Berkeley on whether human sensible ideas are identical to certain divine ideas

References

• Ablondi, Fred. 2005. “Berkeley, Archetypes, and Errors.” The Southern Journal of Philosophy 43: 493–504. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-6962.2005.tb01965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, Jonathan. 1971. Locke, Berkeley, Hume. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berkeley, George. 1948-1957. The Works of George Berkeley, Bishop of Cloyne, edited by A. A. Luce, and T. E. Jessop. London: Thomas Nelson.
   Google Scholar
• Berman, David. 1986. “Berkeley’s Quad: The Question of Numerical Identity.” Idealistic Studies 16: 41–45. https://doi.org/10.5840/idstudies198616112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradatan, Costica. 2006. The Other Bishop Berkeley. New York: Fordham University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Broad, C. D. 1954. “Berkeley’s Denial of Material Substance.” Philosophical Review 63: 155–181. https://doi.org/10.2307/2182343
   Google Scholar
• Dancy, Jonathan. 1987. Berkeley: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Daniel, Stephen H. 2001. “Berkeley’s Christian Neoplatonism, Archetypes, and Divine Ideas.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 39: 239–258. https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.2003.0099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dicker, Georges. 2011. Berkeley’s Idealism. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flage, Daniel. 1994. “Berkeley, Individuation, and Physical Objects.” In Individuation and Identity in Early Modern Philosophy: Descartes to Kant, edited by Kenneth F. Barber, and Jorge J. E. Gracia, 133–154. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, John. 1985. “Berkeley on the Physical World.” In Essays on Berkeley, edited by John Foster, and Howard Robinson, 83–108. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frankel, Melissa. 2012. “Berkeley and God in the Quad.” Philosophy Compass 7 (6): 388–396. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2012.00487.x
   Google Scholar
• Frankel, Melissa. 2016. “Berkeley on the ‘Twofold State of Things’.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 80: 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-015-9541-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grayling, A. C. 1986. Berkeley: The Central Arguments. La Salle, IL: Open Court.
   Google Scholar
• Hight, Marc A. 2008. Idea and Ontology. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hynes, Darren. 2005. “Berkeley’s Corpuscular Philosophy of Time.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 22: 339–356.
   Google Scholar
• Jacquette, Dale. 1993. “Reconciling Berkeley’s Microscopes in God’s Infinite Mind.” Religious Studies 29: 453–463. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412500022538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehman, Craig. 1981. “Will, Ideas, and Perception in Berkeley’s God.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 19: 197–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-6962.1981.tb01424.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke, John. 1979. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luce, A. A. 1940. “The Philosophical Correspondence Between Berkeley and Johnson.” Hermathena 56: 93–112.
   Google Scholar
• Luce, A. A. 1942. “Berkeley’s Doctrine of the Perceivable.” Hermathena 60: 3–15.
   Google Scholar
• Luce, A. A. 1953. “The Inaugural Address: The Berkeleian Idea of Sense.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes, Berkeley and Modern Problems 27: 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/aristoteliansupp/27.1.1
   Google Scholar
• Mabbott, J. D. 1931. “The Place of God in Berkeley's Philosophy.” Journal of Philosophical Studies 6: 18–29. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031819100044867
   Google Scholar
• Marušić, Jennifer Smalligan. 2018. “Berkeley on the Objects of Perception.” In Berkeley’s Three Dialogues: New Essays, edited by Stephan Storrie, 40–60. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCracken, Charles J. 1979. “What Does Berkeley’s God See in the Quad?” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 61: 280–292. https://doi.org/10.1515/agph.1979.61.3.280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCracken, Charles J. 1983. Malebranche and British Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McKim, Robert. 1987–1988. “What Is God Doing in the Quad?” Philosophy Research Archives 13: 637–653. https://doi.org/10.5840/pra1987/19881326
   Google Scholar
• McKim, Robert. 1992. “Berkeley on Private Ideas and Public Objects.” In Minds, Ideas, and Objects, edited by Phillip D. Cummins, and Guenter Zoeller, 215–233. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Muehlmann, Robert. 1992. Berkeley's Ontology. Indianapolis: Hackett.
   Google Scholar
• Pappas, George S. 1982. “Berkeley, Perception, and Common Sense,” pp. 3-21 in Colin M. Turbayne, ed., Berkeley: Critical and Interpretive Essays. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pappas, George S. 2000. Berkeley’s Thought. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pitcher, George. 1977. Berkeley. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Raynor, David R. 1987. “Berkeley’s Ontology.” Dialogue 26: 611–620. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0012217300018199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rickless, Samuel C. 2013. Berkeley’s Argument for Idealism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, John Russell. 2010. “A Mystery at the Heart of Berkeley’s Metaphysics.” Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy 5: 214–246.
   Google Scholar
• Stack, George J. 1970. Berkeley’s Analysis of Perception. The Hague: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Stoneham, Tom. 2002. Berkeley’s World. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stubenberg, Leopold. 1990. “Divine Ideas: The Cure-All for Berkeley’s Immaterialism?” Southern Journal of Philosophy 28: 221–249. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-6962.1990.tb00544.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. C. W. 1985. “Berkeley on Archetypes.” Archiv der Geschichte der Philosophie 67 (1): 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1515/agph.1985.67.1.65
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tipton, I. C. 1974. Berkeley: The Philosophy of Immaterialism. London: Methuen & Co. Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Wenz, Peter S. 1976. “Berkeley's Christian Neo-Platonism.” Journal of the History of Ideas 37: 537–546. https://doi.org/10.2307/2708814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkler, Kenneth. 1998. Berkeley: An Interpretation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yandell, David. 1995. “Berkeley on Common Sense and the Privacy of Ideas.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 12: 411–423.
   Google Scholar