Descartes’s argument for modal voluntarism

References

• Adriaenssen, Han Thomas. 2015. “The Radical Cartesianism of Robert Desgabets and the Scholastic Heritage.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 23 (1): 46–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alanen, Lilli. 1991. “Descartes, Conceivability and Logical Modality.” In Thought Experiments in Science and Philosophy, edited by T. Horowitz, and G. Massey, 65–84. Savage: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Aquinas, Thomas. 1952–1962. Summa Theologiae. 3 vols. Edited by P. Caramello. Turin: Marietti. [ST].
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, Jonathan. 2001. Learning from Six Philosophers. Vol. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Broughton, Janet. 2002. Descartes’s Method of Doubt. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chappell, Vere. 1997. “Descartes’s Ontology.” Topoi 16 (2): 111–127.
   Google Scholar
• Cunning, David. 2010. Argument and Persuasion in Descartes’ Meditations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Curley, Edwin. 1984. “Descartes on the Creation of the Eternal Truths.” The Philosophical Review 93 (4): 569–597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dasgupta, Shamik. 2016. “Metaphysical Rationalism.” Nous 50 (2): 379–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Della Rocca, Michael. 2007. “Causation Without Intelligibility and Causation Without God in Descartes.” In A Companion to Descartes, edited by J. Broughton, and J. Carriero, 235–250. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Descartes, René. 1897–1910. Œuvres de Descartes. Edited by C. E. Adam & P. Tannery. 12 vols. Paris: Cerf. [AT].
   Google Scholar
• Descartes, René. 1984–1985. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes. Edited and translated by J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff, and D. Murdoch. Vols. 1–2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [CSM].
   Google Scholar
• Descartes, René. 1991. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes. Edited and translated by J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff, D. Murdoch, and A. Kenney. Vol 3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [CSMK].
   Google Scholar
• Duns Scotus, John. 2004. Reportatio I-A. Edited and translated by A. Wolter and O. Bychkov. Ashland: Bookmasters. [WB].
   Google Scholar
• Easton, Patricia. 2009. “What is at Stake in the Cartesian Debates on the Eternal Truths?” Philosophy Compass 4 (2): 348–362.
   Google Scholar
• Frankfurt, Harry. 1977. “Descartes on the Creation of the Eternal Truths.” The Philosophical Review 86 (1): 36–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghent, Henry of. 1983. Quodlibet IX. Edited by R. Macken. Leuven: Leuven University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hattab, Helen. 2016. “Descartes on the Eternal Truths and Essences of Mathematics: An Alternative Reading.” Vivarium 54 (2–3): 204–249.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, Tobias. 2009. “Duns Scotus on the Origin of the Possibles in the Divine Intellect.” In Philosophical Debates at Paris in the Early Fourteenth Century, edited by S. Brown, T. Dewender, and T. Kobusch, 359–379. Leiden & Boston: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, Jason. 2018. “Naked Wax and Necessary Existence: Modal Voluntarism and Descartes’s Motives.” Intellectual History Review 28 (4): 477–513.
   Google Scholar
• Karofsky, Amy. 2001. “Suárez’s Influence on Descartes’s Theory of Eternal Truths.” Medieval Philosophy and Theology 10 (2): 241–262.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, Dan. 2002. “Descartes’s Creation Doctrine and Modality.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 80 (1): 24–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman, Dan. 2003. “Infimus gradus libertatis? Descartes on Indifference and Divine Freedom.” Religious Studies 39 (4): 391–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny, Anthony. 1970. “The Cartesian Circle and the Eternal Truths.” Journal of Philosophy 67: 685–700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knuuttila, Simo. 1996. “Duns Scotus and the Foundations of Logical Modalities.” In John Duns Scotus: Metaphysics and Ethics, edited by L. Honnefelder, R. Wood, and M. Dreyer, 127–143. Leiden & Boston: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Knuuttila, Simo. 2017. “Medieval Theories of Modality.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2017 Edition). Ed. by E. Zalta. URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/modality-medieval/>.
   Google Scholar
• Leibniz, Gottfried W. 1859. Nouvelles lettres et opuscules inedits de Leibniz. Edited by Foucher de Careil, Paris: Firmin Didot. [FC].
   Google Scholar
• Leibniz, Gottfried W. 1875–1890. Die philosophischen Schriften. 7 vols. Edited by C. I. Gerhardt, Berlin: Weidmann. [G].
   Google Scholar
• Leibniz, Gottfried W. 1989. Philosophical Essays. Edited and translated by R. Ariew and D. Garber. Indianapolis: Hackett. [AG].
   Google Scholar
• Lennon, Thomas. 2011. “Descartes and the Seven Senses of Indifference in Early Modern Philosophy.” Dialogue 50 (3): 577–602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macbeth, Danielle. 2017. “Descartes on the Creation of the Eternal Truths.” Acta Baltica Historiae et Philosophiae Scientiarum 5 (1): 5–27.
   Google Scholar
• Malebranche, Nicolas. 1980. The Search after Truth. Edited and translated by T. M. Lennon and P. J. Olscamp. Columbus: Ohio State University Press. [LO].
   Google Scholar
• Melamed, Yitzhak Y., and Martin Lin. 2010. “Principle of Sufficient Reason.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2018 Edition). Edited by E. Zalta. URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2018/entries/sufficient-reason/>.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, Alan, and David Cunning. 1999. “Cognition and Modality in Descartes.” Acta Philosophica Fennica 64: 137–153.
   Google Scholar
• Nolan, Lawrence. 2014. “The Third Meditation: Causal Arguments for God’s Existence.” In Cambridge Companion to Descartes’ Meditations, edited by D. Cunning, 127–148. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perler, Dominik. 2001. “Cartesische Möglichkeiten.” In Potentialität und Possibilität. Modalaussagen in der Geschichte der Metaphysik, edited by T. Buchheim, C. Kneepkens, and K. Lorenz, 255–272. Stuttgart & Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.
   Google Scholar
• Pessin, Andrew. 2010. “Divine Simplicity and the Eternal Truths: Descartes and the Scholastics.” Philosophia 38: 69–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragland, C. P. 2013. “Descartes on Degrees of Freedom: A Close Look at a Key Text.” Essays in Philosophy 14 (2): 239–268.
   Google Scholar
• Rozemond, Marleen. 2008. “Descartes’s Ontology of the Eternal Truths.” In Contemporary Perspectives on Early Modern Philosophy: Essays in Honor of Vere Chappell, edited by P. Hoffman, D. Owen, and G. Yaffe, 41–63. Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmaltz Tad. 1991. “Platonism and Descartes’ View of Immutable Essences.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 73 (2): 129–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schröker, Hubert. 2003. Das Verhältnis der Allmacht Gottes zum Kontradiktionsprinzip nach Wilhelm von Ockham. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Suárez, Francisco. 1866. “Disputationes Metaphysicae.” In Opera Omnia, edited by Charles Breton, vols. XXV–XXVI. Paris: Vivès. [DM].
   Google Scholar
• Wippel, John. 1981. “The Reality of Nonexisting Possibles According to Thomas Aquinas, Henry of Ghent, and Godfrey of Fontaines.” The Review of Metaphysics 34 (4): 729–758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar