2019. “Fairness and Transparency in Ranking.” ACM SIGIR Forum 52 (2): 64–71. doi:10.1145/3308774.3308783.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L. Jonathan. 1994. “Some Steps Towards a General Theory of Relevance.” Synthese 101 (2): 171–185. doi:10.1007/BF01064016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diaz, A. 2008. “Through the Google Goggles: Sociopolitical Bias in Search Engine Design.” In Web Search, edited by Amanda Spink, and Michael Zimmer, 11–34. Vol. 14 of Information Science and Knowledge Management. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-75829-7_2.
   Google Scholar
• Elgesem, Dag. 2008. “Search Engines and the Public Use of Reason.” Ethics and Information Technology 10 (4): 233–242. doi:10.1007/s10676-008-9177-3.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, Rachel Elizabeth. 2018. “The Ethics of Metaphor.” Ethics 128 (4): 728–755. doi:10.1086/697448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, Jane. 2020. “The Epistemic and the Zetetic.” The Philosophical Review 129 (4): 501–536. doi:10.1215/00318108-8540918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerhart, Susan. 2004. “Do Web Search Engines Suppress Controversy?” First Monday 9 (1). doi:10.5210/fm.v9i1.1111.
   Google Scholar
• Gesenhues, Amy. 2015. ‘When Google Gets It Wrong: Direct Answers With Debatable, Incorrect & Weird Content’. Search Engline Land, June 27.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, Samuel. 2016. ‘Google Alters Search Autocomplete to Remove “are Jews Evil” Suggestion’. The Guardian, December 5. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/dec/05/Google-alters-search-autocomplete-remove-are-jews-evil-suggestion.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, Alvin I. 1999. Knowledge in a Social World. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Incorporated. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/cam/detail.action?docID=3053391.
   Google Scholar
• Groenendijk, Jeroen, and Martin Stokhof. 1984. “‘On the Semantics of Questions and the Pragmatics of Answers’.” In Varieties of Formal Semantics: Proceedings of the Fourth Amsterdam Colloquium, edited by Fred Landman, and Frank Veltman, 143–170. Dordrecht: Foris.
   Google Scholar
• Groenendijk, Jeroen A.G., and Martin J.B. Stokhof. 1989. “Context and Information in Dynamic Semantics.” In Working Models of Human Perception, edited by Herman Elsendoorn and Ben A. G. Bouma, 457–486. London: Elsevier. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-238050-1.50027-5.
   Google Scholar
• Hacking, Ian. 1995. “The Looping Effects of Human Kinds.” In Causal Cognition: A Multidisciplinary Debate, edited by Dan Sperber, David Premack, and Ann Premack, 351–394. Clarendon: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heersmink, Richard. 2018. “A Virtue Epistemology of the Internet: Search Engines, Intellectual Virtues and Education.” Social Epistemology 32 (1): 1–12. doi:10.1080/02691728.2017.1383530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heintz, Christophe. 2006. “Web Search Engines and Distributed Assessment Systems.” Pragmatics & Cognition 14 (2): 387–409. doi:10.1075/pc.14.2.15hei.
   Google Scholar
• Hinman, Lawrence M. 2005. “Esse Est Indicato in Google: Ethical and Political Issues in Search Engines.” The International Review of Information Ethics 3 (June): 19–25. doi:10.29173/irie345.
   Google Scholar
• Introna, Lucas D., and Helen Nissenbaum. 2000. “Shaping the Web: Why the Politics of Search Engines Matters.” The Information Society 16 (3): 169–185. doi:10.1080/01972240050133634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maron, M. E., and J. L. Kuhns. 1960. “On Relevance, Probabilistic Indexing and Information Retrieval.” Journal of the ACM 7 (3): 216–244. doi:10.1145/321033.321035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaelson, Eliot, Jessica Pepp, and Rachel Sterken. 2022. “Relevance-Based Knowledge-Resistance in Public Conversations" .” In Knowledge Resistance in High-Choice Information Environments, edited by Jesper Strömbäck, Åsa Wikforss, Kathrin Glüer, Torun Linholm, and Henrik Oscarsson, 106–127. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, Boaz, and Isaac Record. 2013. “Justified Belief in a Digital age: On the Epistemic Implications of Secret Internet Technologies.” Episteme; Rivista Critica Di Storia Delle Scienze Mediche E Biologiche 10 (2): 117–134.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, Boaz, and Isaac Record. 2017. “Responsible Epistemic Technologies: A Social-Epistemological Analysis of Autocompleted web Search.” New Media & Society 19 (12): 1945–1963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble, Safiya Umoja. 2018. Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. New York: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, Craige. 1996. “Information Structure in Discourse: Towards an Integrated Formal Theory of Pragmatics.” Semantics and Pragmatics 5: 1–69.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, S. E. 1977a. “The Probabilistic Character of Relevance.” Information Processing & Management 13 (4): 247–251. doi:10.1016/0306-4573(77)90005-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, S. E. 1977b. “The Probability Ranking Principle in IR.” Journal of Documentation 33 (4): 294–304. doi:10.1108/eb026647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, Lydia. 2019. “How Search Engines Work: Everything You Need to Know To Understand Crawlers.” Alexa Blog (blog). August 7. https://blog.alexa.com/how-search-engines-work/.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, Susanna. 2022. “Salience Principles for Democracy.” In Salience, edited by Sophie Archer, 235–266. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, Judith. 2015. “Distributed Epistemic Responsibility in a Hyperconnected Era.” In The Onlife Manifesto, edited by Luciano Floridi, 145–159. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, Thomas W. 2012. “Evaluating Google as an Epistemic Tool.” Metaphilosophy 43 (4): 426–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson. 1994. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Reprint. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Stoljar, Natalie. 1995. “Essence, Identity, and the Concept of Woman.” Philosophical Topics 23 (2): 261–293.
   Google Scholar
• Swanson, Eric. 2022. “Channels for Common Ground.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 104: 171–185. doi:10.1111/phpr.12741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavani, Herman. 2005. “Search Engines, Personal Information and the Problem of Privacy in Public.” The International Review of Information Ethics 3: 39–45.
   Google Scholar
• Tavani, Herman. 2020. “Search Engines and Ethics.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta, Fall 2020. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato-stanford-edu.ezp.lib.cam.ac.uk/archives/fall2020/entries/ethics-search/.
   Google Scholar
• Whiteley, Ella. Forthcoming. “Harmful Salience Perspectives.” In Salience, edited by Sophie Archer, 193–213. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Whitney, Heather, and Robert Mark Simpson. 2019. “Search Engines, Free Speech Coverage, and the Limits of Analogical Reasoning.” In Free Speech in the Digital Age, edited by Susan Brison, and Katharine Gelber, 33–41. Oxford: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Yalcin, Seth. 2018. “Belief as Question-Sensitive.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 97 (1): 23–47. doi:10.1111/phpr.2018.97.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar