Idealism and transparency in Sartre’s ontological proof

References

• Adams, R. M. 2007. “Idealism Vindicated.” In Persons: Human and Divine, edited by P. Van Inwagen and D. Zimmerman, 35–54. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aitken, A., and J. K. McDonough. 2020. “Somethings and Nothings: Śrīgupta and Leibniz on Being and Unity.” Philosophy East and West 70 (4): 1022–1046. doi:10.1353/pew.2020.0074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bliss, R., and G. Priest. 2018. “Metaphysical Dependence, East and West.” In In Buddhist Philosophy: A Comparative Approach, edited by S. Emmanuel, 63–85. Malden, MA: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Block, N. 1996. “Mental Paint and Mental Latex.” Philosophical Issues 7: 19–49. doi:10.2307/1522889.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, M. 2018. “Sartre on Bodily Transparency.” Manuscrito 41 (4): 33–70. doi:10.1590/0100-6045.2018.v41n4.mb.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle, M. 2019. “Transparency and Reflection.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 49 (7): 1012–1039. doi:10.1080/00455091.2019.1565621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, A. 2011. “Transparency, Belief, Intention.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 85: 201–221. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8349.2011.00203.x.
   Google Scholar
• Chrudzimski, A. 2015. “Ingarden on Modes of Being.” In Objects and Pseudo-Objects: Ontological Deserts and Jungles from Brentano to Carnap, edited by D. Seron, S. Richard, and B. Leclercq, 199–222. Berlin: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Curd, P. 1998. The Legacy of Parmenides: Eleatic Monism and Later Presocratic Thought. Las Vegas: Parmenides Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• De Rizzo, J. 2022. “Ingarden on the Varieties of Dependence.” European Journal of Philosophy 30 (3): 996–1009. doi:10.1111/ejop.12728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devitt, M. 1997. Realism and Truth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, G. 1982. The Varieties of Reference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, S. 2009. Sartre’s Being and Nothingness: A Reader’s Guide. New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Goff, P. 2017. Consciousness and Fundamental Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldschmidt, T., and K. L. Pearce. 2017. Idealism: New Essays in Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gurwitsch, A. 1967. “Husserl’s Theory of the Intentionality of Consciousness in Historical Perspective.” In Phenomenology and Existentialism, edited by E. Lee, and M. Mandelbaum, 25–57. Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harman, G. 1990. “The Intrinsic Quality of Experience.” Philosophical Perspectives 4: 31–52. doi:10.2307/2214186.
   Google Scholar
• Hellie, B. 2007. “That Which Makes the Sensation of Blue a Mental Fact: Moore on Phenomenal Relationism.” European Journal of Philosophy 15 (3): 334–366. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0378.2007.00274.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopp, W. 2008. “Husserl on Sensation, Perception, and Interpretation.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 38 (2): 219–245. doi:10.1353/cjp.0.0013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopp, W. 2020. Phenomenology: A Contemporary Introduction. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Husserl, E. 1970. Logical Investigations. J.N. Findlay (trans.). New York: Routledge
   Google Scholar
• Husserl, E. 1999a. Cartesian Meditations. D. Cairns (trans.). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Husserl, E. 1999b. The Idea of Phenomenology. L. Hardy (trans.). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Husserl, E. 2014. Ideas I. D. Dahlstrom (trans.). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
   Google Scholar
• Ingarden, R. 1973. The Literary Work of Art: An Investigation of the Borderlines of Ontology, Logic, and Theory of Language. G. Grabowicz (trans.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ingarden, R. 1975. On the Motives Which Led Husserl to Transcendental Idealism. A. Hannibalsson (trans.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Ingarden, R. 2013. Controversy Over the Existence of the World. Vol. 1. A. Szylewicz (trans.). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang Edition.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, M. 2004. “The Obscure Object of Hallucination.” Philosophical Studies 120 (1/3): 113–183. doi:10.1023/B:PHIL.0000033753.64202.21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidd, C. 2019. “What Has Transparency To Do With Husserlian Phenomenology?” ProtoSociology 36: 221–242. doi:10.5840/protosociology2019368.
   Google Scholar
• Kind, A. 2003. “What’s So Transparent About Transparency?” Philosophical Studies 115 (3): 225–244. doi:10.1023/A:1025124607332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langton, R. 1998. Kantian Humility: Our Ignorance of Things in Themselves. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCulloch, G. 1994. Using Sartre: An Analytical Introduction to Early Sartrean Themes. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McDaniel, K. 2017. The Fragmentation of Being. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, G. E. 1903. “I.—THE REFUTATION OF IDEALISM.” Mind XII (48): 433–453. doi:10.1093/mind/XII.4.433.
   Google Scholar
• Moran, R. 2001. Authority and Estrangement. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mourelatos, A. 2008. The Route of Parmenides. Las Vegas: Parmenides Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Pelczar, M. 2020. “Idealism: Putting Qualia to Work.” In Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Consciousness, edited by U. Kriegel, 328–347. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, P. 1968. “Parmenides and Sartre.” Philosophical Studies 17: 161–184. doi:10.5840/philstudies196817094.
   Google Scholar
• Philipse, H. 1995. “Transcendental Idealism.” In The Cambridge Companion to Husserl, edited by B. Smith and D. W. Smith, 239–322. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rea, M. 2001. “How to Be an Eleatic Monist.” Philosophical Perspectives 15: 129–151. doi:10.1111/0029-4624.35.s15.7.
   Google Scholar
• Rowlands, M. 2020. “Sartre on Intentionality and Pre-Reflective Consciousness.” In The Sartrean Mind, edited by M. Eshleman, and C. Mui, 158–171. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sartre, J.-P. 1960. The Transcendence of the Ego: An Existentialist Theory of Consciousness. F. Williams and R. Kirkpatrick (trans.). New York: Hill and Wang.
   Google Scholar
• Sartre, J.-P. 2004. The Imaginary: A Phenomenological Psychology of the Imagination. J. Webber (trans.). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sartre, J.-P. 2018. Being and Nothingness. S. Richmond (trans.). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sethi, U. 2021. “Mind-Dependence in Berkeley and the Problem of Perception.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 99 (4): 648–668. doi:10.1080/00048402.2020.1826047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A. D. 2003. Husserl and the Cartesian Meditations. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Smithson, R. 2021. “Idealism and Illusions.” European Journal of Philosophy 29: 137–151. doi:10.1111/ejop.12563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spade, P. V. 1996. Class lecture notes on ‘Jean-Paul Sartre's Being and Nothingness’.
   Google Scholar
• Thomasson, A. 1996. “Fiction and Intentionality.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 56 (2): 277–222. doi:10.2307/2108520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomasson, A. 2003. “Introspection and Phenomenological Method.” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 2 (3): 239–254. doi:10.1023/b:phen.0000004927.79475.46.
   Google Scholar
• Tye, M. 1995. Ten Problems of Consciousness: A Representational Theory of the Phenomenal Mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Webber, J. 2020a. “Sartre’s Critique of Husserl.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 28 (1): 155–176. doi:10.1080/09608788.2019.1591339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webber, J. 2020b. “Sartre’s Phenomenological Psychology of Imagination.” In The Sartrean Mind, edited by M. Eshleman, and C. Mui, 104–116. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Westerhoff, J. 2020. The Non-Existence of the Real World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yetter-Chappell, H. 2017. “Idealism Without God.” In Idealism: New Essays in Metaphysics, edited by T. Goldschmidt and K. L. Pearce, 66–81. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar