One person, one vote and the importance of baseline

References

• Abizadeh, Arash. 2008. “Democratic Theory and Border Coercion: No Right to Unilaterally Control Your Own Borders.” Political Theory 36 (1): 37–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abizadeh, Arash. 2012. “On the Demos and its kin: Nationalism, Democracy, and the Boundary Problem.” American Political Science Review 106 (4): 867–882.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, Elizabeth. 1999. “What Is the Point of Equality?” Ethics 109 (2): 287–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, Elizabeth, and Richard Pildes. 2000. “Expressive Theories of Law: A General Restatement.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 148 (5): 1503–1575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrić, Vuko. 2017. “How do Affected Interests Support Global Democracy?” Journal of Global Ethics 13 (3): 264–278.
   Google Scholar
• Arrhenius, Gustaf. 2005. “The Boundary Problem in Democratic Theory.” In Democracy Unbound: Basic Explorations I, edited by Folke Tersman, 14–28. Stockholm: Filosofiska institutionen, Stockholms Universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Bauböck, Rainer. 2018. Democratic Inclusion: Rainer Bauböck in dialogue. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beckman, Ludvig. 2008. “Democratic Inclusion, Law, and Causes.” Ratio Juris 21 (3): 348–364.
   Google Scholar
• Beckman, Ludvig. 2009. The Frontiers of Democracy: The Right to Vote and its Limits. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bengtson, Andreas. 2020. “Differential Voting Weights and Relational Egalitarianism.” Political Studies 68 (4): 1054–1070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bengtson, Andreas. 2022a. “Affirmative Action in the Political Domain.” Political Studies: 1–19. doi:10.1177/00323217221095379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bengtson, Andreas. 2022b. “Animals and Relational Egalitarianism(s).” Journal of Applied Philosophy 1–16. doi:10.1111/japp.12611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bengtson, Andreas. 2022c. “Republicanism and/or Relational Egalitarianism?” Social Theory and Practice 48 (4): 629–645. doi:10.5840/soctheorpract202282168.
   Google Scholar
• Bengtson, Andreas, and Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen. 2021. “Why the all-Affected Principle is Groundless.” Journal of Moral Philosophy 18 (6): 571–596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bidadanure, Juliana. 2016. “Making Sense of Age-Group Justice: A Time for Relational Equality?” Politics, Philosophy & Economics 15 (3): 234–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bidadanure, Juliana Uhuru. 2021. Justice Across Ages: Treating Young and Old as Equals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, Jason. 2011. The Ethics of Voting. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, Jason. 2012. “Political Liberty: Who Needs It?” Social Philosophy and Policy 29 (1): 1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, Jason, and Peter Jaworski. 2015. “Markets Without Symbolic Limits.” Ethics 125 (4): 1053–1077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, Geoffrey, and Loren Lomasky. 2006. “Against Reviving Republicanism.” Politics, Philosophy & Economics 5 (2): 221–252.
   Google Scholar
• Brighouse, Harry, and Marc Fleurbaey. 2010. “Democracy and Proportionality.” Journal of Political Philosophy 18 (2): 137–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiano, Thomas. 1996. The Rule of the Many: Fundamental Issues in Democratic Theory. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, Robert A. 1970. After the Revolution?: Authority in a Good Society. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, Robert A. 1989. Democracy and Its Critics. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Erman, Eva. 2014. “The Boundary Problem and the Ideal of Democracy.” Constellations (oxford, England) 21 (4): 535–546.
   Google Scholar
• Fourie, Carina. 2012. “What is Social Equality? An Analysis of Status Equality as a Strongly Egalitarian Ideal.” Res Publica (liverpool, England) 18: 107–126.
   Google Scholar
• Fourie, C., F. Schuppert, and I. Walliman-Helmner. eds. 2015. Social Equality: On What It Means to be Equals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frazer, Michael L. 2014. “Including the Unaffected.” Journal of Political Philosophy 22 (4): 377–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodin, Robert E. 2007. “Enfranchising All Affected Interests, and Its Alternatives.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 35 (1): 40–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodin, Robert E. 2016. “Enfranchising all Subjected, Worldwide.” International Theory 8 (3): 365–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, James. 2008. On Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guerrero, Alexander A. 2014. “Against Elections: The Lottocratic Alternative.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 42 (2): 135–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellman, Deborah. 2008. When is Discrimination Wrong? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hojlund, Anne-Sofie Greisen. 2022. “Mitigating Servility: Policies of Egalitarian Self-Relations.” British Journal of Political Science 52 (2): 908–920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolodny, Niko. 2014a. “Rule Over None I: What Justifies Democracy?” Philosophy & Public Affairs 42 (3): 195–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolodny, Niko. 2014b. “Rule Over None II: Social Equality and the Justification of Democracy.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 42 (4): 287–336. doi:10.1111/papa.2014.42.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lippert-Rasmussen, Kasper. 2018. Relational Egalitarianism: Living as Equals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lippert-Rasmussen, Kasper. 2019. “Is it Unjust That Elderly People Suffer from Poorer Health Than Young People? Distributive and Relational Egalitarianism on age-Based Health Inequalities.” Politics, Philosophy & Economics 18 (2): 145–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López-Guerra, Claudio. 2005. “Should expatriates vote?” The Journal of Political Philosophy 13 (2): 216–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López-Guerra, Claudio. 2014. Democracy and Disenfranchisement: The Morality of Electoral Exclusions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McTernan, Emily. 2018. “Microaggressions, Equality, and Social Practices.” Journal of Political Philosophy 26 (3): 261–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, David. 1998. “Equality and Justice.” In Ideals of Equality, edited by A. Mason, 21–36. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, David. 2009. “Democracy's Domain.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 37 (3): 201–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mogensen, Andreas L. 2019. “Meaning, Medicine, and Merit.” Utilitas 32: 90–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moles, Andres, and Tom Parr. 2019. “Distributions and Relations: A Hybrid Account.” Political Studies 67 (1): 132–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulligan, Thomas. 2018. “Plural Voting for the Twenty-First Century.” The Philosophical Quarterly 68 (271): 286–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Näsström, Sofia. 2011. “The Challenge of the All-Affected Principle.” Political Studies 59: 116–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nath, Rekha. 2020. “Relational Egalitarianism.” Philosophy Compass 15 (7): e12686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill, Martin. 2008. “What Should Egalitarians Believe?” Philosophy & Public Affairs 36 (2): 119–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen, David. 2012. “Constituting the Polity, Constituting the Demos: On the Place of the all Affected Interests Principle in Democratic Theory and in Resolving the Democratic Boundary Problem.” Ethics & Global Politics 5 (3): 129–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peña-Rangel, David. 2022. “Political Equality, Plural Voting, and the Leveling Down Objection.” Politics, Philosophy & Economics First View: 1-43.
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, Philip. 1997. Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raz, Joseph. 1986. The Morality of Freedom. Oxford: Clarendon.
   Google Scholar
• Satz, Debra. 2010. Why Some Things Should Not Be For Sale: The Moral Limits of Markets. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, Ben. 2010. “Democracy, Political Equality, and Majority Rule.” Ethics 121 (1): 148–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scanlon, T. M. 2008. Moral Dimensions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scheffler, Samuel. 2003. “What is egalitarianism?” Philosophy & Public Affairs 31: 5–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheffler, Samuel. 2005. “Choice, Circumstance and the Value of Equality.” Politics, Philosophy & Economics 4 (4): 5–28.
   Google Scholar
• Scheffler, Samuel. 2015. “The Practice of Equality.” In Social Equality: On What It Means to Be Equals, edited by C. Fourie, F. Schuppert, and I. Wallimann-Helmer, 21–44. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schemmel, Christian. 2012. “Distributive and Relational Equality.” Politics, Philosophy & Economics 11 (2): 123–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schemmel, Christian. 2021. Justice and Egalitarian Relations. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, Andreas T. 2022. “From Relational Equality to Personal Responsibility.” Philosophical Studies 179: 1373–1399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, Sarah. 2012. “The Boundary Problem in Democratic Theory: Why the Demos Should be Bounded by the State.” International Theory 4 (1): 39–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomlin, Patrick. 2014. “What is the Point of Egalitarian Social Relationships?” In Distributive Justice and Access to Advantage: G. A. Cohen’s Egalitarianism, edited by A. Kaufman, 151–179. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Umbers, L. M. 2021. “Against Lottocracy.” European Journal of Political Theory 20 (2): 312–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viehoff, Daniel. 2014. “Democratic Equality and Political Authority.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 42 (4): 337–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viehoff, Daniel. 2019. “Power and Equality.” In Oxford Studies in Political Philosophy. Vol. 5, edited by D. Sobel, P. Vallentyne, and S. Wall, 1–38. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1-38.
   Google Scholar
• Voigt, Kristin. 2018. “Relational Equality and the Expressive Dimension of State Action.” Social Theory and Practice 44 (3): 437–467.
   Google Scholar
• Wall, Steven. 2007. “Democracy and Equality.” The Philosophical Quarterly 57 (228): 416–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whelan, Frederick G. 1983. “Prologue: Democratic Theory and the Boundary Problem.” In Liberal Democracy, edited by James R. Pennock and John W. Chapman, 13–47. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, James L. 2019. Democratic Equality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, Jonathan. 1998. “Fairness, Respect and the Egalitarian Ethos.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 27 (2): 97–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, Iris Marion. 1990. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar