Publication Cover
Inquiry
An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy
Latest Articles
127
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

A simple solution to the collapse argument for logical pluralism

Received 30 Nov 2021, Accepted 25 Oct 2022, Published online: 16 Nov 2022

References

  • Barwise, Jon, and John Perry. 1983. Situations and Attitudes. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Beall, J. C., and Greg Restall. 2000. “Limited Logical Pluralism.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 78 (4): 475–493.
  • Beall, J. C., and Greg Restall. 2001. “Defending Logical Pluralism.” In Logical Consequence: Rival Approaches (Proceedings of the 1999 Conference of the Society of Exact Philosophy), edited by James Woods and Bryson Brown, 1–22. Stanmore: Hermes.
  • Beall, J. C., and Greg Restall. 2006. Logical Pluralism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Bellos, Alex. 2016. “Did You Solve It? The Logic Question Almost Everyone Gets Wrong.” The Guardian, https://www.theguardian.com/science/2016/mar/28/did-you-solve-it-the-logic-questionalmost-everyone-gets-wrong.
  • Blake-Turner, Christopher. 2021. “Reasons, Basing, and the Normative Collapse of Logical Pluralism.” Philosophical Studies 178: 4099–4118.
  • Blake-Turner, Christopher, and Gillian Russell. 2018. “Logical Pluralism Without the Normativity.” Synthese 198: 4859–4877.
  • Broome, John. 2015. “Reason Versus Ought.” Philosophical Issues 25: 80–97.
  • Bueno, Otávio, and Scott A. Shalkowski. 2009. “Modalism and Logical Pluralism.” Mind; A Quarterly Review of Psychology and Philosophy 118 (470): 295–321.
  • Caret, Colin R.. 2016. “The Collapse of Logical Pluralism Has Been Greatly Exaggerated.” Erkenntnis82 (4): 739–760.
  • Evershed, J. W.. 2021. “Another Way Logic Might Be Normative.” Synthese 199 (3): 5861–5881.
  • Ferrari, Filippo, and Sebastiano Moruzzi. 2017. “Limited Logical Pluralism, Indeterminacy and the Normativity of Logic.” Inquiry 63 (3–4): 323–346.
  • Field, Hartry. 2009. “I–Hartry Field: What is the Normative Role of Logic?” Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 83 (1): 251–268.
  • Harman, Gilbert. 1986. Change in View. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Kellen, Nathan. 2020. “The Normative Problem of Logical Pluralism.” Inquiry 63 (3-4): 258–281.
  • Lord, Errol, and Barry Maguire. 2016. Weighting Reasons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • MacFarlane, John. 2004. “In What Sense (If Any) is Logic Normative for Thought?” https://johnmacfarlane.net/normativity_of_logic.pdf.
  • Mares, Edwin. 2004. Relevant Logic: A Philosophical Interpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Read, Stephen. 2006. “Monism: The One True Logic.” In A Logical Approach to Philosophy: Essays in Honour of Graham Solomon, edited by David DeVidi and Kenyon Tim, 193–209. Berlin: Springer.
  • Russell, Gillian. 2017. “Logic Isn't Normative.” Inquiry 63 (3-4): 371–388.
  • Schroeder, Mark. 2021. Reasons First. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Shapiro, Stewart. 2014. Varieties of Logic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Stei, Erik. 2017. “Limited Rivalry, Normativity, and the Collapse of Logical Pluralism.” Inquiry 63 (3–4): 411–432.
  • Stei, Erik. 2020. “Non-Normative Logical Pluralism and the Revenge of the Normativity Objection.” Philosophical Quarterly 70 (278): 162–177.
  • Steinberger, Florian G.. 2019a. “Logical Pluralism and Logical Normativity.” Philosophers' Imprint 19 (12): 1–19.
  • Steinberger, Florian G.. 2019b. “Three Ways in Which Logic Might Be Normative.” The Journal of Philosophy 116 (1): 5–31.
  • Tajer, Diego. 2020. “The Normative Autonomy of Logic.” Erkenntnis 87: 2661–2684.
  • Whiting, Daniel. 2010. “Should I Believe the Truth?.” Dialectica 64 (2): 213–224.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.