The epistemic import of phenomenal consciousness

References

• Ali, R. 2018. “Does Hallucinating Involve Perceiving?” Philosophical Studies 175 (3): 601–627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alston, W. P. 1988. “An Internalist Externalism.” Synthese 74 (3): 265–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alston, W. P. 2005. Beyond ‘Justification’. Dimensions of Epistemic Evaluation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baergen, R. 1992. “Perceptual Consciousness and Perceptual Evidence.” Philosophical Papers 21 (2): 107–119.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, J. 2014. “Perceptual Justification Outside of Consciousness.” In Consciousness Inside and Out: Phenomenology, Neuroscience, and the Nature of Experience, edited by R. Brown, 137–145. Dordrecht, Heidelberg, New York, London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, J. 2020. “Perceptual Consciousness Plays No Epistemic Role.” Philosophical Issues 30 (1): 7–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, J., B. Nanay, and J. Quilty-Dunn. 2018. “Unconscious Perceptual Justification.” Inquiry 61 (5–6): 569–589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Block, N. 1995. “On a Confusion about a Function of Consciousness.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (2): 227–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Block, N. 2011. “Perceptual Consciousness Overflows Cognitive Access.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 15 (12): 567–575.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Block, N., and I. Phillips. 2017. “Debate on Unconscious Perception.” In Current Controversies in Philosophy of Perception, edited by B. Nanay, 165–192. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bourget, D. 2017a. “The Role of Consciousness in Grasping and Understanding.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 95 (2): 285–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourget, D. 2017b. “Why Are Some Phenomenal Experiences ‘Vivid’ and Others ‘Faint’? Representationalism, Imagery, and Cognitive Phenomenology.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 95 (4): 673–687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, B. 2011. Perception and its Objects. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, R. 2010. “Deprioritizing a Priori Arguments Against Physicalism.” Journal of Consciousness Studies 17 (3–4): 47–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, A. 2016. “The Epistemic Significance of Experience.” Philosophical Studies 173 (4): 947–967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalmers, D. 1996. “The Conscious Mind.” In Search of a Fundamental Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers, D. 2002. “Consciousness and its Place in Nature.” In Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Mind, edited by S. P. Stich and T. A. Warfield, 102–142. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Chudnoff, E. 2013. Intuition. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Conee, E., and R. Feldman. 2001. “Internalism Defended.” In Epistemology: Internalism and Externalism, edited by H. Kornblith, 231–260. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Cova, F., M. Gaillard, and F. Kammerer. 2021. “Is the Phenomenological Overflow Argument Really Supported by Subjective Reports?.” Mind & Language 36 (3): 422–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crane, T. 2000. “Introspection, Intentionality, and the Transparency of Experience.” Philosophical Topics 28 (2): 49–67.
   Google Scholar
• Dorsch, F. 2010. “Transparency and Imagining Seeing.” Philosophical Explorations 13 (3): 173–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorsch, F. 2018. “The Phenomenal Presence of Perceptual Reasons.” In Phenomenal Presence, edited by F. Dorsch and F. MacPherson. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Farkas, K. 2014. “A Sense of Reality.” In Hallucination. Philosophy and Psychology, edited by F. MacPherson and D. Platchias, 399–417. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, J. 2000. The Nature of Perception. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• French, C. 2018. “Naïve Realism and Diaphaneity.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 118 (2): 149–175.
   Google Scholar
• French, C. 2020. Naive Realism, Representationalism, and the Rationalizing Role of Visual Perception. Philosophical Issues 30 (1): 102–119.
   Google Scholar
• Ginsborg, H. 2006. “Reasons for Belief.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 72 (2): 286–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gow, L. 2016. “The Limitations of Perceptual Transparency.” The Philosophical Quarterly 66 (265): 723–744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gow, L. 2019. “Everything is Clear: All Perceptual Experiences are Transparent’.” European Journal of Philosophy 27: 412–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimm, S. R. 2011. “Understanding.” In The Routledge Companion to Epistemology, edited by S. Bernecker and D. Pritchard, 84–94. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Heck Jr., R. G. 2000. “Nonconceptual Content and the ‘Space of Reasons’.” The Philosophical Review 109 (4): 483–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellie, B. 2011. “There it is.” Philosophical Issues 21 (1): 110–164.
   Google Scholar
• Hellie, B. 2014a. “It’s Still There!.” In Consciousness Inside and Out: Phenomenology, Neuroscience, and the Nature of Experience, edited by R. Brown, 127–136. Dordrecht, Heidelberg, New York, London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hellie, B. 2014b. “Yep-Still There.” In Consciousness Inside and Out: Phenomenology, Neuroscience, and the Nature of Experience, edited by R. Brown, 163–169. Dordrecht, Heidelberg, New York, London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Huemer, M. 2001. Skepticism and the Veil of Perception. Lanham, Boulder, New York, Toronto, Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Kalderon, M. E. 2011. “Before the Law.” Philosophical Issues 21 (1): 219–244.
   Google Scholar
• Kouider, S., V. de Gardelle, J. Sackur, and E. Dupoux. 2010. “How Rich is Consciousness? The Partial Awareness Hypothesis.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14 (7): 301–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvanvig, J. L. 2003. The Value of Knowledge and the Pursuit of Understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, G. 2014. “Materialism and the Epistemic Significance of Consciousness.” In Current Controversies in Philosophy of Mind, edited by U. Kriegel, 222–245. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, J. 2011. “Circularity, Reliability, and the Cognitive Penetrability of Perception.” Philosophical Issues 21 (1): 289–311.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, J. 2020. “Two Dogmas of Empirical Justification.” Philosophical Issues 30 (1): 221–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandelbaum, E. 2016. “Attitude, Inference, Association: On the Propositional Structure of Implicit Bias.” Noûs 50 (3): 629–658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, M. G. F. 2002. “The Transparency of Experience.” Mind and Language 17 (4): 376–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, M. G. F. 2004. “The Limits of Self-Awareness.” Philosophical Studies 120 (1/3): 37–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marvan, T., and M. Polák. 2017. “Unitary and Dual Models of Phenomenal Consciousness.” Consciousness and Cognition 56: 1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masrour, F. 2020. “On the Possibility of Hallucinations.” Mind; A Quarterly Review of Psychology and Philosophy 129 (515): 737–768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millar, A. 2007. “What the Disjunctivist is Right About.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74 (1): 176–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millar, A. 2010. “Knowledge and Recognition.” In The Nature and Value of Knowledge. Three Investigations, edited by D. Pritchard, A. Millar, and A. Haddock, 91–188. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Overgaard, M., and J. Mogensen. 2015. “Reconciling Current Approaches to Blindsight.” Consciousness and Cognition 32: 33–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, I. 2016. “Consciousness and Criterion: On Block’s Case for Unconscious Seeing.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 93 (2): 419–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, I. 2018a. “The Methodological Puzzle of Phenomenal Consciousness.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 373: 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, I. 2018b. “Unconscious Perception Reconsidered.” Analytic Philosophy 59 (4): 471–514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plantinga, A. 1993. Warrant and Proper Function. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pryor, J. 2004. “What’s Wrong with Moore’s Argument?” Philosophical Issues 14 (1): 349–378.
   Google Scholar
• Raleigh, T. 2014. “A New Approach to “Perfect” Hallucinations.” Journal of Consciousness Studies 21 (11–12): 81–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen, G. 1994. “Objectivity and Modern Idealism: What is the Question?” In Philosophy in Mind, edited by M. Michael and J. O’Leary-Hawthorne, 277–319. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, D. M. 2008. “Consciousness and its Function.” Neuropsychologia 46 (3): 829–840.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, D. M. 2010. “How to Think About Mental Qualities.” Philosophical Issues 20 (1): 368–393.
   Google Scholar
• Schellenberg, S. 2014. “The Relational and Representational Character of Perceptual Experience.” In Does Perception Have Content?, edited by B. Brogaard, 199–220. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schlicht, T. 2012. “Phenomenal Consciousness, Attention and Accessibility.” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 11 (3): 309–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smithies, D. 2019. The Epistemic Role of Consciousness. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Teng, L. 2018. “Is Phenomenal Force Sufficient for Immediate Perceptual Justification?” Synthese 195 (2): 637–656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Travis, C. 2013. “Reason’s Reach.” In Perception. Essays after Frege, 118–143. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tye, M. 2002. “Representationalism and the Transparency of Experience.” Noûs 36 (1): 137–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tye, M. 2014. “Transparency, Qualia Realism and Representationalism.” Philosophical Studies 170 (1): 39–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weksler, A., H. Jacobson, and Z. Z. Bronfman. 2021. “The Transparency of Experience and the Neuroscience of Attention.” Synthese 198 (5): 4709–4730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, T. 2000. Knowledge and its Limits. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zięba, P. J. 2021. “Selectionism and Diaphaneity.” Axiomathes Online first: 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Zięba, P. J. 2022. “Seeing Colours Unconsciously’.” Synthese 200 (3): 1–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar